Corlin Builders, Petitioner Vs. City Of Fenton, Respondent
- Petitioner
- Corlin Builders
- Respondent
- City Of Fenton
Case overview
- Docket number
- 25-002321-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Genesee
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Order of Dismissal | Not recorded | Not recorded | 01/07/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 10 | Proof of Service of Misc Documents was received. | PET | Not recorded | 01/07/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 9 | Motion to Withdraw Appeal was received. | PET | Not recorded | 01/07/2026 | $0.00 | Download |
| 8 | Prehearing General Call | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/18/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Answer was received | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/25/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | ET Case Info Sheet | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/25/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Appearance | RESP | Not recorded | 07/10/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Proof of service of petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 07/01/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 06/09/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/09/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/22/2025 | $400.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Corlin Builders, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002321 City Of Fenton, Respondent. ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that the parties have filed a Joint Motion to Withdraw the appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case. By:_____________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: January 7, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Corlin Builders, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002321 City Of Fenton, Respondent. ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that the parties have filed a Joint Motion to Withdraw the appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case. By:_____________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: January 7, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL CORLIN BUILDERS, Petitioner, v CITY OF FENTON, Respondent. MTT DOCKET No. 25-002321 PARCEL NO. 53-36-506-217 ______________________________________/ Ward D. Tubbs Jim Tubbs Tax Consultants Petitioner Representative G-8469 S. Saginaw Street Grand Blanc, MI 48439 (810) 444-1779 JTCD0543@gmail.com Ross K. Bower II (P70574) Samantha R. Reetz (P86523) Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC Attorneys for Respondent 4151 Okemos Road Okemos, Michigan 48864 (517) 381-0100 Rbower@fsbrlaw.com sreetz@fsbrlaw.com ______________________________________/ PROOF OF SERVICE Jamy A. Staffeld states that on January 7, 2026 she served a copy of Joint Motion to Withdraw Appeal, and this Proof of Service, upon the following via electronic mail: Ward D. Tubbs Jim Tubbs Tax Consultants G-8469 S. Saginaw Street Grand Blanc, MI 48439 JTCD0543@gmail.com I declare that the statements above are true to the best of my information, knowledge, and belief. /s/ Jamy A Staffeld Jamy A. Staffeld
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 _____________________________, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. _____________________________, Respondent(s) JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEAL 1. Petitioner wishes to withdraw its appeal in the above-captioned docket. 2. Good cause exists to grant withdrawal because: 3. Respondent has no objection to Petitioner’s request to withdraw the appeal. 4. The parties ask this Tribunal to grant Petitioner’s request to withdraw the appeal and dismiss the above-captioned docket. _____________________________________ ___________________________________ Petitioner/Representative (sign here) Date _____________________________________ [Print/type name of person signing] _________________________________________ ___________________________________ Respondent/Representative (sign here) Date _________________________________________ [Print/type name of person signing] Corlin Builders 25-002321 City of Fenton The parties hereto, by their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate to the withdrawal of Docket #25-002321 with prejudice and without costs. /s/Ward D. Tubbs 01/07/26 Ward D. Tubbs /s/ Ross K. Bower 01/07/26 Ross K. Bower II (P70574)
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA ACTING DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NOTICE OF JULY 16 - 31, 2026 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER OF PROCEDURE Corlin Builders, Petitioner, v City Of Fenton, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 25-002321 Please be advised that 25-002321 has been placed on a two-week Prehearing General Call commencing July 16, 2026. Parties will be notified at least one week before they are scheduled to appear. Parties are required to submit a valuation disclosure or written notification that no valuation disclosure is required by the dates indicated herein. A “valuation disclosure” is defined as documentary or other tangible evidence in a property tax proceeding that a party relies upon in support of the party’s contention as to the true cash value of the subject property or any portion thereof and contains the party’s value conclusion and data, valuation methodology, analysis or reasoning, as provided by TTR 237. In accordance with MCR 1.109(D)(9), as of January 1, 2021, the responsibility for excluding or redacting personal identifying information (PII) from all documents filed with or offered to the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and their attorneys. The Tribunal is not responsible for or required to review, redact, or screen documents at the time of filing for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. Please refer to the Tribunal’s FAQs and Glossary of Terms pages on our website for more information. IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall: a. If no valuation disclosure is required, notify the Tribunal and the opposing parties in writing within 21 days of entry of this Order that no valuation disclosure is being filed. The notice shall indicate the reason or reasons why no valuation disclosure is required (i.e., exemption claim, etc.). b. If a valuation disclosure is required, file and exchange their valuation disclosures by March 19, 2026. Valuation disclosures will not be admitted into evidence unless disclosed and furnished in accordance with this Order (even though admissible) except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-002321 Page 2 of 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their Prehearing Statements by March 19, 2026. Witnesses will not be allowed to testify unless disclosed in the Prehearing Statement and the Prehearing Statement is furnished in accordance with this Order except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. Failure to file the Prehearing Statement may result in holding a party or parties in default, as provided by TTR 237. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on March 19, 2026, which means all discovery has been requested, all motions to compel have been filed and resolved, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. Discovery relative to the valuation disclosure prepared for purposes of litigating this case or the valuation expert that prepared that valuation disclosure is not permitted during “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on July 16, 2026, which means all discovery has been requested, all motions to compel have been filed and resolved, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is limited to the opposing party’s valuation disclosure, the opposing party’s valuation expert, and the witnesses identified on the opposing party’s Prehearing Statement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if this case is not scheduled for a date certain Prehearing Conference during the time frame indicated it may be scheduled for a date certain Prehearing Conference at any time subsequent to the completion date for this Prehearing General Call. Parties will, however, be notified in writing approximately one week before they are scheduled to appear. By:_____________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: August 18, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA ACTING DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NOTICE OF JULY 16 - 31, 2026 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER OF PROCEDURE Corlin Builders, Petitioner, v City Of Fenton, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 25-002321 Please be advised that 25-002321 has been placed on a two-week Prehearing General Call commencing July 16, 2026. Parties will be notified at least one week before they are scheduled to appear. Parties are required to submit a valuation disclosure or written notification that no valuation disclosure is required by the dates indicated herein. A “valuation disclosure” is defined as
Page 4
MT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
1 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL CORLIN BUILDERS, Petitioner, v CITY OF FENTON, Respondent. MTT DOCKET No. 25-002321 PARCEL NO. 53-36-506-217 ______________________________________/ Ward D. Tubbs Jim Tubbs Tax Consultants Petitioner Representative G-8469 S. Saginaw Street Grand Blanc, MI 48439 (810) 444-1779 JTCD0543@gmail.com Ross K. Bower II (P70574) Samantha R. Reetz (P86523) Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC Attorneys for Respondent 4151 Okemos Road Okemos, Michigan 48864 (517) 381-0100 Rbower@fsbrlaw.com sreetz@fsbrlaw.com ______________________________________/ ANSWER TO ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION Respondent, CITY OF FENTON, by and through its counsel, FAHEY SCHULTZ BURZYCH RHODES PLC, and hereby answers Petitioner’s Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition as follows: 1. Property Parcel No: 53-36-506-217 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) ANSWER: Respondent admits the allegation contained in the above paragraph.
Page 2
2 2. The property identified above is X real personal. ANSWER: Respondent admits the allegation contained in the above paragraph. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? Yes No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) ANSWER: N/A 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? Yes No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) ANSWER: N/A 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): N/A ANSWER: N/A 6. The property identified above is classified as Commercial ANSWER: Respondent admits the allegation contained in the above paragraph. 7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to Respondent’s March July December Board of Review. ANSWER: N/A 8. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): N/A ANSWER: N/A
Page 3
3 9. If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): N/A ANSWER: N/A 10. The property or properties at issue are located in Genesee County. The property or properties’ address is: 111 S Leroy St. Fenton, MI 48430 ANSWER: Respondent admits the allegation contained in the above paragraph. 11. The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): City of Fenton ANSWER: Respondent admits the allegation contained in the above paragraph. 12. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 8210 S. Saginaw St. Suite 2 Grand Blanc, MI 48439 ANSWER: Respondent states that it is without sufficient knowledge or information upon which to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations, which are therefore deemed denied, leaving Petitioner to its proofs. 13. This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): x the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? Yes No uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ANSWER: Respondent states that the legal conclusions require no answer, and to the extent that an answer may be required, neither admits nor denies the allegations contained in the above paragraph and leaves Petitioner to its proofs.
Page 4
4 14. The tax year(s) at issue are: 2025 ANSWER: Respondent admits that Petitioner purports to contest the subject property’s true cash and taxable value for the 2025 tax year. 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): N/A ANSWER: N/A 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 5,555,600 2,777,800 2,777,800 ANSWER: Respondent admits the allegation contained in the above paragraph. 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 4,559,600 2,279,800 2,279,800 ANSWER: Respondent admits only that Petitioner purports to make the indicated contentions of value but
Page 5
5
Page 6
STATE
Page 7
2
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-002321 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City Of Fenton (GENESEE) Local Unit of Government/First Name M.I. Last Name Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State Michigan ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Ross M.I. K Last Name Bower Firm Name (if any) Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 4151 Okemos Road City or Town Okemos State Michigan ZIP Code 48864 Telephone Number 517-381-0100 Fax Number 517-381-5051 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) jstaffeld@fsbrlaw.com Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: Ross K. Bower II /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL CORLIN BUILDERS, Petitioner, v CITY OF FENTON, Respondent. MTT DOCKET No. 25-002321 PARCEL NO. 53-36-506-217 ______________________________________/ Ward D. Tubbs Jim Tubbs Tax Consultants Petitioner Representative G-8469 S. Saginaw Street Grand Blanc, MI 48439 (810) 444-1779 JTCD0543@gmail.com Ross K. Bower II (P70574) Samantha R. Reetz (P86523) Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC Attorneys for Respondent 4151 Okemos Road Okemos, Michigan 48864 (517) 381-0100 Rbower@fsbrlaw.com sreetz@fsbrlaw.com ______________________________________/ APPEARANCE FAHEY SCHULTZ BURZYCH RHODES PLC, hereby enters its Appearance on behalf of Respondent, City of Fenton, in the above-entitled matter. Dated: July 10, 2025 Respectfully submitted, Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC Attorneys for Respondent By: __________________________________ Ross K. Bower II (P70574) Samantha R. Reetz (P86523) 4151 Okemos Road Okemos, MI 48864 (517) 381-0100
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL CORLIN BUILDERS, Petitioner, v CITY OF FENTON, Respondent. MTT DOCKET No. 25-002321 PARCEL NO. 53-36-506-217 ______________________________________/ Ward D. Tubbs Jim Tubbs Tax Consultants Petitioner Representative G-8469 S. Saginaw Street Grand Blanc, MI 48439 (810) 444-1779 JTCD0543@gmail.com Ross K. Bower II (P70574) Samantha R. Reetz (P86523) Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC Attorneys for Respondent 4151 Okemos Road Okemos, Michigan 48864 (517) 381-0100 Rbower@fsbrlaw.com sreetz@fsbrlaw.com ______________________________________/ PROOF OF SERVICE Jamy A. Staffeld states that on July 10, 2025 she served a copy of Appearance and this Proof of Service, upon the following via first class mail: Ward D. Tubbs Jim Tubbs Tax Consultants G-8469 S. Saginaw Street Grand Blanc, MI 48439 I declare that the statements above are true to the best of my information, knowledge, and belief. /s/ Jamy A Staffeld Jamy A. Staffeld
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED JUL 01 2025 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA roe wT ING AN DIRECTOR Corlin Builders , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No.25-002321 City of Fenton Respondent(s) PROOF OF SERVICE FOR PROPERTY TAX PETITION *To be filed after the Tribunal issues the Notice of Docket Number* Ward D. Tubbs states that on he/she [Name of person serving/mailing petition] [date of service] served a copy of the Petition relative to the above-captioned matter upon: [Provide name and address of the following entities] 1. Assessor (via certified mail): City of Fenton 301 S Leroy Fenton,MI 48430 2. City Clerk or Township Supervisor/Clerk (via certified mail): City of Fenton 301 S Leroy Fenton, MI 48430 3. County Equalization Director (via first class mail or personal service): Genesee County 1101 Beach St. Flint, MI 48502 4. County Clerk (via first class mail or personal service): Genesee County 1101 Beach St. Flint, MI 48502 5. Secretary of the local school board (via first class mail or personal service): Fenton Area Public Schools 3100 Owen Rd. Fenton, MI 48430 6. State Treasurer (via first class mail): Michigan Department of Treasury, State Treasurer 430 W. Allegan
Page 2
RECEIVED MAY 2 9 2025 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ) STATE OF MICHIGAN i GRETGHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |, BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Corlin Builders , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. City of Fenton , Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: §3-36-506-217 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing ail other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identifled above is X real ___personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___Yes ___ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4, Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___Yes ___ No. (if no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): N/A 6. The property identified above is classified as Commercial
Page 3
MTT Docket No. Page 2 of 4 8. 10. 11. 12. 13. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunals authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): N/A If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attéch additional page if necessary): N/A The property or properties at issue are located in Genesee County. The property or properties’ address is: 111 S Leroy St. Fenton, MI 48430 The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit); City of Fenton Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is; 8210 S. Saginaw St. Suite 2 Grand Blanc, Ml 48439 This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): X the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition orloss? ___ Yes ___ No uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment
Page 4
MTT Docket No. Page 3 of 4 16. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relles to invoke the Tribunals authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): N/A 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review ars: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 -| 5,555,600 2,777,800 2,777,800 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 4,559,600 2,279,800 2,276,800 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 996,000 498,000 498,000 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): The assessment when equalized exceeds 50% of True Cash Value. The property as improved suffers from physical, functional and economic depreciation.
Page 5
MTT Docket No. ‘Page 4 of 4 ure of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: ~~ Ve Printed Name of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Ward D. Tubbs Email Address: JTCD0543@gmail.com Mailing Address: Jim Tubbs Tax Consultants G-8469 S Saginaw St. Grand Blanc, MI 48439 Telephone Number; 810 444-1779 Date: 05-19-2025
Page 6
RAT TENSE NB ‘Ward D.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED MAY 29 2075 ET MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL nt STATE OF MICHIGAN [IEE EEEER 3 BE REE GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Corlin Builders MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) MTT Docket No. City of Fenton Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: 53-36-506-217 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is X real ___ personal. 3. If more than one parcel or rea property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ____ Yes __ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4, Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parce! of real property under appeal? ___Yes __No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): N/A 6. The property identified above is classified as Commercial
Page 2
MTT Docket No. Page 2 of 4 10. 11. 12. 13. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): N/A If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’'s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): N/A The property or properties at issue are located in Genesee County. The property or properties’ address is: 111 S Leroy St. Fenton, MI 48430 The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): City of Fenton Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 8210 S. Saginaw St. Suite 2 Grand Blanc, MI 48439 This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): X the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition orloss? ___ Yes _ No
Page 3
MTT Docket No. Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the prior tax year or vears (attach additional page if necessary): N/A 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 5,555,600 2,777,800 2,777,800 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 4,569,600 2,279,800 2,279,800 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 996,000 498,000 498,000 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): The assessment when equalized exceeds 50% of True Cash Value. The property as improved suffers from physical, functional and economic depreciation.
Page 4
MTT Docket No. Page 4 of 4 Printed Name of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Ward D. Tubbs Email Address: JTCD0543@gmail.com Mailing Address: Jim Tubbs Tax Consultants G-8469 S Saginaw St. Grand Blanc, Ml 48439 Telephone Number: 810 444-1779 Date: 05-19-2025
Page 5
Corlin Builders Petitioner City of Fenton Respondent 2025 Assessed Value 2025 Requested Assessed Value Assessed Value in dispute Filing Fee State of Michigan Michigan Tax Tribunal Filing Fee 2,777,800 2,279,800 498,800 $400.00
Page 6
Ward D. Tubbs Jim Tubbs Tax Consultants, LLC G-8469 S. Saginaw St 22 MAY 2025 AM 16L Grand Blanc, MI 48439 METROPLEX ME ‘480 Michigan Tax Tribunal PO Box 30232 Lansing, Mi 48909 jin
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Corlin Builders, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 25-002321 City Of Fenton, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this Notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this Notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this Notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the Notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: __Tribunal Clerk________ Entered: June 9, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED MAY 29 2075 ET MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL nt STATE OF MICHIGAN [IEE EEEER 3 BE REE GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Corlin Builders MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) MTT Docket No. City of Fenton Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: 53-36-506-217 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is X real ___ personal. 3. If more than one parcel or rea property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ____ Yes __ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4, Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parce! of real property under appeal? ___Yes __No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): N/A 6. The property identified above is classified as Commercial
Page 2
MTT Docket No. Page 2 of 4 10. 11. 12. 13. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): N/A If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’'s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): N/A The property or properties at issue are located in Genesee County. The property or properties’ address is: 111 S Leroy St. Fenton, MI 48430 The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): City of Fenton Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 8210 S. Saginaw St. Suite 2 Grand Blanc, MI 48439 This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): X the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition orloss? ___ Yes _ No
Page 3
MTT Docket No. Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the prior tax year or vears (attach additional page if necessary): N/A 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 5,555,600 2,777,800 2,777,800 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 4,569,600 2,279,800 2,279,800 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 996,000 498,000 498,000 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): The assessment when equalized exceeds 50% of True Cash Value. The property as improved suffers from physical, functional and economic depreciation.
Page 4
MTT Docket No. Page 4 of 4 Printed Name of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Ward D. Tubbs Email Address: JTCD0543@gmail.com Mailing Address: Jim Tubbs Tax Consultants G-8469 S Saginaw St. Grand Blanc, Ml 48439 Telephone Number: 810 444-1779 Date: 05-19-2025
Page 5
Corlin Builders Petitioner City of Fenton Respondent 2025 Assessed Value 2025 Requested Assessed Value Assessed Value in dispute Filing Fee State of Michigan Michigan Tax Tribunal Filing Fee 2,777,800 2,279,800 498,800 $400.00
Page 6
Ward D. Tubbs Jim Tubbs Tax Consultants, LLC G-8469 S. Saginaw St 22 MAY 2025 AM 16L Grand Blanc, MI 48439 METROPLEX ME ‘480 Michigan Tax Tribunal PO Box 30232 Lansing, Mi 48909 jin
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.