Record Finder / 26-002453-TT
Michigan

Alex Kalani Petitioner Vs. Township Of Rich Respondent

Petitioner
Alex Kalani
Respondent
Township Of Rich

Case overview

Docket number
26-002453-TT
Status
Disposed
CaseType
ET Property
Division
ET
County
Lapeer
Judge
No judge assigned

Docket history

Line #SubjectFilerLine RefEnter Date/Post MarkFeeRelated Item
4Order of DismissalNot recordedNot recorded08/03/2026Not recordedDownload
3Petition has been verifiedPET108/03/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
2Notice of Docket Number ETNot recordedNot recorded08/03/2026Not recordedDownload
1A petition was received.PETNot recorded06/25/2026$150.00Download
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload

Documents

Order_of_Dismissal.2026-08-03_07-26-41.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Alex Kalani, 

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v 

 MTT Docket No. 26-002453

Township Of Rich,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that:

Petitioner is attempting to appeal the classification of the property. The Tribunal has no 

authority over classification appeals, which are within the jurisdiction of the State Tax 

Commission pursuant to MCL 211.34c(6). See also MCL 205.731. 

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED.

This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case.

APPEAL RIGHTS

If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for 

reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of 

Appeals. 

A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee 

within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision 

closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing 

system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such 

motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless 

the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a 

principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the 

decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, 

if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the 

opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to 

electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the 

motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral 

arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-002453

Page 2 of 2

Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the 

claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If 

the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal 

by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the 

record on appeal. There is no certification fee. 

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm

Entered: August 3, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Alex Kalani, 

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v 

 MTT Docket No. 26-002453

Township Of Rich,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that:

Petitioner is attempting to appeal the classification of the property. The Tribunal has no 

authority over classification appeals, which are within the jurisdiction of the State Tax 

Commission pursuant to MCL 211.34c(6). See also MCL 205.731. 

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED.

This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case.

APPEAL RIGHTS

If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for 

reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of 

Appeals. 

A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee 

within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision 

closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing 

system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such 

motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless 

the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a 

principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the 

decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, 

if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the 

opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to 

electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the 

motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral 

arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal.

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 26-002453

Page 2 of 2

Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the 

claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If 

the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal 

by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the 

record on appeal. There is no certification fee. 

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm

Entered: August 3, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 5

STATE OF

Page 6

MTT Docket

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

MTT_Classification_Appeal_Final_Updated.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

Michigan Tax Tribunal – Small Claims Division 

Classification Appeal Packet 

Parcel: 44-018-013-017-00 

Property Address: 8674 Silverwood Rd, Rich Township, Sanilac County 

Owner: Kalani Alex H Revocable Trust 

Prepared by: Alex Kalani 

 

Cover Letter 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

P.O. Box 30232 

Lansing, MI 48909 

 

Re: Small Claims Petition — Classification Appeal 

Parcel: 44-018-013-017-00 

Owner: Kalani Alex H Revocable Trust 

 

To Whom It May Concern: 

 

Enclosed is a Small Claims Petition appealing the improper reclassification of the above 

parcel. The property was classified as Agricultural (101) for more than 25 years, despite 

never being used for row crops or commercial farming. The assessor reclassified the 

property in September 2022, the same month it was purchased, without inspection, without 

identifying any change in use, and without maintaining required documentation, as 

confirmed by a FOIA denial. 

 

The Board of Review denied the appeal using the incorrect “50% farming” standard, which 

applies only to the Qualified Agricultural Exemption. The Board did not review the evidence 

submitted, did not apply MCL 211.34c, and was influenced by the assessor during the 

hearing. One Board member had personal involvement with the property, including hunting 

it during 2023, 2024, and 2025, and meeting with me between 2022 and 2025 regarding 

improvements, yet did not disclose this or recuse himself. 

 

This appeal seeks correction of the classification to Agricultural (101). 

 

Respectfully,

Page 2

Alex Kalani 

 

Petition Narrative 

This section includes the nature of the appeal, statement of the issue, and relief requested. 

 

Statement of Facts 

This section includes all factual background, including parcel history, reclassification, and 

interactions with officials. 

Additional facts include the township clerk’s FOIA denial, lack of township records, and 

audit log irregularities. 

 

Affidavit Regarding Caregiving Years 

This affidavit affirms that the petitioner served as a full-time caregiver for his father from 

2021 through September 2025. 

 

Legal Argument 

This section includes all legal arguments, including statutory violations, improper 

standards, and assessor misconduct. 

Includes assessor’s 'market value' justification, 'hidden for 25 years' claim, and FOIA denial 

implications. 

 

Affidavit of No Change in Use 

This affidavit affirms that there has been no change in the use of the property since its 

purchase in September 2022. 

 

Procedural Defects 

This section outlines all procedural violations, including: 

- Assessor reclassified property without inspection or documentation.

Page 3

- Township clerk denied FOIA request, confirming no records exist. 

- Equalization officer defended assessor instead of investigating. 

- Board failed to document meeting, review evidence, or deliberate. 

- Board applied incorrect legal standard. 

- Assessor controlled the narrative; Board relied entirely on him. 

- Evidence of selective enforcement and lack of uniformity. 

 

Statement Regarding Board Member's Prior Involvement 

This statement details the prior personal involvement of a Board of Review member with 

the subject property, including hunting on the land and meetings with the petitioner. 

 

 Timeline of Events (1995 – March 2026) 

*A clear, chronological record of all relevant events affecting the classification, assessment, 

documentation, and procedural handling of Parcel 44‑018‑013‑017‑00.* 

 

1995–2021: Original Classification and Township Handling 

- 1995–2021 — Property consistently classified as Agricultural (101) for more than 25 

years. 

- No inspections, no documentation, and no classification reviews recorded by the township 

during this entire period. 

- Property remained largely wooded and unchanged in use. 

 

2021–2025: Caregiving Years 

- 2021–September 2025 — Petitioner served as full‑time caregiver for his father, limiting 

ability to engage in farming or land‑use activities. 

- Affidavit Regarding Caregiving Years documents this period. 

 

September 2022: Purchase and Immediate Reclassification

Page 4

- September 2022 — Petitioner purchases the property. 

- Same month — Assessor reclassifies the property from Agricultural (101) to Residential 

(401). 

- No inspection performed. 

- No change in use identified. 

- No documentation created or filed, as later confirmed by FOIA denial. 

- Assessor later claims the property was “hidden for 25 years” and “just found.” 

 

Late 2022: Assessor Statements and Irregularities 

- Assessor states the property was “in the wrong class for 25 years.” 

- Assessor claims reclassification was based on market value, not use — a direct violation of 

MCL 211.34c. 

- No supporting documents exist for the reclassification. 

 

2023–2025: Board Member’s Personal Involvement 

- 2023, 2024, 2025 — A Board of Review member hunts on the property. 

- Board member meets with petitioner multiple times regarding improvements. 

- Board member does not disclose this conflict of interest during the 2026 BOR hearing. 

- Statement Regarding Board Member’s Prior Involvement documents these events. 

 

2023–2024: Township Records and FOIA Issues 

- 2023–2024 — Petitioner requests township records regarding classification history. 

- Township clerk states no records exist. 

- FOIA request denied, confirming the township has no documentation supporting the 

reclassification. 

- This establishes a violation of MCL 211.10g (record‑keeping requirements).

Page 5

2024–2025: Assessor Communications and Audit Log Evidence 

- 2024–2025 — Petitioner communicates with assessor seeking justification for 

reclassification. 

- Assessor repeats that classification was changed due to “market value.” 

- 2025 audit log obtained: 

 - Shows multiple edits made the same day. 

 - Shows no inspection. 

 - Shows no reason codes. 

 - Shows PRE date removed. 

 - Shows classification changed without documentation. 

- Audit log confirms the reclassification was undocumented and procedurally defective.

Page 6

- Board

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Individual 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

Alex

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

Kalani

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

7456 Bridge Way

City or Town

West Bloomfield Charter Township

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48322

Telephone Number

2487305747

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

hpcdoc@gmail.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Classification 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

8674 silverwood

Silverwood

Michigan

48760

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

Township Of Rich (LAPEER) 

County

Lapeer

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 9: Classification Information

Parcel Number:

018-013-017-00

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: 

 Real 

Residential

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

What do you believe is the property’s classification?

Real

Agricultural

If improved property, how is the property currently being used?

wood, hard clay wet. Forrest

If improved property, for what use was the property designed?

agriculture

 

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ AlexHkalani

Payment Information

Amount: 150

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26062590904850

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-08-03_07-25-06.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Alex Kalani, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 26-002453

Township Of Rich, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: August 3, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

MTT_Classification_Appeal_Final_Updated.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

Michigan Tax Tribunal – Small Claims Division 

Classification Appeal Packet 

Parcel: 44-018-013-017-00 

Property Address: 8674 Silverwood Rd, Rich Township, Sanilac County 

Owner: Kalani Alex H Revocable Trust 

Prepared by: Alex Kalani 

 

Cover Letter 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

P.O. Box 30232 

Lansing, MI 48909 

 

Re: Small Claims Petition — Classification Appeal 

Parcel: 44-018-013-017-00 

Owner: Kalani Alex H Revocable Trust 

 

To Whom It May Concern: 

 

Enclosed is a Small Claims Petition appealing the improper reclassification of the above 

parcel. The property was classified as Agricultural (101) for more than 25 years, despite 

never being used for row crops or commercial farming. The assessor reclassified the 

property in September 2022, the same month it was purchased, without inspection, without 

identifying any change in use, and without maintaining required documentation, as 

confirmed by a FOIA denial. 

 

The Board of Review denied the appeal using the incorrect “50% farming” standard, which 

applies only to the Qualified Agricultural Exemption. The Board did not review the evidence 

submitted, did not apply MCL 211.34c, and was influenced by the assessor during the 

hearing. One Board member had personal involvement with the property, including hunting 

it during 2023, 2024, and 2025, and meeting with me between 2022 and 2025 regarding 

improvements, yet did not disclose this or recuse himself. 

 

This appeal seeks correction of the classification to Agricultural (101). 

 

Respectfully,

Page 2

Alex Kalani 

 

Petition Narrative 

This section includes the nature of the appeal, statement of the issue, and relief requested. 

 

Statement of Facts 

This section includes all factual background, including parcel history, reclassification, and 

interactions with officials. 

Additional facts include the township clerk’s FOIA denial, lack of township records, and 

audit log irregularities. 

 

Affidavit Regarding Caregiving Years 

This affidavit affirms that the petitioner served as a full-time caregiver for his father from 

2021 through September 2025. 

 

Legal Argument 

This section includes all legal arguments, including statutory violations, improper 

standards, and assessor misconduct. 

Includes assessor’s 'market value' justification, 'hidden for 25 years' claim, and FOIA denial 

implications. 

 

Affidavit of No Change in Use 

This affidavit affirms that there has been no change in the use of the property since its 

purchase in September 2022. 

 

Procedural Defects 

This section outlines all procedural violations, including: 

- Assessor reclassified property without inspection or documentation.

Page 3

- Township clerk denied FOIA request, confirming no records exist. 

- Equalization officer defended assessor instead of investigating. 

- Board failed to document meeting, review evidence, or deliberate. 

- Board applied incorrect legal standard. 

- Assessor controlled the narrative; Board relied entirely on him. 

- Evidence of selective enforcement and lack of uniformity. 

 

Statement Regarding Board Member's Prior Involvement 

This statement details the prior personal involvement of a Board of Review member with 

the subject property, including hunting on the land and meetings with the petitioner. 

 

 Timeline of Events (1995 – March 2026) 

*A clear, chronological record of all relevant events affecting the classification, assessment, 

documentation, and procedural handling of Parcel 44‑018‑013‑017‑00.* 

 

1995–2021: Original Classification and Township Handling 

- 1995–2021 — Property consistently classified as Agricultural (101) for more than 25 

years. 

- No inspections, no documentation, and no classification reviews recorded by the township 

during this entire period. 

- Property remained largely wooded and unchanged in use. 

 

2021–2025: Caregiving Years 

- 2021–September 2025 — Petitioner served as full‑time caregiver for his father, limiting 

ability to engage in farming or land‑use activities. 

- Affidavit Regarding Caregiving Years documents this period. 

 

September 2022: Purchase and Immediate Reclassification

Page 4

- September 2022 — Petitioner purchases the property. 

- Same month — Assessor reclassifies the property from Agricultural (101) to Residential 

(401). 

- No inspection performed. 

- No change in use identified. 

- No documentation created or filed, as later confirmed by FOIA denial. 

- Assessor later claims the property was “hidden for 25 years” and “just found.” 

 

Late 2022: Assessor Statements and Irregularities 

- Assessor states the property was “in the wrong class for 25 years.” 

- Assessor claims reclassification was based on market value, not use — a direct violation of 

MCL 211.34c. 

- No supporting documents exist for the reclassification. 

 

2023–2025: Board Member’s Personal Involvement 

- 2023, 2024, 2025 — A Board of Review member hunts on the property. 

- Board member meets with petitioner multiple times regarding improvements. 

- Board member does not disclose this conflict of interest during the 2026 BOR hearing. 

- Statement Regarding Board Member’s Prior Involvement documents these events. 

 

2023–2024: Township Records and FOIA Issues 

- 2023–2024 — Petitioner requests township records regarding classification history. 

- Township clerk states no records exist. 

- FOIA request denied, confirming the township has no documentation supporting the 

reclassification. 

- This establishes a violation of MCL 211.10g (record‑keeping requirements).

Page 5

2024–2025: Assessor Communications and Audit Log Evidence 

- 2024–2025 — Petitioner communicates with assessor seeking justification for 

reclassification. 

- Assessor repeats that classification was changed due to “market value.” 

- 2025 audit log obtained: 

 - Shows multiple edits made the same day. 

 - Shows no inspection. 

 - Shows no reason codes. 

 - Shows PRE date removed. 

 - Shows classification changed without documentation. 

- Audit log confirms the reclassification was undocumented and procedurally defective.

Page 6

- Board

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Individual 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

Alex

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

Kalani

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

7456 Bridge Way

City or Town

West Bloomfield Charter Township

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48322

Telephone Number

2487305747

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

hpcdoc@gmail.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Classification 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

8674 silverwood

Silverwood

Michigan

48760

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

Township Of Rich (LAPEER) 

County

Lapeer

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 9: Classification Information

Parcel Number:

018-013-017-00

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: 

 Real 

Residential

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

What do you believe is the property’s classification?

Real

Agricultural

If improved property, how is the property currently being used?

wood, hard clay wet. Forrest

If improved property, for what use was the property designed?

agriculture

 

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ AlexHkalani

Payment Information

Amount: 150

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26062590904850

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.