Arborvitae Building Co LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Lansing Respondent
- Petitioner
- Arborvitae Building Co LLC
- Respondent
- City Of Lansing
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-000667-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Ingham
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Consent Judgment | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/08/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 9 | Proof of Service of Misc Documents was received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/29/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 8 | A Stipulation has been received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/29/2026 | $50.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Prehearing General Call | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/16/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 05/19/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Petition has been verified | Not recorded | 2 | 05/29/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 05/29/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Proof of service of petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 04/22/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | A petition was received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 04/20/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | ET Case Info Sheet | Not recorded | Not recorded | 04/20/2026 | $400.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Arborvitae Building Co LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 26-000667 City of Lansing, Presiding Judge Respondent. Marcus L. Abood ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and the submitted Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment (Stipulation) and finds that the Stipulation meets all filing and statutory requirements.1 As such, the Tribunal shall enter the Stipulation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment including all attachments, terms and conditions is GRANTED and ADOPTED, unless otherwise indicated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with maintaining the assessment rolls for the tax years at issue shall correct or cause the assessment rolls to be corrected to reflect the property’s true cash and taxable values as provided in this Consent Judgment within 20 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment.2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with collecting or refunding the affected taxes shall collect taxes and any applicable interest or issue a refund as required by the Consent Judgment within 28 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment. If a refund is warranted, it shall, unless otherwise indicated, include a proportionate share of any property tax administration fees paid and of penalty and interest paid on delinquent taxes. The refund shall also, unless otherwise indicated, separately indicate the amount of the taxes, fees, penalties, and interest being refunded. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been unlawfully paid shall, unless otherwise indicated, bear interest from the date of payment to the date of judgment and the judgment shall bear interest to the date of its payment. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been underpaid shall not bear interest for any time period prior to 28 days after the issuance of this Consent Judgment. Pursuant to MCL 205.737, interest shall accrue (i) after December 31, 2013, through June 30, 2016, at the rate of 4.25%, (ii) after June 30, 2016, through December 31, 2016, at the rate of 4.40%, (iii) after 1 See MCL 211.27a. 2 See MCL 205.755.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-000667 Page 2 of 2 December 31, 2016, through June 30, 2017, at the rate of 4.50%, (iv) after June 30, 2017, through December 31, 2017, at the rate of 4.70%, (v) after December 31, 2017, through June 30, 2018, at the rate of 5.15%, (vi) after June 30, 2018, through December 31, 2018, at the rate of 5.41%, (vii) after December 31, 2018, through June 30, 2019, at the rate of 5.9%, (viii) after June 30, 2019, through December 31, 2019, at the rate of 6.39%, (ix) after December 31, 2019, through June 30, 2020, at the rate of 6.40%, (x) after June 30 2020, through December 31, 2020, at the rate of 5.63%, (xi) after December 31, 2020, through June 30, 2022, at the rate of 4.25%, (xii) after June 30, 2022, through December 31, 2022, at the rate of 4.27%, (xiii) after December 31, 2022, through June 30, 2023, at the rate of 5.65%, (xiv) after June 30, 2023, through December 31, 2023, at the rate of 8.25%, (xv) after December 31, 2023, through June 30, 2024, at the rate of 9.30%, (xvi) after June 30, 2024, through December 31, 2024, at the rate of 9.50%, (xvii) after December 31, 2024, through June 30, 2025, at the rate of 9.47%, (xviii) after June 30, 2025, through December 31, 2025, at the rate of 8.66%, (xix) after December 31, 2025, through June 30, 2026, at a rate of 8.48%, and (xx) after July 1, 2026, through December 31, 2026, at a rate of 7.85%. This Consent Judgment resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. See docket look up for a copy of stipulation and for any possible refund paragraph. Entered: July 8, 2026 By: /s/ Marcus L. Abood am PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Michigan Administrative Hearing System Michigan Tax Tribunal Arborvitae Building Co., LLC Petitioner, vs City of Lansing, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Docket No.: 26-000667 PROOF OF SERVICE Samantha Eyde (P83314) Jennifer Czeisperger, MMAO Samantha Eyde PLLC City of Lansing Assessor Attorney for Petitioner Assessing Department 2947 Eyde Parkway, Ste. 200 124 W. Michigan Ave. 3rd Floor East Lansing, Michigan, 48823 Lansing, MI 48933 Tel (517) 351-2480 Tel (517) 483-7624 Samantha.Eyde@eydecompany.com Jennifer.Czeiszperger@lansingmi.gov _____________________________________________________________________________/ PROOF OF SERVICE I, Samantha Eyde, herby certify that on June 29, 2026, I served via email, with permission, a copy “Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment (Valuation)” upon Respondent. Dated: June 29, 2026 /s/ Samantha Eyde__________ Samantha Eyde (P83314)
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-000667 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Petitioner Files Document Type: Proof of Service: Misc Documents Attachment File Name: Stip for consent - POS Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR STA TE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING Arborvitae Building Co, LLC MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, V MOAHR Docket No. 26-000667 ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR ------- City of Lansing Respondent. STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT (VALUATION) 1. The subject property is in _ln--=g_ha_m ____________ County. 2. Parcel Number: _3_3-_0 1_- 0_1_-2_1_-1_2 _a-_04_1 _____________ _ (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax vear Assessed Value (AV) Taxable Value (TV) 2026 308,400 308,400 4. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax year True Cash Value AV TV 2026 316,000 158,000 158,000 5. If the stipulated TV does not equal the prior year TV multiplied by the applicable lnflatio·n iate ·multipliei, eA'i)l·ain vvhy (e.g., tiansfei of ovvneiship, additions, losses, omitted property etc.) Transfer of Ownership 6. List any special terms or conditions being proposed by the parties that would affect the execution of a Consent Judgment including, but not limited to, the joint payment MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL • 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, Ml 48933 • 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, Ml 48909 • Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, Ml 48906
Page 2
MOAHR Docket No. 26-000667 Page 2 of 2 of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc. (attach additional page if necessary): NOTE: The Stipulation MUST include ALL parcels and ALL tax years included in the appeal (including subsequent tax years on or after April 1 of each year for appeals pending in the Small Claims Division). The parties may agree, however, to withdraw the appeal of specific parcels and/or tax year(s). IF APPLICABLE, complete the following section(s). Otherwise, LEAVE BLANK. 7. The parties agree to the withdrawai of parcei number: (If more than one parcel is being withdrawn, attach a separate page addressing all other parcels being withdrawn.) 8. The parties agree to the withdrawal of tax year(s) ________ _ Printed Name: Samantha Eyde, Attorney for Petitioner Date: June 1, 2026 Signature of Respondent's authorized representative: Printed Name: ------------------------ Date: ---------------------------- /s/Jennifer Czeiszperger (with permission) Jennifer Czeiszperger June 29, 2026
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-000667 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Joint Files Document Type: Stip for Consent Judgment Attachment File Name: FINAL SIGNED - Stipulation for consent judgment Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 50.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 50.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NOTICE OF MAY 17- 28, 2027 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER OF PROCEDURE Arborvitae Building Co LLC, Petitioner, v City Of Lansing, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 26-000667 Please be advised that 26-000667 has been placed on a two-week Prehearing General Call commencing May 17, 2027. Unless ordered otherwise, parties will be notified at least 28 days before they are scheduled to appear. Scheduling will not necessarily occur in the order in which the cases are listed below. Parties are required to submit a valuation disclosure or written notification that no valuation disclosure is required by the dates indicated herein. A “valuation disclosure” is defined as documentary or other tangible evidence in a property tax proceeding that a party relies upon in support of the party’s contention as to the true cash value of the subject property or any portion thereof and contains the party’s value conclusion and data, valuation methodology, analysis or reasoning. See TTR 203 and TTR 241. Users who file documents with the Tribunal are advised that filed documents are public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tribunal’s Tax Docket Lookup. If a user wishes to file a document for consideration by the Tribunal and prevent its publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for Protective Order under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents covered by the order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a Protective Order will be published. In accordance with MCR 1.109(D)(9) and TTR 209, the responsibility for excluding or redacting personal identifying information (PII) from all documents filed with or offered to the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and their attorneys. The Tribunal is not responsible for or required to review, redact, or screen documents at the time of filing for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A party, representative, or interested person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may request that the Tribunal redact PII contained in a previously filed document by submitting a Request for Redactions. The Request for Redactions form is available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages of the Tribunal’s website. Please refer to the Tribunal’s FAQs and Glossary of Terms pages on the Tribunal’s website for more information.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-000667 Page 2 of 3 IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall: a. If no valuation disclosure is required, notify the Tribunal and the opposing parties in writing within 21 days of entry of this order that no valuation disclosure is being filed. The notice shall indicate the reason or reasons why no valuation disclosure is required (i.e., exemption claim, etc.). b. If a valuation disclosure is required, file and exchange their valuation disclosures by January 19, 2027. Valuation disclosures will not be admitted into evidence unless disclosed and furnished in accordance with this order (even though admissible) except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their Prehearing Statements by January 19, 2027. Witnesses, with the exception of rebuttal witnesses, will not be allowed to testify unless disclosed in the Prehearing Statement and the Prehearing Statement is furnished in accordance with this order except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. Failure to file the Prehearing Statement may result in holding a party or parties in default. See TTR 237. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on January 19, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. Discovery relative to the valuation disclosure prepared for purposes of litigating this case or the valuation expert that prepared that valuation disclosure is not permitted during “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on May 17, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is limited to the opposing party’s valuation disclosure, the opposing party’s valuation expert, and the witnesses identified on the opposing party’s Prehearing Statement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if this case is not scheduled for a date certain prehearing conference during the time frame indicated it may be scheduled for a date certain prehearing conference at any time
Page 3
MTT
Page 4
STAT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED MAY 1 9 2026 STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ’ ARBORVITAE BUILDING CO LLC Petitioner \'2 MOAHR Docket 26-000667 Parcel No. 33-01-01-27-126-041 CITY OF LANSING, Respondent Jennifer Czeiszperger, MMAO City Assessor 124 W. Michigan Avenue 3rd Floor, City Hall Lansing, MI 48933 (517) 483-4136 Jennifer.czeiszperger@lansingmi.gov RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO PETITIONER’S PETITION AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES RESPONDENT, the City of Lansing, through its Assessor, Jennifer Czeiszperger, hereby responds to the allegations made in Petitioner’s Petition as follows: 1. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 1. 2. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 2. 3. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 3. 4. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 4.
Page 2
MTT Docket # 26-000667 10. 11 12, 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. . Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 8. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 9. Respondent lacks the information and knowledge necessary to respond to the allegations in Paragraph 10. The mailing address on record is 2947 Eyde Parkway, East Lansing, MI 48823. . Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations in Paragraph 11 for reason that they do not have sufficient knowledge to for a belief as to the truth of the allegations, and leaving Petitioner to their strictest proofs. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 12. The 2026 values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Parcel Number True Cash Value | Assessed Value Taxable Value 33-01-01-27-126-041 | $616,800 $308,400 $308,400 Respondent contends that the 2025 values for the property identified above are: Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 33-01-01-27-126-041 | $616,800 $308,400 $308,400 The 2025 values in dispute for the property identified above are: Parcel Number True Cash Value | Assessed Value | Taxable Value 33-01-01-27-126-041 $0 $0 $0 Respondent acknowledges Petitioner’s beliefs as to the issues in this appeal but denies that those issues have merit and further denies that Petitioner is entitled to any relief. Further, the subject property did not have any “additions” or “losses” for the 2026 tax year. Respondent denies the allegations in Paragraph 17 for the reason that it is untrue. In further answer, the assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values do not exceed permitted
Page 3
MTT Docket # 26-000667 WHEREFORE, Respondent City of Lansing respectfully requests that this Honorable Tribunal dismiss the Petition; affirm Respondent’s assessed and taxable values, subject to county and state equalization., and award Respondent its cost and attorney fees. Dated: = S [14 21, OFFICE OF THE CITY ASSESSOR CITY OF He By: EY) wal (osass Joes Jennifer Czeiszperger, MMAO [/ City Assessor, City of Lansing 3d Floor, City Hall 124 W Michigan Ave Lansing, Michigan 48933 Telephone: (517) 483-4136 Jennifer.czeiszperger@lansingmi.gov
Page 4
MTT Docket # 26-000667 AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Respondent City of Lansing will rely on the following affirmative defenses: A. Petitioner fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth a cause of action against the Respondent and to support Petitioner’s claim for relief. B. The Tribunal is charged with finding a property’s true cash value to determine the property’s lawful assessment. Alhi Development Co v Orion Twp, 110 Mich App 764, 767 (1981). C. Petitioner has the burden of establishing the property’s true cash value. See MCL 205.737(3) and Kem v Pontiac Twp, 93 Mich App 612 (1974). B. Petitioner fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish fraud, error of law, discrimination, and application of wrong principles or illegality on the part of the Respondent or its agents. C. Petitioner fails to allege the mode and method of assessing the subject property failed to conform to the mode and method applied in the case of all properties within the Respondent’s taxing unit for the tax year in questions. D. Petitioner fails to allege specific and sufficient facts needed to establish the true cash value, assessed and taxable value for the subject property. E. Petitioner fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to support its allegations that the assessed value of the subject property, as equalized, is at a level other than 50% and it also fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to support its allegations that the subject property’s
Page 5
MTT Docket # 26-000667 G. Petitioner asks this Tribunal to grant it illegal preference by application of a method of assessment different from that utilized in the assessment of other properties in the Respondent’s taxing unit, thereby shifting an otherwise equitable tax burden to the City’s
Page 6
STATE
Page 7
C
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Michigan Administrative Hearing System Michigan Tax Tribunal Before the Entire Tribunal Arborvitae Building Co LLC ) ) Petitioner, ) Docket No. ) vs ) Entire Tribunal Property Tax Appeal ) Petition (Parcel No: 33-01-01-27-126-041) City of Lansing, ) ) Respondent ) ) Samantha Eyde (P83314) Samantha Eyde PLLC 2947 Eyde Parkway Ste. 200 East Lansing, MI 48823 (517) 351-2480 Attorney for Petitioner Entire Tribunal Property Tax Appcal Petition 1. Petitioner, by its attorney Samantha Eyde (P83314), hereby files its petition appealing the tax assessment for the year 2026. 2. This petition is for the property identified as parcel ID 33-01-01-27-126-041. 3. The property identified above is real property. 4. There is not more than one parcel of real property at issue. 5. The property identified above is classified as commercial. 6. The Tribunal’s jurisdiction in this case is established pursuant to MCL 205.735a(6) by filing a written petition on or before May 31 of the tax year involved. 7. The property at issue is located in Ingham County. Petition 1
Page 2
8. The property address is 1018 E. Mt. Hope Ave Lansing, MI 48910. 9. The assessment at issue was established by the City of Lansing, 10. Petitioner’s principal office address is 2947 Eyde Parkway, suite 200, East Lansing, MI 48823. 11. This appeal involves issues relating to the property’s assessed value and taxable value. 12. The tax year at issues is 2026. 13. The value for the property identified herein as established by Respondent is: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value | Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 33-01-01-27-126-041 616,800 308,400 308,400 14. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified herein are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value | Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 33-01-01-27-126-041 150,000 75,000 75,000 15. The amount of the values in dispute for the property identified herein are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value | Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 33-01-01-27-126-041 | 466,800 233,400 233,400 16. Petitioner requests that the Tribunal reduce the assessed value and taxable value of the subject property to the values shown in the following schedule, and order a refund with interest, as provided by the Tax Tribunal Act. Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value | Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 33-01-01-27-126-041 | 150,000 75,000 75,000 17. Petitioner contends the taxable value and true cash value of the property are overestimated based on the state the property was in at the time of assessment as well as the lack of interior build out or work completed at that time. Petitioner hereby respectfully files this Petition. Petition 2
Page 3
Dated 20 day of April, 2026 Nas bh JUN 7 Samantha Eyde (83314) 4 / Attorney for Petitioner Petition 3
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Arborvitae Building Co LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-000667 City Of Lansing, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: __Tribunal Clerk________ Entered: May 29, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON
I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
DIRECTOR
Arborvitae Building Co LLC
Petitioner(s)
;
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
v
MTT Docket No.26-000667
City of Lansing
,
Respondent(s)
PROOF OF SERVICE FOR PROPERTY TAX PETITION
*To be filed after the Tribunal issues the Notice of Docket Number*
Spank
a
Cocke
states that on Por \ 22 202%
helshe
[Name of person serving/mdiling petition]
[date of service]
served a copy of the Petition relative to the above-captioned matter upon:
[Provide name and address of the following entities]
1.
Assessor (via certified mail):
3rd Floor City Hall
124 \W. Michigan Ave
| ansing
MI 48933
2.
City Clerk or Township Supervisor/Clerk (via certified mail):
9th Floor City Hall
124 \W_ Michigan Ave
| ansing,
MI 48933
3.
County Equalization Director {via first class mail or personal service):
341 S_lefferson St
Mason,
MI 48854
4.
County Clerk (via first class mail or personal service):
341 S_.efferson St
Mason
MI 48854
5.
Secretary of the local school board (via first class mail or personal service):
Roard of Education ATTN: Cirea Strode
519 W_Kalamazoo St
| ansing,
MI 48933
6.
State Treasurer (via first class mail):
Michigan Department of Treasury, State Treasurer
430 W. Allggan
Lansing,
MI[48922 ~,
%
[
Pp
Samantha Eyde
[Sig
person Who
is“servind/mailing copy]
[Print/type name of person serving/mailing copy]
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
- 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933
- 517-335-9760
PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909
- Other Carriers: 2407
N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, Mi 48906These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Michigan Administrative Hearing System Michigan Tax Tribunal Before the Entire Tribunal Arborvitae Building Co LLC ) ) Petitioner, ) Docket No. ) vs ) Entire Tribunal Property Tax Appeal ) Petition (Parcel No: 33-01-01-27-126-041) City of Lansing, ) ) Respondent ) ) Samantha Eyde (P83314) Samantha Eyde PLLC 2947 Eyde Parkway Ste. 200 East Lansing, MI 48823 (517) 351-2480 Attorney for Petitioner Entire Tribunal Property Tax Appcal Petition 1. Petitioner, by its attorney Samantha Eyde (P83314), hereby files its petition appealing the tax assessment for the year 2026. 2. This petition is for the property identified as parcel ID 33-01-01-27-126-041. 3. The property identified above is real property. 4. There is not more than one parcel of real property at issue. 5. The property identified above is classified as commercial. 6. The Tribunal’s jurisdiction in this case is established pursuant to MCL 205.735a(6) by filing a written petition on or before May 31 of the tax year involved. 7. The property at issue is located in Ingham County. Petition 1
Page 2
8. The property address is 1018 E. Mt. Hope Ave Lansing, MI 48910. 9. The assessment at issue was established by the City of Lansing, 10. Petitioner’s principal office address is 2947 Eyde Parkway, suite 200, East Lansing, MI 48823. 11. This appeal involves issues relating to the property’s assessed value and taxable value. 12. The tax year at issues is 2026. 13. The value for the property identified herein as established by Respondent is: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value | Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 33-01-01-27-126-041 616,800 308,400 308,400 14. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified herein are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value | Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 33-01-01-27-126-041 150,000 75,000 75,000 15. The amount of the values in dispute for the property identified herein are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value | Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 33-01-01-27-126-041 | 466,800 233,400 233,400 16. Petitioner requests that the Tribunal reduce the assessed value and taxable value of the subject property to the values shown in the following schedule, and order a refund with interest, as provided by the Tax Tribunal Act. Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value | Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 33-01-01-27-126-041 | 150,000 75,000 75,000 17. Petitioner contends the taxable value and true cash value of the property are overestimated based on the state the property was in at the time of assessment as well as the lack of interior build out or work completed at that time. Petitioner hereby respectfully files this Petition. Petition 2
Page 3
Dated 20 day of April, 2026 Nas bh JUN 7 Samantha Eyde (83314) 4 / Attorney for Petitioner Petition 3
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MOAHR DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Individual First Name/Company Name Arborvitae Building Co. LLC M.I. Last Name N/A Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 2947 Eyde Parkway Ste. 200 City or Town East Lansing State Michigan ZIP Code 48823 Telephone Number 517-351-2480 Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) samantha.eyde@eydecompany.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Samantha M.I. Last Name Eyde Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 2974 Eyde Parkway Suite 200 City or Town East Lansing State Michigan ZIP Code 48823 Telephone Number 517-351-2480 Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) samantha.eyde@eydecompany.com Section 5: Issue Please designate one: Valuation – Fill out Sections 4, 5, & 6 below Section 6: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing?1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 1018 E. Mt. Hope Ave Lansing, MI 48910 Michigan Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Lansing (INGHAM) County Ingham If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Section 7: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values Section 8: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 33-01-01-27-126-041 Classification of Property: Real Commercial Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 308400 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 308400 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 150000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 75000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Section 9: Assessment Information Type of Tax Assessment(s): Assessment Number(s): Check all that is being appealed: Check what action prompted this appeal: If “other,” please explain: Section 10: Special Assessment Information Type of Special Assessment: Did you protest the special assessment at the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? If Yes, what was the date of the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? If No, please explain: Section 11: Classification Information Parcel Number: Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: What do you believe is the property’s classification?
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR If improved property, how is the property currently being used? If improved property, for what use was the property designed? Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Samantha Eyde
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.