Bayview Mc Associates LLC Petitioner Vs. Township Of Chesterfield Respondent
- Petitioner
- Bayview Mc Associates LLC
- Respondent
- Township Of Chesterfield
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-001543-TT
- Status
- Ready Schedule
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Macomb
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Proof of Service of Misc Documents was received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/23/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 09/23/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Proof of service of petition was received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/15/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 08/18/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/18/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/27/2026 | $600.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER & INDUSTRY SERVICES
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
BAYVIEW MC ASSOCIATES, LLC,
Petitioner,
-VS-
MTT Docket No. 26-001543
TOWNSHIP OF CHESTERFIELD,
Respondent.
/
AARON M. FALES (P72864)
CHRISTINE D. ANDERSON (P45141)
Attorney for Petitioner
SEIBERT AND DLOSKI, PLLC
330 Hamilton Row, Ste. 350
Attorney for Respondent
Birmingham, MI
48009
19500 Hall Road, Suite 101
(248)767-9840
Clinton Township, MI 48038
afaleslaw@gmail.com
(586) 469-3800
canderson@seibertanddloski.com
/
PROOF OF SERVICE
KATHLEEN
J. HAMEL states that she
is an employee of Seibert and Dloski,
PLLC and that on September 23, 2026 she served Charter Township of Chesterfield’s
Answer to Petition and this Proof of Service upon counsel of record listed in the above-
referenced caption via email.
| declare the above is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge, information and belief.
/
2B
FT
i Le oxthsk AU {
Kathleen J. Haniel
’These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-001543 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Respondent Files Document Type: Proof of Service: Misc Documents Attachment File Name: Proof of Service Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
pSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER & INDUSTRY SERVICES MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL BAYVIEW MC ASSOCIATES, LLC, Petitioner, vs MTT Docket No. 26-001543 TOWNSHIP OF CHESTERFIELD, Respondent. / AARON M. FALES (P72864) CHRISTINE D. ANDERSON (P45141) Attorney for Petitioner SEIBERT AND DLOSKI, PLLC 330 Hamilton Row, Ste. 350 Attorney for Respondent Birmingham, MI 48009 19500 Hall Road, Suite 101 (248)767-9840 Clinton Township, MI 48038 afaleslaw@amail.com (586) 469-3800 canderson@seibertanddloski.com CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF CHESTERFIELD’S ANSWER TO ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION The Charter Township of Chesterfield (“Respondent”), by and through its attorneys, SEIBERT AND DLOSKI, PLLC, for its answer to Petitioner's Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition states as follows: 1. Respondent neither admits nor denies the location of Petitioner's principle office for lack of sufficient information on which to do so. 2. Respondent admits that Respondent assesses and collects property taxes on the subject parcel. 3. Respondent admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 3. 4. Respondent admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 4. 5. Respondent denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 5 for the reason they are untrue.
Page 2
6. Respondent denies the existence of a dispute relative to a loss. 7. Respondent denies the allegations contained in paragraph 7 for the reason they are untrue; Respondent further states that values for the subject parcel were uniformly and lawfully assessed for the tax year. WHEREFORE, the Respondent respectfully requests the Tax Tribunal dismiss the Petitioner's Petition as Petitioner is not a party in interest in this matter. Respectfully submitted, SEIBERT AND DLOSKI, PLLC CH Af By: Christine D. Anderson (P45141) Attorney for Respondent 19500 Hall Road, Suite 101 Clinton Township, MI 48038 Dated: September 21, 2026 (586) 469-3800
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001543 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government Township Of Chesterfield (MACOMB) First Name M.I. Last Name Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Christine M.I. D. Last Name Anderson Firm Name (if any) Seibert & Dloski, PLLC Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 19500 Hall Road, Suite 101 City or Town Clinton Township State Michigan ZIP Code 48038 Telephone Number 5864693800 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) canderson@seibertanddloski.com Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: Christine D. Anderson /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL BAYVIEW MC ASSOCIATES LLC, Petitioner, v. MTT Docket # 26-001543 TOWNSHIP OF CHESTERFIELD, Respondent. PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF MICHIGAN ) ) ss. COUNTY OF OAKLAND) Aaron M. Fales, being duly sworn, deposes and says that on September IS 2026 he served a copy of Petitioner's Petition on the parties named on the attached list. Aaron M. Fales
Page 2
8Y CERTIFIED UNITED STATES MAL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED: AND BY FIRST-CLASS UNITED STATES MAIL DIRECTOR OF ZOUAUIATION MACOMB CCU LEN. MAINS MT. CLEMENS, “i 48043-6533 v
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Bayview MC Associates LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-001543 Township Of Chesterfield, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[tlhe respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunals rules. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: August 18, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE | certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS SYSTEM
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
BAYVIEW MC ASSOCIATES LLC,
Petitioner,
MITT Docket #26- 001543
Vs.
Parcel No. 15-09-15-400-031
CHESTERFIELD TOWNSHIP,
Respondent.
/
PETITION
BAYVIEW MC ASSOCIATES LLC
(“Petitioner”), through
its attorneys, Law
Office of Aaron M. Fales, P.C., says:
1.
Petitioner's principal office address
is 43900 Garfield Rd., Ste. 203,
Clinton Twp., Ml 48038.
Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property
faxes on real property tax parcel no. 15-09-15-400-031 ("Petitioner's Property"), at
32743 23 Mile, Chesterfield Twp., MI 48047.
2.
Respondent, Chesterfield Township assesses and collects property
taxes on Petitioner's Property.
3.
In 2026, Respondent determined the taxable value of Petitioner's
Property to be $977,024 and assessed Petitioner's Property at $1,425,200 resulting
in
a
state
equalized
value
of
the same amount
based
on
the
tenativePage 5
Petitioner's
Property
was
originally
designed
to
be
used
for
commercial
purposes.
5.
This matter involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment,
(c) taxable value, and (d} uniformity.
6.
At this time, Petitioner believes, as
it relates to taxable value, that
there is a dispute relative fo the value of a loss.
7.
The 2026 assessment, including state equalized value and taxable
value,
imposed
on
Petitioner's
Property,
and
the
taxes
to
be
levied
and
collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the
taxpayer for the reasons that:
(a)
The
assessment,
including
state
equalized
value
and/or
taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and
applicable statutes;
(b)
The
assessment,
including
state
equalized
value
and/or
taxable value, are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible
under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes;
{c)
The
assessment,
including
taxable
value
and/or
state
equalized value, are based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash
value of that portion of Petitioner's Property that is taxable under Michigan law,Page 6
discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional rights to uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order reducing the 2026 taxable value of Petitioner's Property from $977,000 to $500,000, and reducing the 2026 assessed and state equalized values of Petitioner's Property from $1,425,200 to $500,000, and requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs. Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICE OF AARON M. FALES, P.C. Attorney for Petitioner Lp Aaron M. Fales (P72864) 330 Hamilton Row, Ste. 350 Birmingham, MI 48009 (248) 767-9840 By: Dated: May 27, 2026
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-001543 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Petitioner Files Document Type: Proof of Service: Petition Attachment File Name: 26 - Chester POS Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS SYSTEM
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
BAYVIEW MC ASSOCIATES LLC,
Petitioner,
vs.
CHESTERFIELD TOWNSHIP,
Respondent.
/
MTT Docket #26-
Parcel No. 15-09-15-400-031
PETITION
BAYVIEW MC ASSOCIATES LLC (“Petitioner”), through its attorneys, Law
Office of Aaron M. Fales, P.C., says:
1.
Petitioner's principal office address is 43900 Garfield Rd., Ste. 203,
Clinton Twp., MI 48038. Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property
taxes on real property tax parcel no. 15-09-15-400-031 ("Petitioner's Property"), at
32743 23 Mile, Chesterfield Twp., MI 48047.
2.
Respondent, Chesterfield Township assesses and collects property
taxes on Petitioner's Property.
3.
In 2026, Respondent determined the taxable value of Petitioner's
Property to be $977,024 and assessed Petitioner's Property at $1,425,200 resulting
in a state equalized value of the same amount based on the tenative
equalization factor.
4.
Petitioner's Property is classified as Commercial Real Property.
Petitioner's Property is a commercial property. Petitioner believes thatPage 2
Petitioner's Property was originally designed to be used for commercial purposes. 5. This matter involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, (c) taxable value, and (d) uniformity. 6. At this time, Petitioner believes, as it relates to taxable value, that there is a dispute relative to the value of a loss. 7. The 2026 assessment, including state equalized value and taxable value, imposed on Petitioner's Property, and the taxes to be levied and collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: (a) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (b) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (c) The assessment, including taxable value and/or state equalized value, are based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash value of that portion of Petitioner's Property that is taxable under Michigan law, and are based upon the application of wrong principles; and, (d) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent,
Page 3
discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional rights to uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order reducing the 2026 taxable value of Petitioner's Property from $977,000 to $500,000, and reducing the 2026 assessed and state equalized values of Petitioner's Property from $1,425,200 to $500,000, and requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs. Dated: May 27, 2026 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICE OF AARON M. FALES, P.C. Attorney for Petitioner By: _________________________ Aaron M. Fales (P72864) 330 Hamilton Row, Ste. 350 Birmingham, MI 48009 (248) 767-9840
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name Bayview MC Associates, LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 43900 Garfield City or Town Clinton Twp. State Michigan ZIP Code 48038 Telephone Number 2487679840 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) afaleslaw@gmail.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Aaron M.I. Last Name Fales Firm Name (if any) Law Office of Aaron M Fales, P.C. Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 330 Hamilton Row Suite 350 City or Town Birmingham State Michigan ZIP Code 48009 Telephone Number 248-767-9840 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) afaleslaw@gmail.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 32743 23 Mile Chesterfield
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Michigan 48047 Taxing Authority (City or Township) Township Of Chesterfield (MACOMB) County Macomb If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 15-09-15-400-031 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 1425200 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 977024 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 1000000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 500000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 500000 Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Aaron Fales Payment Information Amount: 600 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26052787072608 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Bayview MC Associates LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-001543 Township Of Chesterfield, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: August 18, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Bayview MC Associates LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-001543 Township Of Chesterfield, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: August 18, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS SYSTEM
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
BAYVIEW MC ASSOCIATES LLC,
Petitioner,
vs.
CHESTERFIELD TOWNSHIP,
Respondent.
/
MTT Docket #26-
Parcel No. 15-09-15-400-031
PETITION
BAYVIEW MC ASSOCIATES LLC (“Petitioner”), through its attorneys, Law
Office of Aaron M. Fales, P.C., says:
1.
Petitioner's principal office address is 43900 Garfield Rd., Ste. 203,
Clinton Twp., MI 48038. Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property
taxes on real property tax parcel no. 15-09-15-400-031 ("Petitioner's Property"), at
32743 23 Mile, Chesterfield Twp., MI 48047.
2.
Respondent, Chesterfield Township assesses and collects property
taxes on Petitioner's Property.
3.
In 2026, Respondent determined the taxable value of Petitioner's
Property to be $977,024 and assessed Petitioner's Property at $1,425,200 resulting
in a state equalized value of the same amount based on the tenative
equalization factor.
4.
Petitioner's Property is classified as Commercial Real Property.
Petitioner's Property is a commercial property. Petitioner believes thatPage 2
Petitioner's Property was originally designed to be used for commercial purposes. 5. This matter involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, (c) taxable value, and (d) uniformity. 6. At this time, Petitioner believes, as it relates to taxable value, that there is a dispute relative to the value of a loss. 7. The 2026 assessment, including state equalized value and taxable value, imposed on Petitioner's Property, and the taxes to be levied and collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: (a) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (b) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (c) The assessment, including taxable value and/or state equalized value, are based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash value of that portion of Petitioner's Property that is taxable under Michigan law, and are based upon the application of wrong principles; and, (d) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent,
Page 3
discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional rights to uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order reducing the 2026 taxable value of Petitioner's Property from $977,000 to $500,000, and reducing the 2026 assessed and state equalized values of Petitioner's Property from $1,425,200 to $500,000, and requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs. Dated: May 27, 2026 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICE OF AARON M. FALES, P.C. Attorney for Petitioner By: _________________________ Aaron M. Fales (P72864) 330 Hamilton Row, Ste. 350 Birmingham, MI 48009 (248) 767-9840
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name Bayview MC Associates, LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 43900 Garfield City or Town Clinton Twp. State Michigan ZIP Code 48038 Telephone Number 2487679840 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) afaleslaw@gmail.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Aaron M.I. Last Name Fales Firm Name (if any) Law Office of Aaron M Fales, P.C. Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 330 Hamilton Row Suite 350 City or Town Birmingham State Michigan ZIP Code 48009 Telephone Number 248-767-9840 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) afaleslaw@gmail.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 32743 23 Mile Chesterfield
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Michigan 48047 Taxing Authority (City or Township) Township Of Chesterfield (MACOMB) County Macomb If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 15-09-15-400-031 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 1425200 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 977024 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 1000000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 500000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 500000 Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Aaron Fales Payment Information Amount: 600 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26052787072608 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.