Record Finder / 24-004107-TT
Michigan

Estella A Garcia, Petitioner V City Of Alma, Respondent

Petitioner
Estella A Garcia
Respondent
City Of Alma

Case overview

Docket number
24-004107-TT
Status
Disposed
CaseType
SC Property
Division
Small Claims Division
County
Gratiot
Judge
No judge assigned

Docket history

Line #SubjectFilerLine RefEnter Date/Post MarkFeeRelated Item
5Order of DismissalNot recordedNot recorded02/11/2025Not recordedDownload
4Order Holding Petitioner in DefaultNot recordedNot recorded01/10/2025Not recordedDownload
3Reissued Order Severing Tax Year 2024 from 24-000072Not recorded112/04/2024Not recordedDownload
2Order Reissuing Order Severing 2024 from 24-000072Not recorded112/04/2024Not recordedDownload
1Order Severing Order Severing Tax Year 2024 from 24-000072Not recordedNot recorded11/19/2024Not recordedDownload

Documents

24-004107 Dismiss (post-sever).pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Estella A Garcia, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 24-004107 

 

City of Alma, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

 

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Petitioner was placed in 

default on January 10, 2025, because Petitioner failed to complete and file a Severed 

Petition for tax year 2024 as ordered in the Final Opinion and Judgment reissued on 

December 4, 2024, for MTT Docket 24-000072. Petitioner has not complied with either 

order, and the latter stated that “failure to comply with this Order shall result in the 

dismissal of the case . . .” and referenced Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury.1 In Grimm, the 

Michigan Court of Appeals summarized factors that the Tribunal should consider before 

imposing the sanction of dismissal. Those factors are: 

 

(1) whether the violation was wilful or accidental; (2) the party's history of 

refusing to comply with previous court orders; (3) the prejudice to the 

opposing party; (4) whether there exists a history of deliberate delay; (5) 

the degree of compliance with other parts of the court's orders; (6) 

attempts to cure the defect; and (7) whether a lesser sanction would better 

serve the interests of justice.2 

 

Here, Petitioner has failed to respond to or comply with multiple Tribunal orders. 

Respondent has been prejudiced by the undue delay in the appeal. As a result, 

considering the factors involved and all options in determining what sanction is just and 

proper, the Tribunal finds that dismissal is appropriate, and a lesser sanction would not 

be appropriate in light of Petitioner’s history of noncompliance in this case. 

Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. 

 

This Order resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. 

 

 

 

1 Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 

2 Id. at 149.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-004107 

Page 2 of 2 

 

APPEAL RIGHTS 

If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for 

reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of 

Appeals. 

 

A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee 

within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision 

closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing 

system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such 

motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless 

the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a 

principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the 

decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, 

if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the 

opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to 

electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the 

motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral 

arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. 

 

Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the 

claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If 

the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal 

by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the 

record on appeal. There is no certification fee. 

 

 

Entered: February 11, 2025 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

kac 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

24-004107 Default.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Estella A Garcia, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 24-004107 

 

City of Alma, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER HOLDING PETITIONER IN DEFAULT 

 

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in this case and finds that the Tribunal severed the 

above-captioned docket from docket number 24-000072 on November 19, 2024.1 The 

order severing this case required Petitioner to file a petition pertaining to the 2024 tax 

year within 21 days of entry of the order. Petitioner failed to respond or submit a 

petition. Though the Tribunal finds an extension of time to file the petition is appropriate 

under TTR 231(1), Petitioner shall be placed in default. Additionally, Petitioner’s failure 

to comply with Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established 

a history of deliberate delay that would justify the dismissal of this case for failure to 

timely comply with this order.2 Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is held in DEFAULT. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must file a petition pertaining to the 2024 tax 

year within 21 days of entry of this Order. The petition shall note the docket number 

assigned by the Tribunal for the 2024 tax year and, if filed utilizing the Tribunal’s e-filing 

system, must be filed on the assigned 2024 docket number as a “Severed Petition.” 

 

Failure to comply with this Order will result in the dismissal of this case.3 

 

 

 

Entered: January 10, 2025 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

bw/jcr 

 

 

 

 

1 The order was reissued on December 4, 2024 because of a service error with the November 19, 2024, 

order. 

2 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 

3 TTR 231(1). See also MCL 205.732.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-004107 

Page 2 of 2 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

24-000072 FOJ w-sever.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

Estella A Garcia, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

v 

MTT Docket Nos. 24-000072 

& 24-004107 

City of Alma, 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

Patricia L. Halm 

FINAL OPINION AND JUDGMENT 

ORDER SEVERING 2024 TAX YEAR AND ASSIGNING IT 

DOCKET NUMBER 24-004107 

The Tribunal issued a Proposed Opinion and Judgment (POJ) on October 3, 2024. The 

POJ states, in pertinent part, “[t]he parties have 20 days from date of entry of this POJ 

to notify the Tribunal in writing, by mail or by electronic filing, if available, if they do 

not agree with the POJ and to state in writing why they do not agree with the POJ (i.e., 

exceptions).” 

Neither party has filed exceptions to the POJ. 

The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) considered the testimony and evidence 

submitted and made specific findings of fact and conclusions of law pertaining to the 

2023 tax year. The ALJ’s determination is supported by the testimony, evidence and 

applicable statutory and case law. 

Neither party provided any relevant evidence of value for the 2024 tax year, however, 

and “the Tribunal may not automatically accept a respondent's assessment, but must 

make its own findings of fact and arrive at a legally supportable true cash value.”1 As 

such, the Tribunal shall sever the 2024 tax year, assign it a new docket number, and 

parties will be ordered to file pleadings specific to the 2024 tax year. 

Given the above, the Tribunal adopts the POJ, pertaining to the 2023 tax year, as the 

Tribunal’s final decision in this case.2 The Tribunal also incorporates by reference the 

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law contained in the POJ in this Final Opinion and 

Judgment. As a result: 

1 Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp v City of Warren, 193 Mich App 348, 355; 483 NW2d 416 (1992) (Citing 

Pinelake Housing Cooperative v Ann Arbor, 159 Mich App 208, 220; 406 NW2d 832 (1987)); 

Consolidated Aluminum Corp v Richmond Twp, 88 Mich App 229, 232-233; 276 NW2d 566 (1979)). 

2 See MCL 205.726. 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Page 2

MTT Docket Nos. 24-000072 & 24-004107 

Page 2 of 4 

a. The property’s taxable value (TV), as established by the Board of Review for 

the tax year at issue, is as follows: 

Parcel Number: 51-032-840-00 

Year 

TV 

2023 

$34,816 

 

b. The property’s TV, as determined by the Tribunal for the tax year at issue, 

is as follows: 

Parcel Number: 51-032-840-00 

Year 

TV 

2023 

$34,816 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the 2024 tax year shall be SEVERED and assigned 

Docket No. 24-004107 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall file a petition pertaining to the 2024 tax 

year within 21 days of the entry of this Order.3 The petition shall note the docket 

number assigned by the Tribunal for the 2024 tax year and if filed utilizing the 

Tribunal’s e-filing system, must be filed on the assigned 2024 docket number as a 

“Severed Petition.” 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Tribunal shall issue a Notice of Docket after receipt 

of the petition. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with maintaining the assessment 

rolls for the 2023 tax year shall correct or cause the assessment rolls to be corrected to 

reflect the property’s true cash and taxable values within 20 days of entry of this Final 

Opinion and Judgment, subject to the processes of equalization.4 To the extent that the 

final level of assessment for a given year has not yet been determined and published, 

the assessment rolls shall be corrected once the final level is published or becomes 

known. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with collecting or refunding the 

affected taxes shall collect taxes and any applicable interest or issue a refund within 28 

days of entry of this Final Opinion and Judgment. If a refund is warranted, it shall 

include a proportionate share of any property tax administration fees paid and penalty 

and interest paid on delinquent taxes. The refund shall also separately indicate the 

3 Alternatively, the petition may be downloaded from the Tribunal’s website and mailed to the Tribunal via 

United States Postal Service at: Michigan Tax Tribunal, PO BOX 30232, Lansing, MI 48909. The petition 

may also be delivered to the Tribunal via overnight carrier (UPS, FedEx, or DHL) at: Michigan Tax 

Tribunal, 2nd Floor MTT, 2407 N. Grand River Avenue, Lansing, MI 48933. 

4 See MCL 205.755.

Page 3

MTT Docket Nos. 24-000072 & 24-004107 

Page 3 of 4 

amount of the taxes, fees, penalties, and interest being refunded. A sum determined by 

the Tribunal to have been unlawfully paid shall bear interest from the date of payment to 

the date of judgment, and the judgment shall bear interest to the date of its payment. A 

sum determined by the Tribunal to have been underpaid shall not bear interest for any 

time period prior to 28 days after the issuance of this Final Opinion and 

Judgment. Pursuant to MCL 205.737, interest shall accrue (i) after December 31, 2013, 

through June 30, 2016, at the rate of 4.25%, (ii) after June 30, 2016, through December 

31, 2016, at the rate of 4.40%, (iii) after December 31, 2016, through June 30, 2017, at 

the rate of 4.50%, (iv) after June 30, 2017, through December 31, 2017, at the rate of 

4.70%, (v) after December 31, 2017, through June 30, 2018, at the rate of 5.15%, (vi) 

after June 30, 2018, through December 31, 2018, at the rate of 5.41%, (vii) after 

December 31, 2018 through June 30, 2019, at the rate of 5.9%, (viii) after June 30, 

2019 through December 31, 2019, at the rate of 6.39%, (ix) after December 31, 2019, 

through June 30, 2020, at the rate of 6.40%, (x) after June 30 2020, through December 

31, 2020, at the rate of 5.63%, (xi) after December 31, 2020, through June 30, 2022, at 

the rate of

Page 4

MTT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

24-000072 reissue order.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Estella A Garcia, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket Nos. 24-000072 & 

 

 

24-004107 

 

City of Alma, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER REISSUING FINAL OPINION AND JUDGMENT 

 

ORDER REISSUING ORDER SEVERING 2024 TAX YEAR AND ASSIGNING IT 

DOCKET NUMBER 24-004107 

 

The Tribunal has considered the files in the above-captioned dockets and finds that a 

Final Opinion and Judgment and Order Severing 2024 Tax Year and Assigning it 

Docket Number 24-004107 were entered on November 19, 2024. The Tribunal erred in 

the entry of these orders because it failed to serve them on all parties to this case. As 

such, the orders shall be reissued together with this Order to ensure proper notice and 

due process to the parties. Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that the Final Opinion and Judgment is REISSUED. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Order Severing 2024 Tax Year and Assigning it 

Docket Number 24-004107 is REISSUED. 

 

 

Entered: December 4, 2024 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

ejg 

 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

24-000072 FOJ w-sever.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Estella A Garcia, 

 

 

 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

 

 

 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MTT Docket Nos. 24-000072 

& 24-004107 

 

City of Alma, 

 

 

 

 

 

Presiding Judge 

 

Respondent. 

 

 

 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

FINAL OPINION AND JUDGMENT 

 

ORDER SEVERING 2024 TAX YEAR AND ASSIGNING IT 

DOCKET NUMBER 24-004107 

 

The Tribunal issued a Proposed Opinion and Judgment (POJ) on October 3, 2024. The 

POJ states, in pertinent part, “[t]he parties have 20 days from date of entry of this POJ 

to notify the Tribunal in writing, by mail or by electronic filing, if available, if they do 

not agree with the POJ and to state in writing why they do not agree with the POJ (i.e., 

exceptions).” 

 

Neither party has filed exceptions to the POJ. 

 

The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) considered the testimony and evidence submitted 

and made specific findings of fact and conclusions of law pertaining to the 2023 tax 

year. The ALJ’s determination is supported by the testimony, evidence and applicable 

statutory and case law. 

 

Neither party provided any relevant evidence of value for the 2024 tax year, however, 

and “the Tribunal may not automatically accept a respondent's assessment, but must 

make its own findings of fact and arrive at a legally supportable true cash value.”1 As 

such, the Tribunal shall sever the 2024 tax year, assign it a new docket number, and 

parties will be ordered to file pleadings specific to the 2024 tax year. 

 

Given the above, the Tribunal adopts the POJ, pertaining to the 2023 tax year, as the 

Tribunal’s final decision in this case.2 The Tribunal also incorporates by reference the 

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law contained in the POJ in this Final Opinion and 

Judgment. As a result: 

 

 

1 Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp v City of Warren, 193 Mich App 348, 355; 483 NW2d 416 (1992) (Citing 

Pinelake Housing Cooperative v Ann Arbor, 159 Mich App 208, 220; 406 NW2d 832 (1987)); 

Consolidated Aluminum Corp v Richmond Twp, 88 Mich App 229, 232-233; 276 NW2d 566 (1979)). 

2 See MCL 205.726.

Page 2

MTT Docket Nos. 24-000072 & 24-004107 

Page 2 of 4 

 

a. The property’s taxable value (TV), as established by the Board of Review for 

the tax year at issue, is as follows: 

 

Parcel Number: 51-032-840-00 

Year

TV

2023

$34,816

 

b. The property’s TV, as determined by the Tribunal for the tax year at issue, is 

as follows: 

 

Parcel Number: 51-032-840-00 

Year

TV

2023

$34,816

 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the 2024 tax year shall be SEVERED and assigned 

Docket No. 24-004107 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall file a petition pertaining to the 2024 tax 

year within 21 days of the entry of this Order.3 The petition shall note the docket 

number assigned by the Tribunal for the 2024 tax year and if filed utilizing the Tribunal’s 

e-filing system, must be filed on the assigned 2024 docket number as a “Severed 

Petition.” 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Tribunal shall issue a Notice of Docket after receipt 

of the petition. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with maintaining the assessment 

rolls for the 2023 tax year shall correct or cause the assessment rolls to be corrected to 

reflect the property’s true cash and taxable values within 20 days of entry of this Final 

Opinion and Judgment, subject to the processes of equalization.4 To the extent that the 

final level of assessment for a given year has not yet been determined and published, 

the assessment rolls shall be corrected once the final level is published or becomes 

known. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with collecting or refunding the 

affected taxes shall collect taxes and any applicable interest or issue a refund within 28 

days of entry of this Final Opinion and Judgment. If a refund is warranted, it shall 

include a proportionate share of any property tax administration fees paid and penalty 

and interest paid on delinquent taxes. The refund shall also separately indicate the 

 

3 Alternatively, the petition may be downloaded from the Tribunal’s website and mailed to the Tribunal via 

United States Postal Service at: Michigan Tax Tribunal, PO BOX 30232, Lansing, MI 48909. The petition 

may also be delivered to the Tribunal via overnight carrier (UPS, FedEx, or DHL) at: Michigan Tax 

Tribunal, 2nd Floor MTT, 2407 N. Grand River Avenue, Lansing, MI 48933. 

4 See MCL 205.755.

Page 3

MTT Docket Nos. 24-000072 & 24-004107 

Page 3 of 4 

 

amount of the taxes, fees, penalties, and interest being refunded. A sum determined by 

the Tribunal to have been unlawfully paid shall bear interest from the date of payment to 

the date of judgment, and the judgment shall bear interest to the date of its payment. A 

sum determined by the Tribunal to have been underpaid shall not bear interest for any 

time period prior to 28 days after the issuance of this Final Opinion and 

Judgment. Pursuant to MCL 205.737, interest shall accrue (i) after December 31, 2013, 

through June 30, 2016, at the rate of 4.25%, (ii) after June 30, 2016, through December 

31, 2016, at the rate of 4.40%, (iii) after December 31, 2016, through June 30, 2017, at 

the rate of 4.50%, (iv) after June 30, 2017, through December 31, 2017, at the rate of 

4.70%, (v) after December 31, 2017, through June 30, 2018, at the rate of 5.15%, (vi) 

after June 30, 2018, through December 31, 2018, at the rate of 5.41%, (vii) after 

December 31, 2018 through June 30, 2019, at the rate of 5.9%, (viii) after June 30, 

2019 through December 31, 2019, at the rate of 6.39%, (ix) after December 31, 2019, 

through June 30, 2020, at the rate of 6.40%, (x) after June 30 2020, through December 

31, 2020,

Page 4

MTT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.