Dg Zulu (Multi) 1 LLC, Petitioner Vs. Township Of Perry, Respondent

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

DG ZULU (MULTI) 1 LLC, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-001621 

 

Perry Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Marcus L. Abood 

 

 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT 

 

CONSENT JUDGMENT 

 

The Tribunal has reviewed the Stipulation and finds that it comports with the mandates 

of State law.1 As a result, the Tribunal shall enter the parties’ Stipulation. Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment including all 

attachments, terms and conditions is GRANTED and ADOPTED, unless otherwise 

indicated. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with maintaining the assessment 

rolls for the tax years at issue shall correct or cause the assessment rolls to be 

corrected to reflect the property’s true cash and taxable values as provided in this 

Consent Judgment within 20 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment.2 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with collecting or refunding the 

affected taxes shall collect taxes and any applicable interest or issue a refund as 

required by the Consent Judgment within 28 days of the entry of the Consent 

Judgment. If a refund is warranted, it shall, unless otherwise indicated, include a 

proportionate share of any property tax administration fees paid and of penalty and 

interest paid on delinquent taxes. The refund shall also, unless otherwise indicated, 

separately indicate the amount of the taxes, fees, penalties, and interest being 

refunded. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been unlawfully paid shall, unless 

otherwise indicated, bear interest from the date of payment to the date of judgment and 

the judgment shall bear interest to the date of its payment. A sum determined by the 

Tribunal to have been underpaid shall not bear interest for any time period prior to 28 

days after the issuance of this Consent Judgment. Pursuant to MCL 205.737, interest 

shall accrue (i) after December 31, 2013, through June 30, 2016, at the rate of 4.25%, 

(ii) after June 30, 2016, through December 31, 2016, at the rate of 4.40%, (iii) after 

December 31, 2016, through June 30, 2017, at the rate of 4.50%, (iv) after June 30, 

 

1 See MCL 211.27a. 

2 See MCL 205.755.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-001621 

Page 2 of 2 

 

2017, through December 31, 2017, at the rate of 4.70%, (v) after December 31, 2017, 

through June 30, 2018, at the rate of 5.15%, (vi) after June 30, 2018, through December 

31, 2018, at the rate of 5.41%, (vii) after December 31, 2018, through June 30, 2019, at 

the rate of 5.9%, (viii) after June 30, 2019, through December 31, 2019, at the rate of 

6.39%, (ix) after December 31, 2019, through June 30, 2020, at the rate of 6.40%, (x) 

after June 30 2020, through December 31, 2020, at the rate of 5.63%, (xi) after 

December 31, 2020, through June 30, 2022, at the rate of 4.25%, (xii) after June 30, 

2022, through December 31, 2022, at the rate of 4.27%, (xiii) after December 31, 2022, 

through June 30, 2023, at the rate of 5.65%, (xiv) after June 30, 2023, through 

December 31, 2023, at the rate of 8.25%, (xv) after December 31, 2023, through June 

30, 2024, at the rate of 9.30%, (xvi) after June 30, 2024, through December 31, 2024, at 

the rate of 9.50%, (xvii) after December 31, 2024, through June 30, 2025, at the rate of 

9.47%, (xviii) after June 30, 2025, through December 31, 2025, at the rate of 8.66%, 

and (xix) after December 31, 2025, through June 30, 2026, at a rate of 8.48%. 

 

This Consent Judgment resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. 

 

See docket look up for a copy of stipulation and for any possible refund paragraph. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By

 

 

Entered: December 30, 2025 

gc 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

December 29, 2025 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

P.O. Box 30232 

Lansing, MI 48909 

 

DG ZULU (MULTI) 1 LLC v. Township of Perry 

MTT Docket No. 25-001621 

Parcel No.: 014-70-001-001 

Tax Year: 2025 

 

Re: Answer and Joint Stipulation in accordance with Tribunal’s Order of Adjournment entered 

December 23, 2025. 

 

Dear Tribunal: 

Pursuant to the Tribunal’s Order of Adjournment entered December 23, 2025, Petitioner hereby files 

the following documents: 

1. With the Respondent's approval, Respondent’s Answer to the Petition; and 

2. Executed Joint Stipulation. 

These filings are submitted in compliance with the Tribunal’s directive that the parties’ stipulation 

agreement and Respondent’s Answer be filed within fourteen (14) days of the Order. 

 

Petitioner respectfully requests that the Tribunal adopt the stipulated values and enter a Consent 

Judgement resolving this appeal for tax year 2025. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 

/s/ Sarah R. Belloli 

 

Sarah R. Belloli 

Ryan, LLC 

Petitioner’s Representative 

 

 

CC: assessor@perrytownship-mi.us 

 centralmichiganassessing@gmail.com 

 

101 West Big Beaver 

Suite 945 

Troy, Michigan 48226 

Tel. 313.230.0104 

Fax 313.230.0114 

www.ryan.com

Page 2

ie 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

DG ZULU (MULTI) 

1 LLC, 

i 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner, 

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-001621 

Township of Perry, 

, 

Respondent. 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX ANSWER 

1s 

X 

Admit ___ Deny. 

If denied, state the parcel number for the property identified 

on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition for the tax year or years at issue: 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Answer 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

2. 

X__ Admit 

Deny. 

If denied, the property identified on the Entire Tribunal 

Property Tax Petitionis ____ real ___ personal. 

3. 

Admit ___ Deny. 

If denied, identify the contiguous and non-contiguous 

parcels by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

4, 

Admit ___ Deny. 

If denied, identify the parcel or parcels of personal property 

that are not located on a parcel of real property under appeal by parcel number 

(attach additional page if necessary): 

5. 

Admit ___ Deny. 

a. 

If denied, state when the personal property statements were filed, if at all: 

b. 

On what date did the March Board of Review commence: 

6. 

_X_ Admit ___ Deny. 

If denied, state the classification of the property identified 

on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition for the tax year or years at issue: 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

- 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 

- 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 

- Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 25-001621 

Page 2 of 4 

7. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

___Admit __ Deny. 

If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent 

relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): 

Admit 

Deny 

Neither Admit Nor Deny. 

If denied, list the separate 

facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional 

page if necessary): 

Admit 

Deny 

Neither Admit Nor Deny. 

If denied, state the facts upon 

which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if 

necessary): 

_X_Admit __Deny. 

If denied, in what County are the property or properties 

located in and what is the address of the property or properties: 

X Admit ___ Deny. 

If denied, what is the applicable local governmental unit: 

X 

Admit 

Deny 

Neither Admit Nor Deny. 

If denied, list the separate facts 

upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if 

necessary): 

If the property's taxable value is at issue, was there an addition or loss for 

purposes of establishing the property's taxable value for the tax year or years at 

issue? ___ Yes _X No.

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 25-001621 

Page 3 of 4 

14. 

Admit 

Deny 

_X 

Neither Admit Nor Deny. 

If denied, 

facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial 

page if necessary): 

list the separate 

(attach additional 

15. 

Admit 

Deny 

Xx 

Neither Admit Nor Deny. 

If denied, list the separate 

facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the

Page 5

MTT

Page 6

G

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

December 29, 2025 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

P.O. Box 30232 

Lansing, MI 48909 

 

DG ZULU (MULTI) 1 LLC v. Township of Perry 

MTT Docket No. 25-001621 

Parcel No.: 014-70-001-001 

Tax Year: 2025 

 

Re: Answer and Joint Stipulation in accordance with Tribunal’s Order of Adjournment entered 

December 23, 2025. 

 

Dear Tribunal: 

Pursuant to the Tribunal’s Order of Adjournment entered December 23, 2025, Petitioner hereby files 

the following documents: 

1. With the Respondent's approval, Respondent’s Answer to the Petition; and 

2. Executed Joint Stipulation. 

These filings are submitted in compliance with the Tribunal’s directive that the parties’ stipulation 

agreement and Respondent’s Answer be filed within fourteen (14) days of the Order. 

 

Petitioner respectfully requests that the Tribunal adopt the stipulated values and enter a Consent 

Judgement resolving this appeal for tax year 2025. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 

/s/ Sarah R. Belloli 

 

Sarah R. Belloli 

Ryan, LLC 

Petitioner’s Representative 

 

 

CC: assessor@perrytownship-mi.us 

 centralmichiganassessing@gmail.com 

 

101 West Big Beaver 

Suite 945 

Troy, Michigan 48226 

Tel. 313.230.0104 

Fax 313.230.0114 

www.ryan.com

Page 2

ie 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

DG ZULU (MULTI) 

1 LLC, 

i 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner, 

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-001621 

Township of Perry, 

, 

Respondent. 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX ANSWER 

1s 

X 

Admit ___ Deny. 

If denied, state the parcel number for the property identified 

on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition for the tax year or years at issue: 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Answer 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

2. 

X__ Admit 

Deny. 

If denied, the property identified on the Entire Tribunal 

Property Tax Petitionis ____ real ___ personal. 

3. 

Admit ___ Deny. 

If denied, identify the contiguous and non-contiguous 

parcels by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

4, 

Admit ___ Deny. 

If denied, identify the parcel or parcels of personal property 

that are not located on a parcel of real property under appeal by parcel number 

(attach additional page if necessary): 

5. 

Admit ___ Deny. 

a. 

If denied, state when the personal property statements were filed, if at all: 

b. 

On what date did the March Board of Review commence: 

6. 

_X_ Admit ___ Deny. 

If denied, state the classification of the property identified 

on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition for the tax year or years at issue: 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

- 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 

- 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 

- Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 25-001621 

Page 2 of 4 

7. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

___Admit __ Deny. 

If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent 

relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): 

Admit 

Deny 

Neither Admit Nor Deny. 

If denied, list the separate 

facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional 

page if necessary): 

Admit 

Deny 

Neither Admit Nor Deny. 

If denied, state the facts upon 

which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if 

necessary): 

_X_Admit __Deny. 

If denied, in what County are the property or properties 

located in and what is the address of the property or properties: 

X Admit ___ Deny. 

If denied, what is the applicable local governmental unit: 

X 

Admit 

Deny 

Neither Admit Nor Deny. 

If denied, list the separate facts 

upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if 

necessary): 

If the property's taxable value is at issue, was there an addition or loss for 

purposes of establishing the property's taxable value for the tax year or years at 

issue? ___ Yes _X No.

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 25-001621 

Page 3 of 4 

14. 

Admit 

Deny 

_X 

Neither Admit Nor Deny. 

If denied, 

facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial 

page if necessary): 

list the separate 

(attach additional 

15. 

Admit 

Deny 

Xx 

Neither Admit Nor Deny. 

If denied, list the separate 

facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the

Page 5

MTT

Page 6

G

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 

 

DG ZULU (Multi) 1 LLC, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-001621 

 

Perry Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Marcus L. Abood 

 

ORDER OF ADJOURNMENT 

 

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Respondent was placed 

in default on September 30, 2025, because Respondent failed to file an answer. The 

Tribunal extended the time for Respondent to cure the default by an additional 14 days 

on November 3, 2025, and it failed to respond or submit the required filing(s). The 

Tribunal found that scheduling a default hearing was warranted. 

 

On December 11, 2025, a telephonic status conference was scheduled for December 

23, 2025, to discuss the processing of the case for default hearing. At the status 

conference, Petitioner disclosed to the Tribunal that the parties have come to a 

stipulation agreement. In addition, Petitioner noted that she has received Respondent’s 

answer to the petition. Petitioner is amenable to submitting the signed stipulation and 

Respondent’s answer (with Respondent’s acknowledgment and permission) to the 

Tribunal to effectuate the necessary procedural requirements. Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that the scheduled December 23, 2025 status conference is 

ADJOURNED. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ stipulation agreement and Respondent’s 

answer shall be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of the date of this order. 

 

Failure to timely file the stipulation agreement and Respondent’s answer shall result in 

rescheduling the status conference for the purpose of processing the case for default 

hearing. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By 

 

 

Entered: December 23, 2025

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-001621 

Page 2 of 2 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

DG ZULU (MULTI) 1 LLC, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-001621 

 

Perry Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Marcus L. Abood 

 

NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE 

 

A telephonic status conference has been scheduled to commence in the above-

captioned case: 

 

DATE: 

December 23, 2025 

TIME: 

10:00 a.m. 

JOIN BY PHONE: 

1-248-509-0316 

ACCESS CODE: 

412112628 

 

During the status conference, the Tribunal will discuss the processing of the case for 

hearing and set dates for the completion of discovery, the filing of dispositive motions, 

the filing of Prehearing Statements, and the scheduling of the Prehearing Conference, if 

applicable. 

 

Failure to participate in the status conference shall result in the holding of that party in 

default and may lead to dismissal of the case or the conducting of a show cause or 

default hearing, as provided by TTR 237. 

By 

 

 

Date Entered: December 11, 2025 

gc

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-001621 

Page 2 of 2 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

DG ZULU (MULTI) 1 LLC, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-001621 

 

Perry Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER FOR DEFAULT HEARING 

 

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Respondent was placed 

in default on September 30, 2025, because Respondent failed to file an answer. The 

Tribunal extended the time for Respondent to cure the default by an additional 14 days 

on November 3, 2025, and it has failed to respond or submit the required filing(s). 

Given this failure, the Tribunal finds that Respondent’s violation was willful. It also 

establishes a history of deliberate delay and refusing to comply with Tribunal rules and 

orders, both of which have prejudiced Petitioner. As a result, giving careful 

consideration to the Grimm factors and considering all options in determining what 

sanction is just and proper, the Tribunal finds that scheduling a default hearing is 

warranted, and a lesser sanction would not be appropriate or better serve the interests 

of justice.1 Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that a default hearing shall be scheduled in the normal course.2 

 

 

 

Entered: December 2, 2025 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

kac 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). Though Grimm was specific to the sanction 

of dismissal, the cases cited by the Court, and the reasoning behind its adoption of the factors set forth 

therein are not so narrow. The factors apply equally to default judgements, or in the case of the Tribunal 

proceedings, the conducting of a default hearing. See Bass v Combs, 238 Mich App 16 (1999), overruled 

in part on other grounds by Dimmitt & Owens Fin, Inc v Deloitte & Touche (ISC), LLC, 481 Mich 618 

(2008), Vicencio v Ramirez, 211 Mich App 501 (1995), and Traxler v Ford Motor Co, 227 Mich App 276 

(1998). See also TTR 237. 

2 A “default hearing" is “a hearing at which the defaulted party is precluded from presenting any testimony, 

offering any evidence, and examining the other party's witnesses.” TTR 203(e).

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-001621 

Page 2 of 2 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

DG ZULU (MULTI) 1 LLC, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-001621 

 

Perry Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR RESPONDENT TO CURE DEFAULT 

 

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that it entered an order 

holding Respondent in default on September 30, 2025, because Respondent failed to 

file an answer.1 Respondent was required to cure the default within 14 days. 

Respondent has had ample time to comply, yet has failed to respond or submit the 

required filings. Though the Tribunal finds an extension of time to cure the default 

appropriate, Respondent’s failure to comply with Tribunal orders and its Rules of 

Practice and Procedure has established a history of deliberate delay that would justify 

the scheduling of a default hearing for failure to timely comply with this order.2 

Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that the time for Respondent to cure the default is EXTENDED. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent must complete the following to cure the 

default: (1) file an answer,3 (2) file a Motion to Set Aside Default, (3) pay the $50.00 fee 

required for the filing of the motion, and (4) file proof the motion and answer were 

served on Petitioner. 

 

The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this order.4 

 

 

1 The order further stated, “Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being 

required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 

2 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 

3 Tribunal rules and forms can be found online at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 

4 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-001621 

Page 2 of 2 

 

Failure to comply with this order may result in the scheduling of a default hearing, as 

provided by TTR 237.5 

 

 

Entered: November 3, 2025 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

kac 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

 

 

 

 

5 See also MCL 205.732.

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

DG ZULU 1 LLC, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-001621 

 

Perry Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

CORRECTED ORDER HOLDING RESPONDENT IN DEFAULT 

 

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in this case and finds that Respondent was held in 

default on September 2, 2025, for failing to file an answer. Upon further review, it was 

discovered that the Tribunal erred in the entry of this order as Respondent was never 

properly served the Order of Default. Consequently, the Tribunal finds it is appropriate 

to reissue the September 2, 2025 Order of Default. 

 

Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is held in DEFAULT. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent must complete the following to cure the 

default: file an answer and proof the answer was served on Petitioner with the Tribunal. 

The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this order.1 

 

Failure to comply with this order will result in Respondent being required to file a motion 

to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). 

 

 

 

Entered: September 30, 2025 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

kac 

 

 

1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-001621 

Page 2 of 2 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

DG ZULU (MULTI) 1 LLC,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

 

MTT Docket No. 25-001621

Township Of Perry,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Respondent has failed to file an answer. As such, Respondent must file and serve an 

answer to the petition and file proof demonstrating service of the answer within 14 days 

of the entry of this order. See TTR 235 and 227. Tribunal rules and information on 

Entire Tribunal answers can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.i 

Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By:_______________________________

Entered: September 2, 2025

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

i “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-001621

Page 2 of 6

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5)

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

DG ZULU (MULTI) 1 LLC,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

 

MTT Docket No. 25-001621

Township Of Perry,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Respondent has failed to file an answer. As such, Respondent must file and serve an 

answer to the petition and file proof demonstrating service of the answer within 14 days 

of the entry of this order. See TTR 235 and 227. Tribunal rules and information on 

Entire Tribunal answers can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.ii 

Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By:_______________________________

Entered: September 2, 2025

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email

Page 4

M

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

101 West Big Beaver 

Suite 945 

Troy, Michigan 48084 

an 

A 

Tel. 313.230.0104 

topovetive Solutions 

Fax 313.230.0114 

to Toxing Problems, 

ryan.com 

RECEIVED 

June 27, 2025 

JUN 3 0 2075 

Re: 

DG ZULU (MULTI) 

I LLC v Perry Township 

MICH 

MOAHR Docket No.: 25-001621 

CHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Dear Chief Clerk: 

Petitioner hereby serves all parties provided for in Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule 221 with its 

petition in this matter. Pursuant to the rule, the petition notes the docket number assigned by the 

tribunal and is served within 45-days of the issuance of the notice of docket number. 

If you have any questions regarding the enclosed pleading, please do not hesitate to contact our 

office directly at (313) 230-0104. 

Respectfully, 

oh OBIE 

Sarah R. Belloli 

Ryan, LLC 

cc: 

State of Michigan Treasurer 

MORRICE AREA SCHOOLS 

Shiawassee County Equalization Director 

Shiawassee County Clerk 

Perry Township Assessor 

Perry Township Clerk

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFARIS 

MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

DG ZULU (MULTI) 

1 LLC 

Petitioner, 

\% 

MOAHR Docket No.: 25-001621 

Perry Township 

Respondent, 

Proof of Service 

Joan Kleiner, being duly sworn, deposes and says that on June 27, 2025 

, she served a copy of the 

Petition relative to the above-captioned matter, via first class mail, upon: 

State of Michigan Treasurer 

MORRICE AREA SCHOOLS 

Department of Treasury 

School Board Secretary 

Treasury Building 

111 E. Mason Street 

430 West Allegan 

Morrice, MI 48857 

Lansing, MI 48922 

Shiawassee County Equalization Director 

Shiawassee County Clerk 

208 N Shiawassee St 

208 N Shiawassee St, 2nd Floor 

Corunna, MI 48857 

Corunna, MI 48817 

and via certified mail, return receipt requested, upon: 

Perry Township Assessor 

Perry Township Clerk 

2770 Ellsworth Rd 

2770 Ellsworth Rd 

Perry, MI 48872 

Perry, M1 48872 

With proper postage affixed thereto. 

Qsan Aloseer 

Wan Kleiner

Page 3

This envelope is only 

yo

ed h

You can help us get 

items securely. Ne 

elas srt fe Pt 

LA 

® 

hm EN... o_o 

| 

i 

RETO, WRN 

1/24 15:47 

£3 

LU/ 

ad 

 Puilto open. 

Check your FedEx Expr

(TY 

\ 

ty 

Hh 

TWAOEL 1d30 

J18VTIIE NON “0d 

! 

202 SOd NOILILd ny 

100°1£5000006 “43 

09.6-G€E (L15; 

90687 [IN ONISNY1 

40074 ANC 

INNIAV YAR ANVYO 'N L0vZ 

TYNNEIRL XV.L NVOIHOIN 

TYNNERLXYL o 

YIAN3S T1118 

7808 IN 'AOYL 

Qf ¥3AVIE 918 'M LOL 

GEGYLINIEELEBILL) :QVO 

JTINVAY 

100°} :LOMLIY 

YINITTINYOT 

SZNNILZ ALVA dIHS 

010-062 (e1e) 

v130:I NI9I¥O 

2465/5400/L1985

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

Lansing 

 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

DG ZULU (MULTI) 1 LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner, 

 

v 

MTT Docket No. 

 

 

Perry Township 

, 

Respondent. 

 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

 

1. 

Property Parcel No: 014-70-001-001 

 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form 

addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

 

2. 

The property identified above is X real 

personal. 

 

3. 

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? 

__Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 

 

4. 

Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under 

appeal? 

Yes 

No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each 

parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 

 

5. 

If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property 

statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

6. 

The property identified above is classified as 201 Commercial- Improved 

 

 

7. 

If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to 

Respondent’s 

March 

July 

December Board of Review. X NA 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, 

 LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 

Page 2 of 4 

 

 

8. 

If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts 

upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

9. 

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or 

classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the 

separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over 

the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

10. 

The property or properties at issue are located in Shiawassee 

 County. The 

property or properties’ address is: 

 

 1160 W LANSING RD 

 

11. 

The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local 

governmental unit): Perry Township 

 

 

12. 

Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 

One Manhattan West 395 9th Avenue 58th Floor New York, NY 10001 

13. 

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

 X the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

 

the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a 

dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? 

Yes 

No 

 

uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment 

 

the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under 

MCL 

 

 

14. 

The tax year(s) at issue are: 2025

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 

Page 3 of 4 

 

 

15. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior 

tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary):NA 

 

 

 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 

Board of Review are: 

 

Tax Year

True Cash Value

Assessed Value

Taxable Value

2025

$2,021,400.00

$1,010,700

$1,010,700

 

 

 

 

 

17. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

 

Tax Year

True Cash Value

State Equalized Value

Taxable Value

 2025 

$1,713,358 

$856,679 

$856,679 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

 

Tax Year

True Cash Value

State Equalized Value

Taxable Value

 2025 

$308,042 

$154,021.00 

$154,021.00 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19. 

Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

20. 

List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the relief 

 

Petitioner relies on the following facts to support the relief requested: 

The subject assessments imposed

Page 4

M

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

DG ZULU (MULTI) 1 LLC, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 25-001621

Township Of Perry, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: __Tribunal Clerk________

Entered: July 8, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

Lansing 

 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

DG ZULU (MULTI) 1 LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner, 

 

v 

MTT Docket No. 

 

 

Perry Township 

, 

Respondent. 

 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

 

1. 

Property Parcel No: 014-70-001-001 

 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form 

addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

 

2. 

The property identified above is X real 

personal. 

 

3. 

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? 

__Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 

 

4. 

Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under 

appeal? 

Yes 

No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each 

parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 

 

5. 

If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property 

statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

6. 

The property identified above is classified as 201 Commercial- Improved 

 

 

7. 

If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to 

Respondent’s 

March 

July 

December Board of Review. X NA 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, 

 LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 

Page 2 of 4 

 

 

8. 

If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts 

upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

9. 

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or 

classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the 

separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over 

the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

10. 

The property or properties at issue are located in Shiawassee 

 County. The 

property or properties’ address is: 

 

 1160 W LANSING RD 

 

11. 

The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local 

governmental unit): Perry Township 

 

 

12. 

Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 

One Manhattan West 395 9th Avenue 58th Floor New York, NY 10001 

13. 

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

 X the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

 

the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a 

dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? 

Yes 

No 

 

uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment 

 

the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under 

MCL 

 

 

14. 

The tax year(s) at issue are: 2025

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 

Page 3 of 4 

 

 

15. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior 

tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary):NA 

 

 

 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 

Board of Review are: 

 

Tax Year

True Cash Value

Assessed Value

Taxable Value

2025

$2,021,400.00

$1,010,700

$1,010,700

 

 

 

 

 

17. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

 

Tax Year

True Cash Value

State Equalized Value

Taxable Value

 2025 

$1,713,358 

$856,679 

$856,679 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

 

Tax Year

True Cash Value

State Equalized Value

Taxable Value

 2025 

$308,042 

$154,021.00 

$154,021.00 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19. 

Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

20. 

List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the relief 

 

Petitioner relies on the following facts to support the relief requested: 

The subject assessments imposed

Page 4

M

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: Organization

First Name/Company Name

M.I.

Last Name

DG ZULU (MULTI) 1 LLC

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

101 W. Big Beaver

Suite 945

City or Town

Troy

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48048

Telephone Number

3132300104

Fax Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

sarah.belloli@ryan.com

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Sarah

M.I.

Last Name

Belloli

Firm Name (if any)

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

101 West Big Beaver Road

Suite 945

City or Town

Troy

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48084

Telephone Number

313-230-0104

Fax Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

sarah.belloli@ryan.com

Section 5: Issue

Please designate one: 

Valuation – Fill out Sections 4, 5, & 6 below

Section 6: Subject Property Information

How many parcels are you 

appealing?1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

Michigan

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

Township Of Perry (SHIAWASSEE)

County

Shiawassee

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Section 7: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply)

True Cash and Taxable Values

Section 8: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

014-70-001-001

Classification of Property: Real 

Commercial

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

1010700

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

1010700

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

1713358

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

856679

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Section 9: Assessment Information

Type of Tax Assessment(s):

Assessment Number(s):

Check all that is being appealed: 

Check what action prompted this appeal:

If “other,” please explain:

Section 10: Special Assessment Information

Type of Special Assessment:

Did you protest the special assessment at the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? 

If Yes, what was the date of the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll?

If No, please explain:

Section 11: Classification Information

Parcel Number:

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: 

What do you believe is the property’s classification?

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

If improved property, how is the property currently being used?

If improved property, for what use was the property designed?

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest 

State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.