Record Finder / 26-000612-TT
Michigan

Aferdita Rica Petitioner V City Of Troy Respondent

Petitioner
Aferdita Rica
Respondent
City Of Troy

Case overview

Docket number
26-000612-TT
Status
Ready Schedule
CaseType
SC Property
Division
Small Claims Division
County
Oakland
Judge
No judge assigned

Docket history

Line #SubjectFilerLine RefEnter Date/Post MarkFeeRelated Item
9Notice of FilingNot recordedNot recorded08/06/2026Not recordedDownload
8Attachments to the Answer were filedNot recordedNot recorded06/15/2026Not recordedDownload
7Attachments to the Answer were filedRESPNot recorded06/15/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
6Answer was receivedRESPNot recorded06/15/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
5Petition has been verifiedPET106/03/2026Not recordedDownload
4Notice of Docket Number SCNot recordedNot recorded06/03/2026Not recordedDownload
3DocumentationPETNot recorded04/19/2026Not recordedDownload
2Attachments to the Petition were filedPETNot recorded04/14/2026Not recordedDownload
1A petition was received.PETNot recorded04/14/2026$0.00Download

Documents

SC-Notice_of_Filing_of_Answer.2026-08-06_15-06-54.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Aferdita Rica,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-000612

City Of Troy,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of 

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the 

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the 

opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail.

Alternate Dispute Resolution Options

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this 

case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference 

is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a 

case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with 

a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an 

appeal of a principal residence exemption that was denied by either the Michigan 

Department of Treasury or a County. Also, state taxes levied by the Michigan 

Department of Treasury, such as income taxes, are not subject to the informal 

settlement conference process.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-000612

Page 2 of 2

MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. 

Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between 

the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a 

mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a 

judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or 

email taxtrib@michigan.gov.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: 

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Aferdita Rica,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-000612

City Of Troy,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of 

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the 

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the 

opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail.

Alternate Dispute Resolution Options

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this 

case through an informal

Page 4

M

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

*** Information herein deemed reliable but not guaranteed***

OAKLAND

County:

CITY OF TROY

Jurisdiction:

Printed on

Parcel Number:

88-20-21-231-009

115,340C

186,230

130,130

56,100

2023

121,100C

224,180

153,030

71,150

2024

124,850C

247,790

166,150

81,640

2025

241,000S

241,000M

246,340

152,000

94,340

2026

Taxable

Value

Tribunal/

Other

Board of

Review

Assessed

Value

Building

Value

Land

Value

Year

 * Factors *

Description Frontage Depth Front Depth Rate %Adj. Reason Value

<Site Value B> R-1B MR CI -10 188676 100 188,676

 90 Actual Front Feet, 0.31 Total Acres Total Est. Land Value = 188,676

Land Value Estimates for Land Table R-1B.R-1B

ES 05/27/2025 DESK REVIE

KAB 04/28/2025 SALE VERIF

007 08/15/1994 INSPECTED

Who When What

Level

Rolling

Low

High

Landscaped

Swamp

Wooded

Pond

Waterfront

Ravine

Wetland

Flood Plain

CONCRETE DRVWAY

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

Topography of 

Site

Dirt Road

Gravel Road

Paved Road

Storm Sewer

Sidewalk

Water

Sewer

Electric

Gas

Curb

Street Lights

Standard Utilities

Underground Utils.

 

 

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

 

 

X

Public

Improvements

Vacant

 

Improved

X

The Equalizer. Copyright (c) 1999 - 2009.

Licensed To: City of Troy, County of

Oakland, Michigan

Comments/Influences

T2N, R11E, SEC 21 TROY MEADOWS SUB NO 4

LOT 227 1-20-88 FR 227-003

Tax Description

RICA, AFERDITA

74 MIRACLE

TROY MI 48084-1700

Owner's Name/Address

74 MIRACLE

Property Address

2026 Est TCV 492,674 TCV/TFA: 290.49

MAP #: 88-20-21-231-009

P.R.E. 100% 01/02/2025 

10,381

PB2019-1277

06/25/2019

Res., Window

School: TROY SCHOOL DISTRICT

Amount

Number

Date

Building Permit(s)

Zoning: R-1B (

Class: RESIDENTIAL-IMPROV

100.0

DEED

24024-746

03-ARM'S LENGTH

WD

09/14/2001

260,000

BROUGHTON

DUPLESSIS

100.0

DEED

37586-422

03-ARM'S LENGTH

WD

05/11/2006

284,000

DEDA, FERDINANT K

BROUGHTON, KATHERINE J

0.0

DEED

57067/164

09-FAMILY/RELATED ENTITY

QC

10/27/2021

1

DEDA, FERDINAND & TAZE

DEDA, FERDINANT K

100.0

DEED

59979/458

03-ARM'S LENGTH

WD

01/02/2025

469,000

RICA, AFERDITA

DEDA, FERDINAND & TAZE

Prcnt.

Trans.

Verified

By

Liber

& Page

Terms of Sale

Inst.

Type

Sale

Date

Sale

Price

Grantee

Grantor

06/11/2026

Page 2

Class: C +5

Effec. Age: 37

Floor Area: 1,696 

Total Base New : 359,750 E.C.F.

Total Depr Cost: 215,296 X 1.412

Estimated T.C.V: 303,998 

Cost Est. for Res. Bldg: 1 Single Family RANCH Cls C 5 Blt 1989

(11) Heating System: Forced Heat & Cool

Ground Area = 1676 SF Floor Area = 1696 SF.

Phy/Ab.Phy/Func/Econ/Comb. % Good=63/100/100/95/59.85

Economic Depreciation because of: MB

Building Areas

Stories Exterior Foundation Size Cost New Depr. Cost 

1 Story Siding/Brick Basement 602 

1 Story Siding/Brick Basement 198 

1 Story Siding/Brick Basement 310 

1 Story Siding/Brick Basement 476 

1 Story Siding/Brick Slab 90 

1 Story Siding Overhang 20 

 Total: 296,404 177,386

Other Additions/Adjustments

Plumbing

 3 Fixture Bath 1 4,833 2,893 

 2 Fixture Bath 1 3,234 1,936 

 Ceramic Tile Floor 3 3,807 2,278 

Porches

 CCP (1 Story) 82 2,679 1,603 

 WCP (1 Story) 120 6,298 3,769 

 Foundation: Shallow 120 -1,052 -630 

Deck

 Treated Wood 550 8,355 5,000 

Garages

Class: C Exterior: Brick Foundation: 42 Inch (Finished)

 Base Cost 485 32,510 19,457 

 Common Wall: 1 Wall 1 -3,756 -2,248 

Built-Ins

<<<<< Calculations too long. See Valuation printout for complete pricing. >>>>>

Carport Area: 

Roof: 

Bsmnt Garage: 

Year Built: 1989

Car Capacity: 2

Class: C

Exterior: Brick

Brick Ven.: 0

Stone Ven.: 0

Common Wall: 1 Wall

Foundation: 42 Inch

Finished ?: Yes

Auto. Doors: 0

Mech. Doors: 0

Area: 485

% Good: 0

Storage Area: 0

No Conc. Floor: 0

 (17) Garage

CCP (1 Story)

WCP (1 Story)

Treated Wood

82

120

550

Type

Area

 (16) Porches/Decks

Interior 1 Story

Interior 2 Story

2nd/Same Stack

Two Sided

Exterior 1 Story

Exterior 2 Story

Prefab 1 Story

Prefab 2 Story

Heat Circulator

Raised Hearth

Wood Stove

Direct-Vented Gas

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 (15) Fireplaces

Appliance Allow.

Cook Top

Dishwasher

Garbage Disposal

Bath Heater

Vent Fan

Hot Tub

Unvented Hood

Vented Hood

Intercom

Jacuzzi Tub

Jacuzzi repl.Tub

Oven

Microwave

Standard Range

Self Clean Range

Sauna

Trash Compactor

Central Vacuum

Security System

 

1

1

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 (15) Built-ins

 Lump Sum Items:

Public Water

Public Sewer

Water Well

1000 Gal Septic

2000 Gal Septic

 

 

 

 

 

 (14) Water/Sewer

Average Fixture(s)

3 Fixture Bath

2 Fixture Bath

Softener, Auto

Softener, Manual

Solar Water Heat

No Plumbing

Extra Toilet

Extra Sink

Separate Shower

Ceramic Tile Floor

Ceramic Tile Wains

Ceramic Tub Alcove

Vent Fan

 

2

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 (13) Plumbing

Few

 

Ave.

X

Many

 

No. of Elec. Outlets

Min

 

Ord.

 

Ex.

X

 No./Qual. of Fixtures

Amps Service

200

 (12) Electric

Central Air

Wood Furnace

 

 

Forced Air w/o Ducts

Forced Air w/ Ducts 

Forced Hot Water

Electric Baseboard

Elec. Ceil. Radiant

Radiant (in-floor)

Electric Wall Heat

Space Heater

Wall/Floor Furnace

Forced Heat & Cool

Heat Pump

No Heating/Cooling

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

Elec.

Steam

 

Oil

Coal

 

Gas

Wood

X

 (11) Heating/Cooling

 Joists: 2X10, 16O.C.

 Unsupported Len: 

 Cntr.Sup: Steel Beams

 (10) Floor Support

Recreation SF

Living SF

Walkout Doors (B)

No Floor SF

Walkout Doors (A)

 

 

 

 

 

 (9) Basement Finish

Conc. Block

Poured Conc.

Stone

Treated Wood

Concrete Floor

 

10

 

 

X

 (8) Basement

 Basement: 1586 S.F.

 Crawl: 0 S.F.

 Slab: 90 S.F.

 Height to Joists: 8.0

 (7) Excavation

 

 

 

 

 (6) Ceilings

 Kitchen: Tile

 Other: Tile

 Other: Plywood

 (5) Floors

H.C.

X

Solid

 

Doors:

Small

 

Ord

X

Lg

 

Size

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

2026 Valuation Report.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

Valuation Report

DB:

Bsaassessing-2026

06/11/2026

09:54 AM

 ECF (21C COOK MEADOWS, TROY MEDWS 2-3-4) 1.412 => TCV: 303,998

Notes: 

 Totals: 359,750 215,296

 Prefab 1 Story 1 2,744 1,642 

Fireplaces

 Oven 1 1,421 850 

 Unvented Hood 1 348 208 

 Garbage Disposal 1 277 166 

 Dishwasher 1 824 493 

 Cook Top 1 824 493 

Built-Ins

 Common Wall: 1 Wall 1 -3,756 -2,248 

 Base Cost 485 32,510 19,457 

Class: C Exterior: Brick Foundation: 42 Inch (Finished)

Garages

 Treated Wood 550 8,355 5,000 

Deck

 Foundation: Shallow 120 -1,052 -630 

 WCP (1 Story) 120 6,298 3,769 

 CCP (1 Story) 82 2,679 1,603 

Porches

 Ceramic Tile Floor 3 3,807 2,278 

 2 Fixture Bath 1 3,234 1,936 

 3 Fixture Bath 1 4,833 2,893 

Plumbing

Other Additions/Adjustments

 Total: 296,404 177,386

1 Story Siding Overhang 20 

1 Story Siding/Brick Slab 90 

1 Story Siding/Brick Basement 476 

1 Story Siding/Brick Basement 310 

1 Story Siding/Brick Basement 198 

1 Story Siding/Brick Basement 602 

Stories Exterior Foundation Size Cost New Depr. Cost 

Building Areas

Economic Depreciation because of: MB

Phy/Ab.Phy/Func/Econ/Comb. % Good=63/100/100/95/59.85

Ground Area = 1676 SF Floor Area = 1696 SF.

(11) Heating System: Forced Heat & Cool

 

Cost Est. for Res. Bldg: 1 Single Family RANCH Cls C 5 Blt 1989

Map #: 88-20-21-231-009 CITY OF TROY TROY, MI 48084-1700 

Property Class: 401 74 MIRACLE 

88-20-21-231-009 2026 Est. T.C.V. RICA, AFERDITA

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

Docket Number: 26-000612

Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? Yes

Party Filing Document 

Respondent

Files

Document Type: Attachments to Answer

Attachment File Name: 2026 Valuation Report

Document Type: Attachments to Answer

Attachment File Name: 2026 Record Card

Fee Information

Filing Fee: $ 0.00

Payment Information

Payment: $ 0.00

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

2026 Assessment Notice.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

ian Oops 

of Tsu 

THIS 

IS NOT A TAX BILL 

L-4400 

Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification 

This form is issued under the authority of Public Act 206 of 1893, Sec. 211.24c and Sec.211.34c, as amended. This is 

a model assessment notice to be used by the local assessor. 

FROM CITY OF TROY ASSESSING DEPT 

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION 

KELLY M. TIMM 

PARCEL NUMBER: 

88-20-21-231-009 

500 W BIG BEAVER ROAD 

PROPERTY ADDRESS: 

TROY, MICHIGAN 48084-5254 

74 MIRACLE 

TROY, MI 48084-1700 

SCHOOL DISTRICT CODE: ~~ 63150 

OWNER'S NAME & ADDRESS/PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: 

EXEMPTIONS 

RICA, AFERDITA 

% Exempt As "Homeowners Principal Residence": 

100.00% 

74 MIRACLE 

% Exempt As "Qualified Agricultural Property": 

.00% 

TROY MI 48084-1700 

% Exempt As "MBT Industrial Personal": 

.00% 

% Exempt As "MBT Commercial Personal": 

.00% 

Exempt As "Disabled Veteran or Surviving 

Spouse™ 

J Yes 

No 

Exempt As "Qualified Forest Property": 

O Yes 

No 

Exempt As "Development Property": 

O Yes 

Xx] 

No 

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 

T2N, R11E, SEC 21 TROY MEADOWS SUB NO 4 LOT 227 1-20-88 FR 227-003 

ACCORDING TO MCL 211.34c THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS: 

401 

Residential 

PRIOR YEAR'S CLASSIFICATION IF DIFFERENT: 

401 

Residential 

CURRENT 

CHANGE FROM 

PRIOR AMOUNT 

TENTATIVE AMOUNT 

PRIOR YEAR TO 

YEAR: 

2025 

YEAR: 

2026 

CURRENT YEAR 

1. TAXABLE VALUE: 

124,850 

246,340 

121,490 

2. ASSESSED VALUE: 

247,790 

246,340 

-1,450 

3. TENTATIVE EQUALIZATION FACTOR: 

1.000 

4. STATE EQUALIZED VALUE (SEV): 

247,790 

246,340 

-1,450 

5. WAS THERE A TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP IN2025 

THAT RESULTED IN A TAXABLE VALUE UNCAPPING? [x] Yes 

[| No 

6. Assessor Change Reason(s): 

Market Adjustment 

The 2026 Inflation rate Multiplier is: 1.027 

Questions regarding the Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification may be directed to the Following: 

Name: 

Telephone Number: 

Email Address: 

KELLY M. TIMM 

(248) 524-3311 

CITYASSESSOR@TROYMI.GOV 

March Board of Review Appeal Information. The Board of Review will meet at the following dates and times: 

*THE MARCH BOARD OF REVIEW WILL BE MEETING ON TUESDAY, MARCH 3RD, 2026 FROM 10AM-12PM FOR AN 

ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING. 

*THE BOARD OF REVIEW WILL BE IN SESSION TO HEAR APPEALS ON THE FOLLOWING DATES: MONDAY, MARCH 9TH, 2026 

(9AM-4PM), TUESDAY, MARCH 10TH, 2026 (1PM-9PM), WEDNESDAY, MARCH 11TH, 2026 (3PM-9PM) AND THURSDAY, MARCH 

12TH, 2026 (9AM-12PM). 

*APPOINTMENTS ARE NECESSARY TO APPEAL YOUR ASSESSMENT AND MUST BE SCHEDULED NO LATER THAN 9:00AM 

ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12TH, 2026. PLEASE CALL (248) 524-3311 TO SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT.

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

scanswer_valuation.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM

VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-000612

 

Respondent’s Contact Information:

Filer Type:

Local Unit of Government

Local Unit of Government:

City Of Troy (OAKLAND)

First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

E-mail Address

 

Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information, if any:

First Name

Kristin

M.I. 

Last Name

Bouscher

Firm Name (if any)

City of Troy

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

500 W Big Beaver

City or Town

Troy

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48084

Telephone Number

2485243308

E-mail Address

kristin.bouscher@troymi.gov

 

 

Subject Property Information:

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings.

 *If necessary, attach a separate sheet.

No 

Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of 50% or more?

Yes

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Please Explain Your Answer to this Appeal:

The subject property was valued using the 24 month sale study and uncapped for the 2026 year in accordance with the State of Michigan's statute MCL 

211.27a(3). Further evidence for valuation will be submitted when a hearing is scheduled.

 

Jurisdictional Issues:

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES:

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review?

Yes

If Yes, check which Board of Review Petitioner attended:

March

If No, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March Board of Review? 

*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer.

If the July or December Board of Review revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? 

If yes, please cite the Board’s authority?

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact?

No

If yes, please explain

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order?

No

If yes, when was it issued?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE:

When was the Notice of Uncapping issued?

Under what statutory section was the taxable value uncapped?

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Valuation Information:

Parcel Identification Number:

88-20-21-231-009

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

 Residential (check one)

Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review:

241000

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

241000

What do you believe is the fair market value?

482000

What do you believe is the taxable value?

 

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent’s Signature: 

/s/ Kristin A. Bouscher

Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature:

/s/

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

01._Property_Tax_Appeal_Petition_Form_Valuation_Poverty_Classification.f1f6d42c-4a54-401f-822a-38f6b245fc06.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax 

disputes.

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review 

Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Individual 

First Name

Aferdita

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

Rica

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

74 Miracle Dr

City or Town

Troy

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48084

Telephone Number

248-635-5527

Fax Number

E-mail Address

aferditarica@gmail.com

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Firm Name (if any)

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

Fax Number

E-mail Address 

Section 3: Subject Property Information

How many parcels are you appealing?

1

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

 *If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

74 Miracle Dr

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Troy

Michigan

48084

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City Of Troy (OAKLAND)

County 

Oakland

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that apply)

True Cash and Taxable Value, Uncapping of Taxable Value

 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal

The assessed value of the subject property exceeds its true cash value and is not supported by market data.

The property was purchased in 2025 for $469,000 in an arm’s-length transaction. However, a review of comparable ranch home sales of similar size, age, condition, 

and location indicates that typical market values range between approximately $390,000 and $420,000.

These comparable sales suggest that the purchase price may have exceeded typical market levels and should not be the sole basis for determining true cash value.

Additionally, no improvements or upgrades have been made to the property since purchase that would justify the drastic increase in value. The property’s features, 

including the finished basement and garage, are typical for the area and do not represent premium characteristics.

Based on the comparable sales and overall market data, the current assessment is overstated and not consistent with similar properties.

Therefore, the requested true cash value is $400,000.

In my neighborhood (Troy Meadows Subdivision) I had my previous house that I sold in 2025 too, and everybody who was looking at it was saying I have 

overpriced exceedingly as on this neighborhood according to all of them the average home price is 350k to 450k, even though that home was unique in features and 

everything (almost 3000 sq ft, a beautiful pool, sun room, 4 beautiful huge bedrooms, separate living room from the kitchen and dining room, huge garage, etc. And 

they still were looking to have it on that price range. So what can I say for the home I purchased in the same neighborhood, but over 1000 sq ft smaller than the 

previous home, no special features, 3 small bedrooms, small garage, and that’s it, nothing special.

One of the main reasons I sold the previous house was the tax affordability - too high property taxes, and I was hoping purchasing a much smaller home, will solve 

my issue, but it looks like it worsened it, being that the City is wanting to charge me even higher taxes than my previous beautiful house.

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues

Year(s) you are appealing:

2026

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes

If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND upload the BOR decision: March

If No, check the applicable reason(s):

Did you request a Poverty Exemption at the BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR considered your application AND upload the BOR decision: 

 March  July  December

If No, explain why:

Section 7: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.

Parcel Identification Number: 88-20-21-231-009

Classification of Property:

Real

Residential

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:

241000

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:

241000

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

410000 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

205000

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

205000

Section 8: Classification Information *Only the MI Dep’t of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal*

Parcel Identification Number:

 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review:

What do you believe

Page 4

STA

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SC_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-06-03_17-05-55.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Aferdita Rica,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-000612

City Of Troy,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: June 3, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Aferdita Rica,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-000612

City Of Troy,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: June 3, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Aferdita Rica,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-000612

City Of Troy,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: June 3, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Some more information to support my appeal.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

Petition challenging property tax assessment issued by the City of Troy 

Michigan Tax Tribunal – Small Claims Division 

 

Subject property address: 74 Miracle Dr, Troy MI 48084 

T2N, R11E, SEC 21 TROY MEADOWS SUB NO 4 LOT 227 1-20-88 FR 227-003 

 

Home style: Ranch 

Living Area: Approx. 1,696 Sq Ft 

Year Built: 1989 

Principal Residence Exemption (PRE): 100% 

2026 Taxable Value Board of Review Decision: $241,000 

 

Statement of appeal 

Petitioner respectfully appeals the property tax assessment issued by the City of Troy for tax year 2026. Petitioner 

believes the current assessment exceeds the subject property’s True Cash Value ("TCV") and is not supported by 

market data for comparable properties. 

The property was purchased in 2025 for $469,000 in an arm’s-length transaction. However, a review of comparable 

ranch home sales of similar size, age, condition, and location indicates that typical market values range between 

approximately $370,000 and $420,000. 

These transactions reflect the broader market and provide a more reliable indication of value than any single sale 

alone. In this context, the purchase price appears to be above the typical range for similar properties and should 

not be the sole basis for determining TCV. 

Since the purchase, no improvements or upgrades have been made that would justify that huge increase in value. 

The property’s features, 3 small bedrooms, 2.5 bath, living room, kitchen and dining are at the same room, the 

garage says 2 cars, but it is functionally limited compared to standard two-car garages. So the subject property 

does not represent premium characteristics that can justify the very high taxable value. 

Petitioner is familiar with the Troy Meadows subdivision market (same neighborhood with the subject property), 

having previously owned and sold a much larger and more feature-rich home within the same neighborhood. That 

property, despite its significantly larger size and superior features, was still subject to market expectations within a 

similar general price range, further supporting that the current assessment of the subject property is not aligned 

with typical market behavior. 

Based on the comparable sales and overall market data, the current assessment is overstated and not consistent 

with similar properties. 

Therefore, the requested true cash value is $400,000.

Page 2

Comparable sales analysis 

The following comparable sales are based on recent residential transactions in the City of Troy and surrounding 

areas, focusing on ranch-style homes with similar square footage, age, and condition. These sales provide a 

reliable indication of current market value. 

 

Comparable Ranch-Style Sales – Troy (2025–2026) – Troy Meadows sub and close to our sub: 

Address 

Style 

Sq Ft 

Sale Date 

Sale Price 

Notes 

177 Eckford Drive, Troy 48085 

Ranch 

1,731 

11/19/2025 

$426,000 

Slightly larger 

192 Kirk Lane Drive, Troy 48084 

Ranch 

1,775 

10/23/2025 

$370,000 

Slightly bigger (same neighborhood) 

293 Scottsdale Drive, Troy 8084 

Ranch 

1,539 

8/15/2025 

$375,000 

Slightly smaller (same neighborhood) 

124 Belhaven Drive, Troy 48085 

Ranch 

1,650 

7/30/2025 

$335,000 

Same size 

 

 Map of comparable 

 

 

The comparable sales above support a market range of approximately $350,000 to $420,000 for properties similar 

to the subject, Ranch style, close in size and rooms. These sales reflect actual arm’s-length transactions within the 

same general market area and timeframe. 

So based on this data, a reasonable and well-supported True Cash Value is approximately $400,000.

Page 3

SUPPORTING CONSIDERATIONS 

• 

No improvements or upgrades since purchase 

• 

Property features are typical for the neighborhood 

• 

Comparable sales support a lower market range 

• 

Current assessment exceeds market-supported value 

 

REQUEST FOR RELIEF 

Petitioner respectfully requests that the Michigan Tax Tribunal revise the assessed value of the subject property to 

reflect a True Cash Value of $400,000 for the 2026 tax year, consistent with the market evidence presented. 

 

Petitioner: Aferdita Rica 

Date: April 19, 2026

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

2026 Board of Review Decision.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

03/23/2026 

10:10 AM 

2026 BOARD OF REVIEW DECISION 

FROM 

CITY OF TROY ASSESSING DEPT 

KELLY M. TIMM 

500 W BIG BEAVER ROAD 

TROY, MICHIGAN 48084-5254 

NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OR PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: 

PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION: (Parcel Code required. Property address 

and legal description optional.); 

88-20-21-231-009 

74 MIRACLE 

RICA, AFERDITA 

74 MIRACLE 

TROY MI 48084-1700 

T2N, R11E, SEC 21 TROY MEADOWS SUB NO 4 LOT 227 1-20 

-88 FR 227-003 

THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED 

401 

(RESIDENTIAL IMPROVED) 

Thank you for attending this years March Board of Review. The Board has reviewed the information you , supplied and the data necessary 

to compute your assessment and taxable value. 

The Board has completed their review of parcel number 88-20-21-231-009 

They have made the following determination based on the information you supplied. 

Board of Review Reason For Change 

MARKET ADJUSTMENT 

[2026 ORIGINAL ASSESSED VALUE 

246,340 

[2026 

"BOARD OF REVIEW" ASSESSED VALUE 

241,000 

| 

(If the above amounts are the same, no revisions have occured) 

[2026 ORIGINAL TAXABLE VALUE 

246,340 

[2026 

"BOARD OF REVIEW" TAXABLE VALUE 

241,000 

| 

2026 PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION/QUALIFIED AG 

100.0000 

Please feel free to contact the assessor at the address listed above or call if you have any questions. 

“Effective March 1, 2013, the Tribunal is no longer able to accept Smail Claims ietter appeais. Rader, you are required to file a petition to 

initiate a new Small Claims appeal. Petition forms are available on this website.” 

http://www.michigan.gov/taxtrib/0,4677,7-187-38254---,00.html

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

01._Property_Tax_Appeal_Petition_Form_Valuation_Poverty_Classification.f1f6d42c-4a54-401f-822a-38f6b245fc06.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax 

disputes.

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review 

Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Individual 

First Name

Aferdita

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

Rica

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

74 Miracle Dr

City or Town

Troy

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48084

Telephone Number

248-635-5527

Fax Number

E-mail Address

aferditarica@gmail.com

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Firm Name (if any)

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

Fax Number

E-mail Address 

Section 3: Subject Property Information

How many parcels are you appealing?

1

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

 *If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

74 Miracle Dr

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Troy

Michigan

48084

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City Of Troy (OAKLAND)

County 

Oakland

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that apply)

True Cash and Taxable Value, Uncapping of Taxable Value

 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal

The assessed value of the subject property exceeds its true cash value and is not supported by market data.

The property was purchased in 2025 for $469,000 in an arm’s-length transaction. However, a review of comparable ranch home sales of similar size, age, condition, 

and location indicates that typical market values range between approximately $390,000 and $420,000.

These comparable sales suggest that the purchase price may have exceeded typical market levels and should not be the sole basis for determining true cash value.

Additionally, no improvements or upgrades have been made to the property since purchase that would justify the drastic increase in value. The property’s features, 

including the finished basement and garage, are typical for the area and do not represent premium characteristics.

Based on the comparable sales and overall market data, the current assessment is overstated and not consistent with similar properties.

Therefore, the requested true cash value is $400,000.

In my neighborhood (Troy Meadows Subdivision) I had my previous house that I sold in 2025 too, and everybody who was looking at it was saying I have 

overpriced exceedingly as on this neighborhood according to all of them the average home price is 350k to 450k, even though that home was unique in features and 

everything (almost 3000 sq ft, a beautiful pool, sun room, 4 beautiful huge bedrooms, separate living room from the kitchen and dining room, huge garage, etc. And 

they still were looking to have it on that price range. So what can I say for the home I purchased in the same neighborhood, but over 1000 sq ft smaller than the 

previous home, no special features, 3 small bedrooms, small garage, and that’s it, nothing special.

One of the main reasons I sold the previous house was the tax affordability - too high property taxes, and I was hoping purchasing a much smaller home, will solve 

my issue, but it looks like it worsened it, being that the City is wanting to charge me even higher taxes than my previous beautiful house.

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues

Year(s) you are appealing:

2026

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes

If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND upload the BOR decision: March

If No, check the applicable reason(s):

Did you request a Poverty Exemption at the BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR considered your application AND upload the BOR decision: 

 March  July  December

If No, explain why:

Section 7: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.

Parcel Identification Number: 88-20-21-231-009

Classification of Property:

Real

Residential

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:

241000

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:

241000

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

410000 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

205000

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

205000

Section 8: Classification Information *Only the MI Dep’t of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal*

Parcel Identification Number:

 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review:

What do you believe

Page 4

STA

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.