Dundee Place Apartments, LLC; Dundee Place Apartments II, LLC; Dundee Place Petitioner Vs. Township Of Dundee Respondent

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Dundee Place Apartments LLC, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Dundee Place Apartments II LLC, 

 

Dundee Place Apartments III LLC, 

 

Dundee Place Apartments IV LLC, 

 

 

Petitioners, 

 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 26-000457 

 

Dundee Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT 

 

CONSENT JUDGMENT 

 

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and the submitted Stipulation for Entry 

of Consent Judgment (Stipulation) and finds that the Stipulation meets all filing and 

statutory requirements.1 As such, the Tribunal shall enter the Stipulation. Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment including all 

attachments, terms and conditions is GRANTED and ADOPTED, unless otherwise 

indicated. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with maintaining the assessment 

rolls for the tax years at issue shall correct or cause the assessment rolls to be 

corrected to reflect the property’s true cash and taxable values as provided in this 

Consent Judgment within 20 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment.2 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with collecting or refunding the 

affected taxes shall collect taxes and any applicable interest or issue a refund as 

required by the Consent Judgment within 28 days of the entry of the Consent 

Judgment. If a refund is warranted, it shall, unless otherwise indicated, include a 

proportionate share of any property tax administration fees paid and of penalty and 

interest paid on delinquent taxes. The refund shall also, unless otherwise indicated, 

separately indicate the amount of the taxes, fees, penalties, and interest being 

refunded. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been unlawfully paid shall, unless 

otherwise indicated, bear interest from the date of payment to the date of judgment and 

the judgment shall bear interest to the date of its payment. A sum determined by the 

Tribunal to have been underpaid shall not bear interest for any time period prior to 28 

days after the issuance of this Consent Judgment. Pursuant to MCL 205.737, interest 

 

1 See MCL 211.27a. 

2 See MCL 205.755.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-000457 

Page 2 of 2 

 

shall accrue (i) after December 31, 2020, through June 30, 2022, at the rate of 4.25%, 

(ii) after June 30, 2022, through December 31, 2022, at the rate of 4.27%, (iii) after 

December 31, 2022, through June 30, 2023, at the rate of 5.65%, (iv) after June 30, 

2023, through December 31, 2023, at the rate of 8.25%, (v) after December 31, 2023, 

through June 30, 2024, at the rate of 9.30%, (vi) after June 30, 2024, through December 

31, 2024, at the rate of 9.50%, (vii) after December 31, 2024, through June 30, 2025, at 

the rate of 9.47%, (viii) after June 30, 2025, through December 31, 2025, at the rate of 

8.66%, (ix) after December 31, 2025, through June 30, 2026, at a rate of 8.48%, and (x) 

after July 1, 2026, through December 31, 2026, at a rate of 7.85%. 

 

This Consent Judgment resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. 

 

See docket look up for a copy of stipulation and for any possible refund paragraph. 

 

 

Entered: October 21, 2026 

 

 

 

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm 

jc 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS, LLC; 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS II, LLC; 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS III, LLC; and 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS IV, LLC, 

Docket No. 26-000457 

Petitioners, 

Parcel Nos. 

5842-014-015-91 

v. 

5842-014-015-30 

5842-014-015-90 

DUNDEE TOWNSHIP, 

5842-040-711-41 

Respondent. 

Jason C. Long (P59244) 

Kerry L. Bondy (P42786) 

WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS, RATTNER 

PETRANGELO BONDY & CROSSLEY, PC 

& PLUNKETT, PC 

212 E. First St. 

380 N. Old Woodward Ave., Ste. 300 

Monroe, MI 48161 

Birmingham, MI 48009 

(734) 241-6470 

(248) 642-0333 

Attorneys for Respondent 

Attorneys for Petitioners 

Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment 

1. 

This matter is pending in the entire tribunal division. 

2. 

The properties involved in this appeal are identified as follows: 

(@ 

Parcel 

No. 

5842-014-015-91, commonly known 

as 

140 

Helle Blvd. 

Dundee, Michigan 48131. 

(b) 

Parcel 

No. 

5842-014-015-30, commonly known 

as 

124 Helle Blvd,

Page 2

Jason C. Long

October 6, 2026

(d 

Parcel 

No. 

5842-040-711-41, 

commonly 

known 

as 

property 

along 

Waterstradt Commerce Dr., Dundee, Michigan 48131. 

These properties are referred to in this Petition as the “Subject Properties.” 

3. 

The Subject Properties are all classified as commercial real property and 

are all located in Monroe County. 

4. 

The values for the Subject Properties established by Respondent's 2026 

March Board of Review set forth on the attached Stipulation Multiple Parcel Form. 

5. 

The 2026 values for the Subject Properties stipulated by the parties for 

settlement purposes are set forth on the attached Stipulated Multiple Parcel Form. 

6. 

Special terms or conditions being proposed by the parties that would 

affect the execution of this Consent Judgment are the following: 

(a) 

All refunds of tax, penalties, and other charges shall be paid within 30 

days from the date of any Judgment entered in this appeal. 

All refunds shall be 

without interest. 

(b) 

All refunds shall be issued payable jointly to Petitioners and delivered 

to Petitioners’ attorneys as follows: Williams Williams Rattner & Plunkett, PC, Attn: 

Jason C. Long, 380 N. Old Woodward Ave., Ste. 300, Birmingham, MI 48009. 

Petitioners and Respondent hereby approve 

this Stipulation 

for Entry 

of 

Consent Judgment and request that the Tribunal enter a Judgment adopting its

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS, LLC; 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS II, LLC; 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS III, LLC; and 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS IV, LLC, 

Docket No. 26-000457 

Petitioners, 

Parcel Nos. 

5842-014-015-91 

v. 

5842-014-015-30 

5842-014-015-90 

DUNDEE TOWNSHIP, 

5842-040-711-41 

Respondent. 

Jason C. Long (P59244) 

WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS, RATTNER 

& PLUNKETT, PC 

380 N. Old Woodward Ave., Ste. 300 

Birmingham, MI 48009 

(248) 642-0333 

Attorneys for Petitioners 

Kerry L. Bondy (P42786) 

PETRANGELO BONDY & CROSSLEY, PC 

212 E. First St. 

Monroe, MI 48161 

(734) 241-6470 

Attorneys for Respondent 

Stipulation Multiple Parcel Form 

1. 

The values for the Subject Properties established by Respondent's 2026 

March Board of Review are as follows: 

Year 

Parcel Number 

True Cash Value | Assessed Value | Taxable Value 

2026 

5842-014-015-91 

10,141,240 

5,070,620 

4,624,534 

2026 

5842-014-015-30 

11,085,000 

5,542,500 

5,271,852 

2026 

5842-014-015-90 

9,632,420 

4,816,210 

4,816,210 

2026 

5842-040-711-41 

18,322,600 

9,161,300 

8,345,640

Page 4

2. 

The 2026 values for the Subject Properties stipulated by the parties for 

settlement purposes are as follows: 

Year 

Parcel Number 

True Cash Value | Assessed Value | Taxable Value 

2026 

5842-014-015-91 

9,720,000 

4,860,000 

4,624,534 

2026 

5842-014-015-30 

9,900,000 

4,950,000 

4,950,000 

2026 

5842-014-015-90 

9,100,000 

4,550,000 

4,550,000 

2026 

5842-040-711-41 

13,500,000 

6,750,000 

6,750,000

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

Docket Number: 26-000457

Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No

Party Filing Document 

Joint

Files

Document Type: Stip for Consent Judgment

Attachment File Name: Dundee Place Apts; Stip for Entry of Consent Jmt

Fee Information

Filing Fee: $ 50.00

Payment Information

Payment: $ 50.00

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906

NOTICE OF JUNE 16- 30, 2027 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER OF 

PROCEDURE

Dundee Place Apartments, LLC; 

Dundee Place Apartments II, LLC; 

Dundee Place,

Petitioner,

v

 

 

Township Of Dundee,

Respondent.

 MTT Docket No. 26-000457

Please be advised that 26-000457 has been placed on a two-week Prehearing General 

Call commencing June 16, 2027. Unless ordered otherwise, parties will be notified at 

least 28 days before they are scheduled to appear. Scheduling will not necessarily 

occur in the order in which the cases are listed below.

Parties are required to submit a valuation disclosure or written notification that no 

valuation disclosure is required by the dates indicated herein. A “valuation disclosure” 

is defined as documentary or other tangible evidence in a property tax proceeding that a 

party relies upon in support of the party’s contention as to the true cash value of the 

subject property or any portion thereof and contains the party’s value conclusion and 

data, valuation methodology, analysis or reasoning. See TTR 203 and TTR 241.

Users who file documents with the Tribunal are advised that filed documents are 

public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tribunal’s Tax Docket 

Lookup. If a user wishes to file a document for consideration by the Tribunal and 

prevent its publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for 

Protective Order under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents 

covered by the order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a 

Protective Order will be published.

In accordance with MCR 1.109(D)(9) and TTR 209, the responsibility for excluding or 

redacting personal identifying information (PII) from all documents filed with or offered to 

the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and their attorneys. The Tribunal is not 

responsible for or required to review, redact, or screen documents at the time of filing 

for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A party, representative, or interested 

person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may request that the Tribunal redact PII 

contained in a previously filed document by submitting a Request for Redactions. The 

Request for Redactions form is available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages 

of the Tribunal’s website.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-000457

Page 2 of 3

Please refer to the Tribunal’s FAQs and Glossary of Terms pages on the Tribunal’s 

website for more information.

IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall:

a. If no valuation disclosure is required, notify the Tribunal and the opposing parties 

in writing within 21 days of entry of this order that no valuation disclosure is being 

filed. The notice shall indicate the reason or reasons why no valuation disclosure 

is required (i.e., exemption claim, etc.).

b. If a valuation disclosure is required, file and exchange their valuation disclosures 

by February 17, 2027. Valuation disclosures will not be admitted into evidence 

unless disclosed and furnished in accordance with this order (even though 

admissible) except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their Prehearing 

Statements by February 17, 2027. Witnesses, with the exception of rebuttal witnesses, 

will not be allowed to testify unless disclosed in the Prehearing Statement and the 

Prehearing Statement is furnished in accordance with this order except upon a finding 

of good cause by the Tribunal. Failure to file the Prehearing Statement may result in 

holding a party or parties in default. See TTR 237. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on 

February 17, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to 

Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged 

by that date. Discovery relative to the valuation disclosure prepared for purposes of 

litigating this case or the valuation expert that prepared that valuation disclosure is not 

permitted during “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on 

June 16, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel 

have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that 

date. “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is limited to the opposing party’s valuation 

disclosure, the opposing party’s valuation expert, and the witnesses identified on the 

opposing party’s Prehearing Statement.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if this case is not scheduled for a date certain 

prehearing conference during the time frame indicated it may be scheduled for a date 

certain prehearing conference at any time subsequent to the completion date for this 

Prehearing General Call. Parties will, however, be notified in writing approximately one 

week before they are scheduled to appear. 

By:_____________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 26-000457

Page 3 of 3

Entered: July 16, 2026 

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date

Page 4

STATE

Page 5

MTT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

JUN 2 2 2026 

LAW OFFICES 

PETRANGELO BONDY & CROSSLEY 

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 

212 EAST FIRST STREET 

MONROE, MICHIGAN 

48161 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

TELEPHONE (734) 241-6470 

TELEFACSIMILE (734) 241-3849 

June 18, 2026 

Samantha Welton, Chief Clerk 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

PO Box 30232 

Lansing, MI 48909 

Re: 

Dundee Place Apartments, LLC; Dundee Place Apartments Il, LLC; Dundee Place 

Apartments lll, LLC; and Dundee Place Apartments IV, LLC vs. Dundee Township 

MTT Docket No. 26-000457 

Dear Ms. Welton: 

Enclosed please find Respondent Dundee Township's Answer to Petitioners’ Petition 

and Affirmative Defenses in the above named matter along with a Proof of Service. 

Very truly yours, 

PETRANGELO BONDY & CROSSLEY 

Professional Corporation 

Kerry LMBondy 

KLB/smr

Page 2

PETRANGELO BONDY & CROSSLEY. PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS, LLC; 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS iI, LLC; 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS Hil, LLC; and 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS IV, LLC, 

Petitioners, 

vs. 

Docket No. 26-000457 

DUNDEE TOWNSHIP, 

Respondent. 

JASON C. LONG (P59244) 

KERRY L. BONDY (P42786) 

JEROME P. PESICK (P29039) 

PETRANGELO BONDY & CROSSLEY, P.C. 

WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS, RATTNER & PLUNKETT, P.C. 

Attorney for Respondent 

Attorneys for Petitioner 

212 E. First St. 

380 N. Old Woodward Ave., Ste. 300 

Monroe, MI 48161 

Birmingham, Ml 48009 

(734) 241-6470 

(248) 642-0333 

RESPONDENT'S ANSWER TO PETITION 

NOW COMES Respondent Dundee Township by and through its attorney, Kerry L. Bondy 

in answer to Petitioners’ Petition and states as follows: 

1. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegation contained in paragraph 1 

of the Petition for the reason that Respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to 

form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the allegation. 

2, 

Respondent admits the allegations contained in paragraph 2 of the Petition.

Page 3

PETRANGELO BONDY & CROSSLEY. PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 

4. 

Respondent admits the allegations contained in paragraph 4 of the Petition. 

5, 

Respondent admits the allegations contained in paragraph 5 of the Petition. 

6. 

Respondent admits the allegations contained in paragraph 6 of the Petition. 

7. 

Respondent admits the allegations contained in paragraph 7 of the Petition. 

8. 

Respondent admits the allegations contained in paragraph 8 of the Petition. 

9. 

Respondent admits the allegations contained in paragraph 9 of the Petition. 

10. 

Respondent denies the allegation contained in paragraph 10 of the Petition for 

the reason that it is untrue. 

11. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegation contained in paragraph 

11 of the Petition for the reason that Respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to 

form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the allegation. 

12, 

Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegation contained in paragraph 

12 of the Petition for the reason that Respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to 

form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the allegation. 

13. 

Respondent denies the allegation contained in paragraph 13 of the Petition for 

the reason that it is untrue. 

14. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegation contained in paragraph 

14 of the Petition for the reason that Respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to 

form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the allegation. 

WHEREFORE, Respondent Dundee Township hereby requests that this Honorable 

Tribunal dismiss the Petition filed 

in the above named matter, affirm the assessment of 

Respondent and award costs and attorney fees-to Respondent as appropriate. 

PETRANGELO|BOMDY 

& CROSSLEY, P.C. 

June 18, 2026 

: 

{C

Page 4

PETRANGELO BONDY & CROSSLEY. PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

NOW COMES Respondent Dundee Township and for its Affirmative Defenses states as 

follows: 

1. 

The appropriate methods of assessing the Subject Properties were used and those 

methods conform to the methods used to assess similarly situated property in the State. 

2. 

Upon information and 

belief, Petitioners are four separate and distinct entities 

which separately own the four individual properties which are the subject of the appeal as of 

the applicable tax day and therefore this Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to hear this appeal 

as to four separately owned parcels pursuant to MCL 205.735(a) et seq. 

3 

Petitioners 

lack standing 

te file the 

Petition 

as to 

properties for which 

the 

Petitioners are not the record owner. 

4. 

Respondent reserves the right to raise additional affirmative defenses as they 

become known. 

WHEREFORE, Respondent Dundee Township requests that 

this Honorable Tribunal 

dismiss the Petition filed in the above named matter, affirm the assessments of Respondent and 

award costs and attorney fees to Respondent as appropriate. 

PETRANGELO BONDY & CROSSLEY, P.C. 

June 18, 2026 

\Cs~ <M 

By: 

Kerry |. Bondy 

ery 

for Respoldent 

answerdundeeplacepd

Page 5

PETRANGELO BONDY & CROSSLEY. PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS, LLC; 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS II, LLC; 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS lI, LLC; and 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS IV, LLC, 

Petitioners, 

vs. 

Docket No. 26-000457 

DUNDEE TOWNSHIP, 

Respondent. 

JASON C. LONG (P59244) 

KERRY L. BONDY (P42786) 

JEROME P. PESICK (P29039)

Page 6

PETRAN

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS, LLC; 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS II, LLC; 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS III, LLC; and 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS IV, LLC, 

Docket No. 26-000457 

Petitioners, 

Parcel Nos. 

5842-014-015-91 

v. 

5842-014-015-30 

5842-014-015-90 

DUNDEE TOWNSHIP, 

5842-040-711-41 

Respondent. 

Jason C. Long (P59244) 

Jerome P. Pesick (P29039) 

WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS, RATTNER 

& PLUNKETT, PC 

380 N. Old Woodward Ave., Ste. 300 

Birmingham, MI 48009 

(248) 642-0333 

Attorneys for Petitioners 

Proof of Service of Petition and Notice of Docket Number 

Monica Athanas states that she personally served copies of the Entire Tribunal 

Property Tax Petition, Notice of Docket Number, and this Proof of Service, on the 

persons identified below, by the means identified below, on Thursday, May 21, 2026. 

Persons served by certified mail: 

Clerk 

Assessor 

Dundee Township 

Dundee Township 

179 Main St. 

179 Main St.

Page 2

Treasurer 

Secretary of the Board 

State of Michigan 

Dundee Community Schools 

Dep't of Treasury 

420 Ypsilanti St. 

Lansing, MI 48922 

Dundee, MI 48131 

Agee haa 

Monica Athanas 

This Proof of Service was signed and sworn before me on Thursday, May 21, 2026. 

jo 

# 

‘ 

- 

ya 

i 

{re 

otary Public 

/ y 

i 

AS 

2, 

Ayres 06 

ft 

“ite, SE 

Hw

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

1 of 1

Docket #: 26-000457

Party Filing Document

Party Filing Document: 

 Petitioner

 Petitioner

 

 

If 'other', Identify: 

File

Document Type: 

 

 

fuFile:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

1 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS, LLC; 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS II, LLC; 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS III, LLC; and 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS IV, LLC, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Docket No. 26- 

 

Petitioners, 

 

 

 

 

Parcel Nos. 5842-014-015-91 

v. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5842-014-015-30 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5842-014-015-90 

DUNDEE TOWNSHIP, 

 

 

 

 

 

5842-040-711-41 

 

 

Respondent.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jason C. Long (P59244) 

Jerome P. Pesick (P29039) 

WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS, RATTNER 

& PLUNKETT, PC 

380 N. Old Woodward Ave., Ste. 300 

Birmingham, MI 48009 

(248) 642-0333 

Attorneys for Petitioners 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition 

 

Petitioners Dundee Place Apartments, LLC; Dundee Place Apartments II, 

LLC; Dundee Place Apartments III, LLC; and Dundee Place Apartments IV, LLC, by 

and through their attorneys, Williams Williams Rattner & Plunkett, PC, state as 

follows for their Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition. 

The Parties 

1. 

Petitioners are commonly controlled Michigan limited liability 

companies, all of which have their registered offices located at 321 Woodland Pass, 

Ste. 300, E. Lansing, Michigan 48823.

Page 2

2 

2. 

Respondent Dundee Township is a Michigan general law township with 

its principal offices located at 179 Main St., Dundee, Michigan 48131. 

The Subject Properties 

3. 

Petitioners are parties in interest in properties identified as: 

(a) 

Parcel No. 5842-014-015-91, commonly known as 140 Helle Blvd., 

Dundee, Michigan 48131. 

(b) 

Parcel No. 5842-014-015-30, commonly known as 124 Helle Blvd., 

Dundee, Michigan, 48131. 

(c) 

Parcel No. 5842-015-015-90, commonly known as property along Helle 

Blvd., Dundee, Michigan 48131. And 

(d) 

Parcel No. 5842-040-711-41, commonly known as property along 

Waterstradt Commerce Dr., Dundee, Michigan 48131. 

These properties are referred to in this Petition as the “Subject Properties.” 

4. 

The Subject Properties are physically contiguous. 

5. 

The Subject Properties are used as an apartment complex with 

consolidated office, management, and administrative functions. 

6. 

The Subject Properties are located in Monroe County and are within the 

Dundee Community Schools public school district. 

The 2025 Property Tax Assessments 

7. 

Respondent possesses jurisdiction to assess and collect property taxes 

for the Subject Properties.

Page 3

3 

8. 

For the 2026 tax year, Respondent classified the Subject Properties as 

commercial real property. 

9. 

For the 2026 tax year, Respondent established the Subject Properties’ 

assessments for property taxes in the amounts set forth on the attached Multiple 

Parcel Form. 

10. 

Petitioners contend that lawful assessments of the Subject Properties 

for the 2026 tax year cannot exceed the amounts set forth on the attached Multiple 

Parcel Form. 

11. 

The amounts in dispute therefore equal the amounts set forth on the 

attached Multiple Parcel Form. 

12. 

This Petition presents issues involving the Subject Properties’ valuation 

for property tax assessment purposes. Petitioners do not believe that this Petition 

presents any issues arising out of “additions” or “losses” as the General Property Tax 

Act, MCL 211.1 et seq. (the “GPTA”), defines those terms, but reserve their rights to 

assert issues involving losses should information supporting such issues become 

available. 

13. 

The Subject Properties’ 2026 assessments (a) violate the Michigan 

Constitution, the GPTA, and other Michigan law, (b) are based on erroneous 

principles and information, (c) are based on the misapplication of valuation 

principles, and (d) otherwise violate Petitioners’ rights.

Page 4

4 

14. 

Petitioners do not assert that the Subject Properties’ 2026 assessments 

are not uniform aside from the lack of uniformity resulting from Respondent 

overestimating the Subject Properties’ values. 

Conclusion and Request for Relief 

 

WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests that this honorable Tribunal 

enter judgment revising the Subject Properties’ 2026 assessments to amounts that do 

not exceed the values set forth as Petitioner’s contentions on the attached Multiple 

Parcel Form and granting Petitioners all other relief to which they are entitled under 

Michigan law. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Respectfully Submitted, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WILLIAMS WILLIAMS RATTNER 

 

 

 

 

 

 

& PLUNKETT, PC 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By: /s/ Jason C. Long 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Jason C. Long (P59244) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Jerome P. Pesick (P29039) 

Dated: April 1, 2026 

 

 

Attorneys for Petitioners

Page 5

5 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS, LLC; 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS II, LLC; 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS III, LLC; and 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS IV, LLC, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Docket No. 26- 

 

Petitioners, 

 

 

 

 

Parcel Nos. 5842-014-015-91 

v. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5842-014-015-30 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5842-014-015-90 

DUNDEE TOWNSHIP, 

 

 

 

 

 

5842-040-711-41 

 

 

Respondent.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jason C. Long (P59244) 

Jerome P. Pesick (P29039) 

WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS, RATTNER 

& PLUNKETT, PC 

380 N. Old Woodward Ave., Ste. 300 

Birmingham, MI 48009 

(248) 642-0333 

Attorneys for Petitioners 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Petition Multiple Parcel Form 

 

1. 

The values for the Subject Properties established by Respondent’s Board 

of Review are: 

Year 

Parcel Number 

True Cash Value

Page 6

6 

2.

Page 7

Exh

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Dundee Place Apartments, LLC; Dundee Place Apartments II, LLC; Dundee Place, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 26-000457

Township Of Dundee, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: __Tribunal Clerk________

Entered: May 21, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

1 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS, LLC; 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS II, LLC; 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS III, LLC; and 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS IV, LLC, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Docket No. 26- 

 

Petitioners, 

 

 

 

 

Parcel Nos. 5842-014-015-91 

v. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5842-014-015-30 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5842-014-015-90 

DUNDEE TOWNSHIP, 

 

 

 

 

 

5842-040-711-41 

 

 

Respondent.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jason C. Long (P59244) 

Jerome P. Pesick (P29039) 

WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS, RATTNER 

& PLUNKETT, PC 

380 N. Old Woodward Ave., Ste. 300 

Birmingham, MI 48009 

(248) 642-0333 

Attorneys for Petitioners 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition 

 

Petitioners Dundee Place Apartments, LLC; Dundee Place Apartments II, 

LLC; Dundee Place Apartments III, LLC; and Dundee Place Apartments IV, LLC, by 

and through their attorneys, Williams Williams Rattner & Plunkett, PC, state as 

follows for their Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition. 

The Parties 

1. 

Petitioners are commonly controlled Michigan limited liability 

companies, all of which have their registered offices located at 321 Woodland Pass, 

Ste. 300, E. Lansing, Michigan 48823.

Page 2

2 

2. 

Respondent Dundee Township is a Michigan general law township with 

its principal offices located at 179 Main St., Dundee, Michigan 48131. 

The Subject Properties 

3. 

Petitioners are parties in interest in properties identified as: 

(a) 

Parcel No. 5842-014-015-91, commonly known as 140 Helle Blvd., 

Dundee, Michigan 48131. 

(b) 

Parcel No. 5842-014-015-30, commonly known as 124 Helle Blvd., 

Dundee, Michigan, 48131. 

(c) 

Parcel No. 5842-015-015-90, commonly known as property along Helle 

Blvd., Dundee, Michigan 48131. And 

(d) 

Parcel No. 5842-040-711-41, commonly known as property along 

Waterstradt Commerce Dr., Dundee, Michigan 48131. 

These properties are referred to in this Petition as the “Subject Properties.” 

4. 

The Subject Properties are physically contiguous. 

5. 

The Subject Properties are used as an apartment complex with 

consolidated office, management, and administrative functions. 

6. 

The Subject Properties are located in Monroe County and are within the 

Dundee Community Schools public school district. 

The 2025 Property Tax Assessments 

7. 

Respondent possesses jurisdiction to assess and collect property taxes 

for the Subject Properties.

Page 3

3 

8. 

For the 2026 tax year, Respondent classified the Subject Properties as 

commercial real property. 

9. 

For the 2026 tax year, Respondent established the Subject Properties’ 

assessments for property taxes in the amounts set forth on the attached Multiple 

Parcel Form. 

10. 

Petitioners contend that lawful assessments of the Subject Properties 

for the 2026 tax year cannot exceed the amounts set forth on the attached Multiple 

Parcel Form. 

11. 

The amounts in dispute therefore equal the amounts set forth on the 

attached Multiple Parcel Form. 

12. 

This Petition presents issues involving the Subject Properties’ valuation 

for property tax assessment purposes. Petitioners do not believe that this Petition 

presents any issues arising out of “additions” or “losses” as the General Property Tax 

Act, MCL 211.1 et seq. (the “GPTA”), defines those terms, but reserve their rights to 

assert issues involving losses should information supporting such issues become 

available. 

13. 

The Subject Properties’ 2026 assessments (a) violate the Michigan 

Constitution, the GPTA, and other Michigan law, (b) are based on erroneous 

principles and information, (c) are based on the misapplication of valuation 

principles, and (d) otherwise violate Petitioners’ rights.

Page 4

4 

14. 

Petitioners do not assert that the Subject Properties’ 2026 assessments 

are not uniform aside from the lack of uniformity resulting from Respondent 

overestimating the Subject Properties’ values. 

Conclusion and Request for Relief 

 

WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests that this honorable Tribunal 

enter judgment revising the Subject Properties’ 2026 assessments to amounts that do 

not exceed the values set forth as Petitioner’s contentions on the attached Multiple 

Parcel Form and granting Petitioners all other relief to which they are entitled under 

Michigan law. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Respectfully Submitted, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WILLIAMS WILLIAMS RATTNER 

 

 

 

 

 

 

& PLUNKETT, PC 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By: /s/ Jason C. Long 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Jason C. Long (P59244) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Jerome P. Pesick (P29039) 

Dated: April 1, 2026 

 

 

Attorneys for Petitioners

Page 5

5 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS, LLC; 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS II, LLC; 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS III, LLC; and 

DUNDEE PLACE APARTMENTS IV, LLC, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Docket No. 26- 

 

Petitioners, 

 

 

 

 

Parcel Nos. 5842-014-015-91 

v. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5842-014-015-30 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5842-014-015-90 

DUNDEE TOWNSHIP, 

 

 

 

 

 

5842-040-711-41 

 

 

Respondent.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jason C. Long (P59244) 

Jerome P. Pesick (P29039) 

WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS, RATTNER 

& PLUNKETT, PC 

380 N. Old Woodward Ave., Ste. 300 

Birmingham, MI 48009 

(248) 642-0333 

Attorneys for Petitioners 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Petition Multiple Parcel Form 

 

1. 

The values for the Subject Properties established by Respondent’s Board 

of Review are: 

Year 

Parcel Number 

True Cash Value

Page 6

6 

2.

Page 7

Exh

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: Organization

First Name/Company Name

M.I.

Last Name

Dundee Place Apartments, LLC; Dundee Place Apartments II, 

LLC; Dundee Place Apartments III, LLC; Dundee Place 

Apartments IV, LLC

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

c/o 380 N. Old Woodward Ave.

Ste. 300

City or Town

Birmingham

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48009

Telephone Number

2486420333

Fax Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

jlong@wwrplaw.com

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Jason

M.I.

C

Last Name

Long

Firm Name (if any)

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

380 N Old Woodward Ave

Suite 300

City or Town

Birmingham

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48009

Telephone Number

248-642-0333

Fax Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

jlong@wwrplaw.com

Section 5: Issue

Please designate one: 

Valuation – Fill out Sections 4, 5, & 6 below

Section 6: Subject Property Information

How many parcels are you 

appealing?4

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

140 Helle Blvd.

Dundee Twp.

Michigan

48131

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

Township Of Dundee (MONROE)

County

Monroe

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? Yes

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

Section 7: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply)

True Cash and Taxable Values

Section 8: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

5842-014-015-91

Classification of Property: Real 

Commercial

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

5070620

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

4624534

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

8640000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

4320000

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Parcel Number:

5842-014-015-30

Classification of Property: Real 

Commercial

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

5542500

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

5271852

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

7920000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

3960000

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Parcel Number:

5842-014-015-90

Classification of Property: Real 

Commercial

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

5816210

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

4816210

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

5040000

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

2520000

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Parcel Number:

5842-040-711-41

Classification of Property: Real 

Commercial

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

9161300

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

8345640

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

6480000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

3240000

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Section 9: Assessment Information

Type of Tax Assessment(s):

Assessment Number(s):

Check all that is being appealed: 

Check what action prompted this appeal:

If “other,” please explain:

Section 10: Special Assessment Information

Type of Special Assessment:

Did you protest the special assessment at the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? 

If Yes, what was the date of the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll?

If No, please explain:

Section 11: Classification Information

Parcel Number:

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: 

What do you believe is the property’s classification?

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

If improved property, how is the property currently being used?

If improved property, for what use was the property designed?

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.