Alpha 700 Soho, LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Kalamazoo Respondent
- Petitioner
- Alpha 700 Soho, LLC
- Respondent
- City Of Kalamazoo
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-000729-TT
- Status
- Ready Sched Prehearing Date Certain
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Kalamazoo
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Prehearing General Call | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/01/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 08/14/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Proof of service of petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 07/24/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 06/08/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/08/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/05/2026 | $600.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NOTICE OF SEPTEMBER 1- 15, 2027 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER OF PROCEDURE Alpha 700 SOHO, LLC, Petitioner, v City Of Kalamazoo, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 26-000729 Please be advised that 26-000729 has been placed on a two-week Prehearing General Call commencing September 01, 2027. Unless ordered otherwise, parties will be notified at least 28 days before they are scheduled to appear. Scheduling will not necessarily occur in the order in which the cases are listed below. Parties are required to submit a valuation disclosure or written notification that no valuation disclosure is required by the dates indicated herein. A “valuation disclosure” is defined as documentary or other tangible evidence in a property tax proceeding that a party relies upon in support of the party’s contention as to the true cash value of the subject property or any portion thereof and contains the party’s value conclusion and data, valuation methodology, analysis or reasoning. See TTR 203 and TTR 241. Users who file documents with the Tribunal are advised that filed documents are public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tribunal’s Tax Docket Lookup. If a user wishes to file a document for consideration by the Tribunal and prevent its publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for Protective Order under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents covered by the order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a Protective Order will be published. In accordance with MCR 1.109(D)(9) and TTR 209, the responsibility for excluding or redacting personal identifying information (PII) from all documents filed with or offered to the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and their attorneys. The Tribunal is not responsible for or required to review, redact, or screen documents at the time of filing for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A party, representative, or interested person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may request that the Tribunal redact PII contained in a previously filed document by submitting a Request for Redactions. The Request for Redactions form is available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages of the Tribunal’s website. Please refer to the Tribunal’s FAQs and Glossary of Terms pages on the Tribunal’s website for more information.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-000729 Page 2 of 3 IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall: a. If no valuation disclosure is required, notify the Tribunal and the opposing parties in writing within 21 days of entry of this order that no valuation disclosure is being filed. The notice shall indicate the reason or reasons why no valuation disclosure is required (i.e., exemption claim, etc.). b. If a valuation disclosure is required, file and exchange their valuation disclosures by May 5, 2027. Valuation disclosures will not be admitted into evidence unless disclosed and furnished in accordance with this order (even though admissible) except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their Prehearing Statements by May 5, 2027. Witnesses, with the exception of rebuttal witnesses, will not be allowed to testify unless disclosed in the Prehearing Statement and the Prehearing Statement is furnished in accordance with this order except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. Failure to file the Prehearing Statement may result in holding a party or parties in default. See TTR 237. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on May 5, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. Discovery relative to the valuation disclosure prepared for purposes of litigating this case or the valuation expert that prepared that valuation disclosure is not permitted during “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on September 1, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is limited to the opposing party’s valuation disclosure, the opposing party’s valuation expert, and the witnesses identified on the opposing party’s Prehearing Statement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if this case is not scheduled for a date certain prehearing conference during the time frame indicated it may be scheduled for a date certain prehearing conference at any time subsequent to the completion date for this Prehearing General Call. Parties will, however, be notified in writing approximately one week before they are scheduled to appear. By:_____________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: October 1, 2026
Page 3
MTT Docket No. 26-000729 Page 3 of 3 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NOTICE OF SEPTEMBER 1- 15, 2027 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER OF
Page 5
MTT Docket
Page 6
M
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ALPHA 700 SOHO, LLC, Petitioner, v CITY OF KALAMAZOO, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 26-000729 Parcel No. 06-20-175-002 _____________________________________________________________________________/ SCOTT ASTON AD VALOREM PARTNERS LLC Representative for Petitioner 21446 Columbine Court Grosse Ile, MI 48138 (734) 731-0558 LAURA M. HALLAHAN (P42101) SETH A. O’LOUGHLIN (P80257) KELSEA M. MELCHER (P85821) HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Attorneys for Respondent 1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302 (248) 731-3089 _____________________________________________________________________________/ ANSWER TO PETITION AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES ANSWER Respondent, City of Kalamazoo, by and through its attorneys, Hallahan & Associates, P.C., responds to the allegations made in Petitioner’s Petition as follows: 1. Respondent lacks the information and knowledge necessary to respond to the truth of the allegations set forth in Paragraph 1 and, therefore, leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 2. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 2. 3. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 3.
Page 2
4. Respondent admits that the subject property was classified as Commercial- Improved for the 2026 tax year. Respondent lacks the information and knowledge necessary to respond to the remainder of the allegations set forth in Paragraph 4 and, therefore, leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 5. Respondent acknowledges Petitioner’s belief as to the issues in this case as set forth in Paragraph 5 but denies that Petitioner’s claims have merit and further denies that Petitioner is entitled to any relief. 6. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations in Paragraph 6 as the General Property Tax Act speaks for itself. 7. Respondent denies the allegations in Paragraph 7, including all subparagraphs, for the reason that the same are untrue. Furthermore, the assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values do not exceed permitted amounts, do not exceed the percentage for true cash value permitted by law, were correctly determined and are based upon correct application of proper principles, and the values and Respondent’s mode of assessment are non-discriminatory and constitutional. 8. Respondent acknowledges the relief requested by Petitioner in the final paragraph of its Petition but denies that Petitioner is entitled to said relief for the reasons set forth above. WHEREFORE, Respondent, City of Kalamazoo, requests the Tribunal dismiss the Petition, affirm Respondent’s assessed and taxable values, subject to county and state equalization, and award Respondent its costs and attorney fees.
Page 3
HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. /s/ Seth A. O’Loughlin____________ Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) Seth A. O’Loughlin (P80257) Kelsea M. Melcher (P85821) 1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 (248) 731-3089 Dated: August 14, 2026 AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Respondent, City of Kalamazoo, asserts the following affirmative defenses: 1. Petitioner fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth a cause of action against Respondent and to support its claim for relief. 2. The Tribunal is charged with finding a property’s true cash value to determine the property’s lawful assessment. Alhi Development Co v Orion Twp, 110 Mich App 764, 767 (1981). 3. Petitioner has the burden of establishing the property’s true cash value. See MCL 205.737(3) and Kern v Pontiac Twp, 93 Mich App 612 (1974). 4. Petitioner has failed to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish fraud, error of law, discrimination, application of wrong principles, or illegality on the part of Respondent or its agents. 5. Petitioner has failed to allege that the mode and method of assessing the subject property fails to conform to the mode and method applied in the case of all other properties in Respondent’s taxing unit for the year in question. 6. Petitioner has failed to show that any factor other than fifty percent (50%) was applied to the true cash value of Petitioner’s property, as well as all others, to arrive at the respective assessments appearing on the roll, and also fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to support its allegations that the property’s taxable value is improper.
Page 4
7. Petitioner asks the Tribunal to grant it preference by application of a self-chosen method of assessment contrary to the intent, purpose and law of this State. 8. Petitioner, in essence, asks the Tribunal to grant it an illegal preference by application of a method of assessment different from that employed in the assessment of other properties in Respondent’s taxing unit. 9. Petitioner, in essence, seeks by petition to challenge the process of county and state equalization as to which it has no legal standing and cannot maintain a cause of action. 10. Any decrease in the value of Petitioner’s property was a result of its own intentional acts and/or negligence and cannot be allowed to reduce Petitioner’s otherwise equitable tax burden. 11. Respondent has properly and lawfully assessed Petitioner’s property and established its taxable value in accordance with statutory and constitutional requirements. 12. Petitioner has failed to pursue its appeal in a timely fashion. 13. Respondent reserves the right to raise additional affirmative defenses as the same may become known to it during the course of these proceedings. HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. /s/ Seth A. O’Loughlin____________ Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) Seth A. O’Loughlin (P80257) Kelsea M. Melcher (P85821) 1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 (248) 731-3089 Dated: August 14, 2026
Page 5
PROOF OF MAILING On the date below I sent by electronic mail a copy of the foregoing Respondent’s Answer to Petition and Affirmative Defenses to: Scott Aston aston@advalpartners.com I
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent MTT DOCKET NO. 26-000729 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government City Of Kalamazoo (KALAMAZOO) First Name M.I. Last Name Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Laura M.I. Last Name Hallahan Firm Name (if any) Hallahan & Associates PC Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 City or Town Bloomfield Hills State Michigan ZIP Code 48302 Telephone Number 248-731-3089 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) mtt@hallahanlaw.com Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: /s/Kelsea M. Melcher /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN O F F I C E O F ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Alpha 700 SOHO, LLC, Petitioner, v. MTT Docket No. 26-000729 City of Kalamazoo, Respondent. / PROOF OF SERVICE The undersigned states that on July 24, 2026, he mailed a copy of the Property Tax Petition in the above matter by certified mail to: City of Kalamazoo Assessor, 241 West South Street, Kalamazoo, MI 49007 City of Kalamazoo Clerk, 241 West South Street, Kalamazoo, MI 49007 And by first-class mail to: City of Kalamazoo School District Secretary, 1220 Howard, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 Kalamazoo County Clerk, 201 W. Kalamazoo, Room 203, Kalamazoo, MI 49007 Kalamazoo County Equalization Director, 201 W. Kalamazoo, Kalamazoo, MI 49007 Treasurer, State of Michigan, 430 West Allegan, Lansing, MI 48922 By affixing proper postage and mailing from a U.S. mailbox in Grosse Ile, Michigan. ______________________________ Scott Aston
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-000729 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Petitioner Files Document Type: Proof of Service: Petition Attachment File Name: 2026 POS Alpha 700 SOHO - MTT 26-000729 Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
Alpha 700 SOHO, LLC,
Petitioner,
v.
MTT Docket No.
Parcel No. 06-20-175-002
City of Kalamazoo,
Respondent.
/
PETITION
Alpha 700 SOHO, LLC ("Petitioner"), through its representatives, AD VALOREM PARTNERS LLC,
says:
Petitioner's principal office address is 44 Abele Road, Ste 304, Bridgeville, PA 15017-3487.
Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property taxes on tax parcel no. 06-20-175-002 ("Petitioner's
Property"), at 700 S Howard Street, Kalamazoo, MI 49006.
2.
Respondent, City of Kalamazoo, assesses and collects property taxes on Petitioner's
Property.
3.
In 2026, Respondent determined the taxable value of parcel number 06-20-175-002 to be
$7,445,750 and the assessed value to be $9,804,700, which will result in a state equalized value in the same
amount based upon the tentative equalization factor.
4.
Petitioner’s Property is classified as Commercial Real. Petitioner's Property is presently
used for Commercial purposes. Petitioner believes that Petitioner's Property was originally designed to be
used for Commercial purposes.Page 2
5. This matter involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, (c) taxable value and (d) uniformity. 6. No March Board of Review protest was required for Petitioner’s Property. 7. The 2026 assessment, including state equalized value and taxable value, imposed on Petitioner's Property, and the taxes to be levied and collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: (a) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, exceed the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (b) The assessment, including state equalized value, are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (c) The assessment, including state equalized value, are based upon erroneous determinations of the true cash value of that portion of Petitioner's Property that is taxable under Michigan law, and is based upon the application of wrong principles; and, (d) The assessment, including state equalized value, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional rights to uniformity, equal protection and due process of law.
Page 3
WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order: (i) reducing the 2026 taxable value of parcel number 06-20-175-002 from $7,445,750 to $5,000,000, and reducing the 2026 assessed value and state equalized value from $9,804,700 to $5,000,000; and (ii) awarding Petitioner any other relief to which it is entitled. Respectfully submitted, AD VALOREM PARTNERS LLC Petitioner’s Representative By:_________________________ Scott Aston 21446 Columbine Court Grosse Ile, MI 48138 (734) 731-0558 aston@advalpartners.com Dated: May 5, 2026
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MOAHR DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name Alpha 700 SOHO, LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 21446 Columbine Ct City or Town Grosse Ile State Michigan ZIP Code 48138 Telephone Number 7347310558 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 4saston@gmail.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Scott M.I. Last Name Aston Firm Name (if any) Ad Valorem Partners LlC Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 21446 Columbine Ct City or Town Grosse Ile State 22 ZIP Code 48138 Telephone Number 7347310558 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) aston@advalpartners.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 700 S Howard Street Kalamazoo
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Michigan 49006 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Kalamazoo (KALAMAZOO) County Kalamazoo If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 06-20-175-002 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 9804700 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 7445750 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 10000000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 5000000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 5000000 Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ scott aston Payment Information Amount: 600 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26050584124382 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Alpha 700 SOHO, LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-000729 City Of Kalamazoo, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: __Tribunal Clerk________ Entered: June 8, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
Scott Aston Ad Valorem Partners LLC 21446 Columbine Court Grosse Ile , MI 48138
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
Alpha 700 SOHO, LLC,
Petitioner,
v.
MTT Docket No.
Parcel No. 06-20-175-002
City of Kalamazoo,
Respondent.
/
PETITION
Alpha 700 SOHO, LLC ("Petitioner"), through its representatives, AD VALOREM PARTNERS LLC,
says:
Petitioner's principal office address is 44 Abele Road, Ste 304, Bridgeville, PA 15017-3487.
Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property taxes on tax parcel no. 06-20-175-002 ("Petitioner's
Property"), at 700 S Howard Street, Kalamazoo, MI 49006.
2.
Respondent, City of Kalamazoo, assesses and collects property taxes on Petitioner's
Property.
3.
In 2026, Respondent determined the taxable value of parcel number 06-20-175-002 to be
$7,445,750 and the assessed value to be $9,804,700, which will result in a state equalized value in the same
amount based upon the tentative equalization factor.
4.
Petitioner’s Property is classified as Commercial Real. Petitioner's Property is presently
used for Commercial purposes. Petitioner believes that Petitioner's Property was originally designed to be
used for Commercial purposes.Page 2
5. This matter involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, (c) taxable value and (d) uniformity. 6. No March Board of Review protest was required for Petitioner’s Property. 7. The 2026 assessment, including state equalized value and taxable value, imposed on Petitioner's Property, and the taxes to be levied and collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: (a) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, exceed the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (b) The assessment, including state equalized value, are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (c) The assessment, including state equalized value, are based upon erroneous determinations of the true cash value of that portion of Petitioner's Property that is taxable under Michigan law, and is based upon the application of wrong principles; and, (d) The assessment, including state equalized value, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional rights to uniformity, equal protection and due process of law.
Page 3
WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order: (i) reducing the 2026 taxable value of parcel number 06-20-175-002 from $7,445,750 to $5,000,000, and reducing the 2026 assessed value and state equalized value from $9,804,700 to $5,000,000; and (ii) awarding Petitioner any other relief to which it is entitled. Respectfully submitted, AD VALOREM PARTNERS LLC Petitioner’s Representative By:_________________________ Scott Aston 21446 Columbine Court Grosse Ile, MI 48138 (734) 731-0558 aston@advalpartners.com Dated: May 5, 2026
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MOAHR DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name Alpha 700 SOHO, LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 21446 Columbine Ct City or Town Grosse Ile State Michigan ZIP Code 48138 Telephone Number 7347310558 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 4saston@gmail.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Scott M.I. Last Name Aston Firm Name (if any) Ad Valorem Partners LlC Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 21446 Columbine Ct City or Town Grosse Ile State 22 ZIP Code 48138 Telephone Number 7347310558 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) aston@advalpartners.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 700 S Howard Street Kalamazoo
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Michigan 49006 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Kalamazoo (KALAMAZOO) County Kalamazoo If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 06-20-175-002 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 9804700 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 7445750 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 10000000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 5000000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 5000000 Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ scott aston Payment Information Amount: 600 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26050584124382 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.