Record Finder / 26-001469-TT
Michigan
Ctvg LLC Petitioner Vs. Township Of Commerce Respondent
- Petitioner
- Ctvg LLC
- Respondent
- Township Of Commerce
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-001469-TT
- Status
- Ready Schedule
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Oakland
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 08/19/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 08/13/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/13/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Proof of service of petition was received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/12/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/26/2026 | $400.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
Documents
2026-08-19 Appearance & Answer.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL CTVG, LLC, Petitioner, v. CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF COMMERCE, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 26-001469 Parcel No. 17-24-476-039 JOSHUA T. SHILLAIR (P72674) COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL Attorney for Petitioner 400 W. 4th Street, Suite 350 Royal Oak, Michigan 48067 (248) 226-1632 Joshua.shillair@colliers.com G. HANS RENTROP (P65121) JOHN W. KUMMER (P79967) ADKISON, NEED, ALLEN, & RENTROP, PLLC Attorneys for Respondent 39572 Woodward Avenue, Suite 222 Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48304 (248) 540-7400 Jkummer@anafirm.com APPEARANCE TO: CLERK OF THE COURT PLEASE ENTER the appearance of Adkison, Need, Allen, & Rentrop, PLLC for and on behalf of RESPONDENT CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF COMMERCE in the above-captioned matter. Respectfully submitted, ADKISON, NEED, ALLEN, & RENTROP, PLLC By: /s/ John W. Kummer John W. Kummer (P79967) Attorney for Respondent 39572 Woodward Avenue, Suite 222 Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48304 Dated: August 19, 2026 (248) 540-7400
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL CTVG, LLC, Petitioner, v. CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF COMMERCE, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 26-001469 Parcel No. 17-24-476-039 JOSHUA T. SHILLAIR (P72674) COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL Attorney for Petitioner 400 W. 4th Street, Suite 350 Royal Oak, Michigan 48067 (248) 226-1632 Joshua.shillair@colliers.com G. HANS RENTROP (P65121) JOHN W. KUMMER (P79967) ADKISON, NEED, ALLEN, & RENTROP, PLLC Attorneys for Respondent 39572 Woodward Avenue, Suite 222 Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48304 (248) 540-7400 Jkummer@anafirm.com ANSWER TO PETITION Now comes Respondent, Charter Township of Commerce, which is located in Oakland County, Michigan, by its attorneys, Adkison, Need, Allen, & Rentrop, PLLC, and for its Answer to Petition states as follows: 1. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 1 for lack of sufficient information on which to form a belief and Petitioner is left to its proofs. 2. Respondent admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 2. 3. Respondent admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 3. 4. Respondent admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 4. 5. Respondent admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 5. 6. Respondent admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 6.
Page 3
CTVG, LLC v. Charter Township of Commerce MTT Docket No. 26-001469 Answer to Petition Page 2 7. Respondent acknowledges the allegations contained in Paragraph 7, but denies the issues raised. 8. Respondent admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 8. 9. Respondent admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 9. 10. Respondent denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 10 subparagraphs (a) through (d), for the reason that the same are untrue. The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values do not exceed permitted amounts, do not exceed the percentage of true cash value permitted by law, were correctly determined and are based upon correction application of proper principles, and the values and Respondent's mode of assessment are non-discriminatory and constitutional. 11. Respondent denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 11 for the reason that said allegations are untrue. 12. Respondent acknowledges the values in dispute contained in Paragraph 12, but denies the issues raised. 13. Respondent denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 13 for the reason that said allegations are untrue. WHEREFORE, Respondent requests that the Tribunal affirm the assessments of the subject property, or increase same if the proofs submitted at trial warrant such action, and award Respondent its costs and fees incurred in defending this action. Respectfully submitted, ADKISON, NEED, ALLEN, & RENTROP, PLLC By: /s/ John W. Kummer John W. Kummer (P79967) Attorney for Respondent 39572 Woodward Avenue, Suite 222 Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48304 Dated: August 19, 2026 (248) 540-7400
Page 4
CTVG, LLC v. Charter Township of Commerce MTT Docket No. 26-001469 Answer to Petition Page 3 AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Respondent asserts the following affirmative defenses in response to Petitioner’s Petition: 1. Respondent will rely upon all affirmative defenses available pursuant to MCR 2.111 and MCR 2.116. 2. Petitioner fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth a cause of action against Respondent and to support its claim for relief. 3. The Tribunal is charged with finding a property’s true cash value to determine the property’s lawful assessment. Alhi Development Co v. Orion Twp, 110 Mich App 764, 767 (1981). 4. Petitioner has the burden of establishing the property’s true cash value. See MCL 205.737(3) and Kern v. Pontiac Twp, 93 Mich App 612 (1974). 5. Petitioner has failed to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish fraud, error of law, discrimination, application of wrong principles, or illegality on the part of Respondent or its agents. 6. Petitioner has failed to allege that the mode and method of assessing the subject property fails to conform to the mode and method applied in the case of all other properties in Respondent’s taxing unit for the year in question. 7. Petitioner has failed to show that any factor other than fifty percent (50%) was applied to the true cash value of Petitioner’s property and fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to support its allegations that the property’s taxable value is improper. 8. Petitioner asks the Tribunal to grant it preference by application of a self-chosen method of assessment contrary to the intent, purpose and law of this State.
Page 5
CTVG, LLC v. Charter Township of Commerce MTT Docket No. 26-001469 Answer to Petition Page 4 9. Petitioner asks the Tribunal to grant it an illegal
Page 6
m:\ctc\trib
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
EntireTribunalCaseISAnswer.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001469 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government Township Of Commerce (OAKLAND) First Name M.I. Last Name Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name John M.I. W Last Name Kummer Firm Name (if any) Adkison, Need, Allen, & Rentrop, PLLC Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 39572 Woodward Avenue Suite 222 City or Town Bloomfield Hills State Michigan ZIP Code 48304 Telephone Number 2485407400 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) jkummer@anafirm.com Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: John W. Kummer /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
CTVGLLC.PET & POS.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service CTVG, LLC v Commerce Township Parcel Number: E -17-24-476-039 MTT Docket No.: Page 1 of 5 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL CTVG, LLC, Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. Commerce Township, Respondent. _____________________________________________________________________________/ Colliers International By: Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) Vice President | Tax Appeal Representative for Petitioner 400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 Royal Oak, MI 48067 O: 248-226-1632 F: 248-226-1633 Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com Karen.Cameron@Colliers.com Commerce Township Assessing Office 2009 Township Dr Commerce Township, MI 48390 (248) 624-0110 _____________________________________________________________________________/ 2026 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. The Petitioner in this matter, CTVG, LLC, has the legal residence or principal office address of 130 King St W, Suite 300,Toronto, ON M5X 1E1, Canada. Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property taxes on property parcel no(s). (hereinafter referenced as the Subject Property) E -17-24-476-039. If the Subject Property in this petition includes more than one (1) real property tax parcel, the Subject Property’s tax parcels are contiguous. 2. The Subject Property is located in Oakland County.
Page 2
2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service CTVG, LLC v Commerce Township Parcel Number: E -17-24-476-039 MTT Docket No.: Page 2 of 5 3. Respondent, Commerce Township of Oakland County, assesses and collects property taxes on the Subject Property. 4. The Subject Property is real property and is classified as Commercial. The Subject Property is presently used or available for use for Commercial purposes. Petitioner believes that the Subject Property was originally designed to be used for Commercial purposes. 5. Protest to the 2026 Board of Review was not made and is not required by law for the Subject Property. 6. The Subject Property’s address is: 2201 HAGGERTY RD, COMMERCE TOWNSHIP, MI 48390-1715 7. This appeal involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, (c) taxable value and (d) uniformity. 8. The tax year(s) at issue are: 2026 9. The values for the Subject Property as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 E -17-24-476- 039 $1,076,240.00 $538,120.00 $508,990.00 10. The 2026 assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value imposed upon all parcels of the Subject Property, and the taxes to be levied and collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: a. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value exceeds the amounts permitted by the Michigan Constitution, applicable statutes and case law;
Page 3
2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service CTVG, LLC v Commerce Township Parcel Number: E -17-24-476-039 MTT Docket No.: Page 3 of 5 b. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution, applicable statutes and case law; c. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value are based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash value of that portion of the Subject Property that is taxable under Michigan law, and are based upon the application of wrong principles; and d. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and denies Petitioner its constitutional rights to uniformity, equal protection and dues process of law. 11. Petitioner contends that the actual values for the Subject Property are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 E -17-24-476- 039 $568,800.00 $284,400.00 $284,400.00 12. The amount of value in contention for the Subject Property is: Tax Year Parcel Number Assessed Value in Contention 2026 E -17-24-476-039 $253,720.00 13. Petitioner relies on the following specific facts to support the relief requested: Market sales and income data indicates that the subject property’s assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value exceed 50% of its actual market value. In addition, the cost less depreciation method Respondent utilizes to establish the Subject Property’s assessment at issue is not related to the Subject Property’s actual market value.
Page 4
2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service CTVG, LLC v Commerce Township Parcel Number: E -17-24-476-039 MTT Docket No.: Page 4 of 5 WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that this Honorable Michigan Tax Tribunal enter an Order reducing the 2026 assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value for the Subject Property to the values stated in Paragraph 11 above and requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs. Respectfully Submitted, COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL Representative for Petitioner By:_/s/ Joshua T. Shillair__Dated:05/18/2026 Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) Vice President | Tax Appeal 400 E 4th Street, Suite 350 Royal Oak, MI 48067 O: 248-226-1632 F: 248-226-1633 Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com
Page 5
2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service CTVG, LLC v Commerce Township Parcel Number: E -17-24-476-039 MTT Docket No.: Page 5 of 5 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL CTVG, LLC, Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. Commerce Township, Respondent.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name CTVG, LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 130 King St W, Suite 300,Toronto, ON M5X 1E1, Canada City or Town TORONTO State Michigan ZIP Code 12345 Telephone Number 2482261632 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) tax.efile@colliers.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Joshua M.I. Thomas Last Name Shillair Firm Name (if any) Colliers International Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 City or Town Royal Oak State Michigan ZIP Code 48067 Telephone Number 248-226-1632 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) tax.efile@colliers.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 2201 HAGGERTY RD COMMERCE TOWNSHIP
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Michigan 48390-1715 Taxing Authority (City or Township) Township Of Commerce (OAKLAND) County Oakland If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: E -17-24-476-039 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 538120 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 508990 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 568800 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 284400 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ /s/Joshua T. Shillair Payment Information Amount: 400 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26052686973215 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-08-13_17-13-26.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 CTVG LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-001469 Township Of Commerce, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: August 13, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 CTVG LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-001469 Township Of Commerce, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: August 13, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
POS_CTVG_LLC_26-001469.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service CTVG, LLC v Commerce Township Parcel Number: 17-24-476-039 MTT Docket No.: 26-001469 Page 1 of 2 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL CTVG, LLC, Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 26-001469 COMMERCE TOWNSHIP, Respondent. _____________________________________________________________________________/ Colliers International By: Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) Senior Vice President | Tax Appeal Representative for Petitioner 400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 Royal Oak, MI 48067 O: 248-226-1632 F: 248-226-1633 Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com Karen.Cameron@Colliers.com Commerce Township Assessing Department 2009 Township Drive Commerce Township, MI 48390 248-960-7000 _____________________________________________________________________________/ PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF MICHIGAN ) )ss COUNTY OF OAKLAND ) Jennifer Lunsford, states that on 8/12/2026, in compliance with TTR 221, she did place in the US mail a copy of Petitioner’s 2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition with docket number as well as this Proof of Service of Petition for the above captioned appeal to the units of government listed on the second page of this Proof of Service of Petition. /s/Jennifer Lunsford Jennifer Lunsford Karen Cameron states that she submitted electronically on 8/12/2026, to the Michigan Tax Tribunal a copy of this Proof of Service of Petition at eFile through www.etaxappeal.lara.state.mi.us. /s/Karen Cameron Karen Cameron
Page 2
2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service CTVG, LLC v Commerce Township Parcel Number: 17-24-476-039 MTT Docket No.: 26-001469 Page 2 of 2 By Certified Mail Assessor’s Office Commerce Township Assessing Department 2009 Township Drive Commerce Township, MI 48390 Office of the Township Clerk Commerce Township Clerk's Office 2009 Township Drive Commerce Township, MI 48390 By First Class Mail Director of Equalization Oakland County Equalization Director 250 Elizabeth Lake Road, Suite 1000W Pontiac, MI 48341 County Clerk’s Office Oakland County Clerk’s Office 1200 N Telegraph Road Pontiac, MI 48341 Secretary of the School Board Walled Lake Consolidated Schools 850 Ladd Road, Building D Walled Lake, MI 48390 Treasurer for the State of Michigan Michigan Department of Treasury Lansing, MI 48922
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
SubsequentFiling.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-001469 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Petitioner Files Document Type: Proof of Service: Petition Attachment File Name: POS_CTVG_LLC_26-001469 Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
CTVGLLC.PET & POS.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service CTVG, LLC v Commerce Township Parcel Number: E -17-24-476-039 MTT Docket No.: Page 1 of 5 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL CTVG, LLC, Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. Commerce Township, Respondent. _____________________________________________________________________________/ Colliers International By: Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) Vice President | Tax Appeal Representative for Petitioner 400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 Royal Oak, MI 48067 O: 248-226-1632 F: 248-226-1633 Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com Karen.Cameron@Colliers.com Commerce Township Assessing Office 2009 Township Dr Commerce Township, MI 48390 (248) 624-0110 _____________________________________________________________________________/ 2026 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. The Petitioner in this matter, CTVG, LLC, has the legal residence or principal office address of 130 King St W, Suite 300,Toronto, ON M5X 1E1, Canada. Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property taxes on property parcel no(s). (hereinafter referenced as the Subject Property) E -17-24-476-039. If the Subject Property in this petition includes more than one (1) real property tax parcel, the Subject Property’s tax parcels are contiguous. 2. The Subject Property is located in Oakland County.
Page 2
2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service CTVG, LLC v Commerce Township Parcel Number: E -17-24-476-039 MTT Docket No.: Page 2 of 5 3. Respondent, Commerce Township of Oakland County, assesses and collects property taxes on the Subject Property. 4. The Subject Property is real property and is classified as Commercial. The Subject Property is presently used or available for use for Commercial purposes. Petitioner believes that the Subject Property was originally designed to be used for Commercial purposes. 5. Protest to the 2026 Board of Review was not made and is not required by law for the Subject Property. 6. The Subject Property’s address is: 2201 HAGGERTY RD, COMMERCE TOWNSHIP, MI 48390-1715 7. This appeal involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, (c) taxable value and (d) uniformity. 8. The tax year(s) at issue are: 2026 9. The values for the Subject Property as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 E -17-24-476- 039 $1,076,240.00 $538,120.00 $508,990.00 10. The 2026 assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value imposed upon all parcels of the Subject Property, and the taxes to be levied and collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: a. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value exceeds the amounts permitted by the Michigan Constitution, applicable statutes and case law;
Page 3
2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service CTVG, LLC v Commerce Township Parcel Number: E -17-24-476-039 MTT Docket No.: Page 3 of 5 b. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution, applicable statutes and case law; c. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value are based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash value of that portion of the Subject Property that is taxable under Michigan law, and are based upon the application of wrong principles; and d. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and denies Petitioner its constitutional rights to uniformity, equal protection and dues process of law. 11. Petitioner contends that the actual values for the Subject Property are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 E -17-24-476- 039 $568,800.00 $284,400.00 $284,400.00 12. The amount of value in contention for the Subject Property is: Tax Year Parcel Number Assessed Value in Contention 2026 E -17-24-476-039 $253,720.00 13. Petitioner relies on the following specific facts to support the relief requested: Market sales and income data indicates that the subject property’s assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value exceed 50% of its actual market value. In addition, the cost less depreciation method Respondent utilizes to establish the Subject Property’s assessment at issue is not related to the Subject Property’s actual market value.
Page 4
2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service CTVG, LLC v Commerce Township Parcel Number: E -17-24-476-039 MTT Docket No.: Page 4 of 5 WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that this Honorable Michigan Tax Tribunal enter an Order reducing the 2026 assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value for the Subject Property to the values stated in Paragraph 11 above and requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs. Respectfully Submitted, COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL Representative for Petitioner By:_/s/ Joshua T. Shillair__Dated:05/18/2026 Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) Vice President | Tax Appeal 400 E 4th Street, Suite 350 Royal Oak, MI 48067 O: 248-226-1632 F: 248-226-1633 Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com
Page 5
2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service CTVG, LLC v Commerce Township Parcel Number: E -17-24-476-039 MTT Docket No.: Page 5 of 5 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL CTVG, LLC, Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. Commerce Township, Respondent.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name CTVG, LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 130 King St W, Suite 300,Toronto, ON M5X 1E1, Canada City or Town TORONTO State Michigan ZIP Code 12345 Telephone Number 2482261632 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) tax.efile@colliers.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Joshua M.I. Thomas Last Name Shillair Firm Name (if any) Colliers International Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 City or Town Royal Oak State Michigan ZIP Code 48067 Telephone Number 248-226-1632 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) tax.efile@colliers.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 2201 HAGGERTY RD COMMERCE TOWNSHIP
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Michigan 48390-1715 Taxing Authority (City or Township) Township Of Commerce (OAKLAND) County Oakland If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: E -17-24-476-039 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 538120 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 508990 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 568800 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 284400 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ /s/Joshua T. Shillair Payment Information Amount: 400 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26052686973215 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.