Record Finder / 25-002347-TT
Michigan

Bobenal Investments, Inc., Petitioner Vs. City Of Alma, Respondent

Petitioner
Bobenal Investments, Inc.
Respondent
City Of Alma

Case overview

Docket number
25-002347-TT
Status
Disposed
CaseType
ET Property
Division
ET
County
Gratiot
Judge
No judge assigned

Docket history

Line #SubjectFilerLine RefEnter Date/Post MarkFeeRelated Item
14Consent JudgmentNot recordedNot recorded08/04/2025Not recordedDownload
13GrantedNot recorded1208/04/2025Not recordedDownload
12A Stipulation has been received.Not recordedNot recorded07/29/2025$50.00Download
11Proof of service of petition was received.PETNot recorded07/18/2025Not recordedDownload
10Order Setting Aside P DefaultNot recordedNot recorded08/04/2025Not recordedDownload
9Filing Fee ReceivedPET607/18/2025Not recordedDownload
8Answer was receivedNot recordedNot recorded07/15/2025Not recordedDownload
7ET Case Info SheetNot recordedNot recorded07/15/2025Not recordedDownload
6Order Corrected: Default PettionerNot recorded407/10/2025Not recordedDownload
5Notice of Docket Number ETNot recordedNot recorded07/10/2025Not recordedDownload
4Order of Default of PetitionerNot recordedNot recorded06/10/2025Not recordedDownload
3Petition has been verifiedPET106/10/2025Not recordedDownload
2Notice of Docket Number ETNot recordedNot recorded06/10/2025Not recordedDownload
1A petition was received.PETNot recorded05/08/2025$250.00Download

Documents

25-002347 Consent Judgment.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Bobenal Investments Inc, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002347 

 

City of Alma, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Jason C. Grinnell 

 

 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT 

 

CONSENT JUDGMENT 

 

The Tribunal has reviewed the Stipulation and finds that it comports with the mandates 

of State law.1 As a result, the Tribunal shall enter the parties’ Stipulation. 

 

Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment including all 

attachments, terms and conditions is GRANTED and ADOPTED, unless otherwise 

indicated. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with maintaining the assessment 

rolls for the tax years at issue shall correct or cause the assessment rolls to be 

corrected to reflect the property’s true cash and taxable values as provided in this 

Consent Judgment within 20 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment.2 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with collecting or refunding the 

affected taxes shall collect taxes and any applicable interest or issue a refund as 

required by the Consent Judgment within 28 days of the entry of the Consent 

Judgment. If a refund is warranted, it shall, unless otherwise indicated, include a 

proportionate share of any property tax administration fees paid and of penalty and 

interest paid on delinquent taxes. The refund shall also, unless otherwise indicated, 

separately indicate the amount of the taxes, fees, penalties, and interest being 

refunded. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been unlawfully paid shall, unless 

otherwise indicated, bear interest from the date of payment to the date of judgment and 

the judgment shall bear interest to the date of its payment. A sum determined by the 

Tribunal to have been underpaid shall not bear interest for any time period prior to 28 

days after the issuance of this Consent Judgment. Pursuant to MCL 205.737, interest 

shall accrue (i) after December 31, 2013, through June 30, 2016, at the rate of 4.25%, 

 

1 See MCL 211.27a. 

2 See MCL 205.755.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-002347 

Page 2 of 2 

 

(ii) after June 30, 2016, through December 31, 2016, at the rate of 4.40%, (iii) after 

December 31, 2016, through June 30, 2017, at the rate of 4.50%, (iv) after June 30, 

2017, through December 31, 2017, at the rate of 4.70%, (v) after December 31, 2017, 

through June 30, 2018, at the rate of 5.15%, (vi) after June 30, 2018, through December 

31, 2018, at the rate of 5.41%, (vii) after December 31, 2018, through June 30, 2019, at 

the rate of 5.9%, (viii) after June 30, 2019, through December 31, 2019, at the rate of 

6.39%, (ix) after December 31, 2019, through June 30, 2020, at the rate of 6.40%, (x) 

after June 30 2020, through December 31, 2020, at the rate of 5.63%, (xi) after 

December 31, 2020, through June 30, 2022, at the rate of 4.25%, (xii) after June 30, 

2022, through December 31, 2022, at the rate of 4.27%, (xiii) after December 31, 2022, 

through June 30, 2023, at the rate of 5.65%, (xiv) after June 30, 2023, through 

December 31, 2023, at the rate of 8.25%, (xv) after December 31, 2023, through June 

30, 2024, at the rate of 9.30%, (xvi) after June 30, 2024, through December 31, 2024, at 

the rate of 9.50%, (xvii) after December 31, 2024, through June 30, 2025, at the rate of 

9.47%, and (xviii) after June 30, 2025, through December 31, 2025, at the rate of 

8.66%. 

 

This Consent Judgment resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. 

 

See docket look up for a copy of stipulation and for any possible refund paragraph. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By _______________________________ 

Entered: August 4, 2025 

jc 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

RECEIVED 

AUG 012025 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Bobenal Investments, Inc. 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-002347 

City of Alma 

, 

Respondent(s) 

STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT 

(VALUATION) 

1. The subject property is in Gratiot 

County. 

2. 

Parcel Number: 51-274-831-07 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

3. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board 

of Review are: 

Tax year 

Assessed Value (AV) 

| Taxable Value (TV) 

- 

2025 

662,500 

592,260 

4. 

The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for 

settlement purposes are: 

Tax year 

True Cash Value 

AV 

TV 

2025 

875,000 

437,500 

437,500 

5. 

If the stipulated TV does not equal the prior year TV multiplied by the applicable 

inflation rate multiplier, explain why (e.g., transfer of ownership, additions, losses, 

omitted property etc.) 

243 958 x 1.031 = 251,520 + 185 980 (additions) = 437,500

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-002347 

Page 2 of 2 

NOTE: The Stipulation MUST include ALL parcels and ALL tax years included in the 

appeal (including subsequent tax years on or after April 1 of each year for appeals 

pending in the Small Claims Division). The parties may agree, however, to withdraw the 

appeal of specific parcels and/or tax year(s). 

IF APPLICABLE, complete the following section(s). Otherwise, LEAVE BLANK. 

7. 

The parties agree to the withdrawal of parcel number: 

(If more than one parcel is being withdrawn, attach a separate page addressing 

all other parcels being withdrawn.) 

8. 

The parties agree to the withdrawal of tax year(s) 

Signature of rs fon 7 or, if none, Petitioner: 

y Ce” 202 

Printed Name! 

Jexsme LH HE 

Date: 

7/4 5/208 S 

Signature of Respondent's authorized representative: 

Printed Name: Katherine J Roslund 

Date; 7-24-2025

Page 3

NS 

7%) 

EN 

AES 

PARNER 

GRAND RAPIDS MI 493 

29 JUL 2025 PM 3 L 

affine 

$0.740 

US POSTAGEM 

FIRST-CLASS

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

RECEIVED 

AUG 012025 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Bobenal Investments, Inc. 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-002347 

City of Alma 

, 

Respondent(s) 

STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT 

(VALUATION) 

1. The subject property is in Gratiot 

County. 

2. 

Parcel Number: 51-274-831-07 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

3. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board 

of Review are: 

Tax year 

Assessed Value (AV) 

| Taxable Value (TV) 

- 

2025 

662,500 

592,260 

4. 

The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for 

settlement purposes are: 

Tax year 

True Cash Value 

AV 

TV 

2025 

875,000 

437,500 

437,500 

5. 

If the stipulated TV does not equal the prior year TV multiplied by the applicable 

inflation rate multiplier, explain why (e.g., transfer of ownership, additions, losses, 

omitted property etc.) 

243 958 x 1.031 = 251,520 + 185 980 (additions) = 437,500

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-002347 

Page 2 of 2 

NOTE: The Stipulation MUST include ALL parcels and ALL tax years included in the 

appeal (including subsequent tax years on or after April 1 of each year for appeals 

pending in the Small Claims Division). The parties may agree, however, to withdraw the 

appeal of specific parcels and/or tax year(s). 

IF APPLICABLE, complete the following section(s). Otherwise, LEAVE BLANK. 

7. 

The parties agree to the withdrawal of parcel number: 

(If more than one parcel is being withdrawn, attach a separate page addressing 

all other parcels being withdrawn.) 

8. 

The parties agree to the withdrawal of tax year(s) 

Signature of rs fon 7 or, if none, Petitioner: 

y Ce” 202 

Printed Name! 

Jexsme LH HE 

Date: 

7/4 5/208 S 

Signature of Respondent's authorized representative: 

Printed Name: Katherine J Roslund 

Date; 7-24-2025

Page 3

NS 

7%) 

EN 

AES 

PARNER 

GRAND RAPIDS MI 493 

29 JUL 2025 PM 3 L 

affine 

$0.740 

US POSTAGEM 

FIRST-CLASS

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

RECEIVED 

JUL 1.8 2025 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Bogen al 

 TwvRsrmanrs Inc, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

i 

v 

MTT Docket No..25 00 23477 

Et 

LF 

A/mA 

, 

Respondent(s) 

PROOF OF SERVICE FOR PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

*To be filed after the Tribunal issues the Notice of Docket Number* 

“Breil Hoy ler 

states thaton ___ 1-15-2025 

he/she 

[Name of pergon serving/mailing petition] 

[date of service] 

served a copy of the Petition relative to the above-captioned matter upon: 

[Provide name and address of the following entities] 

1. Assessor (via certified mail): 

Katherine. J Roslund mmAo 

525 

FE 

Superior St 

Allow 

mt 

HERD) 

2. 

City Clerk or Township Supervisor/Clerk (via certified mail): 

Sara, Ado rson 

525 

e. Superior 8 Alma. ynT 

H4B801 

3. 

County Equalization Director (via first class mail or personal service): 

2eaan Bengel 

UIE. Conded &¢ 

Thhaoa MNT 

HEEHT 

4. 

County Clerk (via first class mail or personal service): 

Aare Thompson 

_ 

Jak 

e chandler St 

THhaca yt 

 ABEYT 

5. 

Secretary of the 

local school board (via first class mail or personal service): 

Art 

MC 

Linde 2 Fecedar) 

B eoved of Education 

1500 WN. Vine Avo 

Aloe 

nL 

HRRO\ 

6. 

State Treasurer (via first class mail): 

Michigan Department of Treasury, State Treasurer

Page 2

baobd}r 

tingly SrA 

N © wo) 

Zezor YoQ 

9d 

™ 

YOUN 

A] xo 

un 

oO 

He Fr 

€788Y Unby|ly ‘B

F 

i 

poy Gujsuny 2yp7

Td 

MiEovisod 

an 

i 

av. 0$ 

juawdojanag 

Lae 

EE 

4890927732 BOBO 

TRIER inl Mek fmt 

l

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Order_Setting_Aside_P_Default.2025-08-04_12-14-22.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Bobenal Investments, Inc., 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002347

City Of Alma,

Respondent.

ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner 

was held in default on July 10, 2025, and the default has been timely cured. The 

documents curing the default can be reviewed through the docket search function on 

the Tribunal’s website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and 

clicking on the document link next to the line item entry for the documents. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Default is SET ASIDE.

By_________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: August 4, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Bobenal Investments, Inc., 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002347

City Of Alma,

Respondent.

ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner 

was held in default on July 10, 2025, and the default has been timely cured. The 

documents curing the default can be reviewed through the docket search function on 

the Tribunal’s website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and 

clicking on the document link next to the line item entry for the documents. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Default is SET ASIDE.

By_________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: August 4, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

RECEDED 

py 

re 

oC J 

21 2005 

~ 

C/ 

> 

3 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Bobenal Investments, Inc., 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner, 

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-002347 

City of Alma, 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

Patricia L. Halm 

CORRECTED ORDER HOLDING PETITIONER IN DEFAULT 

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in this case and finds that an Order Holding Petitioner 

in Default was issued on June 10, 2025, because although Petitioner did pay a filing 

fee, Petitioner failed to pay the full amount due. 

Petitioner was required to cure the 

default within 14 days. Upon further investigation, the Tribunal has found that it erred in 

the entry of this order. The case did not have the correct email address listed on the 

docket, thus preventing Petitioner from being properly notified of the default. 

Consequently, the Tribunal finds it is appropriate to reissue the June 10, 2025 Order of 

Default. 

Specifically, Petitioner failed to pay the full required fee for the filing of the 

petition. As such, the petition is not properly pending. 

Petitioner must pay the 

remaining $150.00 fee required for the filing of the petition within 14 days of the entry of 

this order. Tribunal rules and information on filing fees can be found on the Tribunal’s 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 

Unfortunately, the payment may not be made via 

e-filing. 

Pe 

2 

) 

ert for aclidione A 

2% 

bo 

ASD 

i 

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is held in DEFAULT. 

Le ee 

© F 

J 120 

? ‘I 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petiti 

ing to cure the 

default: 

. The foregoing 

must be filed 

wi 

e Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this Order.’ 

“A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. 

A submission without a postmark or with an 

illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. 

A submission 

Therefore, 

Le vid

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-002347 

Page 2 of 2 

Failure to comply with this order will result in Petitioner being required to file a motion to 

set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). 

7) 

Entered: July 10, 2025 

By 

alicia 

kac 

Fd 

Realy Hac Ra 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

| certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, 

if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

The Bobenal Group 

Date: 07/15/2025 

Amount: $150.00 

No: 

LOCATION 

REF NO. 

DATE 

MEMO 

AMOUNT 

01-BOBINV/03-ALMANT/1680-A 

07/15/2025 

Professional Services 1680 filing fee 

$150.00 

I 

Ao-CORH 

OK 

Payee Name: State of Michigan 

Account: Bobenal Investments, Inc.

Page 4

EE, 

SEE 

WEST'S 

ZENS 

Els 

ESA Si 

HRA 

Zl 

IS 

FRO Ph 

WSR TRS: 

= 

< 

I Jk 

PAAR) =e 

lL 

T 

Wiz ass 

i 

= 

BRYAN 

TENN 

TIE 

x 

ZN 

vr 

SZ 

EH 

%! 7) 

=I ZEN 

IRSTATAY 

OS 

: 

awWZeSuls 

5 

= 

c & 

ov 

1-07 

y-4] 

LR=1) 

Ql,» 

Cag 

shes 

wg 

of 

Zi 

iat

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

ET Answer Prop fillable.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

 

______________________, 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner, 

 

v 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. _____________ 

 

______________________, 

Respondent. 

 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX ANSWER 

 

1. 

___Admit ___Deny. If denied, state the parcel number for the property identified 

on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition for the tax year or years at issue: 

________________________________________________________________ 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Answer 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

 

2. 

___Admit ____Deny. If denied, the property identified on the Entire Tribunal 

Property Tax Petition is ___ real ___ personal. 

 

3. 

___Admit ___Deny. If denied, identify the contiguous and non-contiguous 

parcels by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

4. 

___Admit ___Deny. If denied, identify the parcel or parcels of personal property 

that are not located on a parcel of real property under appeal by parcel number 

(attach additional page if necessary): 

 

5. 

___Admit ___Deny. 

 

a. If denied, state when the personal property statements were filed, if at all: 

______________________________________________________________ 

b. On what date did the March Board of Review commence: 

______________________________________________________________ 

 

6. 

___Admit ___Deny. If denied, state the classification of the property identified 

on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition for the tax year or years at issue: 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

Bobenal Investments, Inc.

25-002347

City of Alma

x

x

x

Page 2

MTT Docket No. ______________ 

Page 2 of 4 

 

7. 

___Admit ___Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent 

relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

8. 

___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate 

facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional 

page if necessary): 

 

 

9. 

___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, state the facts upon 

which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if 

necessary): 

 

 

10. 

___Admit ___Deny. If denied, in what County are the property or properties 

located in and what is the address of the property or properties: 

 

 

11. 

___Admit ___Deny. If denied, what is the applicable local governmental unit: 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

12. 

___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts 

upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if 

necessary): 

 

 

13. 

If the property’s taxable value is at issue, was there an addition or loss for 

purposes of establishing the property’s taxable value for the tax year or years at 

issue? ___Yes ___No. 

 

25-002347

x

NA

NA

x

x

x

x

Page 3

MTT Docket No. ______________ 

Page 3 of 4 

 

14. 

___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate 

facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional 

page if necessary): 

 

 

15. 

___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate 

facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional 

page if necessary): 

 

 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 

Board of Review are: 

 

Tax Year

True Cash Value

Assessed Value

Taxable Value

 

17. 

Respondent contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

 

Tax Year

True Cash Value

State Equalized Value

Taxable Value

 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

 

Tax Year

True Cash Value

State Equalized Value

Taxable Value

 

 

 

 

25-002347

x

NA

2025

1,325,000

662,500

592,260

2025

923,000

461,500

461,500

2025

48,000

24,000

24,000

Page 4

MTT Docket No. ______________ 

Page 4 of 4 

 

19. 

___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

10._Entire_Tribunal_Case_Information_Sheet_Must_Upload_Answer_.aba03728-34aa-4b8e-8df3-aa9120248559.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-002347

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Local Unit of Government

City Of Alma (GRATIOT)

Local Unit of Government/First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

Fax Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Katherine

M.I.

J

Last Name

Roslund

Firm Name (if any)

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

525 E Superior St

City or Town

Alma

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48801

Telephone Number

989-463-9514

Fax Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

kroslund@myalma.org

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: 

/s/

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

25-002347 Corrected Default.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Bobenal Investments, Inc., 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002347 

 

City of Alma, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

CORRECTED ORDER HOLDING PETITIONER IN DEFAULT 

 

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in this case and finds that an Order Holding Petitioner 

in Default was issued on June 10, 2025, because although Petitioner did pay a filing 

fee, Petitioner failed to pay the full amount due. Petitioner was required to cure the 

default within 14 days. Upon further investigation, the Tribunal has found that it erred in 

the entry of this order. The case did not have the correct email address listed on the 

docket, thus preventing Petitioner from being properly notified of the default. 

 

Consequently, the Tribunal finds it is appropriate to reissue the June 10, 2025 Order of 

Default. Specifically, Petitioner failed to pay the full required fee for the filing of the 

petition. As such, the petition is not properly pending. Petitioner must pay the 

remaining $150.00 fee required for the filing of the petition within 14 days of the entry of 

this order. Tribunal rules and information on filing fees can be found on the Tribunal’s 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Unfortunately, the payment may not be made via 

e-filing. 

 

Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is held in DEFAULT. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the 

default: pay the remaining $150.00 required for the filing of the petition. The foregoing 

must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this Order.1 

 

1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an 

illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission 

by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-002347 

Page 2 of 2 

 

Failure to comply with this order will result in Petitioner being required to file a motion to 

set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). 

 

 

Entered: July 10, 2025 

 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

kac 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2025-07-10_16-00-51.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Bobenal Investments, Inc., 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 25-002347

City Of Alma, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: __Tribunal Clerk________

Entered: July 10, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Bobenal Investments, Inc., 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 25-002347

City Of Alma, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: __Tribunal Clerk________

Entered: July 10, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized

Page 3

STATE OF

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

ET_Order_of_Default_Petition.2025-06-10_13-15-01.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Bobenal Investments, Inc.,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002347

City Of Alma,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Petitioner did not pay the full required fee for the filing of the petition. See TTR 223. As 

such, the appeal is not properly pending. See TTR 225. Petitioner must pay the 

additional fee amount required for the filing of the petition within 14 days of the entry of 

this order. Tribunal rules and information on filing fees can be found on our website at 

www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Unfortunately, the payment may not be made via e-filing.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this Order.i 

Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By:_______________________________

Entered: June 10, 2025

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

i “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-002347

Page 2 of 2

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5)

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Bobenal Investments Inc.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

RECEIVED 

MAY 1 4 2025 

MICH] GAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Bobenal Investments, Inc. 

g 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

\ 

MTT Docket No. 

City of Alma 

, 

Respondent(s) 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1. 

Property Parcel No: 51-274-831-07 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

2. 

The property identified above is _X real ___ personal. 

3. 

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties 

contiguous? ___ Yes ___ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- 

contiguous parcel.) 

4. 

Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property 

under appeal? Yes ___ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each 

parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under 

appeal.) 

5. 

If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal 

property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

6. 

The property identified above is classified as commercial

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 

Page 2 of 4 

8. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

if a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the 

assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the 

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 

of the tax year involved), list the separate.and.specific.facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

The property or properties at issue are located in GRATIOT 

County. The 

property or properties’ address is: 

1680 Wright Ave., Alma, MI 

The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable 

local governmental unit): City of Alma 

Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 

784 W. Lake Lansing Rd. 

East Lansing, MI 48823 

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

X 

the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there'a 

dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes __No

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 

Page 3 of 4 

15. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the prior 

tax vear or years (attach additional page if necessary): 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's 

Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

2025 

$1,325,000.00 

$662,500 

$592,260 

17. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2025 

$875,000 

$437,500 

$437,500 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2025 

$450,200 

$225,100 

$155,120 

19. 

Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

See attached

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 

Page 4 of 4 

Signature of Petitioner's 

orized Rensseta 

five or, if none, Petitioner: 

yf) 

Ful, 

5 ze JH - 

Pr 

i 

Printed Name of Peifiéner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Jerome L. Fine, Secretary 

Email Address: jlifine@thebobenalgroup.com 

Mailing Address: 

784 W. Lake Lansing Rd. 

East Lansing, MI 48823 

Telephone Number: Business: 517 351-7543 

Mobile: 517 256-0254 

Date: May 5, 2025

Page 5

Prior to the current Assessment, the Assessed Value for the parcels was $402,700 which 

would have put the TCV of property at $805,400. The Taxable Value was $243,958. As 

noted, the property was not uncapped. As of December 31, 2024, the subject property did 

not have any electrical service, no gas line and no water and sewer to service

Page 6

Bob

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2025-06-10_13-09-54.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Bobenal Investments, Inc., 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 25-002347

City Of Alma, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this Notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this Notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this Notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the Notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: __Tribunal Clerk________

Entered: June 10, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Bobenal Investments Inc.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

RECEIVED 

MAY 1 4 2025 

MICH] GAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Bobenal Investments, Inc. 

g 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

\ 

MTT Docket No. 

City of Alma 

, 

Respondent(s) 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1. 

Property Parcel No: 51-274-831-07 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

2. 

The property identified above is _X real ___ personal. 

3. 

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties 

contiguous? ___ Yes ___ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- 

contiguous parcel.) 

4. 

Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property 

under appeal? Yes ___ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each 

parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under 

appeal.) 

5. 

If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal 

property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

6. 

The property identified above is classified as commercial

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 

Page 2 of 4 

8. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

if a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the 

assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the 

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 

of the tax year involved), list the separate.and.specific.facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

The property or properties at issue are located in GRATIOT 

County. The 

property or properties’ address is: 

1680 Wright Ave., Alma, MI 

The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable 

local governmental unit): City of Alma 

Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 

784 W. Lake Lansing Rd. 

East Lansing, MI 48823 

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

X 

the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there'a 

dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes __No

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 

Page 3 of 4 

15. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the prior 

tax vear or years (attach additional page if necessary): 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's 

Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

2025 

$1,325,000.00 

$662,500 

$592,260 

17. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2025 

$875,000 

$437,500 

$437,500 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2025 

$450,200 

$225,100 

$155,120 

19. 

Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

See attached

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 

Page 4 of 4 

Signature of Petitioner's 

orized Rensseta 

five or, if none, Petitioner: 

yf) 

Ful, 

5 ze JH - 

Pr 

i 

Printed Name of Peifiéner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Jerome L. Fine, Secretary 

Email Address: jlifine@thebobenalgroup.com 

Mailing Address: 

784 W. Lake Lansing Rd. 

East Lansing, MI 48823 

Telephone Number: Business: 517 351-7543 

Mobile: 517 256-0254 

Date: May 5, 2025

Page 5

Prior to the current Assessment, the Assessed Value for the parcels was $402,700 which 

would have put the TCV of property at $805,400. The Taxable Value was $243,958. As 

noted, the property was not uncapped. As of December 31, 2024, the subject property did 

not have any electrical service, no gas line and no water and sewer to service

Page 6

Bob

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.