Brian J Hamlin Petitioner V City Of Birmingham Respondent
- Petitioner
- Brian J Hamlin
- Respondent
- City Of Birmingham
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-002795-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Oakland
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Order of Dismissal | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/16/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Notice of Filing of Motion to Withdraw | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/04/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | Motion to Withdraw Appeal was received. | PET | Not recorded | 09/01/2026 | $0.00 | Download |
| 5 | Notice of Filing | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/04/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 08/21/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 07/28/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/27/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/15/2026 | $100.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Brian J Hamlin, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002795 City Of Birmingham, Respondent. ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that: Petitioner has filed a Motion to Withdraw the Petition and Respondent has not filed an objection to the requested withdrawal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case. APPEAL RIGHTS If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-002795 Page 2 of 2 the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the record on appeal. There is no certification fee. By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: September 16, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Brian J Hamlin, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002795 City Of Birmingham, Respondent. ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that: Petitioner has filed a Motion to Withdraw the Petition and Respondent has not filed an objection to the requested withdrawal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case. APPEAL RIGHTS If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 26-002795 Page 2 of 2 the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the record on appeal. There is no certification fee. By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: September 16, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 5
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING,
Page 6
M
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Brian J Hamlin, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002795 City Of Birmingham, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEAL TAKE NOTICE that Petitioner has filed a Motion to Withdraw (Motion) in the above- captioned appeal. Because the motion was not filed jointly (i.e. signed by both parties or representatives), Respondent has seven days from the service of the motion to file a response. Respondent may respond by agreeing to (i.e. concurrence) the withdrawal of the case or by objecting to the motion. If Respondent does not timely submit a concurrence or objection to the request, it will be deemed to be a concurrence and the request will be granted, unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. If the request is granted, the case will be dismissed. If a request is not granted or the Tribunal has not notified you that it has been granted, you are required to attend the hearing. For your convenience, you may use the Tribunal’s form “Response to Motion to Withdraw Appeal” located on the Tribunal’s website. To access the form, please go to our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib and go to either the “Entire Tribunal” or “Small Claims” page, depending on the division in which the case is pending. To submit the response, please fill out the form and file it with the Tribunal by e-mail or e-filing.1 By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: September 4, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk 1 Though you may file the response by hard copy (i.e. mail), filing by e-mail or e-filing will facilitate the efficient administration of justice.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Brian J Hamlin, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002795 City Of Birmingham, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEAL TAKE NOTICE that Petitioner has filed a Motion to Withdraw (Motion) in the above- captioned appeal. Because the motion was not filed jointly (i.e. signed by both parties or representatives), Respondent has seven days from the service of the motion to file a response. Respondent may respond by agreeing to (i.e. concurrence) the withdrawal of the case or by objecting to the motion. If Respondent does not timely submit a concurrence or objection to the request, it will be deemed to be a concurrence and the request will be granted, unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. If the request is granted, the case will be dismissed. If a request is not granted or the Tribunal has not notified you that it has been granted, you are required to attend the hearing. For your convenience, you may use the Tribunal’s form “Response to Motion to Withdraw Appeal” located on the Tribunal’s website. To access the form, please go to our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib and go to either the “Entire Tribunal” or “Small Claims” page, depending on the division in which the case is pending. To submit the response, please fill out the form and file it with the Tribunal by e-mail or e-filing.2 By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: September 4, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk 2 Though you may file the response by hard copy (i.e. mail), filing by e-mail or e-filing will facilitate the efficient administration of justice.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Brian J Hamlin, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002795 City Of Birmingham, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEAL TAKE NOTICE that Petitioner has filed a Motion to Withdraw (Motion) in the above- captioned appeal. Because the motion was not filed jointly (i.e. signed by both parties or representatives), Respondent has seven days from the service of the motion to file a response. Respondent may respond by agreeing to (i.e. concurrence) the withdrawal of the case or by objecting to the motion. If Respondent does not timely submit a concurrence or objection to the request, it will be deemed to be a concurrence and the request will be granted, unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. If the request is granted, the case will be dismissed. If a request is not granted or the Tribunal has not notified you that it has been granted, you are required to attend the hearing. For your convenience, you may use the Tribunal’s form “Response to Motion to Withdraw Appeal” located on the Tribunal’s website. To access the form, please go to our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib and go to either the “Entire Tribunal” or “Small Claims” page, depending on the division in which the case is pending. To submit the response, please fill out
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
i RECEIVED SEP 03 2026 Brian J. Hamlin 1061 Northlawn Blvd. Birmingham, MI 48009 248-842-4788 brian. hamlin@gmail.com September 1, 2026 Michigan Tax Tribunal PO Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 Re: Notice of Withdrawal — MTT Docket No. 26-002795, Hamlin v. City of Birmingham To the Michigan Tax Tribunal: Please be advised that Petitioner, Brian J. Hamlin, hereby withdraws, with prejudice, the Petition filed in the above-referenced matter, MTT Docket No. 26-002795, Hamlin v. City of Birmingham, concerning the special assessment for the property located at 1061 Northlawn Blvd., Birmingham, MI 48009 (Parcel ID 08-19-35-430-005). Petitioner requests that the Tribunal close this docket accordingly. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, LL Brian J. Hamlin cc: Michael C. Gibbons, Beier Howlett, P.C. (mgibbons@bhlaw.us.com) MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
Page 2
= de ln i. (Clq Neveu Weemiyhew, My ySoe9 S202 on Mid, ian Tat TT boone ( HCE d3g 0. Rox . Lansing Me UR909 Pana Io0sy BERD RUE HUT TE A A A
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Brian J Hamlin, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002795 City Of Birmingham, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important information. EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail. Alternate Dispute Resolution Options INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an appeal of a principal residence exemption that was denied by either the Michigan Department of Treasury or a County. Also, state taxes levied by the Michigan Department of Treasury, such as income taxes, are not subject to the informal settlement conference process.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-002795 Page 2 of 2 MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or email taxtrib@michigan.gov. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Brian J Hamlin, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002795 City Of Birmingham, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important information. EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail. Alternate Dispute Resolution Options INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an appeal of a principal residence exemption that was
Page 4
MTT
Page 5
STA
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
1 March 23, 2026 City Commission Minutes Monday, March 23, 2026 - 7:00 p.m. 151 Martin Street, Birmingham City Commission Room 205 Vimeo Link: https://vimeo.com/event/3470 _________________________________________________ 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Clinton Baller, Mayor, opened the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. ROLL CALL City Clerk Bingham called the roll. Present: Mayor Clinton Baller Mayor Pro Tem Anthony Long Commissioner Andrew Haig Commissioner Brad Host Commissioner Kevin Kozlowski Commissioner William Kolb Commissioner Therese Longe Absent: None Staff: City Manager Ecker; Fire Chief Bartalino, City Clerk Bingham, City Planner Blizinski, City Engineer Coatta, Assistant City Manager Fairbairn, Planning Director Dupuis, Police Chief Grewe, Deputy Treasurer Katz, City Attorney Kucharek 3. PROCLAMATIONS, CONGRATULATORY RESOLUTIONS, AWARDS, APPOINTMENTS, RESIGNATIONS AND CONFIRMATIONS, ADMINISTRATION OF OATHS, INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. ANNOUNCEMENTS Regarding Antisemitism and the March 13, 2026 Attack on Temple Israel in West Bloomfield Birmingham Historic Preservation Master Plan Receives Award from Michigan Historic Preservation Network Happy Birthday Mayor Baller APPOINTMENTS 03-059-26 Planning Board Ms. Whipple-Boyce was interviewed for the appointment. MOTION: Motion by Long: To appoint Janelle Whipple-Boyce as a regular member to the Planning Board to serve a three- year term to expire March 28, 2029 VOICE VOTE Ayes: Haig, Long, Host, Longe, Baller, Kozlowski, Kolb Nays: None Recused: None
Page 2
2 March 23, 2026 CC Bingham swore in Ms. Whipple-Boyce. 4. OPEN TO THE PUBLIC FOR MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA David Bloom commented regarding the former parking assessment district, the negative impacts of antisemitism, the importance of collegial relations between City government and Commissioners, and a vintage store relocating to Birmingham due to the high level of foot traffic. Mike Clift commented regarding keeping the pool operational at 400 E. Lincoln and the resulting economic value to the community from doing so. Jeff Hofeltz commented concerns about a Dollar Tree potentially replacing the CVS. 03-060-26 To Move Item H2 to be Addressed Presently MOTION: Motion by Long, seconded by Kolb: To move Item H2 on the agenda, Birmingham Police Department's Position on Immigration Enforcement, up on the agenda to be heard now. VOICE VOTE Ayes: Haig, Long, Host, Longe, Baller, Kozlowski, Kolb Nays: None Recused: None 03-061-26 Birmingham Police Department's Position on Immigration Enforcement PC Grewe presented the item and answered questions. Public Comment Lila Brickner commented concern about the effects of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations and encouraged the City to publicize its intended approach to potential (ICE) operations within the City. Stacy Schreiber supported the Police Department's stated approach to potential ICE operations within the City and commented regarding this approach’s applicability to all people within Birmingham. Mr. Clift commented concerns regarding ICE agents operating without uniforms or badges within the City. Charles Mcintyre concurred with the other commenters on the item and supported the Police Department's stated approach to potential ICE operations within the City. MOTION: Motion by Long, seconded by Host: To make a motion adopting a resolution to support the Birmingham Police Department's position to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws while providing compassionate and equitable police services to all those who live, work, and travel in our community. Furthermore, to support the Police Department's refusal to work with federal law enforcement for the sole purpose of immigration enforcement and the department's position to not participate in a 287(g) agreement. VOICE VOTE Ayes: Haig, Long, Host, Longe, Baller, Kozlowski, Kolb Nays: None Recused: None
Page 3
3 March 23, 2026 5. CONSENT AGENDA 03-062-26 Consent Agenda MOTION: Motion by Long, seconded by Haig: To move the consent agenda including Items A through G. ROLL CALL VOTE Ayes: Haig, Longe, Baller, Host, Kozlowski, Kolb, Long Nays: None Recused: None A. Resolution to approve the City Commission workshop meeting minutes of March 9, 2026. B. Resolution to approve the City Commission regular meeting minutes of March 9, 2026. C. Resolution to approve the warrant list, including Automated Clearing House payments dated March 11, 2026, in the amount of $5,393,399.61. D. Resolution to approve the warrant list, including Automated Clearing House payments dated March 18, 2026, in the amount of $843,554.19. E. Resolution to set a public hearing date of April 13, 2026 to consider the Special Land Use Permit, Final Site Plan & Design Review application for 211 Hamilton Row - No 28. F. Resolution to approve the City's emergency operations plan promulgation document. Further, to direct the Mayor, City Manager, and Fire Chief to sign the document on behalf of the City. G. Resolution to accept the resignation of Mayor Pro Tem Anthony Long from the City Commission effective on April 13, 2026 at the end portion of the City Commission meeting, to thank him for his service and to direct the City Clerk to begin the process of filling the vacancy. 6. CITY MANAGER’S REPORT CM Ecker presented the report. Commissioners made the following comments: The Celebrate Birmingham Hometown Parade and Party will be Sunday, May 17th, at 1 p.m. For the artificial intelligence (AI) phone answering systems, ensuring that there is a clear ‘out pathway’ to speak to a person throughout the phone call will be important. Many AI phone answering systems fail because of our pathway issues. The City should publicize the bio of the new golf pro that will be working
Page 4
4
Page 5
5
Page 6
6
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT MTT DOCKET NO. 26-002795 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government: City Of Birmingham (OAKLAND) Local Unit of Government/First Name M.I. Last Name Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Michael M.I. C. Last Name Gibbons Firm Name (if any) Beier Howlett P.C. Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 3001 W. Big Beaver Rd. Suite 600 City or Town Troy State Michigan ZIP Code 48084 Telephone Number 2482821069 E-mail Address mgibbons@bhlaw.us.com Section 3: Subject Property Information Parcel Identification Number(s): 08-19-35-430-005 Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. the special assessment confirmation roll) with this Small Claims Answer if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR If multiple parcels are being appealed are they contiguous or adjoining? N/A Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Birmingham (OAKLAND) County Oakland Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal In response to the allegations set forth in Section 4 of Petitioner's Petition, Respondent states: The subject special assessment is permitted by all applicable laws, City Charter, and ordinances, and was initiated and levied in full compliance therewith. The special benefits derived from improvement is beyond that provided to the community as a whole and the amount assessed is reasonably proportionate to the benefits derived from the improvement. The Petitioner did not protest this special assessment. The Petitioner failed to appeal the special assessment within 30 days after the confirmation of the special assessment roll. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues Did Petitioner protest the special assessment at the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? No What was the date of the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? 2026-03-23 How many years is the special assessment being levied? 5 What is the total amount of the special assessment being levied (per parcel)? 2603 What is the basis for the special assessment? Identify the applicable statutory provision. City of Birmingham's ordinance 91-1 through 94-18 and MCL § 117.1, et. seq., including MCL § 117.4d and 117.24. Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Michael C. Gibbons
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIR LANSING GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR RECEIVED MAY 1 9 2026 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL S MARLON |. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT Do not use this form to appeal valuation, exemption, or non-property tax disputes. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information First Name M.1. Last Name/Company Name Brian J Hamlin Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 1061 Northlawn Blvd City or Town State ZIP Code Birmingham MI 48009 Telephone Number 248-842-4788 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) brian.hamlin@gmail.com Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name M1. Last Name Brian J Hamlin Firm Name (if any) Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 1061 Northlawn Blvd City or Town State ZIP Code Birmingham Mi 48009 Telephone Number 248-842-4788 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) brian.hamlin@gmail.com Section 3: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? O Yes [vd] No *If No, you must file separate appeals for each pai If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? reel Parcel Identification Number(s): 08-19-35-430-005 Classification of Property: Real [4 Personal [J (check one) Agricultural [J Commercial (J Industrial [] Residential Timber-Cutover [J Developmental 0 utility (J (check one) Property Address (No., Street) 1061 Northlawn Blvd
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Explain the Reason for this Appeal We are incorrectly being assessed for cape seal of what the City of Birmingham refers to as an "unimproved road" with residents responsible for 85% of the cost when: 1) Based on the city's own 2021 Ad Hoc Unimproved Street Study Committee report (AHUSSC): "if the local road being improved is more of a collector, serves more than one neighborhood, or has a large amount of pass-through traffic, then the percentage of charge is typically reduced to between 50% and 75%. a) AHUSSC report defines traffic counts > 1000 daily cars as high traffic. b) City's own traffic count data indicates Northlawn Boulevard to have in excess of 2,280 cars daily. 2) Based on city's own images / documentation provided to residents, Northlawn Boulevard appears to meet the qualification of an asphalt, or improved road whereby residents would be responsible for 0% of the cost for maintenance. a) FOIA evidence from the County of Oakland indicates that Northlawn Boulevard to be an asphalt, improved road. b) At least 3 different images from 3 different areas of Northlawn indicate asphalt (improved road) surfaces of up to 7 inches in thickness. All of this information was provided to the Birmingham City Commissioners at a February 23, 2026 Public Hearing of Necessity by several neighbors including me who protested the assessment all of which the City Commission ignored. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues BI Did you protest the special assessment at the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? -sd-¥es- §/] No If Yes, what was the date of the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? If No, explain: | was unable to attend the meeting due to a conflict with my work schedule Fee Information: A fee of $100.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. Signature *required Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: J Zon Lenn Isl /
Page 3
B. Hamlin : i 106 | Nor Wauin oe : i . + METROPLEX MI 480 Birraivslau NT \goo§ 15 MAY 2026 PMS EH FOREVER Michigan TAX Tibowal To. Pox 32237 Laon Sing, MT (HY 5701 3 a sed slid peli ond Lith pliifiedia
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Brian J Hamlin, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002795 City Of Birmingham, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: July 27, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Brian J Hamlin, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002795 City Of Birmingham, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: July 27, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIR LANSING GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR RECEIVED MAY 1 9 2026 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL S MARLON |. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT Do not use this form to appeal valuation, exemption, or non-property tax disputes. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information First Name M.1. Last Name/Company Name Brian J Hamlin Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 1061 Northlawn Blvd City or Town State ZIP Code Birmingham MI 48009 Telephone Number 248-842-4788 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) brian.hamlin@gmail.com Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name M1. Last Name Brian J Hamlin Firm Name (if any) Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 1061 Northlawn Blvd City or Town State ZIP Code Birmingham Mi 48009 Telephone Number 248-842-4788 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) brian.hamlin@gmail.com Section 3: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? O Yes [vd] No *If No, you must file separate appeals for each pai If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? reel Parcel Identification Number(s): 08-19-35-430-005 Classification of Property: Real [4 Personal [J (check one) Agricultural [J Commercial (J Industrial [] Residential Timber-Cutover [J Developmental 0 utility (J (check one) Property Address (No., Street) 1061 Northlawn Blvd
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Explain the Reason for this Appeal We are incorrectly being assessed for cape seal of what the City of Birmingham refers to as an "unimproved road" with residents responsible for 85% of the cost when: 1) Based on the city's own 2021 Ad Hoc Unimproved Street Study Committee report (AHUSSC): "if the local road being improved is more of a collector, serves more than one neighborhood, or has a large amount of pass-through traffic, then the percentage of charge is typically reduced to between 50% and 75%. a) AHUSSC report defines traffic counts > 1000 daily cars as high traffic. b) City's own traffic count data indicates Northlawn Boulevard to have in excess of 2,280 cars daily. 2) Based on city's own images / documentation provided to residents, Northlawn Boulevard appears to meet the qualification of an asphalt, or improved road whereby residents would be responsible for 0% of the cost for maintenance. a) FOIA evidence from the County of Oakland indicates that Northlawn Boulevard to be an asphalt, improved road. b) At least 3 different images from 3 different areas of Northlawn indicate asphalt (improved road) surfaces of up to 7 inches in thickness. All of this information was provided to the Birmingham City Commissioners at a February 23, 2026 Public Hearing of Necessity by several neighbors including me who protested the assessment all of which the City Commission ignored. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues BI Did you protest the special assessment at the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? -sd-¥es- §/] No If Yes, what was the date of the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? If No, explain: | was unable to attend the meeting due to a conflict with my work schedule Fee Information: A fee of $100.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. Signature *required Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: J Zon Lenn Isl /
Page 3
B. Hamlin : i 106 | Nor Wauin oe : i . + METROPLEX MI 480 Birraivslau NT \goo§ 15 MAY 2026 PMS EH FOREVER Michigan TAX Tibowal To. Pox 32237 Laon Sing, MT (HY 5701 3 a sed slid peli ond Lith pliifiedia
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.