Automobile Dealers Accessory Corporation Of Michigan Petitioner Vs. City Of East Lansing Respondent

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906

NOTICE OF SEPTEMBER 1- 15, 2027 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER 

OF PROCEDURE

Automobile Dealers Accessory 

Corporation of Michigan,

Petitioner,

v

 

 

City Of East Lansing,

Respondent.

 MTT Docket No. 26-001019

Please be advised that 26-001019 has been placed on a two-week Prehearing General 

Call commencing September 01, 2027. Unless ordered otherwise, parties will be 

notified at least 28 days before they are scheduled to appear. Scheduling will not 

necessarily occur in the order in which the cases are listed below.

Parties are required to submit a valuation disclosure or written notification that no 

valuation disclosure is required by the dates indicated herein. A “valuation disclosure” 

is defined as documentary or other tangible evidence in a property tax proceeding that a 

party relies upon in support of the party’s contention as to the true cash value of the 

subject property or any portion thereof and contains the party’s value conclusion and 

data, valuation methodology, analysis or reasoning. See TTR 203 and TTR 241.

Users who file documents with the Tribunal are advised that filed documents are 

public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tribunal’s Tax Docket 

Lookup. If a user wishes to file a document for consideration by the Tribunal and 

prevent its publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for 

Protective Order under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents 

covered by the order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a 

Protective Order will be published.

In accordance with MCR 1.109(D)(9) and TTR 209, the responsibility for excluding or 

redacting personal identifying information (PII) from all documents filed with or offered to 

the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and their attorneys. The Tribunal is not 

responsible for or required to review, redact, or screen documents at the time of filing 

for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A party, representative, or interested 

person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may request that the Tribunal redact PII 

contained in a previously filed document by submitting a Request for Redactions. The 

Request for Redactions form is available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages 

of the Tribunal’s website.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-001019

Page 2 of 3

Please refer to the Tribunal’s FAQs and Glossary of Terms pages on the Tribunal’s 

website for more information.

IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall:

a. If no valuation disclosure is required, notify the Tribunal and the opposing parties 

in writing within 21 days of entry of this order that no valuation disclosure is being 

filed. The notice shall indicate the reason or reasons why no valuation disclosure 

is required (i.e., exemption claim, etc.).

b. If a valuation disclosure is required, file and exchange their valuation disclosures 

by May 5, 2027. Valuation disclosures will not be admitted into evidence unless 

disclosed and furnished in accordance with this order (even though admissible) 

except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their Prehearing 

Statements by May 5, 2027. Witnesses, with the exception of rebuttal witnesses, will 

not be allowed to testify unless disclosed in the Prehearing Statement and the 

Prehearing Statement is furnished in accordance with this order except upon a finding 

of good cause by the Tribunal. Failure to file the Prehearing Statement may result in 

holding a party or parties in default. See TTR 237. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on 

May 5, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel 

have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that 

date. Discovery relative to the valuation disclosure prepared for purposes of litigating 

this case or the valuation expert that prepared that valuation disclosure is not permitted 

during “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on 

September 1, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to 

Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged 

by that date. “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is limited to the opposing party’s 

valuation disclosure, the opposing party’s valuation expert, and the witnesses identified 

on the opposing party’s Prehearing Statement.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if this case is not scheduled for a date certain 

prehearing conference during the time frame indicated it may be scheduled for a date 

certain prehearing conference at any time subsequent to the completion date for this 

Prehearing General Call. Parties will, however, be notified in writing approximately one 

week before they are scheduled to appear. 

By:_____________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 26-001019

Page 3 of 3

Entered: October 1, 2026 

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906

NOTICE OF SEPTEMBER 1- 15, 2027 PREHEARING

Page 5

M

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

 

Automobile Dealers Accessory 

Corporation of Michigan, 

 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 26-001019 

 

-vs- 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Parcel No. 33-20-02-07-107-030 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CITY OF EAST LANSING, 

 

 

Respondent. 

 

COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 

Joshua T. Shillair (P72674) 

Representative for Petitioner 

400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 

Royal Oak, MI 48067 

(248) 226-1632 

Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com 

Karen.Cameron@Colliers.com 

 

ROSATI, SCHULTZ JOPPICH & 

 AMTSBUECHLER, P.C. 

Debra A. Walling (P37067) 

Attorney for Respondent 

27555 Executive Drive, Suite 250 

Farmington Hills, MI 48331-3554 

(248) 489-4100 

dwalling@rsjalaw.com 

 

RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO PETITION 

 

NOW COMES Respondent, CITY OF EAST LANSING, by and through its Attorneys, 

ROSATI SCHULTZ JOPPICH & AMTSBUECHLER PC, and for its Answer to Petitioner's 

Petition, states as follows: 

1. 

As to Paragraph 1, Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations contained 

therein, lacking knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the 

allegations and, therefore, leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 

2. 

As to Paragraph 2, Respondent admits the allegations contained therein. 

3. 

As to Paragraph 3, Respondent admits the allegations contained therein.

Page 2

2 

 

4. 

As to Paragraph 4, Respondent admits that the subject property is Commercial Real 

Property. Respondent neither admits nor denies Petitioner’s beliefs, lacking knowledge or 

information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the Petitioner’s beliefs. 

5. 

As to Paragraph 5, Respondent denies the allegation contained therein for the 

reason that the allegation is untrue. Petitioner filed an allowable letter appeal dated February 27, 

2026. 

6. 

As to Paragraph 6, Respondent admits the allegation contained therein. 

7. 

As to Paragraph 7, Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations contained 

therein, lacking knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the 

allegations and, therefore, leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 

8. 

As to Paragraph 8, Respondent admits the allegations contained therein. 

9. 

As to Paragraph 9, Respondent admits the allegations contained therein. 

10. 

As to Paragraph 10, Respondent denies the allegations contained therein including 

the allegations contained in subparagraphs a through d, for the reason that the allegations are 

untrue. 

11. 

As to Paragraph 11, Respondent denies the allegations contained therein for the 

reason that the allegations are untrue, and therefore leaves Petitioner to its burden of proof. 

12. 

As to Paragraph 12, Respondent denies the allegation for the reason that the value 

in contention is merely Petitioner’s mathematical calculation based upon a currently unsupported 

contention of market value ($550,000). 

13. 

As to Paragraph 13, Respondent denies the allegation for the reason that the value 

in contention is merely a mathematical calculation based upon a currently unsupported contention 

of market value ($550,000).

Page 3

3 

 

WHEREFORE, Respondent, CITY OF EAST LANSING, requests the that the Tribunal 

dismiss the Petition, affirm Respondent’s assessed and taxable values, subject to county and state 

equalization, and award Respondent its costs and attorney fees. 

 

ROSATI SCHULTZ JOPPICH 

& AMTSBUECHLER, PC 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 /s/ Debra A. Walling 

 

 

DEBRA A. WALLING (P37067) 

Attorney for Respondent 

27555 Executive Drive, Suite 250 

Farmington Hills, MI 48331 

(248) 489-4100 

 

 

 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

 

Respondent, CITY OF EAST LANSING, asserts the following affirmative defenses: 

1. 

Petitioner has failed to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth a cause of 

action against Respondent and to support its claim for relief. 

2. 

Petitioner has failed to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish fraud, error 

of law, discrimination, application of wrong principles, or illegality on the part of the Respondent 

or its agents. 

3. 

Petitioner has failed to allege that the mode and method of assessing the subject 

property fails to conform to the mode and method applied in the case of all other properties in 

Respondent's taxing unit for the year in question. 

4. 

Petitioner has failed to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish the true cash 

value, assessed value and taxable value of its property. 

5. 

Petitioner has failed to allege specific and sufficient facts to support its allegation 

that the assessed value of its property, as equalized, is at a factor other than 50% and has also failed

Page 4

4 

 

to allege specific and sufficient facts to support its allegations that the property's taxable value is 

improper. 

6. 

Petitioner has failed to show that any factor other than 50% was applied to the true 

cash value of its property, as well as to the properties of all others, to arrive at the respective 

assessments appearing on the roll. 

7. 

Petitioner, in essence, asks the Tribunal to grant it an illegal preference by 

application of a method of assessment different from that employed in the assessment of other 

properties in the Respondent's taxing unit. 

8. 

Petitioner, in essence, seeks by Petition to challenge the process of county and state 

equalization as to which it has no legal standing and cannot maintain a cause of action. 

9. 

If Petitioner appeared at the Board of Review, Petitioner failed in its appearance 

before the Board of Review to specifically allege: 

a. 

The equalized assessment of the property is more than 50% of its true cash 

value and that the taxable value is in violation of applicable statutory and 

constitutional limitations. 

b. 

The property is assessed in a discriminatory manner and that the assessment 

is a higher level of true cash value than the average level of assessment of all other 

property within the City of East Lansing, excepting this property and the assessment 

on other property which is also under

Page 5

5

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001019

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: 

Local Unit of Government

Local Unit of Government

City Of East Lansing (INGHAM)

First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Debra

M.I.

A

Last Name

Walling

Firm Name (if any)

Rosati, Schultz, Joppich & Amtsbuechler, P.C.

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

27555 Executive Drive, Suite 250

City or Town

Farmington Hills

State

 Michigan

ZIP Code

48331

Telephone Number

2484894100

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

dwalling@rsjalaw.com

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Debra A. Walling

/s/

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service 

Automobile Dealers Accessory Corp of Michigan v East Lansing 

Parcel Number: 33-20-02-07-107-030 

MTT Docket No.: 26-001019 

Page 1 of 2 

 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ACCESSORY CORP OF MICHIGAN, 

 

Petitioner, 

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-001019 

EAST LANSING, 

 

Respondent. 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

Colliers International 

By: Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) 

Senior Vice President | Tax Appeal 

Representative for Petitioner 

400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 

Royal Oak, MI 48067 

O: 248-226-1632 

F: 248-226-1633 

Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com 

Karen.Cameron@Colliers.com 

City of East Lansing Assessing Department 

410 Abbot Road 

East Lansing, MI 48823 

517-319-6914 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

) 

 

)ss 

COUNTY OF OAKLAND 

) 

 

Jennifer Lunsford, states that on 7/23/2026, in compliance with TTR 221, she did place in the US 

mail a copy of Petitioner’s 2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition with docket number, the 

Notice of Docket Number issued by the Michigan Tax Tribunal for this appeal as well as this Proof 

of Service of Petition for the above captioned appeal to the units of government listed on the second 

page of this Proof of Service of Petition. 

 

/s/Jennifer Lunsford 

Jennifer Lunsford 

 

Karen Cameron states that she submitted electronically on 7/23/2026, to the Michigan Tax 

Tribunal 

a 

copy 

of 

this 

Proof 

of 

Service 

of 

Petition 

at 

eFile 

through 

www.etaxappeal.lara.state.mi.us. 

 

/s/Karen Cameron 

Karen Cameron

Page 2

2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service 

Automobile Dealers Accessory Corp of Michigan v East Lansing 

Parcel Number: 33-20-02-07-107-030 

MTT Docket No.: 26-001019 

Page 2 of 2 

 

By Certified Mail 

 

Assessor’s Office 

City of East Lansing Assessing Department 

East Lansing, MI 48823 

 

Office of the City/Township Clerk 

East Lansing 

Clerk's Office 

410 Abbot Road 

East Lansing, MI 48823 

 

By First Class Mail 

 

Director of Equalization 

Ingham County 

Equalization Director 

341 S Jefferson Street 

Mason, MI 48854 

 

County Clerk’s Office 

Ingham County 

Clerk’s Office 

341 S Jefferson Street 

Mason, MI 48854 

 

Secretary of the School Board 

East Lansing Public Schools 

509 Burcham Drive 

East Lansing, MI 48823 

 

Treasurer for the State of Michigan 

Michigan Department of Treasury 

Lansing, MI 48922

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

Docket Number: 26-001019

Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No

Party Filing Document 

Petitioner

Files

Document Type: Proof of Service: Petition

Attachment File Name: POS_Automobile_Dealers_Accessory_Corp_of_Michigan_26-001019

Fee Information

Filing Fee: $ 0.00

Payment Information

Payment: $ 0.00

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service 

Automobile Dealers Accessory Corporation of Michigan v City of East Lansing 

Parcel Number: 33-20-02-07-107-030 

MTT Docket No.: 

 

Page 1 of 5 

 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Automobile Dealers Accessory Corporation of Michigan, 

 

Petitioner, 

 

v 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 

 

City of East Lansing, 

 

Respondent. 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

Colliers International 

By: Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) 

Vice President | Tax Appeal 

Representative for Petitioner 

400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 

Royal Oak, MI 48067 

O: 248-226-1632 

F: 248-226-1633 

Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com 

Karen.Cameron@Colliers.com 

 

City of East Lansing 

Assessing Office 

410 Abbot Road 

East Lansing, MI 48823 

(517) 337-1731 

 

 

 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

2026 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

 

1. The Petitioner in this matter, Automobile Dealers Accessory Corporation of Michigan, 

has the legal residence or principal office address of 1500 Kendale Blvd, East Lansing, 

MI 48823. Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property taxes on property 

parcel no(s). (hereinafter referenced as the Subject Property) 33-20-02-07-107-030. If the 

Subject Property in this petition includes more than one (1) real property tax parcel, the 

Subject Property’s tax parcels are contiguous. 

2. The Subject Property is located in Ingham County.

Page 2

2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service 

Automobile Dealers Accessory Corporation of Michigan v City of East Lansing 

Parcel Number: 33-20-02-07-107-030 

MTT Docket No.: 

 

Page 2 of 5 

 

3. Respondent, City of East Lansing of Ingham County, assesses and collects property taxes 

on the Subject Property. 

4. The Subject Property is real property and is classified as Commercial. The Subject 

Property is presently used or available for use for Commercial purposes. Petitioner 

believes that the Subject Property was originally designed to be used for Commercial 

purposes. 

5. Protest to the 2026 Board of Review was not made and is not required by law for the 

Subject Property. 

6. The Subject Property’s address is: 

1500 Kendale Blvd, East Lansing, MI 48823 

7. This appeal involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, (c) taxable value 

and (d) uniformity. 

8. The tax year(s) at issue are: 2026 

9. The values for the Subject Property as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: 

 

Tax Year 

Parcel Number 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable 

Value 

2026 

33-20-02-07-

107-030 

$1,356,600.00 

$678,300.00 

$622,978.00 

 

10. The 2026 assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value imposed 

upon all parcels of the Subject Property, and the taxes to be levied and collected thereon, 

are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: 

a. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value 

exceeds the amounts permitted by the Michigan Constitution, applicable 

statutes and case law;

Page 3

2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service 

Automobile Dealers Accessory Corporation of Michigan v City of East Lansing 

Parcel Number: 33-20-02-07-107-030 

MTT Docket No.: 

 

Page 3 of 5 

 

b. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value are 

at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan 

Constitution, applicable statutes and case law; 

c. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value are 

based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash value of that portion 

of the Subject Property that is taxable under Michigan law, and are based 

upon the application of wrong principles; and 

d. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value, 

and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, discriminate against 

Petitioner and denies Petitioner its constitutional rights to uniformity, equal 

protection and dues process of law. 

11. Petitioner contends that the actual values for the Subject Property are: 

Tax Year 

Parcel Number 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

33-20-02-07-

107-030 

$550,000.00 

$275,000.00 

$275,000.00 

 

 

12. The amount of value in contention for the Subject Property is: 

 

Tax Year 

Parcel Number 

Assessed Value in Contention 

2026 

33-20-02-07-107-030 

$403,300.00 

 

13. Petitioner relies on the following specific facts to support the relief requested: Market 

sales and income data indicates that the subject property’s assessed value, state equalized 

value and taxable value exceed 50% of its actual market value. In addition, the cost less 

depreciation method Respondent utilizes to establish the Subject Property’s assessment at 

issue is not related to the Subject Property’s actual market value.

Page 4

2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service 

Automobile Dealers Accessory Corporation of Michigan v City of East Lansing 

Parcel Number: 33-20-02-07-107-030 

MTT Docket No.: 

 

Page 4 of 5 

 

WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that this Honorable Michigan Tax Tribunal enter an 

Order reducing the 2026 assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value for the Subject 

Property to the values stated in Paragraph 11 above and requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner 

the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Respectfully Submitted, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Representative for Petitioner 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:_/s/ Joshua T. Shillair__Dated:05/15/2026 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) 

Vice President | Tax Appeal 

400 E 4th Street, Suite 350 

Royal Oak, MI 48067 

O: 248-226-1632 

F: 248-226-1633 

Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com

Page 5

2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service 

Automobile Dealers

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Organization 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

Automobile Dealers Accessory Corporation of Michigan

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

1500 Kendale Blvd

City or Town

East Lansing

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48223

Telephone Number

2482261632

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

tax.efile@colliers.com

 

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Joshua

M.I.

Thomas

Last Name

Shillair

Firm Name (if any)

Colliers International

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

400 W 4th Street, Suite 350

City or Town

Royal Oak

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48067

Telephone Number

248-226-1632

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

tax.efile@colliers.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

1500 Kendale Blvd,

E LANSING

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Michigan

48823

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City Of East Lansing (INGHAM) 

County

Ingham

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

If “Other”, please explain:

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

33-20-02-07-107-030

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

678300

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

622978

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

550000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

275000

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ /s/Joshua T. Shillair

Payment Information

Amount: 400

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26051585595823

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Automobile Dealers Accessory Corporation of Michigan, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 26-001019

City Of East Lansing, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: July 13, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

Joshua Thomas Shillair

400 W 4th Street, Suite 350

Royal Oak , MI 48067

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service 

Automobile Dealers Accessory Corporation of Michigan v City of East Lansing 

Parcel Number: 33-20-02-07-107-030 

MTT Docket No.: 

 

Page 1 of 5 

 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Automobile Dealers Accessory Corporation of Michigan, 

 

Petitioner, 

 

v 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 

 

City of East Lansing, 

 

Respondent. 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

Colliers International 

By: Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) 

Vice President | Tax Appeal 

Representative for Petitioner 

400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 

Royal Oak, MI 48067 

O: 248-226-1632 

F: 248-226-1633 

Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com 

Karen.Cameron@Colliers.com 

 

City of East Lansing 

Assessing Office 

410 Abbot Road 

East Lansing, MI 48823 

(517) 337-1731 

 

 

 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

2026 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

 

1. The Petitioner in this matter, Automobile Dealers Accessory Corporation of Michigan, 

has the legal residence or principal office address of 1500 Kendale Blvd, East Lansing, 

MI 48823. Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property taxes on property 

parcel no(s). (hereinafter referenced as the Subject Property) 33-20-02-07-107-030. If the 

Subject Property in this petition includes more than one (1) real property tax parcel, the 

Subject Property’s tax parcels are contiguous. 

2. The Subject Property is located in Ingham County.

Page 2

2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service 

Automobile Dealers Accessory Corporation of Michigan v City of East Lansing 

Parcel Number: 33-20-02-07-107-030 

MTT Docket No.: 

 

Page 2 of 5 

 

3. Respondent, City of East Lansing of Ingham County, assesses and collects property taxes 

on the Subject Property. 

4. The Subject Property is real property and is classified as Commercial. The Subject 

Property is presently used or available for use for Commercial purposes. Petitioner 

believes that the Subject Property was originally designed to be used for Commercial 

purposes. 

5. Protest to the 2026 Board of Review was not made and is not required by law for the 

Subject Property. 

6. The Subject Property’s address is: 

1500 Kendale Blvd, East Lansing, MI 48823 

7. This appeal involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, (c) taxable value 

and (d) uniformity. 

8. The tax year(s) at issue are: 2026 

9. The values for the Subject Property as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: 

 

Tax Year 

Parcel Number 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable 

Value 

2026 

33-20-02-07-

107-030 

$1,356,600.00 

$678,300.00 

$622,978.00 

 

10. The 2026 assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value imposed 

upon all parcels of the Subject Property, and the taxes to be levied and collected thereon, 

are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: 

a. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value 

exceeds the amounts permitted by the Michigan Constitution, applicable 

statutes and case law;

Page 3

2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service 

Automobile Dealers Accessory Corporation of Michigan v City of East Lansing 

Parcel Number: 33-20-02-07-107-030 

MTT Docket No.: 

 

Page 3 of 5 

 

b. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value are 

at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan 

Constitution, applicable statutes and case law; 

c. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value are 

based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash value of that portion 

of the Subject Property that is taxable under Michigan law, and are based 

upon the application of wrong principles; and 

d. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value, 

and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, discriminate against 

Petitioner and denies Petitioner its constitutional rights to uniformity, equal 

protection and dues process of law. 

11. Petitioner contends that the actual values for the Subject Property are: 

Tax Year 

Parcel Number 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

33-20-02-07-

107-030 

$550,000.00 

$275,000.00 

$275,000.00 

 

 

12. The amount of value in contention for the Subject Property is: 

 

Tax Year 

Parcel Number 

Assessed Value in Contention 

2026 

33-20-02-07-107-030 

$403,300.00 

 

13. Petitioner relies on the following specific facts to support the relief requested: Market 

sales and income data indicates that the subject property’s assessed value, state equalized 

value and taxable value exceed 50% of its actual market value. In addition, the cost less 

depreciation method Respondent utilizes to establish the Subject Property’s assessment at 

issue is not related to the Subject Property’s actual market value.

Page 4

2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service 

Automobile Dealers Accessory Corporation of Michigan v City of East Lansing 

Parcel Number: 33-20-02-07-107-030 

MTT Docket No.: 

 

Page 4 of 5 

 

WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that this Honorable Michigan Tax Tribunal enter an 

Order reducing the 2026 assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value for the Subject 

Property to the values stated in Paragraph 11 above and requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner 

the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Respectfully Submitted, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Representative for Petitioner 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:_/s/ Joshua T. Shillair__Dated:05/15/2026 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) 

Vice President | Tax Appeal 

400 E 4th Street, Suite 350 

Royal Oak, MI 48067 

O: 248-226-1632 

F: 248-226-1633 

Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com

Page 5

2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service 

Automobile Dealers

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Organization 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

Automobile Dealers Accessory Corporation of Michigan

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

1500 Kendale Blvd

City or Town

East Lansing

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48223

Telephone Number

2482261632

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

tax.efile@colliers.com

 

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Joshua

M.I.

Thomas

Last Name

Shillair

Firm Name (if any)

Colliers International

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

400 W 4th Street, Suite 350

City or Town

Royal Oak

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48067

Telephone Number

248-226-1632

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

tax.efile@colliers.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

1500 Kendale Blvd,

E LANSING

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Michigan

48823

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City Of East Lansing (INGHAM) 

County

Ingham

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

If “Other”, please explain:

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

33-20-02-07-107-030

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

678300

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

622978

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

550000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

275000

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ /s/Joshua T. Shillair

Payment Information

Amount: 400

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26051585595823

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.