Dawn White, Petitioner V County Of Lapeer, Respondent
- Petitioner
- Dawn White
- Respondent
- County Of Lapeer
Case overview
- Docket number
- 24-003987-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Lapeer
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Order of Dismissal | Not recorded | Not recorded | 02/20/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Order extending default | Not recorded | Not recorded | 01/27/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Order of Default of Petitioner | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/24/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 10/24/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/24/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 09/04/2024 | $0.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Dawn White, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003987 Lapeer Township, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Petitioner was placed in default on October 24, 2024, because Petitioner filed an incomplete petition, failed to submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment notice, etc.) with the filing of the petition,1 and failed to pay the required filing fee. On January 27, 2025, the Tribunal extended the time for Petitioner to cure the default by an additional 14 days. Petitioner has failed to respond, thus has not complied with either order, and the latter stated that “failure to comply with this Order shall result in the dismissal of the case . . .” and referenced Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury. In Grimm, the Michigan Court of Appeals summarized factors that the Tribunal should consider before imposing the sanction of dismissal. Those factors are: (1) whether the violation was wilful or accidental; (2) the party's history of refusing to comply with previous court orders; (3) the prejudice to the opposing party; (4) whether there exists a history of deliberate delay; (5) the degree of compliance with other parts of the court's orders; (6) attempts to cure the defect; and (7) whether a lesser sanction would better serve the interests of justice.2 Here, Petitioner’s failure to comply with multiple orders has established a history of deliberate delay. As a result, giving careful consideration to the factors involved and considering all options in determining what sanction is just and proper, the Tribunal finds that dismissal is appropriate, and a lesser sanction would not be appropriate in light of Petitioner’s history of noncompliance in this case. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. This Order resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. 1 TTR 277. 2 Id. at 149.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003987 Page 2 of 2 APPEAL RIGHTS If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the record on appeal. There is no certification fee. Entered: February 20, 2025 By _____________________________ kac PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Dawn White, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003987 County Of Lapeer, Respondent. ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT The Tribunal has considered the file in the above-captioned case and finds that it entered an order holding Petitioner in default on October 24, 2024.1 Petitioner was required to cure the default within 14 days. Petitioner has had ample time to comply, yet has failed to respond or submit the required filings. Though the Tribunal finds an extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioner’s failure to comply with Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a history of deliberate delay that would justify dismissal of the case for failure to timely comply with this Order.2 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the time for Petitioner to cure the default is EXTENDED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the default: (1) file the documentation and/or petition filing fee required by the October 24, 2024 default order, (2) file a Motion to Set Aside Default, (3) pay the 25.00 Motion fee, and (4) file proof the Motion and a copy of the documentation and/or petition filing fee were served on Respondent. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of the case, as provided by TTR 231.3 By:___________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: January 27, 2025 1 The Order further stated, “Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 2 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 3 See also MCL 205.732.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003987 Page 2 of 5 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
Dawn White 2475 Tomahawk Dr. Lapeer , MI 48446
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Dawn White, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003987 County Of Lapeer, Respondent. ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT The Tribunal has considered the file in the above-captioned case and finds that it entered an order holding Petitioner in default on October 24, 2024.4 Petitioner was required to cure the default within 14 days. Petitioner has had ample time to comply, yet has failed to respond or submit the required filings. Though the Tribunal finds an extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioner’s failure to comply with Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a history of deliberate delay that would justify dismissal of the case for failure to timely comply with this Order.5 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the time for Petitioner to cure the default is EXTENDED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the default: (1) file the documentation and/or petition filing fee required by the October 24, 2024 default order, (2) file a Motion to Set Aside Default, (3) pay the 25.00 Motion fee, and (4) file proof the Motion and a copy of the documentation and/or petition filing fee were served on Respondent. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of the case, as provided by TTR 231.6 By:___________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: January 27, 2025 4 The Order further stated, “Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 5 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 6 See also MCL 205.732.
Page 5
MTT Docket No. 24-003987 Page 5 of 5 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Dawn White, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003987 County Of Lapeer, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment notice, etc.), as required by TTR 277. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within 14 days of the entry of this Order. Petitioner failed to properly complete the petition and has also failed to pay the required fee for the filing of the petition. See TTR 277 and 267. As such, the appeal is not properly pending. Petitioner must complete the petition by providing all information required by each applicable section, return the completed petition, and pay the fee amount required for the filing of the petition within 14 days of the entry of this Order. The petition shall note the docket number assigned by the Tribunal. Small Claims petition forms and a filing fee calculator can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Unfortunately, the payment may not be made via e-filing. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this Order.i Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By:_______________________________ Entered: October 24, 2024 Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003987 Page 2 of 5 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk i “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 219(5)
Page 3
Dawn White 2475 Tomahawk Dr. Lapeer , MI 48446
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Dawn White, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003987 County Of Lapeer, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment notice, etc.), as required by TTR 277. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within 14 days of the entry of this Order. Petitioner failed to properly complete the petition and has also failed to pay the required fee for the filing of the petition. See TTR 277 and 267. As such, the appeal is not properly pending. Petitioner must complete the petition by providing all information required by each applicable section, return the completed petition, and pay the fee amount required for the filing of the petition within 14 days of the entry of this Order. The petition shall note the docket number assigned by the Tribunal. Small Claims petition forms and a filing fee calculator can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Unfortunately, the payment may not be made via e-filing. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this Order.ii Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By:_______________________________ Entered: October 24, 2024 Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair
Page 5
MTT Docket No. 24-003987 Page 5 of 5 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk ii “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 3: Subject Property Information Parcel Identification Number: LAO~-80-T104-0%0 -00 How many if you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? parcetsareyou | [[] vest [J No appealing? *If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels. | **If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulted. Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP} [if multiple, list first property's address] 4) Tuer Avenue |, [areee. pI H24Y6 Taxing Authority (City or Township) County LAPEER Larese Classification of Property: Agricultural Commercial Industrial a Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing Kl prinipa Residence Exemption I] Qualified Agricultural Exemption Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal PLEASE SEE ATTACHED Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues List the tax year(s) denied: indicate who denied the exemption under appeal: Assessor County Treasurer or Equalization Michigan Dept. of Treasury July Board of Review December Board of Review Other SEP 09 2024
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Fee Information A fee of $25.00 is required for the filing of this appeal unless you possess a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition. Signature required re) or Attorney/Authorized Ri resel tative's Signature: Isl
Page 3
09/02/2024 RE: PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION DENIAL NOTICE PARCEL iD: 1208070404000, 911 TURRILL AVENUE, LAPEER, MI 48446 To Whom It May Concern: | am writing in reference to the Principal Residence Exemption Denial Notice that we have received in the mail for tax years 2021 — 2024. We have completed a Principal Residence Exemption questionnaire over the last couple of months regarding the house we purchased located at 911 Turrill Avenue in Lapeer, MI 48446. This home was an investment by my husband, Todd and myself and my mother, Karon Rossman. This home is occupied by Karon Rossman as her primary place of residence. Karon maintains the home and pays all taxes and utilities. We have received a bill from the Lapeer County Treasurer for payment of back taxes that should have been paid on the Turrill home from the time of purchase, including interest. These charges are due beacause the Turrill home was considered a Homestead for Todd White when he already claims a Homestead at our place of residence located at 2475 Tomahawk Drive, Lapeer, Mi 48446. This point is understood that only 1 principal residence can be claimed by any 1 individual. Todd's principle residence is at 2475 Tomahawk Drive and has been for going on 30 years. As stated above, the Turrill home was bought as a joint investment. Todd and | had a lump sum of money that was used in the purchase of the home along with additional monies from Karon Rossman. Karon also funded all monies needed for the complete renovation of the Turrill home and has been the only person to live there from the time the home was purchased. The sole intent in buying this home was for my mother to have a place to live when moving back to Michigan. She was involved from the beginning, even dealing with the real estate agent in picking out the home. This home is intended for my mother to live in until the day she is no longer with us. At this time, the home will be left to Todd & myself. The only reason for the deed being in Todd's name is to eliminate any issues in the future with other siblings at the time of my mothers death. This was intended to protect our investment in the future and avoid any possible issues with the family. The intent was not to provide any type of false information or get any financial gain from this decision. | am not in agreement on how the Turrill home has been categorized in this way for over 3 years and it is just now being brought to our attention owing back taxes plus interest. We thought we were handling everything properly and saw no future repercussions. We did recently attempt to add Karon to the deed of the Turrill home to correct this issue. It would not be allowed at this time with the outstanding back taxes showing due. We would like know what can be done to amend the deed and correct these charges for the Principal Residence Exemption. Although Todd was given the Exemption in error, this home has been a primary residence for Karon and the Exemption would have been granted to her in the same way it was to Todd.
Page 4
LAPEER COUNTY TREASURER MESSAGE TO TAXPAYER PAYMENT INFORMATION YOU ARE BEING BILLED THE ENCLOSED AMOUNT BECAUSE This tax is due upon receipt YOUR PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION WAS DENIED FOR AT o \ . LEAST ONE OF THE LAST 3 YEARS. THIS BILL INCLUDES THE Pay by mail £0: LAPEER COUNTY TREASURER AMOUNT OF SCHOOL TAXES YOU WOULD HAVE BEEN BILLED FOR 255 CLAY ST SUITE 303 THE YEAR(S) YOUR EXEMPTION WAS DENIED. LAPEER MI 48446 810-667-0239 PROPERTY INFORMATION TAX DETAIL Owner/Property Assessed To: LAPEER SCHOOLS Mort Code: Unit:L Class:401 RESIDENTIAL WHITE, TODD SCHOOL: 44010 2023 Summer Wintex 911 TURRILL AVE Taxable 58,895 LAPEER, MI 48446 P.R.E, % 0.0000 School Op. 1,060.11 Admin, To 16.60 Property Number: 44-L20-80-704-040-00 focal Charges 65.92 Property Address: 911 TURRILL AVE SUBTOTAL 1,137.63 Legal Description: ! 2022 faxable, 56,091 P.R.E, 0.0000 School Op. 1,009.63 Admin. : Local Charges Interest 214.55 SUBTOTAL 1,224.18 2021 Taxable 54,300 P.R.E. % 0.0000 School Op. 977.40 Admin. ! Local Charges Interest 354.31 SUBTOTAL
Page 5
WHITE
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Dawn White, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003987 County Of Lapeer, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: October 24, 2024 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
Dawn White 2475 Tomahawk Dr. Lapeer , MI 48446
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Dawn White, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003987 County Of Lapeer, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: October 24, 2024 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 3: Subject Property Information Parcel Identification Number: LAO~-80-T104-0%0 -00 How many if you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? parcetsareyou | [[] vest [J No appealing? *If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels. | **If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulted. Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP} [if multiple, list first property's address] 4) Tuer Avenue |, [areee. pI H24Y6 Taxing Authority (City or Township) County LAPEER Larese Classification of Property: Agricultural Commercial Industrial a Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing Kl prinipa Residence Exemption I] Qualified Agricultural Exemption Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal PLEASE SEE ATTACHED Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues List the tax year(s) denied: indicate who denied the exemption under appeal: Assessor County Treasurer or Equalization Michigan Dept. of Treasury July Board of Review December Board of Review Other SEP 09 2024
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Fee Information A fee of $25.00 is required for the filing of this appeal unless you possess a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition. Signature required re) or Attorney/Authorized Ri resel tative's Signature: Isl
Page 3
09/02/2024 RE: PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION DENIAL NOTICE PARCEL iD: 1208070404000, 911 TURRILL AVENUE, LAPEER, MI 48446 To Whom It May Concern: | am writing in reference to the Principal Residence Exemption Denial Notice that we have received in the mail for tax years 2021 — 2024. We have completed a Principal Residence Exemption questionnaire over the last couple of months regarding the house we purchased located at 911 Turrill Avenue in Lapeer, MI 48446. This home was an investment by my husband, Todd and myself and my mother, Karon Rossman. This home is occupied by Karon Rossman as her primary place of residence. Karon maintains the home and pays all taxes and utilities. We have received a bill from the Lapeer County Treasurer for payment of back taxes that should have been paid on the Turrill home from the time of purchase, including interest. These charges are due beacause the Turrill home was considered a Homestead for Todd White when he already claims a Homestead at our place of residence located at 2475 Tomahawk Drive, Lapeer, Mi 48446. This point is understood that only 1 principal residence can be claimed by any 1 individual. Todd's principle residence is at 2475 Tomahawk Drive and has been for going on 30 years. As stated above, the Turrill home was bought as a joint investment. Todd and | had a lump sum of money that was used in the purchase of the home along with additional monies from Karon Rossman. Karon also funded all monies needed for the complete renovation of the Turrill home and has been the only person to live there from the time the home was purchased. The sole intent in buying this home was for my mother to have a place to live when moving back to Michigan. She was involved from the beginning, even dealing with the real estate agent in picking out the home. This home is intended for my mother to live in until the day she is no longer with us. At this time, the home will be left to Todd & myself. The only reason for the deed being in Todd's name is to eliminate any issues in the future with other siblings at the time of my mothers death. This was intended to protect our investment in the future and avoid any possible issues with the family. The intent was not to provide any type of false information or get any financial gain from this decision. | am not in agreement on how the Turrill home has been categorized in this way for over 3 years and it is just now being brought to our attention owing back taxes plus interest. We thought we were handling everything properly and saw no future repercussions. We did recently attempt to add Karon to the deed of the Turrill home to correct this issue. It would not be allowed at this time with the outstanding back taxes showing due. We would like know what can be done to amend the deed and correct these charges for the Principal Residence Exemption. Although Todd was given the Exemption in error, this home has been a primary residence for Karon and the Exemption would have been granted to her in the same way it was to Todd.
Page 4
LAPEER COUNTY TREASURER MESSAGE TO TAXPAYER PAYMENT INFORMATION YOU ARE BEING BILLED THE ENCLOSED AMOUNT BECAUSE This tax is due upon receipt YOUR PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION WAS DENIED FOR AT o \ . LEAST ONE OF THE LAST 3 YEARS. THIS BILL INCLUDES THE Pay by mail £0: LAPEER COUNTY TREASURER AMOUNT OF SCHOOL TAXES YOU WOULD HAVE BEEN BILLED FOR 255 CLAY ST SUITE 303 THE YEAR(S) YOUR EXEMPTION WAS DENIED. LAPEER MI 48446 810-667-0239 PROPERTY INFORMATION TAX DETAIL Owner/Property Assessed To: LAPEER SCHOOLS Mort Code: Unit:L Class:401 RESIDENTIAL WHITE, TODD SCHOOL: 44010 2023 Summer Wintex 911 TURRILL AVE Taxable 58,895 LAPEER, MI 48446 P.R.E, % 0.0000 School Op. 1,060.11 Admin, To 16.60 Property Number: 44-L20-80-704-040-00 focal Charges 65.92 Property Address: 911 TURRILL AVE SUBTOTAL 1,137.63 Legal Description: ! 2022 faxable, 56,091 P.R.E, 0.0000 School Op. 1,009.63 Admin. : Local Charges Interest 214.55 SUBTOTAL 1,224.18 2021 Taxable 54,300 P.R.E. % 0.0000 School Op. 977.40 Admin. ! Local Charges Interest 354.31 SUBTOTAL
Page 5
WHITE
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.