Farm & Fleet Of Janesville, Inc Petitioner Vs. City Of Walker Respondent
- Petitioner
- Farm & Fleet Of Janesville, Inc
- Respondent
- City Of Walker
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-000955-TT
- Status
- Ready Sched Prehearing Date Certain
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Kent
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Prehearing General Call | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/01/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 08/06/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Proof of service of petition was received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/09/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | Not recorded | 1 | 07/08/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/08/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 05/14/2026 | $600.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NOTICE OF AUGUST 2- 13, 2027 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER OF PROCEDURE Farm & Fleet of Janesville, Inc, Petitioner, v City Of Walker, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 26-000955 Please be advised that 26-000955 has been placed on a two-week Prehearing General Call commencing August 02, 2027. Unless ordered otherwise, parties will be notified at least 28 days before they are scheduled to appear. Scheduling will not necessarily occur in the order in which the cases are listed below. Parties are required to submit a valuation disclosure or written notification that no valuation disclosure is required by the dates indicated herein. A “valuation disclosure” is defined as documentary or other tangible evidence in a property tax proceeding that a party relies upon in support of the party’s contention as to the true cash value of the subject property or any portion thereof and contains the party’s value conclusion and data, valuation methodology, analysis or reasoning. See TTR 203 and TTR 241. Users who file documents with the Tribunal are advised that filed documents are public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tribunal’s Tax Docket Lookup. If a user wishes to file a document for consideration by the Tribunal and prevent its publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for Protective Order under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents covered by the order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a Protective Order will be published. In accordance with MCR 1.109(D)(9) and TTR 209, the responsibility for excluding or redacting personal identifying information (PII) from all documents filed with or offered to the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and their attorneys. The Tribunal is not responsible for or required to review, redact, or screen documents at the time of filing for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A party, representative, or interested person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may request that the Tribunal redact PII contained in a previously filed document by submitting a Request for Redactions. The Request for Redactions form is available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages of the Tribunal’s website. Please refer to the Tribunal’s FAQs and Glossary of Terms pages on the Tribunal’s website for more information.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-000955 Page 2 of 3 IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall: a. If no valuation disclosure is required, notify the Tribunal and the opposing parties in writing within 21 days of entry of this order that no valuation disclosure is being filed. The notice shall indicate the reason or reasons why no valuation disclosure is required (i.e., exemption claim, etc.). b. If a valuation disclosure is required, file and exchange their valuation disclosures by April 5, 2027. Valuation disclosures will not be admitted into evidence unless disclosed and furnished in accordance with this order (even though admissible) except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their Prehearing Statements by April 5, 2027. Witnesses, with the exception of rebuttal witnesses, will not be allowed to testify unless disclosed in the Prehearing Statement and the Prehearing Statement is furnished in accordance with this order except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. Failure to file the Prehearing Statement may result in holding a party or parties in default. See TTR 237. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on April 5, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. Discovery relative to the valuation disclosure prepared for purposes of litigating this case or the valuation expert that prepared that valuation disclosure is not permitted during “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on August 2, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is limited to the opposing party’s valuation disclosure, the opposing party’s valuation expert, and the witnesses identified on the opposing party’s Prehearing Statement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if this case is not scheduled for a date certain prehearing conference during the time frame indicated it may be scheduled for a date certain prehearing conference at any time subsequent to the completion date for this Prehearing General Call. Parties will, however, be notified in writing approximately one week before they are scheduled to appear. By:_____________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: September 1, 2026
Page 3
MTT Docket No. 26-000955 Page 3 of 3 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NOTICE OF AUGUST 2- 13, 2027 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER OF
Page 5
MTT
Page 6
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL FARM & FLEET OF JANESVILLE, INC, Petitioner, v CITY OF WALKER, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 26-000955 Parcel No. 41-13-30-100-030 / Brian Thomas Representative For Petitioner 6615 Brotherhood Way Fort Wayne, IN 46825 (260) 637-8899 bthomas@integritytax.com Toby Koenig (P72367) BLOOM SLUGGETT, PC Attorneys for Respondent 161 Ottawa Ave NW, Suite 400 Grand Rapids, MI 49503 (616) 965-9340 toby@bloomsluggett.com / RESPONDENT’S APPEARANCE NOW COMES attorney Toby Koenig, of the law firm of Bloom Sluggett, PC, and hereby enters his appearance on behalf of Respondent City of Walker in this matter. Dated: August 6, 2026 Respectfully submitted by, BLOOM SLUGGETT, PC /s/ Toby Koenig Toby Koenig (P72367) Attorneys for Respondents City of Walker
Page 2
2 4897-9714-9380, v. 1 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL FARM & FLEET OF JANESVILLE, INC, Petitioner, v CITY OF WALKER, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 26-000955 Parcel No. 41-13-30-100-030 / Brian Thomas Representative For Petitioner 6615 Brotherhood Way Fort Wayne, IN 46825 (260) 637-8899 bthomas@integritytax.com Toby Koenig (P72367) BLOOM SLUGGETT, PC Attorneys for Respondent 161 Ottawa Ave NW, Suite 400 Grand Rapids, MI 49503 (616) 965-9340 toby@bloomsluggett.com / RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO PETITION AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Respondent, City of Walker, through its attorneys hereby submits this Answer to Petitioner’s Petition filed in this matter. (1) Admitted. (2) Admitted. (3) There are no allegations in Paragraph 3 of the Petition and therefore no response is required. (4) There are no allegations in Paragraph 4 of the Petition and therefore no response is required. (5) There are no allegations in Paragraph 5 of the Petition and therefore no response is required. (6) Admitted. (7) There are no allegations in Paragraph 7 of the Petition and therefore no response is required.
Page 3
3 4897-9714-9380, v. 1 (8) There are no allegations in Paragraph 8 of the Petition and therefore no response is required. (9) There are no allegations in Paragraph 9 of the Petition and therefore no response is required. (10) Admitted. (11) Admitted. (12) Respondent lacks sufficient information and/or knowledge to form a belief as to the truthfulness of the allegations with respect to Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address and therefore leaves Petitioner to its proofs. (13) The allegations in paragraph 13 merely involve a restatement of Petitioner’s claim to which no response is required. Respondent otherwise denies that the subject property was improperly assessed and denied that Petitioner is entitled to any relief. (14) Admitted. (15) There are no allegations in Paragraph 15 of the Petition and therefore no response is required. (16) Respondent admits that the values of the property set forth in Paragraph 16 of the petition reflect the values on the ad valorem tax roll. (17) Denied as untrue. (18) Respondent admits that Petitioner contends the values in dispute based on the allegations in paragraph 17; however, Respondent denies as untrue that the subject property is improperly assessed and denies that Petitioner is entitled to any relief. (19) Paragraph 19 contains a request for relief to which no response is required; Respondent denies that Petitioner is entitled to any relief, requested or otherwise. (20) Respondent admits that the subject property features a 107,800 square foot improvement being utilized for commercial retail. Respondent denies as untrue that an appraisal supports a much lower value. The last sentence of paragraph 20 contains a request for relief to which no response is required; to the extent a response is required, Respondent denies that Petitioner is entitled to any relief, requested or otherwise. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 1. Petitioner has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
Page 4
4 4897-9714-9380, v. 1 2. Petitioner’s claims against Respondent are barred because the valuation methods used by Respondent comply with the Constitution, state law, and prevailing Michigan State Tax Commission procedures. 3. Respondent’s assessment reflects 50% of the subject property’s true cash value and the values on the roll, including the taxable value, comply with MCL 211.27a. 4. Petitioner may not be a party in interest capable of bringing this appeal as to the parcel at issue in this matter. 5. Petitioner’s claims may be barred in whole or in part for failing to allege sufficient facts to invoke the Tax Tribunal’s jurisdiction. 6. Respondent reserves the right to identify further affirmative defenses as may become known through discovery. WHEREFORE, Respondent requests that the Tribunal dismiss Petitioner’s appeal with prejudice and award Respondent its costs, attorney fees, and all such further and additional relief as this Tribunal may deem appropriate. Dated: August 5, 2026 Respectfully submitted by, BLOOM SLUGGETT, PC /s/ Toby Koenig Toby Koenig (P72367) Attorneys for Respondent City of Walker PROOF OF SERVICE Tonya Voakes, being duly sworn, deposes and says that she is employed by Bloom Sluggett, PC, and that on August 6, 2026, she served a copy of Respondent’s Appearance, Answer to Petition and Affirmative Defenses, and Proof of Service by e-mail and First-Class Mail upon Brian Thomas at: /s/ Tonya Voakes Tonya Voakes Brian Thomas Representative For Petitioner 6615 Brotherhood Way Fort Wayne, IN 46825 (260) 637-8899 bthomas@integritytax.com
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent MTT DOCKET NO. 26-000955 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government City Of Walker (KENT) First Name M.I. Last Name Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Toby M.I. Last Name Koenig Firm Name (if any) Bloom Sluggett PC Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 161 Ottawa Ave NW Suite 400 City or Town Grand Rapids State Michigan ZIP Code 49503 Telephone Number (616) 965-9343 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) toby@bloomsluggett.com Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: Toby Koenig /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Farm & Fleet of Janesville, Inc, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-000955 City Of Walker, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: July 8, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE | certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, Mi 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER ' DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I, BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Farm & Fleet of Janesville - Kent LOA | MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No.2” A — OOD GFE Clty of Walker , Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: 41-13-30-100-030 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is _v_real ___personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___ Yes No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___Yes ___ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of persanal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 6. The property identified above is classified as 201 Commercial 7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to Respondent's March July December Board of Review. MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 811 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, M1 48833 - 617-336-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 + Other Carrlers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE,, LANSING, MI 45208
Page 3
MTT Docket No.2 <b ~ OOF 55 Page 2 of 4 8. 10. 11. 12, 13. 14. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to Invoke the Tribunals authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary}: If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): The property or properties at issue are located in Kent County. The property or properties’ address is: 146 Wilson Ave NW, Grand Rapids, MI 49534-3538 The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit); City of Walker Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 3607 E Racine St. Janesville, WI 63646-2320 This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): ¥ ___ the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes ___ No uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valoram taxation under MCL The tax year(s) at issue are: 2026
Page 4
MTT Docket No, pla” 9b 55 Page 3 of 4 i 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific i facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunals authority over the prior tax vear or years (attach additional page if necessary): 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 13986800 8993400 5904778 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value : 2026 7400000 3700000 3700000 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are:
Page 5
MTT
Page 6
ST
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-000955 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Petitioner Files Document Type: Proof of Service: Petition Attachment File Name: 26-000955 POS and NOTICE OF DOCKET Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Farm & Fleet of Janesville - Kent LOA , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) \ MTT Docket No.n/a City of Walker , Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: 41-13-30-100-030 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is _v real __ personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___ Yes ___ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___Yes __ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 6. The property identified above is classified as 201 Commercial 7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to Respondent's March July December Board of Review. MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 611 W. OTTAWA ST, LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 . PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, Ml 48906 |
Page 2
MTT Docket No. n/a Page 2 of 4 8. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): The property or properties at issue are located in Kent County. The property or properties’ address is: 145 Wilson Ave NW, Grand Rapids, MI 49534-3538 The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit); City of Walker Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 3507 E Racine St. Janesville, WI 53546-2320 This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): v the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes __ No uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL The tax year(s) at issue are: 2026
Page 3
MTT Docket No. n/a Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunals authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary}: 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 13986800 6993400 5904778 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 7400000 3700000 3700000 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 6586800 3203400 2204778 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): We respectfully request that the taxable value and assessed value be corrected to $3700000 with the true cash value $7400000. 20. List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the relief requested (attach additional page if necessary): [The subject property is a 107,800 square foot big box retail warehouse being operated as a Blaines Farm and Fleet. An appraisal supports a much lower valuation. We would respectfully request the assessment be adjusted to more appropriately represent the value of the subject property.
Page 4
MTT Docket No. n/a Page 4 of 4 suas Roe Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Printed Name of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Brian Thomas Email Address: bthomas@integritytax.com Mailing Address: 6615 Brotherhood Way Fort Wayne, IN 46825 Telephone Number: 260-637-8899 Date: 5/14/2026
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name Integrity Tax Consulting Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 6615 Brotherhood Way City or Town Fort Wayne State Indiana ZIP Code 46825-4226 Telephone Number 2606378899 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) tbeerman@integritytax.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Brian M.I. Last Name Thomas Firm Name (if any) Integrity Tax Consulting Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 6615 Brotherhood Way City or Town Fort Wayne State Indiana ZIP Code 46825-4226 Telephone Number 2606378899 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) bthomas@integritytax.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 145 Wilson Ave NW Grand Rapids
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Michigan 49534-3538 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Walker (KENT) County Kent If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 41-13-30-100-030 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 6993400 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 5904778 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 7400000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 3700000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Brian Thomas Payment Information Amount: 600 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26051485401199 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Farm & Fleet of Janesville, Inc, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-000955 City Of Walker, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: July 8, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Farm & Fleet of Janesville - Kent LOA , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) \ MTT Docket No.n/a City of Walker , Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: 41-13-30-100-030 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is _v real __ personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___ Yes ___ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___Yes __ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 6. The property identified above is classified as 201 Commercial 7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to Respondent's March July December Board of Review. MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 611 W. OTTAWA ST, LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 . PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, Ml 48906 |
Page 2
MTT Docket No. n/a Page 2 of 4 8. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): The property or properties at issue are located in Kent County. The property or properties’ address is: 145 Wilson Ave NW, Grand Rapids, MI 49534-3538 The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit); City of Walker Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 3507 E Racine St. Janesville, WI 53546-2320 This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): v the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes __ No uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL The tax year(s) at issue are: 2026
Page 3
MTT Docket No. n/a Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunals authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary}: 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 13986800 6993400 5904778 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 7400000 3700000 3700000 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 6586800 3203400 2204778 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): We respectfully request that the taxable value and assessed value be corrected to $3700000 with the true cash value $7400000. 20. List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the relief requested (attach additional page if necessary): [The subject property is a 107,800 square foot big box retail warehouse being operated as a Blaines Farm and Fleet. An appraisal supports a much lower valuation. We would respectfully request the assessment be adjusted to more appropriately represent the value of the subject property.
Page 4
MTT Docket No. n/a Page 4 of 4 suas Roe Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Printed Name of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Brian Thomas Email Address: bthomas@integritytax.com Mailing Address: 6615 Brotherhood Way Fort Wayne, IN 46825 Telephone Number: 260-637-8899 Date: 5/14/2026
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name Integrity Tax Consulting Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 6615 Brotherhood Way City or Town Fort Wayne State Indiana ZIP Code 46825-4226 Telephone Number 2606378899 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) tbeerman@integritytax.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Brian M.I. Last Name Thomas Firm Name (if any) Integrity Tax Consulting Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 6615 Brotherhood Way City or Town Fort Wayne State Indiana ZIP Code 46825-4226 Telephone Number 2606378899 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) bthomas@integritytax.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 145 Wilson Ave NW Grand Rapids
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Michigan 49534-3538 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Walker (KENT) County Kent If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 41-13-30-100-030 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 6993400 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 5904778 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 7400000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 3700000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Brian Thomas Payment Information Amount: 600 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26051485401199 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.