Record Finder / 26-000330-TT
Michigan

Blake Robert Graham, Petitioner V Township Of Clinton, Respondent

Petitioner
Blake Robert Graham
Respondent
Township Of Clinton

Case overview

Docket number
26-000330-TT
Status
Ready Schedule
CaseType
SC Property
Division
Small Claims Division
County
Macomb
Judge
No judge assigned

Docket history

Line #SubjectFilerLine RefEnter Date/Post MarkFeeRelated Item
10Order Setting Aside R DefaultNot recordedNot recorded07/08/2026Not recordedDownload
9Response to Order - AnswerRESP804/30/2026Not recordedDownload
8Order of Default of RespondentNot recordedNot recorded04/24/2026Not recordedDownload
7Notice of FilingNot recordedNot recorded04/24/2026Not recordedDownload
6Attachments to the Answer were filedNot recordedNot recorded04/14/2026Not recordedDownload
5Answer was receivedNot recordedNot recorded04/14/2026Not recordedDownload
4Petition has been verifiedPET104/13/2026Not recordedDownload
3Notice of Docket Number SCNot recordedNot recorded04/13/2026Not recordedDownload
2Attachments to the Petition were filedNot recordedNot recorded03/20/2026Not recordedDownload
1A petition was received.PETNot recorded03/20/2026Not recordedDownload

Documents

Order_Setting_Aside_R_Default.2026-07-08_15-46-01.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Blake Robert Graham, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 26-000330

Township Of Clinton,

Respondent.

ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Respondent was held in 

default on April 24, 2026, and the default has been timely cured. The documents curing 

the default can be reviewed through the docket search function on the Tribunal’s 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and clicking on the 

document link next to the line item entry for the documents. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Default is SET ASIDE.

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm

Entered: July 8, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Blake Robert Graham, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 26-000330

Township Of Clinton,

Respondent.

ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Respondent was held in 

default on April 24, 2026, and the default has been timely cured. The documents curing 

the default can be reviewed through the docket search function on the Tribunal’s 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and clicking on the 

document link next to the line item entry for the documents. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Default is SET ASIDE.

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm

Entered: July 8, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

RECEIVED 

MAY 0 5 2026 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Blake Robert Graham 

: 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-000330 

Township of Clinton 

Respondent(s) 

RESPONSE TO ORDER OF DEFAULT 

1. 

A default was entered against me on April 24, 2026 

2. 

Good cause exists to set aside the defauit because: 

One of our other Authorized Representatives, who completed the original answer form & 

will be assigned to this case, had signed the answer form by mistake. 

It should have 

been signed by the default Authorized Representative (Assessor) who is listed in 

Section 2 of the answer. 

3. 

| ask this Tribunal to set aside the default. 

Sethi 

Party/Representative (sign here) 

Elizabeth Schwartz 

[Print/type name of person signing] 

| certify that on this date 

| served a copy of this request, and any additional documentation, on 

the opposing party or their representative.

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETGHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

N 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

VALUATION / UNCAPPING 

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-000330 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information 

Unit of Government 

Township of Clinton (Macomb) 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.Q. Box or Rural Route): 

40700 Romeo Plank Rd 

City or Town: 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

Clinton Township 

Ml 

148038 

Telephone Number: 

586-723-8021 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

| 

First Name: 

Ml: 

Last Name: 

Elizabeth 

Schwartz 

Firm Name (if any): 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

40700 Romeo Plank 

City or Town: 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

Clinton Township 

Mi 

148038 

Telephone Number: 

586-723-8014 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

assessor@clintontownship.com 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? 

if no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. Altacha 

separate sheet if necessary. 

ves 

[noe 

WA Not Applicable 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more for all tax years at issue? 

Wives 

Ono

Page 3

RECEIVED 

MAY 0 5 2026 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Blake Robert Graham 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No.26-000330 

Township of Clinton 

Respondent(s) 

RESPONSE TO ORDER OF DEFAULT 

1. 

A default was entered against me on April 24, 2026 

2. 

Good cause exists to set aside the default because: 

One of our other Authorized Representatives, who completed the original answer form & 

will be assigned to this case, had signed the answer form by mistake. 

It should have 

been signed by the default Authorized Representative (Assessor) who is listed in 

Section 2 of the answer. 

3. 

| ask this Tribunal to set aside the default. 

Shit 

Party/Representative (sign here) 

Elizabeth Schwartz 

[Print/type name of person signing] 

| certify that on this date 

| served a copy of this request, and any additional documentation, on 

the opposing party or their representative.

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I, BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

= 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

VALUATION / UNCAPPING 

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-000330 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact information 

Unit of Government 

Township of Clinton (Macomb) 

Mailing Address {No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

40700 Romeo Plank Rd 

City or Town: 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

Clinton Township 

Ml 

48038 

Telephone Number: 

586-723-8021 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via emait): 

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

{ 

First Name: 

MA 

Last Name: 

Elizabeth 

Schwartz 

Firm Name (if any): 

Malling Address {No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

40700 Romeo Plank 

City or Town: 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

Clinton Township 

Ml 

148038 

Telephone Number: 

586-723-8014 

Email Address (do not enter unfess you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

assessor@clintontownship.com 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? 

if no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. Attacha 

separate sheet if necessary. 

d Yes 

[| No 

[4] Not Applicable 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more for all tax years at issue?

Page 5

(5d 

Pray 

mm 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal 

RESPONDENT MAINTAINS THAT THE VALUES AT QUESTION ARE INDICATIVE 

OF THE MARKET AND WERE PREPARED ACCORDING TO STATE GUIDELINES. 

RESPONDENT WILL COMPLETE A GRID OF COMPARABLE SALES PRIOR TO THE 

MTT'S REQUIRED DATE FOR EVIDENCE SUBMITTAL AND, IF NECESSARY, WILL 

CONTACT THE PETITIONER TO INSPECT THE PROPERTY. 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES 

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [7] Yes 

OJ No 

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

March 

O July 

Od December 

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? O Yes 

[| No 

If yes, cite the Board’s authority. 

Was the assessment at issue established as the result of 

a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? OJ Yes 

No 

If yes, explain 

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

O Yes 

No 

If so, what is the issue date? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE

Page 6

CLI

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Order_of_Default_of_Answer.2026-04-24_14-27-03.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Blake Robert Graham,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 26-000330

Township Of Clinton,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Respondent has filed an answer, however the Attorney/Authorized Representative who 

signed the answer is not the same Attorney/Authorized Representative listed in section 

2 of the answer. As such, Respondent is held in default. Respondent must complete 

and return an amended answer indicating the same Attorney/Authorized Representative 

in both section 2 and the signature line within 14 days of the entry of this order. 

Tribunal rules and Small Claims answer forms can be found online at 

www.michigan.gov/taxtrib.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.i 

Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By:_______________________________

Entered: April 24, 2026

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

i “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-000330

Page 2 of 6

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5)

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Blake Robert Graham,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 26-000330

Township Of Clinton,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Respondent has filed an answer, however the Attorney/Authorized Representative who 

signed the answer is not the same Attorney/Authorized Representative listed in section 

2 of the answer. As such, Respondent is held in default. Respondent must complete 

and return an amended answer indicating the same Attorney/Authorized Representative 

in both section 2 and the signature line within 14 days of the entry of this order. 

Tribunal rules and Small Claims answer forms can be found online at 

www.michigan.gov/taxtrib.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.ii 

Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By:_______________________________

Entered: April 24, 2026

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

ii “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 26-000330

Page 4 of 6

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5)

Page 5

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN,

Page 6

MTT Docket

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SC-Notice_of_Filing_of_Answer.2026-04-24_14-27-04.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Blake Robert Graham,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-000330

Township Of Clinton,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of 

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the 

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the 

opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail.

Users who file documents with the Michigan Tax Tribunal are advised that filed 

documents are public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tax 

Docket Lookup. Users who file documents are responsible for ensuring sensitive or 

personal identifying information is withheld or redacted. See TTR 209. If a user wishes 

to file a document for consideration by the Michigan Tax Tribunal and prevent its 

publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for Protective Order 

under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents covered by the 

Order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a Protective Order 

will be published.

The responsibility for excluding or redacting personal identifying information (PII) from 

all documents filed with or offered to the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and 

their attorneys. The Tribunal is not responsible for or required to review, redact, or 

screen documents at the time of filing for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A 

party, representative, or interested person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may 

request that the Tribunal redact PII contained in a previously-filed document by

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-000330

Page 2 of 6

submitting a Request for Redactions. The Request for Redactions form will be 

available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages of our website. 

Alternate Dispute Resolution Options

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this 

case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference 

is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a 

case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with 

a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an 

appeal of a principal residence exemption that was denied by either the Michigan 

Department of Treasury or a County. Also, state taxes levied by the Michigan 

Department of Treasury, such as income taxes, are not subject to the informal 

settlement conference process.

MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. 

Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between 

the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a 

mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a 

judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or 

email taxtrib@michigan.gov.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: April 24, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Blake Robert Graham,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-000330

Township Of Clinton,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your

Page 4

MTT

Page 5

STATE

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Notice of Assessment.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

ir Cpteno Taser 

THIS IS NOT A TAX BILL 

L-4400 

1018 (Rev. 10-25) 

Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification 

This form is issued under the authority of Public Act 206 of 1893, Sec, 211.24c and Sec.211.34c, as amended. This is a model assessment notice to be used by the local assessor. 

FROM 

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION 

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF CLINTON 

PARCEL NUMBER: 

16+11-23-276-011 

ELIZABETH SCHWARTZ, ASSESSOR 

40700 ROMEO PLANK RD 

PROPERTY ADDRESS: 

CLINTON TWP, MI 48038 

38335 NEWCASTLE 

CLINTON TOWNSHIP, Mi 48036 

SCHOOL DISTRICT CODE: 50140 

OWNER'S NAME AND ADDRESS/PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: 

EXEMPTIONS 

GRAHAM BLAKE 

% Exempt 

As "Homeowners Principal Residence” 100.0000% 

38335 NEWCASTLE 

% Exempt 

As "Qualified Agricultural Property": 

0% 

CLINTON TOWNSHIP, MI 48036 

% Exempt 

As "MBT Industrial Personai™: 

0% 

% Exempt As "MBT Commercial Personai™ 

0% 

Suing Spouser oor 

OYes 

[XI Ne 

Exempt 

As "Qualified Forest Property” 

[| Yes 

No 

Exempt 

As "Development Property": 

[Yes 

No 

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 

50-11-23-276-011 D 18 H71 ASBURY PARK SUBDN LOT 18. 

ACCORDING TO MCL 211.34c THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS: 

401 

Residential 

PRIOR YEAR'S CLASSIFICATION 

401 

Residential 

PRIOR AMOUNT 

CURRENT TENTATIVE 

CHANGE FROM 

. 

PRIOR YEAR 

TO 

YEAR: 

2025 

AMOUNT YEAR: 

5026 

CURRENT ean 

1. TAXABLE VALUE: 

100,215 

153,600 

53,385 

2. ASSESSED VALUE: 

145,800 

i 

153,600 

7.700 

3. TENTATIVE EQUALIZATION FACTOR: 

1.000 

Le 

= 

= 

4. STATE EQUALIZED VALUE (SEV): 

145,900 

153,600 

7,700 

5. WAS THERE A TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP IN 2025 THAT RESULTED IN A TAXABLE VALUE UNCAPPING? 

[X]Yes 

[] No 

6. Assessor Change Reason{s): 

Market Adjustment, Parcel Review 

The 2026 Inflation rate Multiplier is: 1.027 

Questions regarding the Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification may be directed to the Following: 

Telephone Number: 

Email Address: 

ASSESSOR@CLINTONTOWNSHIP.COM 

Name: 

ELIZABETH SCHWARTZ 

586-286-9468 

March Board of Review Appeal Information. The Board of Review will meet at the following dates and times:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

05._Property_Tax_Appeal_Answer_Form_Valuation_Poverty_Classification.cf5fa90d-d058-412d-bdc6-77b8f78dd197.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 26-000330

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Township Of Clinton (MACOMB)

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

Fax Number

E-mail Address

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Elizabeth

M.I.

Last Name

Schwartz

Firm Name (if any)

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

40700 Romeo Plank

City or Town

Clinton Township

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48038

Telephone Number

586-723-8016

Fax Number

E-mail Address

assessor@clintontownship.com

Section 3: Subject Property Information

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? 

Yes

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another.

N/A 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review 

Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this 

document, you may be held in default.

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

RESPONDENT MAINTAINS THAT THE VALUES AT QUESTION ARE INDICATIVE OF THE MARKET AND WERE PREPARED ACCORDING TO 

STATE GUIDELINES. RESPONDENT WILL COMPLETE A GRID OF COMPARABLE SALES PRIOR TO THE MTT'S REQUIRED DATE FOR 

EVIDENCE SUBMITAL AND IF NECESSARY, WILL CONTACT PETITIONER TO INSPECT THE PROPERTY

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: March

If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? March*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer.

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? 

If yes, cite the Board’s authority.

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No

If yes, explain.

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

If so, what is the issue date?

No

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE

When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued?

Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION

Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption:

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION 

OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS

Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR?

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended:

Tax Year(s) denied:

List the date the exemption was denied:

What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY

What do you believe the classification should be: 

Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.

Parcel Identification Number:

16-11-23-276-011

Classification of Property:

Real 

Residential

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:

153.600

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:

153,600

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

$307,200

Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.

153,600

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Michele Tobeler-Cantalupo

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

01._Property_Tax_Appeal_Petition_Form_Valuation_Poverty_Classification.54179396-70fa-47aa-9598-c4b266982a5c.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax 

disputes.

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review 

Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Individual 

First Name

Blake

M.I.

Robert

Last Name/Company Name

Graham

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

38335 Newcastle St

City or Town

Clinton Township

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48036

Telephone Number

313-949-7669

Fax Number

E-mail Address

grahamblake17@gmail.com

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Firm Name (if any)

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

Fax Number

E-mail Address 

Section 3: Subject Property Information

How many parcels are you appealing?

1

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

 *If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

38335 Newcastle St

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Clinton Township

Michigan

48036

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

Township Of Clinton (MACOMB)

County 

Macomb

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that apply)

True Cash and Taxable Value

 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal

Arms length sale for $283,000 as of April 2025. Reviewed six comparable sales for sold homes within nine months of sale date (April 2025) and determined 

average price per square foot of $146. Gave comparable sales to Board of Review. This would indicate valuation of $283,000 is supportable. 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues

Year(s) you are appealing:

2026

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes

If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND upload the BOR decision: March

If No, check the applicable reason(s):

Did you request a Poverty Exemption at the BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR considered your application AND upload the BOR decision: 

 March  July  December

If No, explain why:

Section 7: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.

Parcel Identification Number: 16-11-23-276-011

Classification of Property:

Real

Residential

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:

153600

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:

153600

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

283000 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

141500

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Section 8: Classification Information *Only the MI Dep’t of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal*

Parcel Identification Number:

 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review:

What do you believe is the property’s classification?

If improved property, how is the property currently being used?

If improved property, for what use was the property designed?

Fee Information

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition?

Yes

Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption?

No

If you answered yes to either or both of these questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees.

The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.

If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is:

$100,000.00 and under $125.00

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00

$Over $500,000.00 $300.00

If your property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is:

$100,000.00 and under $250.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above.

If your property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is $100,000.01 or greater the appeal does not qualify for 

Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed.

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Blake Graham

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SC_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-04-13_16-19-16.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Blake Robert Graham,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-000330

Township Of Clinton,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: April 13, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Blake Robert Graham,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-000330

Township Of Clinton,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: April 13, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

2026 BOARD OF REVIEW DECISION.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

2026 BOARD OF REVIEW DECISION 

FROM 

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF CLINTON 

ELIZABETH SCHWARTZ, ASSESSOR 

40700 ROMEO PLANK RD 

CLINTON TWP, MI 48038 

NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OR PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL 

PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION (parcel code required, property address and 

legal description optional) 

GRAHAM BLAKE 

38335 NEWCASTLE 

CLINTON TOWNSHIP, MI 48036 

16-11-23-276-011 

38335 NEWCASTLE 

THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS: 

401 (RESIDENIAL-IMPROVED) 

Thank you for attending this year's March Board of Review. The Board has reviewed the information you supplied and the data necessary 

to compute your assessment and taxable value. 

The Board has completed their review of parcel number 

16-11-23-276-011 

They have made the following determination based on the information you supplied: 

Board of Review Comments: 

REQUEST FOR REDUCTION DENIED, SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE NOT PROVIDED 

2026 ORIGINAL ASSESSED VALUE 

153,600 

2026 ORIGINAL TAXABLE VALUE 

153,600 

(if the amounts below are the same then no revisions have occurred) 

2026 "BOARD OF REVIEW" ASSESSED VALUE 

153,600 

2026 "BOARD OF REVIEW" TAXABLE VALUE 

153,600 

2026 PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION % 

100 

The above values are subject to State Equalization. The tentative factor is 1.0000. 

This Decision may be further appealed to the Michigan Tax Tribunal or State Tax Commission as indicated below: 

— If you disagree with the decision of the Board of Review regarding tentative assessed or taxable value, further appeal may be made to the 

Michigan Tax Tribunal at the address below. Please note the appeal deadlines for each class of property. 

VALUE AND EXEMPTION APPEAL DEADLINES: 

APPEAL TO: 

JUNE 1,200 

ea EE 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Commercial Real 

Residential 

www. michigan.gov/taxtrib 

Industrial Real 

Poverty Exemption 

(517) 335-9760 

Commercial Personal 

MTT appeals must be made pursuant to 

Industrial Persona 

Tribunal rules. Contact the MTT regarding 

Utility Personal 

appeal rules. 

— If you disagree with the decision of the Board of Review regarding CLASSIFICATION, appeal is made by sending Form 2167 to the 

State Tax Commission 

P.O. Box 30471, Lansing, MI 48908 by June 30, 2026..

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

01._Property_Tax_Appeal_Petition_Form_Valuation_Poverty_Classification.54179396-70fa-47aa-9598-c4b266982a5c.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax 

disputes.

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review 

Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Individual 

First Name

Blake

M.I.

Robert

Last Name/Company Name

Graham

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

38335 Newcastle St

City or Town

Clinton Township

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48036

Telephone Number

313-949-7669

Fax Number

E-mail Address

grahamblake17@gmail.com

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Firm Name (if any)

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

Fax Number

E-mail Address 

Section 3: Subject Property Information

How many parcels are you appealing?

1

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

 *If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

38335 Newcastle St

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Clinton Township

Michigan

48036

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

Township Of Clinton (MACOMB)

County 

Macomb

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that apply)

True Cash and Taxable Value

 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal

Arms length sale for $283,000 as of April 2025. Reviewed six comparable sales for sold homes within nine months of sale date (April 2025) and determined 

average price per square foot of $146. Gave comparable sales to Board of Review. This would indicate valuation of $283,000 is supportable. 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues

Year(s) you are appealing:

2026

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes

If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND upload the BOR decision: March

If No, check the applicable reason(s):

Did you request a Poverty Exemption at the BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR considered your application AND upload the BOR decision: 

 March  July  December

If No, explain why:

Section 7: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.

Parcel Identification Number: 16-11-23-276-011

Classification of Property:

Real

Residential

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:

153600

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:

153600

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

283000 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

141500

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Section 8: Classification Information *Only the MI Dep’t of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal*

Parcel Identification Number:

 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review:

What do you believe is the property’s classification?

If improved property, how is the property currently being used?

If improved property, for what use was the property designed?

Fee Information

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition?

Yes

Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption?

No

If you answered yes to either or both of these questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees.

The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.

If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is:

$100,000.00 and under $125.00

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00

$Over $500,000.00 $300.00

If your property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is:

$100,000.00 and under $250.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above.

If your property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is $100,000.01 or greater the appeal does not qualify for 

Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed.

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Blake Graham

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.