Charwood North LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Warren Respondent

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

CHARWOOD NORTH LLC, 

Petitioner, 

Vv. 

MTT Docket # 26-001554 

CITY OF WARREN, 

Respondent. 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

) 

} ss. 

COUNTY OF OAKLAND) 

Opxonen.d 

Aaron M. Fales, being duly sworn, deposes and says that on September __, 2026 he served a 

copy of Petitioner's Petition on the parties named on the attached list. 

J 

all 

Aaron M. Fales

Page 2

BY CERTIFIED UNITED STATES MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED: 

ONE 

UH 

VIARREM, 

AND BY FIRST-CLASS UNITED STATES MAIL: 

Cie 

MATOMB 

COI 

ATT FL KRYCIA ADM BLDG. 

| 1 

MA. CLEME 

DIRECTOR 

¢ 

MAL 

ATTM: # KRYCiA ADM 

El 

aT, CLIME! 

WARREN CONSO. DAL 

31300, Un

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Charwood North LLC, 

Petitioner, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

v 

MTT Docket No.: 26-001554 

City Of Warren, 

Respondent. 

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER 

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. 

A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. 

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” 

Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default. 

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. 

Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules. 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

Entered: August 18, 2026 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

| certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

CHARWOOD NORTH, LLC, 

Petitioner, 

MTT Docket #26. DOSS) 

ve 

Parcel No. 12-13-13-351-054 & 

CITY OF WARREN, 

12-13-13-351-055 

Respondent. 

, 

PETITION 

CHARWOOD NORTH, LLC (“Petitioner”), through 

its attorneys, Law Office 

of Aaron M. Fales, P.C., says: 

1. 

Petitioner's principal office address 

is 43900 Garfield Rd., Ste. 203, 

Clinton Twp., Ml 48038. 

Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property 

faxes on contiguous real property tax parcel nos. 12-13-13-351-054 and 12-13-13- 

351-055 ("Petitioner's Property"), at 27472 & 27550 Schoenherr, respectively. 

2. 

Respondent, City of Warren, assesses and coliects property taxes on 

Petitioner's Property. 

3. 

In 2025, Respondent determined the taxable value of Petitioner's 

Property 

to 

be 

$1,351,110 and 

assessed 

Petitioner's 

Property 

at 

$1,446,650 

resulting in a state equalized value of the same amount based on the tenative

Page 5

$390,650 resulting in a state equalized value of the same amount based on the 

tenative equalization factor for parcel 12-13-13-351-055. 

4, 

Petitioner's 

Property 

is 

classified 

as 

Commercial 

Real 

Property. 

Petitioner's Property 

is an 

office 

Building. 

Petitioner believes that Petitioner's 

Property was originally designed to be used for commercial purposes. 

5. 

This matter involves issues relating to: {a} valuation, (b) assessment, 

(c) taxable value, and {d} uniformity. 

6. 

At this time, Petitioner believes, as 

it relates to taxable value, that 

there is a dispute relative fo the value of a loss. 

7. 

The 2026 assessments, including state equalized value and taxable 

value, 

imposed 

on 

Petitioner's 

Property, 

and 

the 

taxes 

to 

be 

levied 

and 

collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the 

taxpayer for the reasons that: 

(a) 

The 

assessment, 

including 

state 

equalized 

value 

and/or 

taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and 

applicable statutes; 

(b) 

The 

assessment, 

including 

state 

equalized 

value 

and/or 

taxable value, are af higher percentages of true cash value than permissible 

under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes;

Page 6

value of that portion of Petitioner's Property that is taxable under Michigan law, 

and are based upon the application of wrong principles; and, 

(d) 

The 

assessment, 

including 

state 

equalized 

value 

and/or 

taxable 

value, 

and 

the 

mode 

of 

assessment 

adopted 

by 

Respondent, 

discriminate against Petitioner and deny Pefitioner 

its constitutional 

rights 

fo 

uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. 

WHEREFORE, 

Petitioner requests 

that 

the 

Tax Tribunal 

enter an Order 

reducing the 2026 taxable value of Petitioner's Property identified as Parcel 12- 

13-13-351-054 from $1,351,110 to $1,000,000, and reducing the 2026 assessed 

and state equalized values of Petitioner's Property from $1,446,650 to $1,000,000 

and reducing the 2026 taxable value of Petitioner's Property identified as Parcel 

12-13-13-351-055 from $390,650 to $200,000, and reducing the 2026 assessed and 

state equalized values of Petitioner's Property from $390,650 to $200,000, and 

requiring 

Respondent 

to 

pay 

Petitioner 

the 

refunds 

attributable 

to 

such 

reductions, plus interest and costs.

Page 7

Respectfully submitted, 

LAW OFFICE OF AARON M. FALES, P.C. 

Attorney for Petitioner 

EY 

Aaron M. Fales (P72864) 

330 Hamilton Row, Ste. 350 

Birmingham, Mi 48009 

(248) 767-9840 

By: 

Dated: May 27, 2026

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

Docket Number: 26-001554

Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No

Party Filing Document 

Petitioner

Files

Document Type: Proof of Service: Petition

Attachment File Name: 26 - Charwood POS

Fee Information

Filing Fee: $ 0.00

Payment Information

Payment: $ 0.00

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

CHARWOOD NORTH, LLC, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

CITY OF WARREN, 

Respondent. 

/

 

 

 

MTT Docket #26- 

Parcel No. 12-13-13-351-054 & 

 12-13-13-351-055 

 

PETITION 

 

 

CHARWOOD NORTH, LLC (“Petitioner”), through its attorneys, Law Office 

of Aaron M. Fales, P.C., says: 

 

1. 

Petitioner's principal office address is 43900 Garfield Rd., Ste. 203, 

Clinton Twp., MI 48038. Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property 

taxes on contiguous real property tax parcel nos. 12-13-13-351-054 and 12-13-13-

351-055 ("Petitioner's Property"), at 27472 & 27550 Schoenherr, respectively. 

 

2. 

Respondent, City of Warren, assesses and collects property taxes on 

Petitioner's Property. 

 

3. 

 In 2025, Respondent determined the taxable value of Petitioner's 

Property to be $1,351,110 and assessed Petitioner's Property at $1,446,650 

resulting in a state equalized value of the same amount based on the tenative 

equalization factor for parcel 12-13-13-351-054 and determined the taxable 

value of Petitioner's Property to be $390,650 and assessed Petitioner's Property at

Page 2

$390,650 resulting in a state equalized value of the same amount based on the 

tenative equalization factor for parcel 12-13-13-351-055. 

 

4. 

Petitioner's Property is classified as Commercial Real Property. 

Petitioner's Property is an office Building. Petitioner believes that Petitioner's 

Property was originally designed to be used for commercial purposes. 

 

5. 

This matter involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, 

(c) taxable value, and (d) uniformity. 

 

6. 

At this time, Petitioner believes, as it relates to taxable value, that 

there is a dispute relative to the value of a loss. 

 

7. 

The 2026 assessments, including state equalized value and taxable 

value, imposed on Petitioner's Property, and the taxes to be levied and 

collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the 

taxpayer for the reasons that: 

 

 

(a) 

The assessment, including state equalized value and/or 

taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and 

applicable statutes; 

 

 

(b) 

The assessment, including state equalized value and/or 

taxable value, are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible 

under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

 

 

(c) 

The assessment, including taxable value and/or state 

equalized value, are based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash

Page 3

value of that portion of Petitioner's Property that is taxable under Michigan law, 

and are based upon the application of wrong principles; and, 

 

 

(d) 

The assessment, including state equalized value and/or 

taxable value, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, 

discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional rights to 

uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. 

 

WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order 

reducing the 2026 taxable value of Petitioner's Property identified as Parcel 12-

13-13-351-054 from $1,351,110 to $1,000,000, and reducing the 2026 assessed 

and state equalized values of Petitioner's Property from $1,446,650 to $1,000,000 

and reducing the 2026 taxable value of Petitioner's Property identified as Parcel 

12-13-13-351-055 from $390,650 to $200,000, and reducing the 2026 assessed and 

state equalized values of Petitioner's Property from $390,650 to $200,000, and 

requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner the refunds attributable to such 

reductions, plus interest and costs.

Page 4

Dated: May 27, 2026 

Respectfully submitted, 

 

LAW OFFICE OF AARON M. FALES, P.C. 

Attorney for Petitioner 

 

 

 

By: _________________________ 

 

Aaron M. Fales (P72864) 

 330 Hamilton Row, Ste. 350 

 Birmingham, MI 48009 

 (248) 767-9840

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Organization 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

Charwood North LLC

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

43900 Garfield

City or Town

Clinton Twp.

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48038

Telephone Number

2487679840

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

afaleslaw@gmail.com

 

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Aaron

M.I.

Last Name

Fales

Firm Name (if any)

Law Office of Aaron M Fales, P.C.

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

330 Hamilton Row

Suite 350

City or Town

Birmingham

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48009

Telephone Number

248-767-9840

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

afaleslaw@gmail.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

2

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

27472 and 27550 Schoenherr

Warren

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Michigan

48093

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City Of Warren (MACOMB) 

County

Macomb

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

Yes

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

If “Other”, please explain:

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

12-13-13-351-054

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

1446650

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

1351110

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

2000000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

1000000

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

1000000

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

12-13-13-351-055

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

390650

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

390650

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

400000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

200000

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

200000

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Aaron Fales

Payment Information

Amount: 425

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26052787080921

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Charwood North LLC, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 26-001554

City Of Warren, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: August 18, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

CHARWOOD NORTH, LLC, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

CITY OF WARREN, 

Respondent. 

/

 

 

 

MTT Docket #26- 

Parcel No. 12-13-13-351-054 & 

 12-13-13-351-055 

 

PETITION 

 

 

CHARWOOD NORTH, LLC (“Petitioner”), through its attorneys, Law Office 

of Aaron M. Fales, P.C., says: 

 

1. 

Petitioner's principal office address is 43900 Garfield Rd., Ste. 203, 

Clinton Twp., MI 48038. Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property 

taxes on contiguous real property tax parcel nos. 12-13-13-351-054 and 12-13-13-

351-055 ("Petitioner's Property"), at 27472 & 27550 Schoenherr, respectively. 

 

2. 

Respondent, City of Warren, assesses and collects property taxes on 

Petitioner's Property. 

 

3. 

 In 2025, Respondent determined the taxable value of Petitioner's 

Property to be $1,351,110 and assessed Petitioner's Property at $1,446,650 

resulting in a state equalized value of the same amount based on the tenative 

equalization factor for parcel 12-13-13-351-054 and determined the taxable 

value of Petitioner's Property to be $390,650 and assessed Petitioner's Property at

Page 2

$390,650 resulting in a state equalized value of the same amount based on the 

tenative equalization factor for parcel 12-13-13-351-055. 

 

4. 

Petitioner's Property is classified as Commercial Real Property. 

Petitioner's Property is an office Building. Petitioner believes that Petitioner's 

Property was originally designed to be used for commercial purposes. 

 

5. 

This matter involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, 

(c) taxable value, and (d) uniformity. 

 

6. 

At this time, Petitioner believes, as it relates to taxable value, that 

there is a dispute relative to the value of a loss. 

 

7. 

The 2026 assessments, including state equalized value and taxable 

value, imposed on Petitioner's Property, and the taxes to be levied and 

collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the 

taxpayer for the reasons that: 

 

 

(a) 

The assessment, including state equalized value and/or 

taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and 

applicable statutes; 

 

 

(b) 

The assessment, including state equalized value and/or 

taxable value, are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible 

under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

 

 

(c) 

The assessment, including taxable value and/or state 

equalized value, are based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash

Page 3

value of that portion of Petitioner's Property that is taxable under Michigan law, 

and are based upon the application of wrong principles; and, 

 

 

(d) 

The assessment, including state equalized value and/or 

taxable value, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, 

discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional rights to 

uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. 

 

WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order 

reducing the 2026 taxable value of Petitioner's Property identified as Parcel 12-

13-13-351-054 from $1,351,110 to $1,000,000, and reducing the 2026 assessed 

and state equalized values of Petitioner's Property from $1,446,650 to $1,000,000 

and reducing the 2026 taxable value of Petitioner's Property identified as Parcel 

12-13-13-351-055 from $390,650 to $200,000, and reducing the 2026 assessed and 

state equalized values of Petitioner's Property from $390,650 to $200,000, and 

requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner the refunds attributable to such 

reductions, plus interest and costs.

Page 4

Dated: May 27, 2026 

Respectfully submitted, 

 

LAW OFFICE OF AARON M. FALES, P.C. 

Attorney for Petitioner 

 

 

 

By: _________________________ 

 

Aaron M. Fales (P72864) 

 330 Hamilton Row, Ste. 350 

 Birmingham, MI 48009 

 (248) 767-9840

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Organization 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

Charwood North LLC

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

43900 Garfield

City or Town

Clinton Twp.

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48038

Telephone Number

2487679840

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

afaleslaw@gmail.com

 

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Aaron

M.I.

Last Name

Fales

Firm Name (if any)

Law Office of Aaron M Fales, P.C.

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

330 Hamilton Row

Suite 350

City or Town

Birmingham

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48009

Telephone Number

248-767-9840

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

afaleslaw@gmail.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

2

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

27472 and 27550 Schoenherr

Warren

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Michigan

48093

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City Of Warren (MACOMB) 

County

Macomb

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

Yes

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

If “Other”, please explain:

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

12-13-13-351-054

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

1446650

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

1351110

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

2000000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

1000000

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

1000000

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

12-13-13-351-055

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

390650

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

390650

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

400000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

200000

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

200000

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Aaron Fales

Payment Information

Amount: 425

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26052787080921

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.