Edb Properties Port Huron LLC, Petitioner Vs. City Of Port Huron, Respondent
- Petitioner
- Edb Properties Port Huron LLC
- Respondent
- City Of Port Huron
Case overview
- Docket number
- 25-001841-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Saint Clair
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Consent Judgment | Not recorded | 7 | 11/06/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 8 | Granted | PET | 7 | 11/06/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | A Stipulation has been received. | PET | Not recorded | 11/04/2025 | $50.00 | Download |
| 6 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 09/06/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Proof of service of petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 08/26/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Petition has been verified | PET | 2 | 07/25/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/25/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/30/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | ET Case Info Sheet | Not recorded | Not recorded | 05/30/2025 | $400.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 EDB Properties Port Huron LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 25-001841 City of Port Huron, Presiding Judge Respondent. Joshua M. Wease ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the Stipulation and finds that it comports with the mandates of State law.1 As a result, the Tribunal shall enter the parties’ Stipulation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment including all attachments, terms and conditions is GRANTED and ADOPTED, unless otherwise indicated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with maintaining the assessment rolls for the tax years at issue shall correct or cause the assessment rolls to be corrected to reflect the property’s true cash and taxable values as provided in this Consent Judgment within 20 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment.2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with collecting or refunding the affected taxes shall collect taxes and any applicable interest or issue a refund as required by the Consent Judgment within 28 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment. If a refund is warranted, it shall, unless otherwise indicated, include a proportionate share of any property tax administration fees paid and of penalty and interest paid on delinquent taxes. The refund shall also, unless otherwise indicated, separately indicate the amount of the taxes, fees, penalties, and interest being refunded. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been unlawfully paid shall, unless otherwise indicated, bear interest from the date of payment to the date of judgment and the judgment shall bear interest to the date of its payment. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been underpaid shall not bear interest for any time period prior to 28 days after the issuance of this Consent Judgment. Pursuant to MCL 205.737, interest shall accrue (i) after December 31, 2013, through June 30, 2016, at the rate of 4.25%, (ii) after June 30, 2016, through December 31, 2016, at the rate of 4.40%, (iii) after December 31, 2016, through June 30, 2017, at the rate of 4.50%, (iv) after June 30, 1 See MCL 211.27a. 2 See MCL 205.755.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-001841 Page 2 of 2 2017, through December 31, 2017, at the rate of 4.70%, (v) after December 31, 2017, through June 30, 2018, at the rate of 5.15%, (vi) after June 30, 2018, through December 31, 2018, at the rate of 5.41%, (vii) after December 31, 2018, through June 30, 2019, at the rate of 5.9%, (viii) after June 30, 2019, through December 31, 2019, at the rate of 6.39%, (ix) after December 31, 2019, through June 30, 2020, at the rate of 6.40%, (x) after June 30 2020, through December 31, 2020, at the rate of 5.63%, (xi) after December 31, 2020, through June 30, 2022, at the rate of 4.25%, (xii) after June 30, 2022, through December 31, 2022, at the rate of 4.27%, (xiii) after December 31, 2022, through June 30, 2023, at the rate of 5.65%, (xiv) after June 30, 2023, through December 31, 2023, at the rate of 8.25%, (xv) after December 31, 2023, through June 30, 2024, at the rate of 9.30%, (xvi) after June 30, 2024, through December 31, 2024, at the rate of 9.50%, (xvii) after December 31, 2024, through June 30, 2025, at the rate of 9.47%, and (xviii) after June 30, 2025, through December 31, 2025, at the rate of 8.66%. This Consent Judgment resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. See docket look up for a copy of stipulation and for any possible refund paragraph. By _____________________________ Entered: November 6, 2025 gc PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
1 4908-0307-1863.1 STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL EDB PROPERTIES PORT HURON, LLC, Petitioner, MTT Docket No. 25-001841-TT v. CITY OF PORT HURON, Respondent. _____________________________________________/ STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT 1. The case is pending in the X Entire Tribunal OR __ Small Claims Division. 2. Property Parcel No: 74-06-298-0088-000 3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 74-06-298-0088- 000 $920,200 $460,100 $460,100 4. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 74-06-298-0088- 000 $300,000 $150,000 $150,000 5. If stipulation addresses tax years other than the tax year originally appealed or tax years added through motions to amend that have been granted by the Tribunal, list the separate facts upon which the parties rely to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over those tax year or years: 6. List separately any special terms or conditions being proposed by the parties that would affect the execution of this Consent Judgment including, but not limited to, the joint payment of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc.:
Page 2
2 4908-0307-1863.1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that refunds shall be made payable jointly to Petitioner named herein and its counsel, Foley & Lardner LLP, and sent in care of such counsel. Calculations of the refund amount shall also be sent to Petitioner’s counsel at the same address. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that all interest due hereunder is waived if, and only if, all refunds otherwise due are made within 120 days of the date of entry of the Consent Judgment. FOLEY & LARDNER LLP FLETCHER FEALKO SHOUDY & FRANCIS, PC Attorneys for Petitioner Attorneys for Respondent By: /s/ Jason Conti By: /s/ Gary A. Fletcher Jason Conti (P55617) Gary A. Fletcher (P26823) 500 Woodward Avenue, Suite 2700 1411 Third Street Fourth Floor, Suite F Detroit, Michigan 48226 Port Huron, Michigan 48060 (313) 234-7177 (810) 987-8444 Dated: November 4, 2025
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
1 4908-0307-1863.1 STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL EDB PROPERTIES PORT HURON, LLC, Petitioner, MTT Docket No. 25-001841-TT v. CITY OF PORT HURON, Respondent. _____________________________________________/ STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT 1. The case is pending in the X Entire Tribunal OR __ Small Claims Division. 2. Property Parcel No: 74-06-298-0088-000 3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 74-06-298-0088- 000 $920,200 $460,100 $460,100 4. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 74-06-298-0088- 000 $300,000 $150,000 $150,000 5. If stipulation addresses tax years other than the tax year originally appealed or tax years added through motions to amend that have been granted by the Tribunal, list the separate facts upon which the parties rely to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over those tax year or years: 6. List separately any special terms or conditions being proposed by the parties that would affect the execution of this Consent Judgment including, but not limited to, the joint payment of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc.:
Page 2
2 4908-0307-1863.1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that refunds shall be made payable jointly to Petitioner named herein and its counsel, Foley & Lardner LLP, and sent in care of such counsel. Calculations of the refund amount shall also be sent to Petitioner’s counsel at the same address. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that all interest due hereunder is waived if, and only if, all refunds otherwise due are made within 120 days of the date of entry of the Consent Judgment. FOLEY & LARDNER LLP FLETCHER FEALKO SHOUDY & FRANCIS, PC Attorneys for Petitioner Attorneys for Respondent By: /s/ Jason Conti By: /s/ Gary A. Fletcher Jason Conti (P55617) Gary A. Fletcher (P26823) 500 Woodward Avenue, Suite 2700 1411 Third Street Fourth Floor, Suite F Detroit, Michigan 48226 Port Huron, Michigan 48060 (313) 234-7177 (810) 987-8444 Dated: November 4, 2025
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
FLETCHER FEALKO SHOUDY & FRANCIS, P.C. ATTORNEYS & COUNSELORS 1411 THIRD STREET FOURTH FLOOR SUITE F PORT HURON, MICHIGAN 48060 TELEPHONE (810) 987-8444 GARY A. FLETCHER FACSIMILE (810) 987-8149 WILLIAM L. FEALKO Ill TODD J. SHOUDY T.ALLENFRANCIS MARC W.OSWALD DANA L. VANDREW VICTORIA R. FERRES TAYLOR M. ROGGENBUCK September 4, 2025 Clerk Michigan Tax Tribunal P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, Michigan 48909 Re: EDB Properties Port Huron, LLC vs. City of Port Huron MTT Docket No. 25-001841 Parcel No. 74-06-298-0088-000 Dear Clerk: RECEIVED SEP 09 2025 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL DAVID C DEVENDORF Of Counsel Enclosed please find original and one copy of Respondent City of Port Huron’s Answer to Petition and Proof of Service regarding the above matter. Please process in your usual manner and return a time stamped copy to me in the enclosed, self- address stamped envelope. If you have any questions or need further information, please give me a call. Very truly yours, FLETCHER FEALKO SHOUDY & FRANCIS, P.C. 7/4 Fletcher GAF/tm Enclosures cc: Jason Conti (w/encl.)
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND ECONOMIC GROWTH MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL EDB PROPERTIES PORT HURON, LLC, Petitioner, Vs. MTT Docket No. 25-001841 : Parcel No. 74-06-298-0088-000 CITY OF PORT HURON, Respondent. JASON CONTI (P55617) Foley & Lardner LLP Attorneys for Petitioner 500 Woodward Avenue, Suite 2700 Detroit, Michigan 48226 (313) 234-7177 jconti@foley.com GARY A. FLETCHER (P26823) Fletcher Fealko Shoudy & Francis, P.C. Attorneys for Respondent 1411 Third Street, Suite F Port Huron, Michigan 48060 (810) 987-8444 ANSWER TO PETITION NOW COMES Respondent, City of Port Huron, by its attorneys, Fletcher Fealko Shoudy & Francis, P.C., and for its Answer to the Petition says as follows: 1. Respondent admits this matter involved Parcel 74-06-298-0088-000 which is classified as commercial real property.
Page 3
6. The allegations contained in Paragraph Six (6) of the Petition state legal conclusions to which no response is required. Zs Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations contained in Paragraph Seven (7) of the Petition and leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 8. Respondent denies the allegations contained in Paragraph Eight (8) of the Petition for the reason they are untrue. a. Respondent denies the allegations contained in Subparagraph 8 a of the Petition for the reason they are untrue. b. Respondent denies the allegations contained in Subparagraph 8 b of the Petition for the reason they are untrue. c. Respondent denies the allegations contained in Subparagraph 8 c of the Petition for the reason they are untrue. d. Respondent denies the allegations contained in Subparagraph 8 d of the Petition for the reason they are untrue. WHEREFORE, Respondent, City of Port Huron, prays that the relief requested in the Petition be denied. FLETCHER FEALKO SHOUDY & FRANCIS, P.C. Attorneys for Respondent Aa Vz GARY A. FLETCHER (P26823) 1411 Third Street, Suite F Port Huron, Michigan 48060 The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing instrument was served upon the attorneys of record
Page 4
Ja EE Te Fletcher Fealko Shoudy & Francis P.C. 1411 Third Street, Suite F Port Huron, MI 48060 ZIP 48060 02 7H 0006072316 SE Clerk Michigan Tax Tribunal P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, Michigan 48909
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
4926-1529-6098.1 STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL EDB PROPERTIES PORT HURON, LLC, MTT Docket No. 25-001841 Parcel No. 74-06-298-0088-000 Petitioner, v CITY OF PORT HURON, Respondent. ________________________________________/ FOLEY & LARDNER LLP Attorneys for Petitioner By: Jason Conti (P55617) 500 Woodward Avenue, Suite 2700 Detroit, Michigan 48226 (313) 234-7100 jconti@foley.com _____________________________________________/ PROOF OF SERVICE On August 25, 2025, I caused to be served, via the methods listed below, a copy of Petitioner’s Petition for 2025 Tax Year, Notice of Docket Number, and this Proof of Service on: St. Clair County Clerk 201 McMorran Blvd. Room 1100 Port Huron, Michigan 48060 via U.S. mail St. Clair County Equalization Director 200 Grand River Avenue Suite 105 Port Huron, Michigan 48060 via U.S. mail Secretary of Local School Board Port Huron Area School District 2720 Riverside Drive Port Huron, Michigan 48060 via U.S. mail State Treasurer Michigan Dep’t of Treasury Treasury Building 430 W. Allegan Street Lansing, Michigan 48922 via U.S. mail City of Port Huron Clerk 100 McMorran Blvd. Port Huron, Michigan 48060 via Certified Mail City of Port Huron Assessor 100 McMorran Blvd. Port Huron, Michigan 48060 via Certified Mail
Page 2
2 4926-1529-6098.1 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP Attorneys for Petitioner By: s/ Jason Conti (P55617) 500 Woodward Avenue, Suite 2700 Detroit, Michigan 48226 (313) 234-7100 jconti@foley.com
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
1 4918-8388-9223.1 STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL EDB PROPERTIES PORT HURON, LLC, MTT Docket No. _____________ [Parcel No. 74-06-298-0088-000] Petitioner, v CITY OF PORT HURON, Respondent. ________________________________________/ PETITION FOR THE 2025 TAX YEAR EDB PROPERTIES PORT HURON, LLC (“Petitioner”), through its attorneys, Foley & Lardner LLP, states: 1. Petitioner’s principal office address is 23820 Eureka, Taylor, Michigan 48180. Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property taxes on real property tax parcel no. 74-06-298-0088-000 (the “Subject Property”), also known as 240 Huron Avenue, Port Huron, Michigan. 2. Respondent the City of Port Huron (“Respondent”) assesses and collects property taxes on the Subject Property. 3. In 2025, Respondent determined the taxable and assessed values of the Subject Property to be $460,100 and $460,100 respectively which will result in a state equalized value in the same amount based upon the tentative equalization factor. 4. The Subject Property is classified as Commercial Real. The Subject Property is presently used or available for use for Commercial purposes. Petitioner believes that the Subject Property was originally designed to be used for Commercial purposes. 5. This matter involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, (c) taxable value, and (d) uniformity.
Page 2
2 4918-8388-9223.1 6. At this time, Petitioner believes, as it relates to taxable value, that there is a dispute relative to the value of a loss. 7. If P.A. 174 of 2006 requires a board of review protest for the Subject Property, then a board of review protest was filed in March, 2025. 8. The 2025 assessment, including state equalized value and taxable value, imposed on the Subject Property, and the taxes to be levied and collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: (a) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (b) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (c) The assessment, including taxable value and/or state equalized value, are based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash value of that portion of the Subject Property that is taxable under Michigan law, and are based upon the application of wrong principles; and (d) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional rights to uniformity, equal protection, and due process of law. WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order reducing the 2025 taxable value of the Subject Property from $460,100 to $100,000, and reducing the 2025 state equalized value of the Subject Property from $460,100 to $100,000, and requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs.
Page 3
3 4918-8388-9223.1 Respectfully submitted, FOLEY & LARDNER LLP Attorneys for Petitioner By: /s/ Jason Conti Jason Conti (P55617) 500 Woodward Avenue, Suite 2700 Detroit, Michigan 48226 (313) 234-7177 jconti@foley.com Dated: May 30, 2025
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 EDB Properties Port Huron LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 25-001841 City Of Port Huron, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: __Tribunal Clerk________ Entered: July 25, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
1 4918-8388-9223.1 STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL EDB PROPERTIES PORT HURON, LLC, MTT Docket No. _____________ [Parcel No. 74-06-298-0088-000] Petitioner, v CITY OF PORT HURON, Respondent. ________________________________________/ PETITION FOR THE 2025 TAX YEAR EDB PROPERTIES PORT HURON, LLC (“Petitioner”), through its attorneys, Foley & Lardner LLP, states: 1. Petitioner’s principal office address is 23820 Eureka, Taylor, Michigan 48180. Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property taxes on real property tax parcel no. 74-06-298-0088-000 (the “Subject Property”), also known as 240 Huron Avenue, Port Huron, Michigan. 2. Respondent the City of Port Huron (“Respondent”) assesses and collects property taxes on the Subject Property. 3. In 2025, Respondent determined the taxable and assessed values of the Subject Property to be $460,100 and $460,100 respectively which will result in a state equalized value in the same amount based upon the tentative equalization factor. 4. The Subject Property is classified as Commercial Real. The Subject Property is presently used or available for use for Commercial purposes. Petitioner believes that the Subject Property was originally designed to be used for Commercial purposes. 5. This matter involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, (c) taxable value, and (d) uniformity.
Page 2
2 4918-8388-9223.1 6. At this time, Petitioner believes, as it relates to taxable value, that there is a dispute relative to the value of a loss. 7. If P.A. 174 of 2006 requires a board of review protest for the Subject Property, then a board of review protest was filed in March, 2025. 8. The 2025 assessment, including state equalized value and taxable value, imposed on the Subject Property, and the taxes to be levied and collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: (a) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (b) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (c) The assessment, including taxable value and/or state equalized value, are based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash value of that portion of the Subject Property that is taxable under Michigan law, and are based upon the application of wrong principles; and (d) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional rights to uniformity, equal protection, and due process of law. WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order reducing the 2025 taxable value of the Subject Property from $460,100 to $100,000, and reducing the 2025 state equalized value of the Subject Property from $460,100 to $100,000, and requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs.
Page 3
3 4918-8388-9223.1 Respectfully submitted, FOLEY & LARDNER LLP Attorneys for Petitioner By: /s/ Jason Conti Jason Conti (P55617) 500 Woodward Avenue, Suite 2700 Detroit, Michigan 48226 (313) 234-7177 jconti@foley.com Dated: May 30, 2025
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MOAHR DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization First Name/Company Name M.I. Last Name EDB Properties Port Huron, LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 23820 Eureka City or Town Taylor State Michigan ZIP Code 48180 Telephone Number 3132347177 Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) jconti@foley.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Jason M.I. Last Name Conti Firm Name (if any) Foley & Lardner LLP Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 500 Woodward Ave, Ste 2700 City or Town Detroit State Michigan ZIP Code 48226 Telephone Number 313-234-7177 Fax Number 313-234-2800 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) jconti@foley.com Section 5: Issue Please designate one: Valuation – Fill out Sections 4, 5, & 6 below Section 6: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing?1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 240 Huron Avenue Port Huron Michigan Taxing Authority (City or Township) Township Of Port Huron (SAINT CLAIR) County Saint Clair If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Section 7: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values Section 8: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 74-06-298-0088-000 Classification of Property: Real Commercial Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 460100 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 460100 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 200000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 100000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Section 9: Assessment Information Type of Tax Assessment(s): Assessment Number(s): Check all that is being appealed: Check what action prompted this appeal: If “other,” please explain: Section 10: Special Assessment Information Type of Special Assessment: Did you protest the special assessment at the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? If Yes, what was the date of the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? If No, please explain: Section 11: Classification Information Parcel Number: Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: What do you believe is the property’s classification?
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR If improved property, how is the property currently being used? If improved property, for what use was the property designed? Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Jason Conti
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.