Eig14T Pri Mi Jenison Baldwin LLC Petitioner Vs. Township Of Georgetown Respondent
- Petitioner
- Eig14T Pri Mi Jenison Baldwin LLC
- Respondent
- Township Of Georgetown
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-000949-TT
- Status
- Ready Sched Prehearing Date Certain
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Ottawa
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Prehearing General Call | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/16/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 09/04/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Proof of service of petition was received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/12/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 06/25/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/25/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/14/2026 | $600.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NOTICE OF SEPTEMBER 16- 30, 2027 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER OF PROCEDURE EIG14T PRI MI Jenison Baldwin LLC, Petitioner, v Township Of Georgetown, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 26-000949 Please be advised that 26-000949 has been placed on a two-week Prehearing General Call commencing September 16, 2027. Unless ordered otherwise, parties will be notified at least 28 days before they are scheduled to appear. Scheduling will not necessarily occur in the order in which the cases are listed below. Parties are required to submit a valuation disclosure or written notification that no valuation disclosure is required by the dates indicated herein. A “valuation disclosure” is defined as documentary or other tangible evidence in a property tax proceeding that a party relies upon in support of the party’s contention as to the true cash value of the subject property or any portion thereof and contains the party’s value conclusion and data, valuation methodology, analysis or reasoning. See TTR 203 and TTR 241. Users who file documents with the Tribunal are advised that filed documents are public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tribunal’s Tax Docket Lookup. If a user wishes to file a document for consideration by the Tribunal and prevent its publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for Protective Order under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents covered by the order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a Protective Order will be published. In accordance with MCR 1.109(D)(9) and TTR 209, the responsibility for excluding or redacting personal identifying information (PII) from all documents filed with or offered to the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and their attorneys. The Tribunal is not responsible for or required to review, redact, or screen documents at the time of filing for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A party, representative, or interested person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may request that the Tribunal redact PII contained in a previously filed document by submitting a Request for Redactions. The Request for Redactions form is available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages of the Tribunal’s website.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-000949 Page 2 of 3 Please refer to the Tribunal’s FAQs and Glossary of Terms pages on the Tribunal’s website for more information. IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall: a. If no valuation disclosure is required, notify the Tribunal and the opposing parties in writing within 21 days of entry of this order that no valuation disclosure is being filed. The notice shall indicate the reason or reasons why no valuation disclosure is required (i.e., exemption claim, etc.). b. If a valuation disclosure is required, file and exchange their valuation disclosures by May 20, 2027. Valuation disclosures will not be admitted into evidence unless disclosed and furnished in accordance with this order (even though admissible) except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their Prehearing Statements by May 20, 2027. Witnesses, with the exception of rebuttal witnesses, will not be allowed to testify unless disclosed in the Prehearing Statement and the Prehearing Statement is furnished in accordance with this order except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. Failure to file the Prehearing Statement may result in holding a party or parties in default. See TTR 237. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on May 20, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. Discovery relative to the valuation disclosure prepared for purposes of litigating this case or the valuation expert that prepared that valuation disclosure is not permitted during “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on September 16, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is limited to the opposing party’s valuation disclosure, the opposing party’s valuation expert, and the witnesses identified on the opposing party’s Prehearing Statement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if this case is not scheduled for a date certain prehearing conference during the time frame indicated it may be scheduled for a date certain prehearing conference at any time subsequent to the completion date for this Prehearing General Call. Parties will, however, be notified in writing approximately one week before they are scheduled to appear. By:_____________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair
Page 3
MTT Docket No. 26-000949 Page 3 of 3 Entered: October 16, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NOTICE OF SEPTEMBER 16- 30, 2027 PREHEARING GENERAL
Page 5
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL EIG14T PRI MI Jenison Baldwin LLC, Petitioner, v. Georgetown Charter Township, Respondent. ___________________________________/ MTT Docket No. 26-000949-TT Steve Johnson Michigan Tax Appeal Services Representative for Petitioner 436 N. Center St. Northville, MI 48167 (248) 392-4342 info@mitaxappeal.com __________________________________/ Ryan M. Shannon (P74535) Dickinson Wright PLLC Counsel for Respondent 123 W. Allegan St., Suite 900 Lansing, MI 48933 (517) 410-5443 rshannon@dickinsonwright.com ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Respondent, through undersigned counsel, responds to the Petition filed in the above-captioned matter by like-numbered paragraphs as follows, and states thereafter its Affirmative Defenses: 1. Respondent’s records do not reflect the existence of a parcel with ID number 70-14-15-290-046. Petitioner appears to have pleaded in error and to have mis-identified the property. The tax rolls reflect that Petitioner owns a parcel designated 70-14-15-279-046 at the same address listed in the Petition. Without waiving any arguments concerning jurisdiction, Respondent refers to this latter parcel as the “Subject Property” and interposes the following answers with respect to the Subject Property.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-000949 Page 2 Respondent otherwise denies as untrue all allegations with respect to Parcel 70-14-15-290-046. 2. Admitted. 3. No allegation of fact or law has been made to which a response is required. 4. No allegation of fact or law has been made to which a response is required. 5. No allegation of fact or law has been made to which a response is required. 6. Admitted. 7. No allegation of fact or law has been made to which a response is required. 8. No allegation of fact or law has been made to which a response is required. 9. No allegation of fact or law has been made to which a response is required. 10. Admitted. 11. Admitted. 12. Respondent neither admits nor denies as it is without sufficient information, and leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 13. Respondent neither admits nor denies as it is without sufficient information, and leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 14. Admitted. 15. No allegation of fact or law has been made to which a response is required. 16. Admitted. 17. Respondent denies as untrue that the values for the Subject Property are or should be as set forth in this paragraph.
Page 3
MTT Docket No. 26-000949 Page 3 18. Respondent admits, based on Petitioner’s contentions, that the values in dispute are as set forth in this paragraph. 19. Respondent denies as untrue that Petitioner is entitled to the requested relief. 20. Denied as untrue AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES For its Affirmative Defenses, Respondent states further as follows: 1. Petitioner has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. Petitioner has failed to invoke the Tribunal’s jurisdiction because it did not timely file a petition with respect to property in which it has an interest. 3. Petitioner has failed to state a claim because it has not complied with the Tribunal’s rules governing pleading. 4. Petitioner has failed to support the existence of a property interest supporting standing to bring an appeal of the property taxes. 5. Any reduction in value compared to the assessed value is the result of Petitioner’s own conduct or action such that it would be inequitable or improper to reduce its tax liability. 6. Granting the relief sought would result in dis-uniform assessment in violation of the Michigan Constitution. 7. Respondent reserves the right to add or identify further affirmative defenses as they become known through the course of this litigation.
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 26-000949 Page 4 WHEREFORE, Respondent respectfully requests that the Tribunal enter an order dismissing the appeal or in the alternative affirming the values on the rolls, and granting such other and further relief as are in its power to give. Submitted Respectfully, DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC /s/ Ryan M. Shannon Ryan M. Shannon (P74535) Counsel for Respondent 123 W. Allegan St., Suite 900 Lansing, MI 48933 (517) 371-1730 rshannon@dickinsonwright.com Dated: September 4, 2026 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that on September 4, 2026 he caused the foregoing Answer and Affirmative defenses to be served on representative for the Petitioners at the following address by first class mail, postage prepaid: Steve Johnson Michigan Tax Appeal Services 436 N. Center St. Northville, MI 48167 /s/ Ryan M. Shannon Ryan M. Shannon September 4, 2026
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent MTT DOCKET NO. 26-000949 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government Township Of Georgetown (OTTAWA) First Name M.I. Last Name Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Ryan M.I. Last Name Shannon Firm Name (if any) Dickinson Wright PLLC Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 123 W. Allegan St. Suite 900 City or Town Lansing State Michigan ZIP Code 48933 Telephone Number (517) 410-5443 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) rshannon@dickinsonwright.com Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: Ryan M. Shannon /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR EIG14T PRI MI Jenson Baldwin LLC , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. 26-000949 Township of Georgetown Respondent(s) PROOF OF SERVICE FOR PROPERTY TAX PETITION *To be filed after the Tribunal issues the Notice of Docket Number* Rebecca Adler states that on 8/12/26 he/she [Name of person serving/mailing petition] [date of service] served a copy of the Petition relative to the above-captioned matter upon: [Provide name and address of the following entities] 1. Assessor (via certified mail): Attn: Jill Skelley, Assessor, Georgetown Township, Assessing Office, 1515 Baldwin Street, Box 769, Jenison, MI 49429 2. City Clerk or Township Supervisor/Clerk (via certified mail): Georgetown Township, Clerk's Office, 1515 Baldwin Street, P.O. Box 769, Jenison, MI 49429 3. County Equalization Director (via first class mail or personal service): Ottawa County, Equalization Director, 12220 Filmore St, Room 110, West Olive, MI 49460 4. County Clerk (via first class mail or personal service): Ottawa County, Clerk's Office, 12220 Fillmore Street, Room 130, West Olive, MI 49466 5. Secretary of the local school board (via first class mail or personal service): Secretary of School Board, Jenison Public Schools, 8375 20th Ave, Georgetown Township, MI 6. State Treasurer (via first class mail): Michigan Department of Treasury, State Treasurer 430 W. Allegan Lansing, MI 48922 /s/ Rebecca Adler Rebecca Adler [Signature of person who is serving/mailing copy] [Print/type name of person serving/mailing copy] MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-000949 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Petitioner Files Document Type: Proof of Service: Petition Attachment File Name: Proof of Service_EIG14T PRI MI Jenison Baldwin LLC_26-000949 Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
poms, STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR EIG14T PRI MI Jenison Baldwin LLC , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) \% MTT Docket No. Georgetown Charter Township Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: 70 14 15 290 046 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is _X real ___ personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___ Yes ___ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? Yes ___ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): N/A 6. The property identified above is classified as Commercial 7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to Respondent's March July December Board of Review. MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
Page 2
MTT Docket No. Page 2 of 4 8. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): N/A If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): N/A The property or properties at issue are located in Ottawa County. The property or properties’ address is: 1675 Baldwin St., Jenison, MI 49428 The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): Georgetown Township Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 1695 Twelve Mile Rd, STE 100, Berkley, MI 48072 This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): X the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition orloss? ___ Yes __ No uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL The tax year(s) at issue are: 2026
Page 3
MTT Docket No. Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunals authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): N/A 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 4,450,200 2,225,100 2,225,100 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 1,100,000 550,000 550,000 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 3,350,200 1,675,100 1,675,100 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): by the Tax Tribunal Act. Petitioner requests that the Tribunal reduce the assessed, state equalized, and taxable value from 2,225,100 to 550,000 and order a refund with interest as provided 20. List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the relief requested (attach additional page if necessary): true cash value. Our initial review of the subject property indicates the assessment exceeds 50% of the
Page 4
MTT Docket No. Page 4 of 4 Signature of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: /s/ Steve Johnson Printed Name of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Steve Johnson Email Address: info@mitaxappeal.com Mailing Address: 436 N. Center St, Northville, MI 48167 Telephone Number: 248 3924342 Date: May 14,2026
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name EIG14T PRI MI Jenison Baldwin LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 436 N. Center Street City or Town Northville State Michigan ZIP Code 48167-1224 Telephone Number 2483924342 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) info@mitaxappeal.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 1675 Baldwin St. Jenison Michigan 49428 Taxing Authority (City or Township) Township Of Georgetown (OTTAWA) County Ottawa If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain:
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 70-14-15-290-046 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 2225100 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 2225100 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 1100000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 550000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 1675100 Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Steve Johnson Payment Information Amount: 600 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26051485390956 Supporting Waiver Documents:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 EIG14T PRI MI Jenison Baldwin LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-000949 Township Of Georgetown, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: June 25, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
poms, STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR EIG14T PRI MI Jenison Baldwin LLC , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) \% MTT Docket No. Georgetown Charter Township Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: 70 14 15 290 046 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is _X real ___ personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___ Yes ___ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? Yes ___ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): N/A 6. The property identified above is classified as Commercial 7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to Respondent's March July December Board of Review. MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
Page 2
MTT Docket No. Page 2 of 4 8. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): N/A If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): N/A The property or properties at issue are located in Ottawa County. The property or properties’ address is: 1675 Baldwin St., Jenison, MI 49428 The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): Georgetown Township Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 1695 Twelve Mile Rd, STE 100, Berkley, MI 48072 This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): X the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition orloss? ___ Yes __ No uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL The tax year(s) at issue are: 2026
Page 3
MTT Docket No. Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunals authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): N/A 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 4,450,200 2,225,100 2,225,100 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 1,100,000 550,000 550,000 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 3,350,200 1,675,100 1,675,100 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): by the Tax Tribunal Act. Petitioner requests that the Tribunal reduce the assessed, state equalized, and taxable value from 2,225,100 to 550,000 and order a refund with interest as provided 20. List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the relief requested (attach additional page if necessary): true cash value. Our initial review of the subject property indicates the assessment exceeds 50% of the
Page 4
MTT Docket No. Page 4 of 4 Signature of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: /s/ Steve Johnson Printed Name of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Steve Johnson Email Address: info@mitaxappeal.com Mailing Address: 436 N. Center St, Northville, MI 48167 Telephone Number: 248 3924342 Date: May 14,2026
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name EIG14T PRI MI Jenison Baldwin LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 436 N. Center Street City or Town Northville State Michigan ZIP Code 48167-1224 Telephone Number 2483924342 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) info@mitaxappeal.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 1675 Baldwin St. Jenison Michigan 49428 Taxing Authority (City or Township) Township Of Georgetown (OTTAWA) County Ottawa If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain:
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 70-14-15-290-046 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 2225100 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 2225100 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 1100000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 550000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 1675100 Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Steve Johnson Payment Information Amount: 600 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26051485390956 Supporting Waiver Documents:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.