Andrew Otten Petitioner V City Of Grand Rapids Respondent
- Petitioner
- Andrew Otten
- Respondent
- City Of Grand Rapids
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-002557-TT
- Status
- Default Petitioner
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Kent
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Documentation | PET | Not recorded | 10/05/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Documentation | PET | Not recorded | 10/05/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Order of Default of Petitioner | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/22/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 09/22/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/22/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 07/06/2026 | $0.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
CITY ASSESSOR CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS February 20, 2026 OTTEN DANIELLE ANDREW 344 WASHINGTON ST SE GRAND RAPIDS MI 49503 RE: 41-14-30-331-007 344 SE WASHINGTON ST Dear Property Owner: The Assessor has opened the 2026 assessment roll for inspection and has accepted appeals for ten business days beginning February 2, 2026. After reviewing the record for this property and any information submitted by the owner or agent, the Assessor has made the following decision: Appeal #: 26_125 Original Revised Change Tentative S.E.V. 238,000 228,600 -9,400 Tentative Taxable Value 238,000 228,600 -9,400 Assessor’s Review Decision: Decrease The Grand Rapids Board of Review will convene to conduct hearings between March 4 and March 20, 2026. The Board will review the roll as set by the Assessor and hear appeals of the decisions made during the Assessor's Review. Hearings are by appointment only. If your appeal at Assessor’s Review did not provide specific arguments as required by C ity Charter, the Board of Review may refuse to hear your appeal. If you wish to file an appeal with the Board of Review, please call (616) 456-3411 for an appointment. Appointments will be accepted through March 13,2026. We suggest you call prior to March 6, 2026. Written appeals to the March Board of Review are accepted and should be as detailed as possible. Include your opinion of the fair market value of the property, income and expenses on income property, and cost data for newer structures. Written appeals must be received in the Assessor's Office by March 13, 2026. Appeals by fax machine or other electronic media are not accepted. City Assessor’s Office 300 MONROE AVENUE, N.W. « GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN 49503 © (616) 456-3081 www.grcity.us
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
2026 MARCH BOARD OF REVIEW DECISION From City of Grand Rapids Office of City Assessor 300 Monroe Ave NW Grand Rapids, MI 49503 March 27, 2026 NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OR PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: OTTEN DANIELLE ANDREW 344 WASHINGTON ST SE GRAND RAPIDS MI 49503 PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION: (Parcel Code required. Property address and legal description optional.): 41-14-30-331-007 344 WASHINGTON ST ~~ SE The Board of Review has reviewed the 2026 assessment roll prepared by the City Assesssor. They have also considered appeals of the assessed values, taxable values, property classifications and transfer decisions made at the Assessor's Review. The Board has completed their review of parcel number : The Board made the following determination: PETITION #: M_035 41-14-30-331-007 DECREASED 2026 ORIGINAL ASSESSED VALUE 228,600 ] 2026 "BOARD OF REVIEW" ASSESSED VALUE 225,000 (If the above amounts are the same, no revisions have occurred) 2026 ORIGINAL TAXABLE VALUE 228,600 2026 "BOARD OF REVIEW" TAXABLE VALUE 225,000 (If the above amounts are the same, no revisions have occurred) THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS: 401 (RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) If you disagree with the decision of the Board of Review regarding assessed or taxable value, further appeal may be made to the Michigan Tax Tribunal by May 31, 2026 for Commercial Real, Industrial Real, Developmental Real, Commercial Personal, Industrial Personal and Utility Personal Property, or by July 31, 2026 for Agricultural Real, Residential Real, Timber-Cut Over Real, and Agricultural Personal Property. Petition must be filed on a Michigan Tax Tribunal form or form approved by the Michigan Tax Tribunal. Contact information for the Michigan Tax Tribunal appears below. If you disagree with the decision of the Board of Review regarding classification, appeal may be made to the State Tax Commission by June 30, 2026. Contact information for the State Tax Commission appears below. State of Michigan Michigan Tax Tribunal P.O. Box 30232 Lansing MI 48909 www.michigan.gov/taxtrib State Tax Commission Property Classification Appeals P.O. Box 30471 Lansing MI 48909 www.michigan.gov/treasury Links to the Michigan Tax Tribunal and State Tax Commission websites may be found on the City Assessor's web page at www.grandrapidsmi.gov
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-002557 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? Yes Party Filing Document Petitioner Files Document Type: Documentation Attachment File Name: March Board of Review Document Type: Documentation Attachment File Name: GR City Appeal Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Andrew Otten, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002557 City Of Grand Rapids, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment notice, etc.), as required by TTR 279. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within 14 days of the entry of this order. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.1 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: September 22, 2026 1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-002557 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Andrew Otten, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002557 City Of Grand Rapids, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment notice, etc.), as required by TTR 279. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within 14 days of the entry of this order. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.2 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: September 22, 2026 2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 26-002557 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
The taxable value is too high because the taxable value is significantly over the purchase price ($238,000 assessed and taxable vs $225,000 (450,000 purchase price / 2). The average uncapped taxable value for 2024 purchases is 6.9% below the purchase price. 20 properties sold in 2024 in Heritage Hill and the variation of assessed and taxable value to sales price was an average of -6.9%. My home, 344 Washington, was purchased for $450,000 after the new roof was completed. The new roof cost $28,695.09 with the seller paying $15,000 at close and myself paying upfront for materials ($8,457.61 shingles, 582.60 dumpster, $1,004.88 decking, $3650 to roofing contractor. The purchase price also included $6,300 in personal property (see attached table). The net purchase price of the home was $415,004.91 after subtracting the cost of the new roof and personal property. Applying the average of a -6.9% assessed value revision the new assessed and taxable value for 344 Washington should be $192,577.35. (450,000 – 30,000 – 6,300) = 413,700 / 2 = 206,850 x (1 – 0.69) = 192,577.35 Taxable value is still higher than purchase price. Purchased for $450,000 with $6,300 in personal property $15,000 in seller credits roofing fee $3,650 in buyer roofing fee $10,045.09 in material charges for roof Fair Market Value 415,004.91 Assessed and taxable value 207,502
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 1 of 3 PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. Petitioner’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Individual Local Unit of Government: First Name Andrew M.I. Last Name Otten Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 344 Washington St SE Apt 2 City or Town Grand Rapids State Michigan ZIP Code 49503 Telephone Number 616-560-6639 E-mail Address aotten86@gmail.com Subject Property Information: How many parcels are you appealing? 1 If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? *If no, you must file separate appeals for each parcel N/A Property Address (No., Street) 344 Washington St SE City or Town Grand Rapids County Kent State Michigan ZIP Code 49503 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Grand Rapids (KENT) Check which of the following you are appealing: (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal:
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 2 of 3 City did not factor in the seller credits and buyer paid credits or personal property included in the purchase price Jurisdictional Issues: Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended: March If No, please check the applicable reason(s): Year(s) Under Appeal: 2 Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal: Parcel Number: 411430331007 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Residential (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 225000 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 225000 What do you believe is the fair market value? 415004 Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 207502 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 207502 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner’s Signature: /s/ Andrew Otten
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 3 of 3 Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/ Fee Information: If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition, you are required to pay a filing fee for the filing of this appeal. The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. Property tax appeal: Residential** Non-Residential SEV or TV in contention* Filing fee*** Filing Fee** $100,000 or less...........................................................................................$ 125.00 $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00.........................................................................$ 200.00 N/A More than $500,000…..................................................................................$ 300.00 N/A Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? Yes
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Andrew Otten, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002557 City Of Grand Rapids, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: September 22, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Andrew Otten, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002557 City Of Grand Rapids, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: September 22, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
The taxable value is too high because the taxable value is significantly over the purchase price ($238,000 assessed and taxable vs $225,000 (450,000 purchase price / 2). The average uncapped taxable value for 2024 purchases is 6.9% below the purchase price. 20 properties sold in 2024 in Heritage Hill and the variation of assessed and taxable value to sales price was an average of -6.9%. My home, 344 Washington, was purchased for $450,000 after the new roof was completed. The new roof cost $28,695.09 with the seller paying $15,000 at close and myself paying upfront for materials ($8,457.61 shingles, 582.60 dumpster, $1,004.88 decking, $3650 to roofing contractor. The purchase price also included $6,300 in personal property (see attached table). The net purchase price of the home was $415,004.91 after subtracting the cost of the new roof and personal property. Applying the average of a -6.9% assessed value revision the new assessed and taxable value for 344 Washington should be $192,577.35. (450,000 – 30,000 – 6,300) = 413,700 / 2 = 206,850 x (1 – 0.69) = 192,577.35 Taxable value is still higher than purchase price. Purchased for $450,000 with $6,300 in personal property $15,000 in seller credits roofing fee $3,650 in buyer roofing fee $10,045.09 in material charges for roof Fair Market Value 415,004.91 Assessed and taxable value 207,502
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 1 of 3 PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. Petitioner’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Individual Local Unit of Government: First Name Andrew M.I. Last Name Otten Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 344 Washington St SE Apt 2 City or Town Grand Rapids State Michigan ZIP Code 49503 Telephone Number 616-560-6639 E-mail Address aotten86@gmail.com Subject Property Information: How many parcels are you appealing? 1 If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? *If no, you must file separate appeals for each parcel N/A Property Address (No., Street) 344 Washington St SE City or Town Grand Rapids County Kent State Michigan ZIP Code 49503 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Grand Rapids (KENT) Check which of the following you are appealing: (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal:
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 2 of 3 City did not factor in the seller credits and buyer paid credits or personal property included in the purchase price Jurisdictional Issues: Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended: March If No, please check the applicable reason(s): Year(s) Under Appeal: 2 Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal: Parcel Number: 411430331007 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Residential (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 225000 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 225000 What do you believe is the fair market value? 415004 Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 207502 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 207502 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner’s Signature: /s/ Andrew Otten
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 3 of 3 Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/ Fee Information: If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition, you are required to pay a filing fee for the filing of this appeal. The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. Property tax appeal: Residential** Non-Residential SEV or TV in contention* Filing fee*** Filing Fee** $100,000 or less...........................................................................................$ 125.00 $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00.........................................................................$ 200.00 N/A More than $500,000…..................................................................................$ 300.00 N/A Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? Yes
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.