Argos Building LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Kalamazoo Respondent
- Petitioner
- Argos Building LLC
- Respondent
- City Of Kalamazoo
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-000813-TT
- Status
- Ready Sched Prehearing Date Certain
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Kalamazoo
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Prehearing General Call | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/16/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 07/01/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Proof of service of petition was received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/16/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 06/16/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/16/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/09/2026 | $600.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NOTICE OF JUNE 16- 30, 2027 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER OF PROCEDURE Argos Building LLC, Petitioner, v City Of Kalamazoo, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 26-000813 Please be advised that 26-000813 has been placed on a two-week Prehearing General Call commencing June 16, 2027. Unless ordered otherwise, parties will be notified at least 28 days before they are scheduled to appear. Scheduling will not necessarily occur in the order in which the cases are listed below. Parties are required to submit a valuation disclosure or written notification that no valuation disclosure is required by the dates indicated herein. A “valuation disclosure” is defined as documentary or other tangible evidence in a property tax proceeding that a party relies upon in support of the party’s contention as to the true cash value of the subject property or any portion thereof and contains the party’s value conclusion and data, valuation methodology, analysis or reasoning. See TTR 203 and TTR 241. Users who file documents with the Tribunal are advised that filed documents are public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tribunal’s Tax Docket Lookup. If a user wishes to file a document for consideration by the Tribunal and prevent its publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for Protective Order under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents covered by the order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a Protective Order will be published. In accordance with MCR 1.109(D)(9) and TTR 209, the responsibility for excluding or redacting personal identifying information (PII) from all documents filed with or offered to the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and their attorneys. The Tribunal is not responsible for or required to review, redact, or screen documents at the time of filing for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A party, representative, or interested person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may request that the Tribunal redact PII contained in a previously filed document by submitting a Request for Redactions. The Request for Redactions form is available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages of the Tribunal’s website. Please refer to the Tribunal’s FAQs and Glossary of Terms pages on the Tribunal’s website for more information.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-000813 Page 2 of 3 IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall: a. If no valuation disclosure is required, notify the Tribunal and the opposing parties in writing within 21 days of entry of this order that no valuation disclosure is being filed. The notice shall indicate the reason or reasons why no valuation disclosure is required (i.e., exemption claim, etc.). b. If a valuation disclosure is required, file and exchange their valuation disclosures by February 17, 2027. Valuation disclosures will not be admitted into evidence unless disclosed and furnished in accordance with this order (even though admissible) except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their Prehearing Statements by February 17, 2027. Witnesses, with the exception of rebuttal witnesses, will not be allowed to testify unless disclosed in the Prehearing Statement and the Prehearing Statement is furnished in accordance with this order except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. Failure to file the Prehearing Statement may result in holding a party or parties in default. See TTR 237. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on February 17, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. Discovery relative to the valuation disclosure prepared for purposes of litigating this case or the valuation expert that prepared that valuation disclosure is not permitted during “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on June 16, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is limited to the opposing party’s valuation disclosure, the opposing party’s valuation expert, and the witnesses identified on the opposing party’s Prehearing Statement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if this case is not scheduled for a date certain prehearing conference during the time frame indicated it may be scheduled for a date certain prehearing conference at any time subsequent to the completion date for this Prehearing General Call. Parties will, however, be notified in writing approximately one week before they are scheduled to appear. By:_____________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: July 16, 2026
Page 3
MTT Docket No. 26-000813 Page 3 of 3 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NOTICE OF JUNE 16- 30, 2027 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER OF
Page 5
MTT Docket
Page 6
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
1 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Argos Building LLC, Petitioner, vs. City of Kalamazoo, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 26-000813 Tax ID# 06-15-377-100 Eva T. Cantarella (P51917) Hertz Schram PC 1760 S. Telegraph Road Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 (248) 335-5000 Attorney for Petitioner Aaron Powers WCA ASSESSING 38110 Executive Dr., Ste. 200 Westland, MI 48185 (734) 331-3980 Authorized Representatives for Respondent RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO PETITION NOW COMES the Respondent, City of Kalamazoo, by and through its Representative, WCA Assessing and in answer to the Petition filed herein, states as follows: 1. Admits. 2. Denies allegations regarding petitioner’s stated land area; cannot admit nor deny to allegations regarding petitioner’s leasable square footage; admits to remaining allegations stated in item #2. 3. Admits. 4. Admits. 5. Admits. 6. Admits. 7. Denies. 8. Admits.
Page 2
2 9. Admits. 10. Admits. 11. Denies. 12. Neither admit nor deny. 13. Neither admit nor deny. 14. Neither admit nor deny. 15. Neither admit nor deny. 16. Neither admit nor deny. 17. Neither admit nor deny. 18. Neither admit nor deny. 19. Denies. 20. Neither admit nor deny. 21. Denies. 22. Denies.
Page 3
3 WHEREFORE, Respondent, City of Kalamazoo, feels that the case lacks merit and requests the Tribunal dismiss the Petition, affirm Respondent’s assessed and taxable values, subject to county and state equalization and award Respondent its costs and representation fees. Dated: July 1, 2026 Respectfully Submitted, WCA Assessing ______________________ Aaron P. Powers Representative for Respondent 38110 Executive Drive, Ste. 200 Westland, Michigan 48185 734-331-3980
Page 4
4 PROOF OF SERVICE The undersigned, being first duly sworn, deposes and say that he, Daniel K. Currie, placed in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, a copy of the following, properly addressed: DATE: July 1, 2026 DOCUMENT: Respondent’s Answer to Petitioner’s Petition ADDRESSESSEE(S): Eva T. Cantarella (P51917) Hertz Schram PC 1760 S. Telegraph Road Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302-3346 _________________________________________ Daniel K. Currie July 1, 2026
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent MTT DOCKET NO. 26-000813 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government City Of Kalamazoo (KALAMAZOO) First Name M.I. Last Name Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Aaron M.I. P Last Name Powers Firm Name (if any) WCA Assessing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 38110 Executive Dr. STE 200 City or Town Westland State Michigan ZIP Code 48185 Telephone Number 7343313980 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) MTTappeals@wcaassessing.com Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: Aaron P. Powers /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Argos Building LLC, Petitioner, v. MTT Docket No. 26-000813 Parcel ID 06-15-377-100 City of Kalamazoo, Respondent. ______________________________________________________________________________ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FOR PETITION WITH DOCKET NUMBER I hereby certified that on June 16, 2026, I caused the above-referenced Petition with docket number to be served on the following individuals and entities and in the following manner: via Certified Mail Assessor, City of Kalamazoo Kalamazoo City Hall 241 West South Street Kalamazoo, MI 49007 Clerk, City of Kalamazoo Kalamazoo City Hall 241 West South Street Kalamazoo, MI 49007 via First Class Mail Director, Kalamazoo County Equalization 201 W. Kalamazoo Ave., Room 203 Kalamazoo, MI 49007 Clerk, Kalamazoo County 201 W. Kalamazoo Ave., Room 203 Kalamazoo, MI 49007 1
Page 2
Secretary, Kalamazoo Public Schools Board 1220 Howard St. Kalamazoo, MI 49008 State Treasurer, Michigan Dept. of Treasury Treasury Building 430 W. Allegan Street Lansing, MI 48922 /s/ Eva T. Cantarella Eva T. Cantarella ecantarella@hertzschram.com 2
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-000813 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Petitioner Files Document Type: Proof of Service: Petition Attachment File Name: COS for Petition w dkt# Argos Building LLC Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Argos Building LLC, Petitioner, v. MTT Docket No. 26_________ Parcel ID 06-15-377-100 City of Kalamazoo, Respondent. ______________________________________________________________________________ PETITION Argos Building LLC (“Petitioner”), through its attorney Eva Cantarella at the law firm Hertz Schram PC, petitions this Tribunal as follows: 1. Petitioner is a limited liability company whose business address is 215 E. Michigan Avenue, Suite 200, Kalamazoo, MI 49007-3909. 2. The Subject Property is a six-story office building built in 1988 comprising 36,542 leaseable square feet, situated on 0.17 acres at 141 E. Michigan Avenue, Kalamazoo, MI, and further identified by parcel ID number 06-15-377-100. 3. Petitioner is the party in interest, as Petitioner is responsible for paying the property taxes on the Subject Property. 4. Respondent City of Kalamazoo levies and collects the property taxes on the Subject Property. 5. The Subject Property is classified 201 Commercial Improved and was built for its current use as an office building. 1
Page 2
6. The Subject Property is located in Kalamazoo County and is in the Kalamazoo City school district. 7. This Petition concerns issues relating to (a) valuation, (b) assessment, and (c) taxable value. 8. For the 2026 year, Respondent determined the following assessed, state-equalized, and taxable values for the Subject Property: Respondent’s 2026 Value Contentions Assessed Value State-Equalized Value Taxable Value Parcel ID 06-15-377-100 $1,570,800 $1,570,800 $1,570,800 9. Petitioner did not protest Respondent’s value contentions to the City of Kalamazoo Board of Review. 10. Based on Respondent’s contention of Assessed Value, Respondent determined the Subject Property’s true cash value to equal $3,141,600 [double the AV]. 11. For the following reasons, Petitioner contends Respondent has over-valued the Subject Property. 12. The Subject Property is 27.77% vacant and most of its leased space is short term, meaning it is at risk of losing more tenants and becoming more vacant over the next few years. 13. Perhaps not surprisingly, the Subject Property’s 2025 net operating income (after excluding interest, amortization and depreciation from expenses) was only $33,272! 14. One reason for the Subject’s high vacancy is that it has no on-site parking. In fact, there is no way to create such parking because the site is only 0.17 acres in size–just a little bigger than the footprint of the building. 2
Page 3
15. Although there are a few metered parking spots along the street, the closest surface lot or parking garage is about a block away. 16. Additionally, both elevators in the building are in urgent need of replacement. In fact, one elevator is currently not working at all. 17. Written quotes to replace the elevators have exceeded $800,000. 18. When Petitioner purchased the Subject Property, Petitioner was unaware the elevators were in poor mechanical condition and on the verge of needing to be replaced. 19. Given the foregoing, Petitioner contends the 2026 true cash value of the Subject Property is $2,000,000 and therefore the 2026 assessed, state-equalized, and taxable values should be as follows: Petitioner’s 2026 Value Contentions Assessed Value State-Equalized Value Taxable Value Parcel ID 16-15-377-100 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 20. Petitioner is unaware of any dispute concerning the value of a statutory “addition” or “loss” in determining the Subject Property’s taxable value. 21. Should Petitioner hereafter become aware of any such dispute, Petitioner reserves the right to amend this Petition to reflect the dispute. 22. Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order (i) reducing the 2026 assessed, state-equalized and taxable values of the Subject Property to the amounts contended by Petitioner, and (ii) requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner any refunds attributable to such reductions, plus allowable interest and costs. 3
Page 4
Respectfully submitted Hertz Schram PC /s/ Eva T. Cantarella Eva T. Cantarella (P51917) Attorney for Petitioners 1760 S. Telegraph Road Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302-0183 off. (248) 335-5000; fax. (248) 335-3346 ecantarella@hertzschram.com 4
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MOAHR DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name Argos Building LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 215 E Michigan Avenue Suite 200 City or Town Kalamazoo State Michigan ZIP Code 49007-3909 Telephone Number 269-329-1808 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) steve.brown@treystar.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Eva M.I. T Last Name Cantarella Firm Name (if any) Hertz Schram PC Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 1760 S Telegraph Rd Ste 300 City or Town Bloomfield Hills State 22 ZIP Code 48302 Telephone Number 248-335-5000 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) ecantarella@hertzschram.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 141 E Michigan Avenue Kalamazoo
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Michigan 49007 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Kalamazoo (KALAMAZOO) County Kalamazoo If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 06-15-377-100 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 1570800 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 1570800 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 2000000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 1000000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ /s/ Eva Cantarella Payment Information Amount: 600 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26050884588139 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Argos Building LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-000813 City Of Kalamazoo, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: __Tribunal Clerk________ Entered: June 16, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Argos Building LLC, Petitioner, v. MTT Docket No. 26_________ Parcel ID 06-15-377-100 City of Kalamazoo, Respondent. ______________________________________________________________________________ PETITION Argos Building LLC (“Petitioner”), through its attorney Eva Cantarella at the law firm Hertz Schram PC, petitions this Tribunal as follows: 1. Petitioner is a limited liability company whose business address is 215 E. Michigan Avenue, Suite 200, Kalamazoo, MI 49007-3909. 2. The Subject Property is a six-story office building built in 1988 comprising 36,542 leaseable square feet, situated on 0.17 acres at 141 E. Michigan Avenue, Kalamazoo, MI, and further identified by parcel ID number 06-15-377-100. 3. Petitioner is the party in interest, as Petitioner is responsible for paying the property taxes on the Subject Property. 4. Respondent City of Kalamazoo levies and collects the property taxes on the Subject Property. 5. The Subject Property is classified 201 Commercial Improved and was built for its current use as an office building. 1
Page 2
6. The Subject Property is located in Kalamazoo County and is in the Kalamazoo City school district. 7. This Petition concerns issues relating to (a) valuation, (b) assessment, and (c) taxable value. 8. For the 2026 year, Respondent determined the following assessed, state-equalized, and taxable values for the Subject Property: Respondent’s 2026 Value Contentions Assessed Value State-Equalized Value Taxable Value Parcel ID 06-15-377-100 $1,570,800 $1,570,800 $1,570,800 9. Petitioner did not protest Respondent’s value contentions to the City of Kalamazoo Board of Review. 10. Based on Respondent’s contention of Assessed Value, Respondent determined the Subject Property’s true cash value to equal $3,141,600 [double the AV]. 11. For the following reasons, Petitioner contends Respondent has over-valued the Subject Property. 12. The Subject Property is 27.77% vacant and most of its leased space is short term, meaning it is at risk of losing more tenants and becoming more vacant over the next few years. 13. Perhaps not surprisingly, the Subject Property’s 2025 net operating income (after excluding interest, amortization and depreciation from expenses) was only $33,272! 14. One reason for the Subject’s high vacancy is that it has no on-site parking. In fact, there is no way to create such parking because the site is only 0.17 acres in size–just a little bigger than the footprint of the building. 2
Page 3
15. Although there are a few metered parking spots along the street, the closest surface lot or parking garage is about a block away. 16. Additionally, both elevators in the building are in urgent need of replacement. In fact, one elevator is currently not working at all. 17. Written quotes to replace the elevators have exceeded $800,000. 18. When Petitioner purchased the Subject Property, Petitioner was unaware the elevators were in poor mechanical condition and on the verge of needing to be replaced. 19. Given the foregoing, Petitioner contends the 2026 true cash value of the Subject Property is $2,000,000 and therefore the 2026 assessed, state-equalized, and taxable values should be as follows: Petitioner’s 2026 Value Contentions Assessed Value State-Equalized Value Taxable Value Parcel ID 16-15-377-100 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 20. Petitioner is unaware of any dispute concerning the value of a statutory “addition” or “loss” in determining the Subject Property’s taxable value. 21. Should Petitioner hereafter become aware of any such dispute, Petitioner reserves the right to amend this Petition to reflect the dispute. 22. Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order (i) reducing the 2026 assessed, state-equalized and taxable values of the Subject Property to the amounts contended by Petitioner, and (ii) requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner any refunds attributable to such reductions, plus allowable interest and costs. 3
Page 4
Respectfully submitted Hertz Schram PC /s/ Eva T. Cantarella Eva T. Cantarella (P51917) Attorney for Petitioners 1760 S. Telegraph Road Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302-0183 off. (248) 335-5000; fax. (248) 335-3346 ecantarella@hertzschram.com 4
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MOAHR DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name Argos Building LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 215 E Michigan Avenue Suite 200 City or Town Kalamazoo State Michigan ZIP Code 49007-3909 Telephone Number 269-329-1808 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) steve.brown@treystar.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Eva M.I. T Last Name Cantarella Firm Name (if any) Hertz Schram PC Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 1760 S Telegraph Rd Ste 300 City or Town Bloomfield Hills State 22 ZIP Code 48302 Telephone Number 248-335-5000 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) ecantarella@hertzschram.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 141 E Michigan Avenue Kalamazoo
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Michigan 49007 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Kalamazoo (KALAMAZOO) County Kalamazoo If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 06-15-377-100 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 1570800 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 1570800 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 2000000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 1000000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ /s/ Eva Cantarella Payment Information Amount: 600 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26050884588139 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.