Bear Pointe Ventures LLC Petitioner Vs. Township Of Alpena Respondent
- Petitioner
- Bear Pointe Ventures LLC
- Respondent
- Township Of Alpena
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-000763-TT
- Status
- Ready Sched Prehearing Date Certain
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Alpena
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Prehearing General Call | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/01/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 08/06/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Proof of service of petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 07/14/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 06/10/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/10/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/06/2026 | $600.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NOTICE OF AUGUST 2- 13, 2027 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER OF PROCEDURE Bear Pointe Ventures LLC, Petitioner, v Township Of Alpena, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 26-000763 Please be advised that 26-000763 has been placed on a two-week Prehearing General Call commencing August 02, 2027. Unless ordered otherwise, parties will be notified at least 28 days before they are scheduled to appear. Scheduling will not necessarily occur in the order in which the cases are listed below. Parties are required to submit a valuation disclosure or written notification that no valuation disclosure is required by the dates indicated herein. A “valuation disclosure” is defined as documentary or other tangible evidence in a property tax proceeding that a party relies upon in support of the party’s contention as to the true cash value of the subject property or any portion thereof and contains the party’s value conclusion and data, valuation methodology, analysis or reasoning. See TTR 203 and TTR 241. Users who file documents with the Tribunal are advised that filed documents are public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tribunal’s Tax Docket Lookup. If a user wishes to file a document for consideration by the Tribunal and prevent its publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for Protective Order under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents covered by the order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a Protective Order will be published. In accordance with MCR 1.109(D)(9) and TTR 209, the responsibility for excluding or redacting personal identifying information (PII) from all documents filed with or offered to the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and their attorneys. The Tribunal is not responsible for or required to review, redact, or screen documents at the time of filing for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A party, representative, or interested person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may request that the Tribunal redact PII contained in a previously filed document by submitting a Request for Redactions. The Request for Redactions form is available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages of the Tribunal’s website. Please refer to the Tribunal’s FAQs and Glossary of Terms pages on the Tribunal’s website for more information.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-000763 Page 2 of 3 IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall: a. If no valuation disclosure is required, notify the Tribunal and the opposing parties in writing within 21 days of entry of this order that no valuation disclosure is being filed. The notice shall indicate the reason or reasons why no valuation disclosure is required (i.e., exemption claim, etc.). b. If a valuation disclosure is required, file and exchange their valuation disclosures by April 5, 2027. Valuation disclosures will not be admitted into evidence unless disclosed and furnished in accordance with this order (even though admissible) except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their Prehearing Statements by April 5, 2027. Witnesses, with the exception of rebuttal witnesses, will not be allowed to testify unless disclosed in the Prehearing Statement and the Prehearing Statement is furnished in accordance with this order except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. Failure to file the Prehearing Statement may result in holding a party or parties in default. See TTR 237. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on April 5, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. Discovery relative to the valuation disclosure prepared for purposes of litigating this case or the valuation expert that prepared that valuation disclosure is not permitted during “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on August 2, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is limited to the opposing party’s valuation disclosure, the opposing party’s valuation expert, and the witnesses identified on the opposing party’s Prehearing Statement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if this case is not scheduled for a date certain prehearing conference during the time frame indicated it may be scheduled for a date certain prehearing conference at any time subsequent to the completion date for this Prehearing General Call. Parties will, however, be notified in writing approximately one week before they are scheduled to appear. By:_____________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: September 1, 2026
Page 3
MTT Docket No. 26-000763 Page 3 of 3 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NOTICE OF AUGUST 2- 13, 2027 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER OF
Page 5
MTT
Page 6
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED STATE OF MICHIGAN AUG 10 2026 DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAI MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Ritrcan TAX TRIBUNAL Bear Pointe Ventures LLC, Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 26-000763 Alpena Township, Respondent. ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX ANSWER I.__ Admit Deny X Neither Admit Nor Deny. 2. Admit Deny X Neither Admit Nor Deny. The subject parcel is a shopping center located at 2680 US 23 S, Alpena, MI 49707. This has a parcel ID of 018-103-000-199-00. Our records indicate that the parcel has two buildings: Building 1—93,110 sq ft, constructed in 1968. Building 2—5,100 sq ft, constructed in 1968. 3. _X Admit___ Deny. 4. _X Admit ___ Deny. 5. X Admit ___ Deny. 6. _X Admit __ Deny. 7. If the property’s taxable value is at issue, was there an addition or loss for purposes of establishing the property’s taxable value for the tax year or years atissue? X Yes No.
Page 2
_ Entire Tribunal Property Tax Answer Page 2 of 3 10. _ Admit Deny X Neither Admit Nor Deny. Respondent would need time and additional supporting documentation to validate the claims in this petition. 11. Admit __ Deny X Neither Admit Nor Deny. Respondent would need time and additional supporting documentation to validate the claims in this petition. 12. _ Admit ___ Deny X_ Neither Admit Nor Deny. Respondent would need time and additional supporting documentation to validate the claims in this petition. 13. Admit ___ Deny X_ Neither Admit Nor Deny. Respondent would need time and additional supporting documentation to validate the claims in this petition. 14. _ Admit __ Deny X_ Neither Admit Nor Deny. Respondent would need time and additional supporting documentation to validate the claims in this petition. 15. Admit __ Deny X Neither Admit Nor Deny. “Respondent would need time and additional supporting documentation to validate the claims in this petition. 16. Admit ___Deny X_ Neither Admit Nor Deny. Respondent would need time and additional supporting documentation to validate the claims in this petition. 17. Admit ___ Deny X Neither Admit Nor Deny. Respondent would need time and additional supporting documentation to validate the claims in this petition. 18. Respondent contends that the values for the property identified above are:
Page 3
Entire Tribunal Property Tax Answer - Page 3 of 3 19. Admit __ Deny X Neither Admit Nor Deny. 20. Admit ___ Deny X Neither Admit Nor Deny. 21. Admit _X Deny. Respondent disagrees with the Petitioner’s requests. Respondent has calculated the true cash value based on the cost approach. Respondent asserts that the values indicated by Respondent’s cost approach fairly reflect the true cash value of the subject property. We believe that the assessment reflects 50% of the true cash value. Taxable value is correctly calculated. Signature of Respondent’s Authorized Representative, if none, Respondent: (llr Bs 74 Email Address: info@assessingoffice.com Mailing Address: Assessing Office P.O. Box 25 Rogers City, Mi 49779 Telephone Number: 989-734-3555 (Fax: 989-734-9901) Date: 8/4/2026
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 Bear Pointe Ventures LLC Petitioner, MTT # 26-000763 Vs, Alpena Township Respondent, Petitioner Respondent Bear Pointe Ventures LLC Assessing Department 44160 Riverview Ridge Dr P.O. Box 25 Clinton Township, M1 48038 Rogers City, M1 49779 PROOF OF SERVICE Onthe _4 dayof August , 2026 |, Iserved the enclosed documents upon the Michigan Tax Tribunal and Petitioner Bear Pointe Ventures LLC at the address above by placing the same in a stamped, addressed envelope and depositing in a U.S. mailbox. | DECLARE THE ABOVE TO BE TRUE AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION, AND BELIEF.
Page 5
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 Bear Pointe Ventures LLC Petitioner, MTT # 26-000763 vs, Alpena Township Respondent, Petitioner's Representative Respondent Eva Cantarella, Hertz Schram PC Assessing Department 1760 S Telegraph Rd, Ste 300 P.O. Box 25 Bloomfield Hills, Mi 48302 Rogers City, MI 49779 PROOF OF SERVICE Onthe _4 dayof August , 2026 , |served the enclosed documents upon the Michigan Tax Tribunal and Petitioner's Representative Eva Cantarella at the address above by placing the same in a stamped, addressed envelope and depositing in a U.S. mailbox. | DECLARE THE ABOVE TO BE TRUE AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION, AND BELIEF.
Page 6
Assessing Department PO. Box 25 Rogers City, MI 49779 GRAND RAPIDS MI 493 6 AUG 2026 PM 4 L UN FE F Michigan Tax Tribunal PO Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 AEE TT BEER Idee el Ep ged 1g eyo)
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Bear Pointe Ventures LLC, Petitioner, v. MTT Docket No. 26-000763 Parcel ID 018-103-000-199-00 Charter Township of Alpena, Respondent. ______________________________________________________________________________ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FOR PETITION WITH DOCKET NUMBER I hereby certify that, on July 14, 2026, I caused the Petition with docket number in the above- referenced matter to be served on the following individuals and entities, and in the following manner: via Certified Mail Assessor, Charter Township of Alpena Assessing Department P.O. Box 25 Rogers City, MI 49779 Clerk, Charter Township of Alpena 4385 US 23 North Alpena, MI 49707 via First Class Mail Director, Alpena County Equalization 720 W Chisholm St Ste 5 Alpena, MI 49707 Clerk, Alpena County 720 W Chisholm St Ste 2 Alpena, MI 49707 1
Page 2
Secretary, Alpena Public Schools Board 2373 Gordon Rd. Alpena, MI 49707 State Treasurer, Michigan Dept. of Treasury Treasury Building 430 W. Allegan Street Lansing, MI 48922 /s/ Eva T. Cantarella Eva T. Cantarella 2
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-000763 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Petitioner Files Document Type: Proof of Service: Petition Attachment File Name: COS for Petition w dkt # Bear Pointe Plaza 2026 Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Bear Pointe Ventures LLC, Petitioner, v. MTT Docket No. 26-________ Parcel ID 018-103-000-199-00 Charter Township of Alpena, Respondent. ______________________________________________________________________________ PETITION Bear Pointe Ventures LLC (“Petitioner”), through its attorney Eva Cantarella at the law firm Hertz Schram PC, petitions this Tribunal as follows: 1. Petitioner is a limited liability company whose business address is 44160 Riverview Ridge Dr., Clinton Twp., MI 48038. 2. The Subject Property is a shopping plaza at 2680 US 23 South, Alpena Twp, MI., 48707, built primarily in 1968 and 1988, but with a 17,649 square foot addition in 2007, and having a total of 97,307 rentable square feet and further identified by Parcel ID No. 018-103-000-199-00. 3. Petitioner is the party in interest, as Petitioner is responsible for paying the property taxes on the Subject Property. 4. Respondent Charter Township of Alpena levies and collects the property taxes on the Subject Property. 5. The Subject Property is classified 201 Commercial and was built for its present use as a shopping plaza. 1
Page 2
6. The Subject Property is located in Alpena County and is in the Alpena Public Schools school district. 7. This Petition concerns issues relating to (a) valuation, (b) assessment, and (c) taxable value. 8. For the 2026 year, Respondent determined the following assessed, state-equalized, and taxable values for the Subject Property: Respondent’s 2026 Value Contentions Assessed Value State-Equalized Value Taxable Value Parcel ID 018-103-000-199-00 1,087,600 1,087,600 971,736 9. For the following reasons, Petitioner contends Respondent has over-valued the Subject Property. 10. The Subject Property has experienced high vacancy for many years. 11. In just the past two years, two anchor tenants--Big Lots and Joann fabrics--filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and vacated their spaces which had totaled 55,764 rentable square feet, or 57.31% of the total rentable square feet. 12. Another 13,600 square feet has been vacant for 12 years, and a 6,000 square feet former Family Dollar space has been vacant for 21 years. 13. Thus, as of 12/31/25, 75,364 rentable square feet were vacant, and only 21,943 rentable square feet were occupied. 14. Stated otherwise, as of 12/31/25, 77.45% of the Subject was vacant and only 22.55% was occupied. 15. Although 17,169 square feet of the non-vacant space is occupied by a relatively new tenant (rent commenced June 2025), PACE (a non-profit that provides various community services), 2
Page 3
prior to moving in, the space was vacant for nine years and Pace pays only $3/square foot. 16. Given the foregoing, the Subject Property’s 2025 net operating income was only $44,394 [excludes interest, amortization, and depreciation from expenses]. 17. In addition, the Subject’s parking lot needs resurfacing and the parking lot lighting needs to be replaced. 18. For all of these reasons, Petitioner contends the Subject Property’s True Cash Value is $1,000,000 and therefore its 2026 assessed, state-equalized, and taxable values should be as follows: Petitioner’s 2026 Value Contentions Assessed Value State-Equalized Value Taxable Value Parcel ID 018-103-000-199-00 500,000 500,000 500,000 19. Petitioner is unaware of any dispute concerning the value of a statutory “addition” or “loss” in determining the Subject Property’s taxable value. 20. Should Petitioner hereafter become aware of any such dispute, Petitioner reserves the right to amend this Petition to reflect the dispute. 21. Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order (i) reducing the 2026 assessed, state-equalized and taxable values of the Subject Property to the amounts contended by Petitioner, and (ii) requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner any refunds attributable to such reductions, plus allowable interest and costs. 3
Page 4
Respectfully submitted Hertz Schram PC /s/ Eva T. Cantarella Eva T. Cantarella (P51917) Attorney for Petitioner 1760 S. Telegraph Road Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302-0183 off. (248) 335-5000; fax. (248) 335-3346 ecantarella@hertzschram.com 4
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MOAHR DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name Bear Pointe Ventures LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 44160 Riverview Ridge Drive City or Town Clinton Township State Michigan ZIP Code 48038 Telephone Number 586-876-0296 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) brianjcolellc@gmail.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Eva M.I. T Last Name Cantarella Firm Name (if any) Hertz Schram PC Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 1760 S Telegraph Rd Ste 300 City or Town Bloomfield Hills State 22 ZIP Code 48302 Telephone Number 248-335-5000 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) ecantarella@hertzschram.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 2680 US 23 South Alpena Township
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Michigan 48707 Taxing Authority (City or Township) Township Of Alpena (ALPENA) County Alpena If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 018-103-000-199-00 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 1087600 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 971736 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 1000000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 500000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 500000 Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ /s/ Eva Cantarella Payment Information Amount: 600 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26050684258388 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Bear Pointe Ventures LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-000763 Township Of Alpena, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: __Tribunal Clerk________ Entered: June 10, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
Eva T Cantarella Hertz Schram PC 1760 S Telegraph Rd Ste 300 Bloomfield Hills , MI 48302-0183
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Bear Pointe Ventures LLC, Petitioner, v. MTT Docket No. 26-________ Parcel ID 018-103-000-199-00 Charter Township of Alpena, Respondent. ______________________________________________________________________________ PETITION Bear Pointe Ventures LLC (“Petitioner”), through its attorney Eva Cantarella at the law firm Hertz Schram PC, petitions this Tribunal as follows: 1. Petitioner is a limited liability company whose business address is 44160 Riverview Ridge Dr., Clinton Twp., MI 48038. 2. The Subject Property is a shopping plaza at 2680 US 23 South, Alpena Twp, MI., 48707, built primarily in 1968 and 1988, but with a 17,649 square foot addition in 2007, and having a total of 97,307 rentable square feet and further identified by Parcel ID No. 018-103-000-199-00. 3. Petitioner is the party in interest, as Petitioner is responsible for paying the property taxes on the Subject Property. 4. Respondent Charter Township of Alpena levies and collects the property taxes on the Subject Property. 5. The Subject Property is classified 201 Commercial and was built for its present use as a shopping plaza. 1
Page 2
6. The Subject Property is located in Alpena County and is in the Alpena Public Schools school district. 7. This Petition concerns issues relating to (a) valuation, (b) assessment, and (c) taxable value. 8. For the 2026 year, Respondent determined the following assessed, state-equalized, and taxable values for the Subject Property: Respondent’s 2026 Value Contentions Assessed Value State-Equalized Value Taxable Value Parcel ID 018-103-000-199-00 1,087,600 1,087,600 971,736 9. For the following reasons, Petitioner contends Respondent has over-valued the Subject Property. 10. The Subject Property has experienced high vacancy for many years. 11. In just the past two years, two anchor tenants--Big Lots and Joann fabrics--filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and vacated their spaces which had totaled 55,764 rentable square feet, or 57.31% of the total rentable square feet. 12. Another 13,600 square feet has been vacant for 12 years, and a 6,000 square feet former Family Dollar space has been vacant for 21 years. 13. Thus, as of 12/31/25, 75,364 rentable square feet were vacant, and only 21,943 rentable square feet were occupied. 14. Stated otherwise, as of 12/31/25, 77.45% of the Subject was vacant and only 22.55% was occupied. 15. Although 17,169 square feet of the non-vacant space is occupied by a relatively new tenant (rent commenced June 2025), PACE (a non-profit that provides various community services), 2
Page 3
prior to moving in, the space was vacant for nine years and Pace pays only $3/square foot. 16. Given the foregoing, the Subject Property’s 2025 net operating income was only $44,394 [excludes interest, amortization, and depreciation from expenses]. 17. In addition, the Subject’s parking lot needs resurfacing and the parking lot lighting needs to be replaced. 18. For all of these reasons, Petitioner contends the Subject Property’s True Cash Value is $1,000,000 and therefore its 2026 assessed, state-equalized, and taxable values should be as follows: Petitioner’s 2026 Value Contentions Assessed Value State-Equalized Value Taxable Value Parcel ID 018-103-000-199-00 500,000 500,000 500,000 19. Petitioner is unaware of any dispute concerning the value of a statutory “addition” or “loss” in determining the Subject Property’s taxable value. 20. Should Petitioner hereafter become aware of any such dispute, Petitioner reserves the right to amend this Petition to reflect the dispute. 21. Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order (i) reducing the 2026 assessed, state-equalized and taxable values of the Subject Property to the amounts contended by Petitioner, and (ii) requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner any refunds attributable to such reductions, plus allowable interest and costs. 3
Page 4
Respectfully submitted Hertz Schram PC /s/ Eva T. Cantarella Eva T. Cantarella (P51917) Attorney for Petitioner 1760 S. Telegraph Road Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302-0183 off. (248) 335-5000; fax. (248) 335-3346 ecantarella@hertzschram.com 4
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MOAHR DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name Bear Pointe Ventures LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 44160 Riverview Ridge Drive City or Town Clinton Township State Michigan ZIP Code 48038 Telephone Number 586-876-0296 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) brianjcolellc@gmail.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Eva M.I. T Last Name Cantarella Firm Name (if any) Hertz Schram PC Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 1760 S Telegraph Rd Ste 300 City or Town Bloomfield Hills State 22 ZIP Code 48302 Telephone Number 248-335-5000 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) ecantarella@hertzschram.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 2680 US 23 South Alpena Township
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Michigan 48707 Taxing Authority (City or Township) Township Of Alpena (ALPENA) County Alpena If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 018-103-000-199-00 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 1087600 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 971736 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 1000000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 500000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 500000 Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ /s/ Eva Cantarella Payment Information Amount: 600 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26050684258388 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.