Abela D Mary, Petitioner V City Of Roseville, Respondent
- Petitioner
- Abela D Mary
- Respondent
- City Of Roseville
Case overview
- Docket number
- 24-003673-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Macomb
- Judge
- Welton, Samantha M
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | Consent Judgment | Not recorded | 13 | 01/21/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 14 | Granted | Not recorded | 13 | 01/21/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 13 | Amended Stipulation | Not recorded | Not recorded | 01/20/2026 | $0.00 | Download |
| 12 | Denied | PET | 10 | 01/14/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 11 | Order Denying Motion | Not recorded | 10 | 01/14/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 10 | A Stipulation has been received. | PET | Not recorded | 01/06/2026 | $50.00 | Download |
| 9 | Notice of Hearing | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/24/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 8 | A hearing has been scheduled | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/24/2025 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| 7 | Notice of Filing | Not recorded | Not recorded | 12/09/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | Attachments to the Answer were filed | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/11/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Answer was received | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/11/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Petition has been verified | PET | 3 | 10/09/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 07/16/2024 | $0.00 | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/08/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 07/16/2024 | $125.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Abela D Mary, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003673 City Of Roseville, Presiding Judge Respondent. Jason C. Grinnell ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the Stipulation and finds that it comports with the mandates of State law.1 As a result, the Tribunal shall enter the parties’ Stipulation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment including all attachments, terms and conditions is GRANTED and ADOPTED, unless otherwise indicated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with maintaining the assessment rolls for the tax years at issue shall correct or cause the assessment rolls to be corrected to reflect the property’s true cash and taxable values as provided in this Consent Judgment within 20 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment.2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with collecting or refunding the affected taxes shall collect taxes and any applicable interest or issue a refund as required by the Consent Judgment within 28 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment. If a refund is warranted, it shall, unless otherwise indicated, include a proportionate share of any property tax administration fees paid and of penalty and interest paid on delinquent taxes. The refund shall also, unless otherwise indicated, separately indicate the amount of the taxes, fees, penalties, and interest being refunded. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been unlawfully paid shall, unless otherwise indicated, bear interest from the date of payment to the date of judgment and the judgment shall bear interest to the date of its payment. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been underpaid shall not bear interest for any time period prior to 28 days after the issuance of this Consent Judgment. Pursuant to MCL 205.737, interest shall accrue (i) after December 31, 2013, through June 30, 2016, at the rate of 4.25%, (ii) after June 30, 2016, through December 31, 2016, at the rate of 4.40%, (iii) after 1 See MCL 211.27a. 2 See MCL 205.755.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003673 Page 2 of 2 December 31, 2016, through June 30, 2017, at the rate of 4.50%, (iv) after June 30, 2017, through December 31, 2017, at the rate of 4.70%, (v) after December 31, 2017, through June 30, 2018, at the rate of 5.15%, (vi) after June 30, 2018, through December 31, 2018, at the rate of 5.41%, (vii) after December 31, 2018, through June 30, 2019, at the rate of 5.9%, (viii) after June 30, 2019, through December 31, 2019, at the rate of 6.39%, (ix) after December 31, 2019, through June 30, 2020, at the rate of 6.40%, (x) after June 30 2020, through December 31, 2020, at the rate of 5.63%, (xi) after December 31, 2020, through June 30, 2022, at the rate of 4.25%, (xii) after June 30, 2022, through December 31, 2022, at the rate of 4.27%, (xiii) after December 31, 2022, through June 30, 2023, at the rate of 5.65%, (xiv) after June 30, 2023, through December 31, 2023, at the rate of 8.25%, (xv) after December 31, 2023, through June 30, 2024, at the rate of 9.30%, (xvi) after June 30, 2024, through December 31, 2024, at the rate of 9.50%, (xvii) after December 31, 2024, through June 30, 2025, at the rate of 9.47%, (xviii) after June 30, 2025, through December 31, 2025, at the rate of 8.66%, and (xix) after December 31, 2025, through June 30, 2026, at a rate of 8.48%. This Consent Judgment resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. See docket look up for a copy of stipulation and for any possible refund paragraph. By _______________________________ Entered: January 21, 2026 jcr PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RiECelVEL JAN 2 0 2026 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX CONSULTANTS YOUR PROPERTY TAX EXPERTS SINCE 1989 January 16, 2026 Clerk of the Court Michigan Tax Tribunal P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 RE: Property Tax Consultants for Abela D Mary Parcel # 08-14-19-454-015, v. City of Roseville Docket # 24-003673 Dear Clerk, Regarding the above matter, enclosed please find the revised STIPULATION TO CONSENT JUDGEMENT fully authorized by the petitioner and the respondent. We hope that this meets with the approval of the Michigan Tax Tribunal. Very truly yours, Aylsworth Agent for Abela D Mary JA/ac Cec: Assessor, City of Roseville
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEMS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Property Tax Consultants for: Abela D Mary, Petitioner, \ MTT Docket No. 24-003673 City of Roseville, Respondent. " STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND CONSENT JUDGMENT 1. The case is pending in the ___ Entire Tribunal OR _x__ Small Claims Division. 2. Property Parcel No: 08-14-19-454-015. (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: see attached multiple parcel form. Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2024 $130,000 $65,000 $65,000 2025 $149,000 $74,500 $67,015 4. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: see attached multiple parcel form. Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value
Page 3
MTT Docket No. 24-003673 Consent Judgment, Page 2 of 2 5. If stipulation addresses tax years other than the tax year originally appealed or tax years added through motions to amend that have been granted by the Tribunal, list the separate facts upon which the parties rely to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over those tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): The stipulated taxable value for the 2024 tax year has been reduced, and an inflation rate multiplier of 1.031 has been applied for the 2025 tax year. 6. List separately any special terms or conditions being proposed by the parties that would affect the execution of this Consent Judgment including, but not limited to, the joint payment of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc. (attach additional page if necessary): Signature of tal Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Jon va Property Tax Consultants Date: [ / / b / 2 5 Sigs SETI [ies representative: Assessor, City of yi Date: Jan 14,200 [Consent Judgment will be prepared by the Tribunal.]
Page 4
§ GONSBULTY 269.366.0300 Received Clerk of the Court JAN 20 2026 Michigan Tax Tribunal LARA P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 Ijin] nilegihy
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RiECelVEL JAN 2 0 2026 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX CONSULTANTS YOUR PROPERTY TAX EXPERTS SINCE 1989 January 16, 2026 Clerk of the Court Michigan Tax Tribunal P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 RE: Property Tax Consultants for Abela D Mary Parcel # 08-14-19-454-015, v. City of Roseville Docket # 24-003673 Dear Clerk, Regarding the above matter, enclosed please find the revised STIPULATION TO CONSENT JUDGEMENT fully authorized by the petitioner and the respondent. We hope that this meets with the approval of the Michigan Tax Tribunal. Very truly yours, Aylsworth Agent for Abela D Mary JA/ac Cec: Assessor, City of Roseville
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEMS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Property Tax Consultants for: Abela D Mary, Petitioner, \ MTT Docket No. 24-003673 City of Roseville, Respondent. " STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND CONSENT JUDGMENT 1. The case is pending in the ___ Entire Tribunal OR _x__ Small Claims Division. 2. Property Parcel No: 08-14-19-454-015. (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: see attached multiple parcel form. Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2024 $130,000 $65,000 $65,000 2025 $149,000 $74,500 $67,015 4. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: see attached multiple parcel form. Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value
Page 3
MTT Docket No. 24-003673 Consent Judgment, Page 2 of 2 5. If stipulation addresses tax years other than the tax year originally appealed or tax years added through motions to amend that have been granted by the Tribunal, list the separate facts upon which the parties rely to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over those tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): The stipulated taxable value for the 2024 tax year has been reduced, and an inflation rate multiplier of 1.031 has been applied for the 2025 tax year. 6. List separately any special terms or conditions being proposed by the parties that would affect the execution of this Consent Judgment including, but not limited to, the joint payment of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc. (attach additional page if necessary): Signature of tal Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Jon va Property Tax Consultants Date: [ / / b / 2 5 Sigs SETI [ies representative: Assessor, City of yi Date: Jan 14,200 [Consent Judgment will be prepared by the Tribunal.]
Page 4
§ GONSBULTY 269.366.0300 Received Clerk of the Court JAN 20 2026 Michigan Tax Tribunal LARA P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 Ijin] nilegihy
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED AM | JAN 18 2026 PROPERTY TA X MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL CONSULTANTS YOUR PROPERTY TAX EXPERTS SINCE 1989 January 6, 2026 Clerk of the Court Traninfoade0h 26086617-1 01/12/26 Michigan Tax Tribunal UE. 50.00 P.O. Box 30232 SULTATION Lansing, MI 48909 RE: Property Tax Consultants for Abela D Mary Parcel # 08-14-19-454-015, v. City of Roseville Docket # 24-003673 Dear Clerk, Regarding the above matter, enclosed please find the STIPULATION TO CONSENT JUDGEMENT fully authorized by the petitioner and the respondent. We hope that this meets with the approval of the Michigan Tax Tribunal. Very truly yours, Jon Aylsworth Agent for Abela D Mary JA/ac Cc: Assessor, City of Roseville
Page 2
DEPAR MICHIGAN ADMINI MICHIGAN TAX TRIB STATE OF MICHIGAN STRATIVE HE Property Tax Consultants for; Abela D Mary, Petitioner, Vv City of Roseville, Respondent. 1. The case is pending in the STIPULATIO Division. 2. Property Parcel No: (If more than one par Stipulation Form add 3. The values for the property ide Board of Review are: see aftac MTT Docket No. 24-003673 08-14-19-454-015. cel is at issue, attach ressing all other parcels at issue.) TMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS ARING SYSTEMS UNAL N FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND CONSENT JUDGMENT Entire Tribunal OR _x__ Small Claims a completed Multiple Parcel Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value POE ntified above as established by Respondent’s hed multiple parcel form. 2024 $130,000 $65,000 $65,000 4. The values for the property ide tified above as stipulated by the parties for ched multiple parcel form. —
Page 3
MTT Docket No. 24-003673 Consent Judgment, Page 2 of 2 5. Ifstipulation addresses tax years other than the tax year originally appealed or tax years added through motions to amend that have been granted by the Tribunal, list the separate facts upon which the parties rely to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over those tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 6. List separately any special terms or conditions being proposed by the parties that would affect the execution of this Consent Judgment including, but not limited to, the joint payment of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc. (attach additional page if necessary): Signature of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 7 Jon Ameer Tax Consultants Date: ] / 6 / 4 6 sige oF IRAE Assessor, City of Roseville Date: Jan 0b, 2030 [Consent Judgment will be prepared by the Tribunal.]
Page 4
East Clerk of the Court Michigan Tax Tribunal P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 wal fe <, GRAND RAPIDS MI 493 © JAN 2026 UNITE OF A E FoRE SESE TF HEHE [LE ET ER 1 ER FTE EA VF FLT B TH RE LETT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 Abela D Mary, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003673 City of Roseville, Presiding Judge Respondent. Jason C. Grinnell ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT On January 6, 2026, Petitioner filed a Joint Stipulations for Entry of Contest Judgment (the “stipulation”). The Tribunal has reviewed the stipulation and finds denial is appropriate. The stipulation filed by Petitioner only addresses the 2024 tax year. In that regard, subsequent tax year assessments are automatically included in a valuation appeal once the assessment has been established for that tax year unless the Tribunal grants the exclusion of the subsequent tax year.1 For purposes of administrative efficiency, the Tribunal considers this date April 1st. Given the above, the Tribunal finds good cause to give the respective parties 14 days to submit a revised stipulation.2 If for whatever reason the parties do not submit a revised stipulation within 14 days, the Tribunal will reschedule the case for a telephonic hearing. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because the Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any future settlement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties must submit a revised Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment within 14 days of entry of this Order. If the parties file a new stipulation within 14 days, no additional filing fee is required. Failure to file a new stipulation within 14 days will result in the rescheduling of a telephonic hearing. 1 See MCL 205.737. 2 See MCL 205.732.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003673 Page 2 of 2 By _______________________________ Entered: January 14, 2026 jcg PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED AM | JAN 18 2026 PROPERTY TA X MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL CONSULTANTS YOUR PROPERTY TAX EXPERTS SINCE 1989 January 6, 2026 Clerk of the Court Traninfoade0h 26086617-1 01/12/26 Michigan Tax Tribunal UE. 50.00 P.O. Box 30232 SULTATION Lansing, MI 48909 RE: Property Tax Consultants for Abela D Mary Parcel # 08-14-19-454-015, v. City of Roseville Docket # 24-003673 Dear Clerk, Regarding the above matter, enclosed please find the STIPULATION TO CONSENT JUDGEMENT fully authorized by the petitioner and the respondent. We hope that this meets with the approval of the Michigan Tax Tribunal. Very truly yours, Jon Aylsworth Agent for Abela D Mary JA/ac Cc: Assessor, City of Roseville
Page 2
DEPAR MICHIGAN ADMINI MICHIGAN TAX TRIB STATE OF MICHIGAN STRATIVE HE Property Tax Consultants for; Abela D Mary, Petitioner, Vv City of Roseville, Respondent. 1. The case is pending in the STIPULATIO Division. 2. Property Parcel No: (If more than one par Stipulation Form add 3. The values for the property ide Board of Review are: see aftac MTT Docket No. 24-003673 08-14-19-454-015. cel is at issue, attach ressing all other parcels at issue.) TMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS ARING SYSTEMS UNAL N FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND CONSENT JUDGMENT Entire Tribunal OR _x__ Small Claims a completed Multiple Parcel Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value POE ntified above as established by Respondent’s hed multiple parcel form. 2024 $130,000 $65,000 $65,000 4. The values for the property ide tified above as stipulated by the parties for ched multiple parcel form. —
Page 3
MTT Docket No. 24-003673 Consent Judgment, Page 2 of 2 5. Ifstipulation addresses tax years other than the tax year originally appealed or tax years added through motions to amend that have been granted by the Tribunal, list the separate facts upon which the parties rely to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over those tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 6. List separately any special terms or conditions being proposed by the parties that would affect the execution of this Consent Judgment including, but not limited to, the joint payment of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc. (attach additional page if necessary): Signature of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 7 Jon Ameer Tax Consultants Date: ] / 6 / 4 6 sige oF IRAE Assessor, City of Roseville Date: Jan 0b, 2030 [Consent Judgment will be prepared by the Tribunal.]
Page 4
East Clerk of the Court Michigan Tax Tribunal P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 wal fe <, GRAND RAPIDS MI 493 © JAN 2026 UNITE OF A E FoRE SESE TF HEHE [LE ET ER 1 ER FTE EA VF FLT B TH RE LETT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Abela D Mary, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No.: 24-003673 City Of Roseville, Respondent. NOTICE OF TELEPHONE HEARING The Tribunal has scheduled a telephone hearing to be conducted as follows. Hearings are generally 30 minutes in length. HEARING DATE: January 13, 2026 HEARING TIME: 2:30 PM EST JOIN BY PHONE: 1-248-509-0316 ACCESS CODE: 78158180 This hearing will be held by telephone conference call with the Judge as the host. In order to join the hearing, call the phone number listed above at least 5 minutes prior to the hearing time. You will then be required to input the access code, followed by # to connect. The Tribunal judge will call in and join by phone at the hearing time. Failure to timely call in may result in the placement of a party or parties in default. This is an important legal document. Please have someone translate the document. Este es un documento legal importante. Por favor, haga traducir este documento. এটি একটি গুরুত্বপূর্ণ আইনি দলিল, অনুগ্রহ করে কেউ দলিলটিকে অনুবাদ করুন। .ةقيثولا مجرتت صخش كيدل ىجري ةماه ةينوناق ةقيثو وه اذه Ito ay isang mahalagang legal na dokumento. Mangyari lamang na magkaroon ng isang tao isalin ang dokumento.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003673 Page 2 of 12 HEARING INFORMATION – PLEASE READ IMMEDIATELY GENERAL INFORMATION: An impartial hearing will be conducted in accordance with the Michigan Tax Tribunal Rules (R 792.10201-R 792.10297) and the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act, MCL 24.201 et seq. The Michigan Rules of Evidence and the Michigan Court Rules may be applicable. Parties are expected to exercise proper respect and courtesy toward other parties, witnesses, and administrative law judges, which includes attending the hearing on time, silencing cell phones, and choosing a quiet, private location to participate in the hearing to limit distractions and ensure minimal background noise. The hearing may be recorded for notetaking purposes, but the recording is not a formal record, unless otherwise provided for by the Tribunal. REPRESENTATION: You may have an attorney or anyone else of your choice represent you at the hearing. The Tribunal does not recommend or appoint representatives for you and will not pay for your representative. WITNESSES: You may have anyone join you at the hearing to speak in support of your case. However, the time to present your case is limited and additional time may not be provided to accommodate witness testimony. DOCUMENTATION: Parties are required to submit all documents in support of their contentions to both the Tribunal and the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents were previously submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to both the Tribunal and the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be submitted to the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s electronic filing (e- filing) system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to submission by e-mail. If sent by mail, the documents must be sent to the opposing party or their authorized representative at the address identified in the petition or answer for that party or authorized representative, unless the party or authorized representative filed an appearance or other documentation identifying a different mailing address. The documents do not need to be resubmitted after the Notice of Hearing if they were previously submitted to the Tribunal and the opposing party in this case. If a hearing had previously been scheduled in this case and adjourned, and the adjournment order indicates that the parties are precluded from submitting any further documentary evidence, no further documentary evidence will be accepted even if filed and exchanged as indicated above. INCLUSION OF SUBSEQUENT TAX YEARS: Subsequent tax year assessments are
Page 3
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Abela D Mary, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003673 City Of Roseville, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important information. EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail. Alternate Dispute Resolution Options INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003673 Page 2 of 8 If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or email taxtrib@michigan.gov. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: December 9, 2024 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Abela D Mary, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003673 City Of Roseville, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing
Page 4
M
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Abela D Mary, Petitioner, \ MTT Docket No. 24-003673 Parcel No. 08-14-19-454-015 City of Roseville, Respondent / PROOF OF SERVICE I, Brook Openshaw an employee for the City of Roseville, hereby certify that on October 11, 2024 | served a copy of the Property Tax Appeal Answer Form to the following party by first class mail addressed as follows: Petitioner's Representative: Jack Aylsworth Property Tax Consultants 861 Pine Crest Ave SE Grand Rapids, MI 49506 | declare that this proof of service has been examined by me and that the contents thereof are true to the best of my information, knowledge and belief. Prod. cua Brook Openshaw
Page 2
2024 BOARD OF REVIEW DECISION FROM CITY OF ROSEVILLE ASSESSORS OFFICE 29777 GRATIOT ROSEVILLE MI 48066 NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OR PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION: (Parcel Code required. Property address and legal description optional): 08-14-19-454-015 25192 PACKARD ABELA, MARY DELORES 385 WEST PREDMORE RD OAKLAND MI 48363 THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED 401 (RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) Thank you for attending this years March Board of Review. The Board has reviewed the information you supplied and the data necessary to compute your assessment and taxable value. The Board has completed their review of parcel number: (8-14-19-454-015 They have made the following determination based on the information you supplied. Board of Review Comments: 2024 MARCH BOARD OF REVIEW ADJUSTED THE ASSESSMENT BASED ON SALES OF COMPARABLE PROPERTIES. [2024 ORIGINAL ASSESSED VALUE 72,900 1 [ 2024 "BOARD OF REVIEW" ASSESSED VALUE 65,000 | (If the above amounts are the same, no revisions have occured) [ 2024 ORIGINAL TAXABLE VALUE 67,410 2024 "BOARD OF REVIEW" TAXABLE VALUE 65,000 2024 PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION % 0.0000 | If you disagree with the Board of Review's decision, further appeal may be made to the Michigan Tax Tribunal. Residential properties must be appealed by July 31,2024. Commercial, Industrial or Business/Utility Personal Property must be appealed by May 31, 2024. To appeal this decision you will need to timely file a petition with the Michigan Tax Tribunal. The petition must be a Michigan Tax Tribunal form or a form approved by the Michigan Tax Tribunal. Michigan Tax Tribunal forms are available at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. You can print the petition that applies to your appeal and mail the completed form to the Michigan Tax Tribunal at P.O. Box 30232, Lansing, Michigan 48909 or complete the form online and submit it electronically. In order to appeal your property classification you must send an appeal to the State Tax Commission at the address below: State Tax Commission Classification Appeals P.O.Box 30471 Lansing MI 48909
Page 3
1000€S
02°96
00Z ‘v9
006‘zL
[000 “59
sxxP993ueIENd
JOU INQ STQRTTSI PIWSSP UTSISY UOTIPWIOIUI
sxx
1202
|
QELOFASNI ZT0Z/6T/P0 WOH|
zzoz|
—ceYel
Id qAIVAdn 6T0Z/LT/S0
WOH
30
Ajunop
|"600z - 6661
(2)
GEE UeBTYI TH
"quooey
‘9TTTA9S0Y
JO A3TD
:0L PasuadTT
ubtaAdo)y
-zazTTenbd
ayg
_
looz's
| ezog|s 4AIATHEA £202/82/80 WCY
1eyM
oum
uayM
anTep
atqexer
|z9y30
|maTasy
|/Teungrag |30 preos
|enteA
|P3sSaSSY
¥Ivddy ¥3IMIS
:T1002/ST/20 PanssI
NIg ¥00T-0
ONILVEH
:€102/2Z/Z0
PensSSI
¥od
SYIVAT NOILOHASNI
:€T0Z/TZ/G0
PINSSI
LSIT AON¥dNDD0
40 FLVIIAILYID
¥dAd
SYIVdEY NOILOIISNI
{AL XAANOYT
{XYOLVAYT
:€T0Z/8Z/90
PeNSSI
¥IALYIH ¥IIVM
T
:$T0Z/€Z/¥0
pPanssI
I0IA¥ES
dWY
00T
:6T0Z/6Z/¥0
P3nSSI
~looeres
0096
|
vzoz
uted pootd|
antes
butpring
|
pueTIoM|
Juoz31032M|
puod
papoos|
durems
|
padeospueT
ybTH|
mor
|
buttro¥|
TOAST
9371S
|
yo Aydexbodog,
SEO.
ed
*STT30 punoxbispup|
[
S9TITTTIN prepuels|
|
SIULTT 39313]
|enteA
|puet
|
‘990070dd 3TWISd
103 UOTIATIOSSA FIOM
SSHT
¥0
«8
AINWIHD dIAAY
:€T0Z-TO-%0
qanp|
‘pZTOETW
3ITWIag
703 uoT3dTIDSag FIOM
seo|
0 40
otx3097a|
‘60P0€TEd ITWIS
I0F uoTIATIOSBQ HIOM
LISOTO YHALVM
‘9620€Tdd 3TwIad
103 uot3drIdsag YIoM
‘TLTOPTdd
3Twrad
I0J uoT3dTIOSSQ
{IOM
|
‘§220613d 3TWIsg
103
uoT3dTIOS3Q IOM
|
T93eM|
{TeMapTS|
I9M3S WIOIS
$90USNTIUT /SIUSUWOD
peoy paaed|
Xf
€F
I0T
2/1
S
dNSMUVd
QIvMOVd
_Page 4
xxx
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL MOAHR DOCKET NO. 24-003673 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City Of Roseville (MACOMB) First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State Michigan ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Brook M.I. Last Name Openshaw Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 29777 Gratiot PO Box 290 City or Town Roseville State Michigan ZIP Code 48066 Telephone Number 586-445-5430 Fax Number 586-445-5402 E-mail Address bopenshaw@roseville-mi.gov Section 3: Subject Property Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? No Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. N/A Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR The 2024 assessment represents 50% true cash value as of 12/31/2023. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: March If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? March*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, cite the Board’s authority. Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No If yes, explain. Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? If so, what is the issue date? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR? If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Tax Year(s) denied: List the date the exemption was denied: What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY What do you believe the classification should be: Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 08-14-19-454-015 Classification of Property: Real Residential Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 65,000 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 65,000 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? $130,000 Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 65,000 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Brook Openshaw
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED JUL 2 42024 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS ~~ MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name Abela D Mary Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 385 West Predmore Rd City or Town State | ZIP Code TranInfo:406 257591151 Oakland Ml 48363 Chil: 2445 Ant: $125.00 Telephone Number Fax Number 1D: PROPERTY TAX CONSULTANTR E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information ] First Name M.1. Last Name Jack Aylsworth met Property Tax Consultants Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 861 Pine Crest Ave SE City or Town State ZIP Code Grand Rapids MI 49506 Telephone Number Fax Number 269-366-0300 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) jack@skylinepropertytax.com Section 3: Subject Property Information How many If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? parcelsareyou | [7] vest [] No** appealing? *If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels. **If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulted. 1 718/24
Page 2
gree STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (checkall that apply) True Cash and Taxable Value [O Poverty Exemption [J Taxable Value Only (calculation) [J Disabled Veterans Exemption [J Uncapping of Taxable Value [O Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) [J Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a [O Classification Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal The market approach to value supports a reduction of value. Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Year(s) you are appealing: Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes O No If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: [#4 March [J July [] December If No, check the applicable reason(s): O Not required to attend Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner [] Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 7: Valuation Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 08-14-19-454-015 Classification of Property: Real Personal (check one) O Agricultural Commercial Industrial Residential Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 65,000 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 65,000 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 95,000 Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 47,500 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 47,500 Section 8: Classification Information only the mi Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal* Parcel Identification Number: Current Classification of
Page 4
S
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED JUL 2 42024 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS ~~ MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name Abela D Mary Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 385 West Predmore Rd City or Town State | ZIP Code TranInfo:406 257591151 Oakland Ml 48363 Chil: 2445 Ant: $125.00 Telephone Number Fax Number 1D: PROPERTY TAX CONSULTANTR E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information ] First Name M.1. Last Name Jack Aylsworth met Property Tax Consultants Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 861 Pine Crest Ave SE City or Town State ZIP Code Grand Rapids MI 49506 Telephone Number Fax Number 269-366-0300 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) jack@skylinepropertytax.com Section 3: Subject Property Information How many If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? parcelsareyou | [7] vest [] No** appealing? *If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels. **If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulted. 1 718/24
Page 2
gree STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (checkall that apply) True Cash and Taxable Value [O Poverty Exemption [J Taxable Value Only (calculation) [J Disabled Veterans Exemption [J Uncapping of Taxable Value [O Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) [J Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a [O Classification Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal The market approach to value supports a reduction of value. Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Year(s) you are appealing: Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes O No If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: [#4 March [J July [] December If No, check the applicable reason(s): O Not required to attend Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner [] Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 7: Valuation Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 08-14-19-454-015 Classification of Property: Real Personal (check one) O Agricultural Commercial Industrial Residential Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 65,000 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 65,000 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 95,000 Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 47,500 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 47,500 Section 8: Classification Information only the mi Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal* Parcel Identification Number: Current Classification of
Page 4
S
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Abela D Mary, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003673 City Of Roseville, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: October 8, 2024 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Abela D Mary, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003673 City Of Roseville, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: October 8, 2024 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED JUL 242024 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information First Name MI. Last Name/Company Name Abela D Mary Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 385 West Predmore Rd City or Town State | ZIP Code TranInfo:di0h 25759031 Oakland Ml 48363 Chic: 2445 Ant: $126.00 Telephone Number Fax Number 1D: FROFERTY TAX CONSULTANT E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information | First Name MI Last Name Jack Aylsworth met property Tax Consultants Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 861 Pine Crest Ave SE City or Town State ZIP Code Grand Rapids MI [49506 Telephone Number Fax Number 269-366-0300 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) jack@skylinepropertytax.com Section 3: Subject Property Information How many If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? parcels areyou | [7] vest [] No** appealing? *If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels. **If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulted. 718/24
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Issues Being Appealed check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Value [J Poverty Exemption [0 Taxable Value Only (calculation) [] Disabled Veterans Exemption [TJ Uncapping of Taxable Value [J Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) [7] Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a [J Classification Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal The market approach to value supports a reduction of value. Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Year(s) you are appealing: Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes [Hl] No If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: [#4 March [J ouly [J December if No, check the applicable reason(s): [| Not required to attend I] Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner [| Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation In Section 8) |] Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order 0 Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping
Page 3
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 7: Valuation Information use the muitipte parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel identification Number: ClassHication of Property: Real Personal (check one) Agricultural Commercial industrial Residential Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: | 65,000 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 65,000 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 95,000 Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value, 47,500 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 47,500 STATE OF MICHIGAN Section 8: Classification Information only the mi Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunat* Parcel Identification Number: Current Classification of Property as
Page 4
STATE OF
Page 5
:
Page 6
PR
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.