Ahmad Jaber, Petitioner V Township Of York, Respondent
- Petitioner
- Ahmad Jaber
- Respondent
- Township Of York
Case overview
- Docket number
- 24-003759-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Washtenaw
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Order of Dismissal | Not recorded | Not recorded | 12/11/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Order extending default | Not recorded | Not recorded | 11/13/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Order of Default of Petitioner | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/11/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 10/11/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/11/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 07/30/2024 | $0.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Ahmad Jaber, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003759 York Township, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Petitioner was placed in default on October 11, 2024, because they filed an outdated petition form. On November 13, 2024, the Tribunal extended the time for Petitioner to cure the default by an additional 14 days and they have failed to respond. Petitioner has not complied with either order, and the latter stated that “failure to comply with this Order shall result in the dismissal of the case . . .” and referenced Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury.1 In Grimm, the Michigan Court of Appeals summarized factors that the Tribunal should consider before imposing the sanction of dismissal. Those factors are: (1) whether the violation was wilful or accidental; (2) the party's history of refusing to comply with previous court orders; (3) the prejudice to the opposing party; (4) whether there exists a history of deliberate delay; (5) the degree of compliance with other parts of the court's orders; (6) attempts to cure the defect; and (7) whether a lesser sanction would better serve the interests of justice.2 Here, Petitioner’s failure to comply with multiple orders has established a history of deliberate delay. As a result, giving careful consideration to the factors involved and considering all options in determining what sanction is just and proper, the Tribunal finds that dismissal is appropriate, and a lesser sanction would not be appropriate in light of Petitioner’s history of noncompliance in this case. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. This Order resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. 1 Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 2 Id. at 149.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003759 Page 2 of 2 APPEAL RIGHTS If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the record on appeal. There is no certification fee. Entered: December 11, 2024 By _____________________________ ejg PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Ahmad Jaber, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003759 Township Of York, Respondent. ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT The Tribunal has considered the file in the above-captioned case and finds that it entered an order holding Petitioner in default on October 11, 2024.1 Petitioner was required to cure the default within 14 days. Petitioner has had ample time to comply, yet has failed to respond or submit the required filings. Though the Tribunal finds an extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioner’s failure to comply with Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a history of deliberate delay that would justify dismissal of the case for failure to timely comply with this Order.2 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the time for Petitioner to cure the default is EXTENDED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the default: (1) file the documentation required by the October 11, 2024default order, (2) file a Motion to Set Aside Default, and (3) file proof the Motion and a copy of the documentation were served on Respondent. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of the case, as provided by TTR 231.3 By:___________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: November 13, 2024 1 The Order further stated, “Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 2 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 3 See also MCL 205.732.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003759 Page 2 of 6 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Ahmad Jaber, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003759 Township Of York, Respondent. ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT The Tribunal has considered the file in the above-captioned case and finds that it entered an order holding Petitioner in default on October 11, 2024.4 Petitioner was required to cure the default within 14 days. Petitioner has had ample time to comply, yet has failed to respond or submit the required filings. Though the Tribunal finds an extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioner’s failure to comply with Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a history of deliberate delay that would justify dismissal of the case for failure to timely comply with this Order.5 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the time for Petitioner to cure the default is EXTENDED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the default: (1) file the documentation required by the October 11, 2024default order, (2) file a Motion to Set Aside Default, and (3) file proof the Motion and a copy of the documentation were served on Respondent. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of the case, as provided by TTR 231.6 By:___________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: November 13, 2024 4 The Order further stated, “Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 5 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 6 See also MCL 205.732.
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 24-003759 Page 4 of 6 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 5
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Ahmad Jaber, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003759 Township Of York, Respondent. ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT The Tribunal has considered the file in the above-captioned case and finds that it entered an order holding Petitioner in default on October 11, 2024.7 Petitioner was required to cure the default within 14 days. Petitioner has had ample time to comply, yet has failed to respond or submit the required filings. Though the Tribunal finds an extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioner’s failure to comply with Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a history of deliberate delay that would justify dismissal of the case for failure to timely comply with this Order.8 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the time for Petitioner to cure the default is
Page 6
MTT Docket
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Ahmad Jaber, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003759 Township Of York, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner failed to file an updated Tribunal petition form. As such, the petition is not properly pending. Petitioner must complete and return a current petition form within 14 days of the entry of this Order. The petition shall note the docket number assigned by the Tribunal and if filed utilizing the Tribunal’s e-filing system, must be filed on the assigned docket number as an “Amended Petition.” Small Claims petition forms can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this Order.i Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By:_______________________________ Entered: October 11, 2024 Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003759 Page 2 of 4 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk i “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 219(5)
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Ahmad Jaber, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003759 Township Of York, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner failed to file an updated Tribunal petition form. As such, the petition is not properly pending. Petitioner must complete and return a current petition form within 14 days of the entry of this Order. The petition shall note the docket number assigned by the Tribunal and if filed utilizing the Tribunal’s e-filing system, must be filed on the assigned docket number as an “Amended Petition.” Small Claims petition forms can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this Order.ii Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By:_______________________________ Entered: October 11, 2024 Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 24-003759 Page 4 of 4 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk ii “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 219(5)
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED a KN} UG 01 2024 Michigan PROPERTY TAX ATTORNEYS: Paul O’Neill paul@mipropertytaxattorneys.com July 30, 2024 Michigan Tax Tribunal P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 RE: Ahmad Jaber v Charter Township of York Property ID No. 81-S-19-05-300-005 Dear Clerk, Enclosed for filing is a Small Claims Petition in the above matter, along with a copy of the March Board of Review Decision. Sincerely yours, front AVA 2 Paul T. ONeill PTON:jb Encl. MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM
VALUATION APPEAL
MTT DOCKET NO.
Section 1: Petitioner's Contact Information
First Name/Company Name
Ml.
Last Name
Abmad
Jaber
Mailing Address {No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route}
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
Telephone Number
Fax Number
E-mail Address
Section 2: Petitioner's Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information
First Name
Paul
ML
Last Name
O'Neill
Firm Name (if any)
Michigan Property Tax Attorneys, P.C.
Mailing Address {No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)
74 West Long Lake Rd., Suite 101
City or Town
State
Bloomfield Hills
Mi
ZIP Code
48304-2770
Telephone Number
(248) 546-7600
Fax Number
(248) 546-1668
E-mail Address
paul@mipropertytaxattorneys.com
Section 3: Subject Property Information
How many parcels are you appealing?
adjoining?
If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or
I Yes
[J No *If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-
contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.
*Please use the attached multiple parcel form for information regarding
any continguous parcels,Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION
Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing
(check all that apply)
MW True Cash and Taxable Value
0 Taxable Value Only {calculation)
LJ Uncapping of Taxable Value
0
Exemption from Taxation {other than the denial of a principal residence or qualified agricultural exemption)
8
Classification
DO
Poverty Exemption
Section 5: Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal
50% of the True Cash Value is less than the State Equalized Value and Taxable Value.
Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues
Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review?
Mives
[No
If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended:
~~ EMarch
Duly
CDecember
if No, please check the applicable reason(s):
LJ Assessment Change Notice was not properly sent to Petitioner
3 Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact
EB Appealing within 35 days of July or December Board of Review Decision
0 Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order
0 Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping
Did you request a poverty exemption at the Board of Review?
[Ives
#No
If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended:
[March
Duly
[DecemberPage 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION Section 7: Valuation Information* Parcel Number: 81-5-19-05-300-005 Classification of Property: Reall} Personal] (check one) Agricultural D Commercial @ Industrial [OJ Residential @ Timber-Cutover 0 Developmental [J Utility 0 (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: $235,900 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: $199,859 What do you believe is the fair market value? $266,479 What do you believe is the taxable value? $133,239 *If you are appealing multiple parcels, fill the multiple parcel form information for each contiguous parcel. Please attach the completed multiple parcel form(s) to the completed petition form prior to submission. Signature: Petitioner's Signature: Attorney or Authorized Representative’s Signature: / 2 E Frnt > IV Fee Information: If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition, you are required to pay a filing fee for the filing of this appeal. The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee od $1,000. If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $125.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00 $Over $500,000.00 $300.00 If your property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00
Page 5
94/76 2024 BOARD OF REVIEW DECISION FROM ASSESSOR'S OFLU CHARTER WI OF YORK HIS60 STONY CREBK RD MILAN, NHCHIGAN 48160 MENT ROLE PROPLIITY IDEN HICATION. (Parcel Code requned Propty addicss and [egal dlesedption options) ) 81'S -19-05-300-005 1763 WILLIS RD MAT SW COR OF SEC 3, TIERLY 766.32 17 IN NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER Of PERSON RAED OF A YI 5-064 1h La JABER, ALMAD | WILLIS RD SALINE MI8170 x SRD FOR POF BI SWLY DI EET 20942 FETUS TED 24 1311, TNS DEG 53 WSTLTT PT, HIELY & CHL OF WILLIS RD TO FOB BEING PART OF SW I/4, SKC 58618 THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED 401 (RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) Thask you for attending this years March Board of Review. The Board has reviewed the information you supplied und the data ne fo compute your assesstient and taxable value, The Board has completed their review of parcel number $18 -19-05-300-005 They have made the following determination
Page 6
A
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Ahmad Jaber, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003759 Township Of York, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: October 11, 2024 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Ahmad Jaber, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003759 Township Of York, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: October 11, 2024 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED a KN} UG 01 2024 Michigan PROPERTY TAX ATTORNEYS: Paul O’Neill paul@mipropertytaxattorneys.com July 30, 2024 Michigan Tax Tribunal P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 RE: Ahmad Jaber v Charter Township of York Property ID No. 81-S-19-05-300-005 Dear Clerk, Enclosed for filing is a Small Claims Petition in the above matter, along with a copy of the March Board of Review Decision. Sincerely yours, front AVA 2 Paul T. ONeill PTON:jb Encl. MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM
VALUATION APPEAL
MTT DOCKET NO.
Section 1: Petitioner's Contact Information
First Name/Company Name
Ml.
Last Name
Abmad
Jaber
Mailing Address {No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route}
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
Telephone Number
Fax Number
E-mail Address
Section 2: Petitioner's Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information
First Name
Paul
ML
Last Name
O'Neill
Firm Name (if any)
Michigan Property Tax Attorneys, P.C.
Mailing Address {No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)
74 West Long Lake Rd., Suite 101
City or Town
State
Bloomfield Hills
Mi
ZIP Code
48304-2770
Telephone Number
(248) 546-7600
Fax Number
(248) 546-1668
E-mail Address
paul@mipropertytaxattorneys.com
Section 3: Subject Property Information
How many parcels are you appealing?
adjoining?
If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or
I Yes
[J No *If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-
contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.
*Please use the attached multiple parcel form for information regarding
any continguous parcels,Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION
Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing
(check all that apply)
MW True Cash and Taxable Value
0 Taxable Value Only {calculation)
LJ Uncapping of Taxable Value
0
Exemption from Taxation {other than the denial of a principal residence or qualified agricultural exemption)
8
Classification
DO
Poverty Exemption
Section 5: Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal
50% of the True Cash Value is less than the State Equalized Value and Taxable Value.
Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues
Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review?
Mives
[No
If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended:
~~ EMarch
Duly
CDecember
if No, please check the applicable reason(s):
LJ Assessment Change Notice was not properly sent to Petitioner
3 Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact
EB Appealing within 35 days of July or December Board of Review Decision
0 Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order
0 Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping
Did you request a poverty exemption at the Board of Review?
[Ives
#No
If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended:
[March
Duly
[DecemberPage 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION Section 7: Valuation Information* Parcel Number: 81-5-19-05-300-005 Classification of Property: Reall} Personal] (check one) Agricultural D Commercial @ Industrial [OJ Residential @ Timber-Cutover 0 Developmental [J Utility 0 (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: $235,900 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: $199,859 What do you believe is the fair market value? $266,479 What do you believe is the taxable value? $133,239 *If you are appealing multiple parcels, fill the multiple parcel form information for each contiguous parcel. Please attach the completed multiple parcel form(s) to the completed petition form prior to submission. Signature: Petitioner's Signature: Attorney or Authorized Representative’s Signature: / 2 E Frnt > IV Fee Information: If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition, you are required to pay a filing fee for the filing of this appeal. The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee od $1,000. If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $125.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00 $Over $500,000.00 $300.00 If your property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00
Page 5
94/76 2024 BOARD OF REVIEW DECISION FROM ASSESSOR'S OFLU CHARTER WI OF YORK HIS60 STONY CREBK RD MILAN, NHCHIGAN 48160 MENT ROLE PROPLIITY IDEN HICATION. (Parcel Code requned Propty addicss and [egal dlesedption options) ) 81'S -19-05-300-005 1763 WILLIS RD MAT SW COR OF SEC 3, TIERLY 766.32 17 IN NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER Of PERSON RAED OF A YI 5-064 1h La JABER, ALMAD | WILLIS RD SALINE MI8170 x SRD FOR POF BI SWLY DI EET 20942 FETUS TED 24 1311, TNS DEG 53 WSTLTT PT, HIELY & CHL OF WILLIS RD TO FOB BEING PART OF SW I/4, SKC 58618 THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED 401 (RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) Thask you for attending this years March Board of Review. The Board has reviewed the information you supplied und the data ne fo compute your assesstient and taxable value, The Board has completed their review of parcel number $18 -19-05-300-005 They have made the following determination
Page 6
A
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.