Cvs Lake Norwood Inc, Petitioner Vs. City Of Grand Rapids, Respondent
- Petitioner
- Cvs Lake Norwood Inc
- Respondent
- City Of Grand Rapids
Case overview
- Docket number
- 25-002170-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Kent
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | Order of Dismissal | Not recorded | Not recorded | 02/20/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 11 | Proof of Service of Misc Documents was received. | PET | Not recorded | 02/19/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 10 | Motion to Withdraw Appeal was received. | PET | Not recorded | 02/19/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 9 | Appearance | RESP | Not recorded | 02/17/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 8 | Prehearing General Call | Not recorded | Not recorded | 02/17/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Answer was received | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/22/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | ET Case Info Sheet | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/22/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Proof of service of petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 08/26/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Petition has been verified | PET | 2 | 08/13/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/13/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 06/02/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | ET Case Info Sheet | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/02/2025 | $600.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 CVS Lake Norwood Inc, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002170 City Of Grand Rapids, Respondent. ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner has filed a Motion to Withdraw the Petition and the motion indicates that Petitioner informed Respondent of the motion and that Respondent concurs with the requested withdrawal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case. APPEAL RIGHTS If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-002170 Page 2 of 6 Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the record on appeal. There is no certification fee. By:___________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: February 20, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 CVS Lake Norwood Inc, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002170 City Of Grand Rapids, Respondent. ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner has filed a Motion to Withdraw the Petition and the motion indicates that Petitioner informed Respondent of the motion and that Respondent concurs with the requested withdrawal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case. APPEAL RIGHTS If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted
Page 4
MTT
Page 5
S
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEMS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL CVS LAKE NORWOOD, INC., ) MOAHR Docket No.: 25-002170 ) Petitioner, ) Parcel No.: 41-14-32-229-014 ) v. ) ) CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS, ) ) Respondent. ) ______________________________________________________________________________ Paul M. Jones, Jr. (P82235) Jones Pyatt Law, LLC 435 East Main Street, Suite 220 Greenwood, IN 46143 (317) 991.1864 paul@jonespyattlaw.com Elizabeth J. Fossel (P41430) Dylan M. Gill (P89172) Grand Rapids Department of Law Attorneys for Respondent 300 Monroe Ave NW, Suite 620 Grand Rapids, MI 49503 (616) 456-4029 efossel@grand-rapids.mi.us dgill@grand-rapids.mi.us PROOF OF SERVICE Mandy Jonte states that on February 19, 2026 she served by U.S. first-class mail and email, a copy of the Motion to Withdraw Appeal relative to the above-captioned matter to: Elizabeth J. Fossel (P41430) Dylan M. Gill (P89172) Grand Rapids Department of Law Attorneys for Respondent 300 Monroe Ave NW, Suite 620 Grand Rapids, MI 49503 (616) 456-4029 efossel@grand-rapids.mi.us dgill@grand-rapids.mi.us
Page 2
Mandy Jonte states that on February 19, 2026 she served by U.S. first-class mail, a copy of the Motion to Withdraw Appeal relative to the above-captioned matter to: Kent County Bureau of Equalization Attn: Equalization Director 300 Monroe Avenue NW Grand Rapids, MI 49503-2288 Kent County Attn: County Clerk 300 Monroe Avenue NW Grand Rapids, MI 49503-2288 Grand Rapids Public Schools Attn: BOE Secretary 1331 Martin Luther King Jr St, SE Grand Rapids, MI 49506 Michigan Department of Treasury State Treasurer 430 W Allegan Lansing, MI 48922 Dated: February 19, 2026 /s/Mandy Jonte Mandy Jonte Paralegal Jones Pyatt Law, LLC
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR CVS Lake Nanunad Inc : MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No.25-002170-TT City of Grand Rapids Respondent(s) MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEAL 1. 1 wish to withdraw my appeal in the above-captioned docket. 2. Good cause exists to grant withdrawal because: Substantive reasons, including, but not limited to; the cost of litigation outweighs potential tax savings. 3. l ask this Tribunal to grant my request to withdraw the appeal and dismiss the above- captioned docket. Please select one of the following: __ lam filing this Motion to Withdraw before Respondent filed an Answer or a responsive motion with the Tribunal. x_ 1 am filing this Motion to Withdraw after Respondent has filed an Answer or Responsive Motion with the Tribunal. | attached to this Motion Respondent's written consent to withdraw my petition, or | shall grant Respondent the opportunity to object to this withdrawal. Pz Paul M. Jones, Jr. (P82235) Party/Representative (sign here) Print name of person signing | certify that on this date | served a copy of this Motion, and any additional documentation, on the opposing party or their representative. 2/18/2026 Pes Date (sign here) MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
Page 2
Mandy Jonte From: Gill, Dylan <dgill@grand-rapids.mi.us> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2026 1:46 PM To: Paul Jones Cc: Post, Lindsey; Echeverria, Alma; Mandy Jonte Subject: RE: CVS LAKE NORWOOD INC. (25-002170) - Answer to Petition Good morning Paul, Respondent has no objection to the withdrawal. Thanks, Dylan M. Gill (she, her) » Assistant City Attorney City of Grand Rapids 300 Monroe Ave NW Grand Rapids, MI 49503 dgill@grand-rapids.mi.us (616)456-4028 CONFIDENTIAL THIS DOCUMENT IS SUBJECT TO ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE DO NOT FORWARD WITHOUT PERMISSION From: Paul Jones <paul@jonespyattlaw.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2026 11:41 AM To: Echeverria, Alma <aecheverria@grand-rapids.mi.us> Cc: O'Connor, Kendall <koconnor@grand-rapids.mi.us>; Mandy Jonte <mandy@jonespyattlaw.com> Subject: RE: CVS LAKE NORWOOD INC. (25-002170) - Answer to Petition [Stop. Think. Read. This is an external email. Please use caution when clicking on the links and opening attachments in unsolicited email.] Counsel, good morning, we have been asked by our client, petitioner, to withdraw the above-referenced appeal pending at MTT. Is there any objection to our withdrawal? If not, we will proceed with drafting a voluntary dismissal and note no objection. If objection, please let me know. Thank you, Paul Paul M. Jones, Jr. Partner JONES PYATT LAW, LLC 435 E. Main Street, Suite 220 Greenwood, IN 46143 mobile 317.223.5441 office 317.991.1865
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
1 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL CVS LAKE NORWOOD, INC. Petitioner, Docket No. 25-002170 v. Parcel No. 41-14-32-229-014 CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS, Respondent. ___________________________________________________________________________ Paul M. Jones, Jr (P82235) Jones Pyatt Law, LLC Attorney for Petitioner 435 E Main St, Ste. 200 Greenwood, IN 46143 paul@jonespyatttlaw.com Elizabeth J. Fossel (P41430) Dylan M. Gill (P89172) Grand Rapids Department of Law Attorneys for Respondent 300 Monroe Ave NW, Suite 620 Grand Rapids, MI 49503 (616) 456-4029 efossel@grand-rapids.mi.us dgill@grand-rapids.mi.us ______________________________________________________________________________ APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL NOW COMES, Assistant City Attorney Dylan M. Gill and hereby enters appearance on behalf of Respondent City of Grand Rapids CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS, a Michigan municipal corporation Dated: February 17, 2026 By: /s/ Dylan M. Gill Dylan M. Gill (P89172) Assistant City Attorney Attorney for Respondent
Page 2
2 PROOF OF SERVICE Alma Echeverria, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that she is a Paralegal in the Office of the City Attorney, attorneys for Respondent herein, and that on February 17, 2026 she served true and complete copies of Respondent’s Appearance of Counsel via email, upon: Paul M. Jones Jr. Jones Pyatt Law, LLC paul@jonespyattlaw.com /s/ Alma Echeverria Alma Echeverria
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NOTICE OF JANUARY 19 - 29, 2027 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER OF PROCEDURE CVS Lake Norwood Inc, Petitioner, v City Of Grand Rapids, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 25-002170 Please be advised that 25-002170 has been placed on a two-week Prehearing General Call commencing January 19, 2027. Unless ordered otherwise, parties will be notified at least 28 days before they are scheduled to appear. Scheduling will not necessarily occur in the order in which the cases are listed below. Parties are required to submit a valuation disclosure or written notification that no valuation disclosure is required by the dates indicated herein. A “valuation disclosure” is defined as documentary or other tangible evidence in a property tax proceeding that a party relies upon in support of the party’s contention as to the true cash value of the subject property or any portion thereof and contains the party’s value conclusion and data, valuation methodology, analysis or reasoning. See TTR 203 and TTR 241. Users who file documents with the Tribunal are advised that filed documents are public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tribunal’s Tax Docket Lookup. If a user wishes to file a document for consideration by the Tribunal and prevent its publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for Protective Order under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents covered by the order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a Protective Order will be published. In accordance with MCR 1.109(D)(9) and TTR 209, the responsibility for excluding or redacting personal identifying information (PII) from all documents filed with or offered to the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and their attorneys. The Tribunal is not responsible for or required to review, redact, or screen documents at the time of filing for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A party, representative, or interested person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may request that the Tribunal redact PII contained in a previously filed document by submitting a Request for Redactions. The Request for Redactions form is available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages of the Tribunal’s website. Please refer to the Tribunal’s FAQs and Glossary of Terms pages on the Tribunal’s website for more information.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-002170 Page 2 of 3 IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall: a. If no valuation disclosure is required, notify the Tribunal and the opposing parties in writing within 21 days of entry of this order that no valuation disclosure is being filed. The notice shall indicate the reason or reasons why no valuation disclosure is required (i.e., exemption claim, etc.). b. If a valuation disclosure is required, file and exchange their valuation disclosures by September 22, 2026. Valuation disclosures will not be admitted into evidence unless disclosed and furnished in accordance with this order (even though admissible) except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their Prehearing Statements by September 22, 2026. Witnesses, with the exception of rebuttal witnesses, will not be allowed to testify unless disclosed in the Prehearing Statement and the Prehearing Statement is furnished in accordance with this order except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. Failure to file the Prehearing Statement may result in holding a party or parties in default. See TTR 237. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on September 22, 2026, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. Discovery relative to the valuation disclosure prepared for purposes of litigating this case or the valuation expert that prepared that valuation disclosure is not permitted during “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on January 19, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is limited to the opposing party’s valuation disclosure, the opposing party’s valuation expert, and the witnesses identified on the opposing party’s Prehearing Statement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if this case is not scheduled for a date certain prehearing conference during the time frame indicated it may be scheduled for a date certain prehearing conference
Page 3
M
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL CVS LAKE NORWOOD, INC. Petitioner, Docket No. 25-002170 v. Parcel No. 41-14-32-229-014 CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS, Respondent. ___________________________________________________________________________ Paul M. Jones, Jr. Jones Pyatt Law, LLC Attorney for Petitioner 435 E Main St, Ste. 220 Greenwood, IN 46143 paul@jonespyattlaw.com Elizabeth J. Fossel (P41430) Kendall R. O’Connor (P84036) Grand Rapids Department of Law Attorneys for Respondent 300 Monroe Ave NW, Suite 620 Grand Rapids, MI 49503 (616) 456-4029 efossel@grand-rapids.mi.us koconnor@grand-rapids.mi.us ______________________________________________________________________________ RESPONDENT’S APPEARANCE AND ANSWER TO PETITION WITH PROOF OF SERVICE NOW COMES Elizabeth J. Fossel and Kendall R. O’Connor for the City of Grand Rapids, who hereby enters their Appearance of Counsel on behalf of Respondent City of Grand Rapids, and answers Petitioner’s Petition as follows: 1. Property Parcel No: 41-14-32-229-014 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) ANSWER: Admitted. 2. The property identified above is x real personal. ANSWER: Admitted. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous?
Page 2
__ Yes __ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non-contiguous parcel.) ANSWER: There are no allegations in paragraph 3 of Petitioner’s Petition, and therefore no response is required. 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? Yes __ No . (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) ANSWER: There are no allegations in paragraph 4 of Petitioner’s Petition, and therefore no response is required. 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): ANSWER: There are no allegations in paragraph 5 of Petitioner’s Petition, and therefore no response is required. 6. The property identified above is classified as 201 Commercial- Improved. ANSWER: Respondent admits the property is classified as Commercial. 7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to Respondent’s March ____ July ___ December Board of Review. ANSWER: There are no allegations in paragraph 7 of Petitioner’s Petition, and therefore no response is required. 8. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): ANSWER: There are no allegations in paragraph 8 of Petitioner’s Petition, and therefore no response is required. 9. If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke
Page 3
the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): N/A ANSWER: There are no allegations in paragraph 9 of Petitioner’s Petition, and therefore no response is required. 10. The property or properties at issue are located in Kent County. The property or properties’ address is: 1528 SE Lake Dr, Grand Rapids, MI 49506 ANSWER: Admitted. 11. The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local government unit): City of Grand Rapids ANSWER: Respondent admits the assessment at issue was established by the City of Grand Rapids. 12. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 200 Highland Corp Dr MC 2315 Cumberland, RI 02864 ANSWER: Respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of this allegation, and leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 13. This appeal involved issues relating to the (check all that are applicable); x the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? Yes No uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ANSWER: Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations in paragraph 13 of Petitioner’s Petition for the reason that Respondent lacks knowledge or sufficient information to
Page 4
15.
Page 5
Ta
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-002170 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City Of Grand Rapids (KENT) Local Unit of Government/First Name Kendall M.I. R. Last Name O'Connor Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 300 Monroe Ave NW City or Town Grand Rapids State Michigan ZIP Code 49503 Telephone Number 616-456-4029 Fax Number 616-456-4569 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) cityattorney@grcity.us Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Kendall M.I. R. Last Name O'Connor Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 300 Monroe Avenue NW Suite 620 City or Town Grand Rapids State Michigan ZIP Code 49503 Telephone Number 616-456-4029 Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) cityattorney@grand-rapids.mi.us Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: Kendall R. O'Connor /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEMS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL CVS LAKE NORWOOD INC, ) MOAHR Docket No.: 25-002170 ) Petitioner, ) Parcel No.: 41-14-32-229-014 ) v. ) ) CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS, ) ) Respondent. ) Paul M. Jones, Jr. Jones Pyatt Law, LLC 435 East Main Street, Suite 220 Greenwood, IN 46143 TEL: (317) 991-1864 E-mail: paul@jonespyattlaw.com Attorney No.: P82235 PROOF OF SERVICE FOR PROPERTY TAX PETITION Mandy Jonte states that on August 21 2025 she served by U.S. certified mail, return receipt requested, a copy of the foregoing documents relative to the above-captioned matter: Case Information Sheet, Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition, Notice of Docket Number and Proof of Service to: City of Grand Rapids City of Grand Rapids Attn: Assessor Attn: City Clerk 300 Monroe NW, 3 Floor 300 Monroe Ave NW, 2" Floor Grand Rapids, MI 49503 Grand Rapids, MI 49503
Page 2
Mandy Jonte states that on August 1% 2025 she served by U.S. first-class mail, a copy of the Petition relative to the above-captioned matter: Case Information Sheet, Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition, Notice of Docket Number and Proof of Service to: Kent County Kent County Bureau of Equalization Attn: County Clerk Attn: Equalization Director 300 Monroe Avenue NW 300 Monroe Avenue NW Grand Rapids, MI 49503-2288 Grand Rapids, MI 49503-2288 Grand Rapids Public Schools Michigan Department of Treasury Attn: BOE Secretary State Treasurer 1331 Martin Luther King Jr St, SE 430 W Allegan St Grand Rapids, MI 49506 Lansing, MI 48933-1592 Dated: August id 2025 /s/Mandy Jonte Mandy Jonte Paralegal Jones Pyatt Law, LLC 435 E Main St, Suite 220 Greenwood, IN 46143 mandy @jonespyattlaw.com
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 _____________________________, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. _____________________________, Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: _____________________________________________ (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is ___real ___personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 6. The property identified above is classified as _________________________ 7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to Respondent’s ___ March ___ July ___December Board of Review. CVS Lake Norwood, Inc. CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS 41-14-32-229-014 x 201 Commercial-Improved
Page 2
MTT Docket No. _________________ Page 2 of 4 8. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 9. If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 10. The property or properties at issue are located in _______________County. The property or properties’ address is: 11. The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): ________________________________________ 12. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 13. This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): ________the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values ________the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes ___No ________uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment ________the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ______ 14. The tax year(s) at issue are: _______________________________________ Kent 1528 SE Lake Dr, Grand Rapids, MI 49506 City of Grand Rapids 200 Highland Corp Dr MC 2315 Cumberland, RI 02864 x 2025
Page 3
MTT Docket No. _________________ Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 20. List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the relief requested (attach additional page if necessary): 2025 3,531,200 1,756,600 1,369,097 2025 2,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 2025 1,531,200 756,600 369,097 Reduction of TCV, SEV and AV as indicated in paragraph 17. Petitioner is a party-in-interest, i.e., Petitioner holds an interest in the parcel of property that is the subject of this appeal. Comparable sales and/or income capitalization analysis. Petitioner may obtain an appraisal for the purpose of this appeal.
Page 4
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 CVS Lake Norwood Inc, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 25-002170 City Of Grand Rapids, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: __Tribunal Clerk________ Entered: August 13, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 _____________________________, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. _____________________________, Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: _____________________________________________ (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is ___real ___personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 6. The property identified above is classified as _________________________ 7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to Respondent’s ___ March ___ July ___December Board of Review. CVS Lake Norwood, Inc. CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS 41-14-32-229-014 x 201 Commercial-Improved
Page 2
MTT Docket No. _________________ Page 2 of 4 8. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 9. If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 10. The property or properties at issue are located in _______________County. The property or properties’ address is: 11. The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): ________________________________________ 12. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 13. This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): ________the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values ________the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes ___No ________uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment ________the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ______ 14. The tax year(s) at issue are: _______________________________________ Kent 1528 SE Lake Dr, Grand Rapids, MI 49506 City of Grand Rapids 200 Highland Corp Dr MC 2315 Cumberland, RI 02864 x 2025
Page 3
MTT Docket No. _________________ Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 20. List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the relief requested (attach additional page if necessary): 2025 3,531,200 1,756,600 1,369,097 2025 2,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 2025 1,531,200 756,600 369,097 Reduction of TCV, SEV and AV as indicated in paragraph 17. Petitioner is a party-in-interest, i.e., Petitioner holds an interest in the parcel of property that is the subject of this appeal. Comparable sales and/or income capitalization analysis. Petitioner may obtain an appraisal for the purpose of this appeal.
Page 4
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MOAHR DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization First Name/Company Name M.I. Last Name CVS Lake Norwood, Inc., Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 200 Highland Corp Dr Suite 220 City or Town Cumberland State Rhode Island ZIP Code 02864 Telephone Number 317.991.1865 Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) paul@jonespyattlaw.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Paul M.I. M Last Name Jones Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 435 East Main St. Suite 220 City or Town Greenwood State Indiana ZIP Code 46143 Telephone Number 317-223-5441 Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) paul@jonespyattlaw.com Section 5: Issue Please designate one: Valuation – Fill out Sections 4, 5, & 6 below Section 6: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing?1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 1528 SE Lake Dr Grand Rapids Michigan 49506 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Grand Rapids (KENT) County Kent If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Section 7: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values Section 8: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 41-14-32-229-014 Classification of Property: Real Commercial Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 1756600 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 1369097 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 2000000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 1000000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Section 9: Assessment Information Type of Tax Assessment(s): Assessment Number(s): Check all that is being appealed: Check what action prompted this appeal: If “other,” please explain: Section 10: Special Assessment Information Type of Special Assessment: Did you protest the special assessment at the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? If Yes, what was the date of the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? If No, please explain: Section 11: Classification Information Parcel Number: Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: What do you believe is the property’s classification?
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR If improved property, how is the property currently being used? If improved property, for what use was the property designed? Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Paul M Jones, Jr
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.