Record Finder / 26-001473-TT
Michigan

940 Rochester LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Rochester Hills Respondent

Petitioner
940 Rochester LLC
Respondent
City Of Rochester Hills

Case overview

Docket number
26-001473-TT
Status
Ready Schedule
CaseType
ET Property
Division
ET
County
Oakland
Judge
No judge assigned

Docket history

Line #SubjectFilerLine RefEnter Date/Post MarkFeeRelated Item
5Answer was receivedRESPNot recorded09/24/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
4Proof of service of petition was received.Not recordedNot recorded08/20/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
3Petition has been verifiedPET108/13/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
2Notice of Docket Number ETNot recordedNot recorded08/13/2026Not recordedDownload
1A petition was received.PETNot recorded05/26/2026$400.00Download
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload

Documents

Answer to Petition (940 ROCHESTER LLC) (09.24.2026).pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS SYSTEM AND RULES 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

940 ROCHESTER LLC, 

 

 

 

Petitioner, 

 

v 

 

CITY OF ROCHESTER HILLS, 

 

Respondent.

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 26-001473 

Parcel No. 70-15-15-476-011 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

Colliers International 

Joshua T. Shillar (P72674) 

Representative for Petitioner 

400 W. 4th Street, Suite 350 

Royal Oak, MI 48067 

(248) 226-1632 

Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com 

Karen.Cameron@Colliers.com 

 

P. DANIEL CHRIST (P45080) 

HAFELI STARAN & CHRIST, P.C. 

Attorney for Respondent 

2055 Orchard Lake Road 

Sylvan Lake, MI 48320-1746 

(248) 731-3085 

(248) 227-5421 (cell) 

dchrist@hsc-law.com 

 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

ANSWER TO PETITION 

 

Respondent City of Rochester Hills, through its City Attorney, P. Daniel Christ, responds 

to the allegations made in the Petition, as follows: 

1. 

Respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth 

of the allegation. 

2. Admitted. 

3. Admitted. 

4. Admitted. 

5. Admitted. 

6. Admitted.

Page 2

2

7. No response is required because no allegations are set forth. 

8. Admitted. 

9. Admitted, except as to the Assessed Value which was $278,230.00 for tax year 2026. 

10. 

Respondent denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 11, as Respondent’s 

assessed, state equalized and taxable values and the corresponding taxes are valid. 

(a) 

Respondent denies the allegations contained in subparagraph (a), as 

Respondent submits the assessed, state equalized and taxable values do not exceed permitted 

amounts. 

(b) 

Respondent denies the allegations contained in subparagraph (b), as 

Respondent’s assessed, state equalized and taxable values do not exceed the percentage of true 

cash value permitted by law. 

(c) 

Respondent denies the allegations contained in subparagraph (c), as 

Respondent’s assessed, state equalized and taxable values were correctly determined and are based 

upon proper application of proper principles. 

(d) 

Respondent denies the allegations contained in subparagraph (d), as 

Respondent’s assessed, taxable and state equalized values are non-discriminatory and conform to 

uniformity, equal protection and due process requirements. 

11. 

Respondent acknowledges Petitioner’s contentions of values, but denies that 

Petitioner’s contentions of values is correct. 

12. 

Respondent acknowledges the values in dispute, but Respondent denies that 

Petitioner’s contentions of values is correct. 

13. Respondent denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 13, as Respondent’s assessed 

and taxable values and the corresponding taxes are valid.

Page 3

3

WHEREFORE, Respondent City of Rochester Hills requests the Tribunal to dismiss the 

Petition, affirm Respondent’s assessed and taxable values, subject to county and state equalization, 

and award Respondent its costs and attorney fees. 

/s/P. Daniel Christ 

P. DANIEL CHRIST (P45080) 

HAFELI STARAN & CHRIST, P.C. 

Attorneys for Respondent 

2055 Orchard Lake Road 

Sylvan Lake, MI 48320 

(248) 731-3085 

 

Dated: September 24, 2026 

 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

On the date below, I sent by first class mail and email a copy of the foregoing Answer to Petition 

to: 

 

Joshua T. Shillar (P72674) 

Representative for Petitioner 

400 W. 4th Street, Suite 350 

Royal Oak, MI 48067 

Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com 

Karen.Cameron@Colliers.com 

 

 

I declare that the statement above is true to the best of my information, knowledge, and belief. 

 

 

/s/P. Daniel Christ 

P. Daniel Christ 

 

Dated: September 24, 2026

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISAnswer.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001473

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: 

Local Unit of Government

Local Unit of Government

City Of Rochester Hills (OAKLAND)

First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

P.

M.I.

Daniel

Last Name

Christ

Firm Name (if any)

Hafeli Staran & Christ

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

2055 Orchard Lake Road

City or Town

Sylvan Lake

State

 Michigan

ZIP Code

48320

Telephone Number

2482275421

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

dchrist@hsc-law.com

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: 

P. Daniel Christ

/s/

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

POS_940_ROCHESTER_LLC_26-001473.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service 

940 ROCHESTER LLC v Rochester Hills 

Parcel Number: 70-15-15-476-011 

MTT Docket No.: 26-001473 

Page 1 of 2 

 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

940 ROCHESTER LLC, 

 

Petitioner, 

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-001473 

ROCHESTER HILLS, 

 

Respondent. 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

Colliers International 

By: Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) 

Senior Vice President | Tax Appeal 

Representative for Petitioner 

400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 

Royal Oak, MI 48067 

O: 248-226-1632 

F: 248-226-1633 

Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com 

Karen.Cameron@Colliers.com 

City of Rochester Hills 

Assessing Office 

1000 Rochester Hills Dr. 

Rochester Hills, MI 48309 

(248) 656-4600 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

) 

 

)ss 

COUNTY OF OAKLAND 

) 

 

Jennifer Lunsford, states that on 8/20/2026, in compliance with TTR 221, she did place in the US 

mail a copy of Petitioner’s 2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition with docket number as well 

as this Proof of Service of Petition for the above captioned appeal to the units of government listed 

on the second page of this Proof of Service of Petition. 

 

/s/Jennifer Lunsford 

Jennifer Lunsford 

 

Karen Cameron states that she submitted electronically on 8/20/2026, to the Michigan Tax 

Tribunal 

a 

copy 

of 

this 

Proof 

of 

Service 

of 

Petition 

at 

eFile 

through 

www.etaxappeal.lara.state.mi.us. 

 

/s/Karen Cameron 

Karen Cameron

Page 2

2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service 

940 ROCHESTER LLC v Rochester Hills 

Parcel Number: 70-15-15-476-011 

MTT Docket No.: 26-001473 

Page 2 of 2 

 

By Certified Mail 

 

Assessor’s Office 

City of Rochester Hills 

Assessing Office 

1000 Rochester Hills Dr. 

Rochester Hills, MI 48309 

 

Office of the City/Township Clerk 

Rochester Hills 

Clerk's Office 

1000 Rochester Hills Drive 

Rochester Hills, MI 48309 

 

By First Class Mail 

 

Director of Equalization 

Oakland County 

Equalization Director 

250 Elizabeth Lake Road, Suite 1000W 

Pontiac, MI 48341 

 

County Clerk’s Office 

Oakland County 

Clerk’s Office 

1200 N Telegraph Road 

Pontiac, MI 48341 

 

Secretary of the School Board 

Rochester Community Schools 

501 W University Drive 

Rochester, MI 48307 

 

Treasurer for the State of Michigan 

Michigan Department of Treasury 

Lansing, MI 48922

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

Docket Number: 26-001473

Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No

Party Filing Document 

Petitioner

Files

Document Type: Proof of Service: Petition

Attachment File Name: POS_940_ROCHESTER_LLC_26-001473

Fee Information

Filing Fee: $ 0.00

Payment Information

Payment: $ 0.00

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

940ROCHESTERLLC.PET & POS.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service 

940 ROCHESTER LLC v City of Rochester Hills 

Parcel Number: 70-15-15-476-011 

MTT Docket No.: 

 

Page 1 of 5 

 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

940 ROCHESTER LLC, 

 

Petitioner, 

 

v 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 

 

City of Rochester Hills, 

 

Respondent. 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

Colliers International 

By: Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) 

Vice President | Tax Appeal 

Representative for Petitioner 

400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 

Royal Oak, MI 48067 

O: 248-226-1632 

F: 248-226-1633 

Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com 

Karen.Cameron@Colliers.com 

 

 

City of Rochester Hills 

Assessing Office 

1000 Rochester Hills Dr. 

Rochester Hills, MI 48309 

(248) 656-4600 

 

 

 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

2026 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

 

1. The Petitioner in this matter, 940 ROCHESTER LLC, has the legal residence or principal 

office address of 130 King St W, Suite 300,Toronto, ON M5X 1E1, Canada. Petitioner is 

a party in interest with respect to property taxes on property parcel no(s). (hereinafter 

referenced as the Subject Property) 70-15-15-476-011. If the Subject Property in this 

petition includes more than one (1) real property tax parcel, the Subject Property’s tax 

parcels are contiguous. 

2. The Subject Property is located in Oakland County.

Page 2

2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service 

940 ROCHESTER LLC v City of Rochester Hills 

Parcel Number: 70-15-15-476-011 

MTT Docket No.: 

 

Page 2 of 5 

 

3. Respondent, City of Rochester Hills of Oakland County, assesses and collects property 

taxes on the Subject Property. 

4. The Subject Property is real property and is classified as Commercial. The Subject 

Property is presently used or available for use for Commercial purposes. Petitioner 

believes that the Subject Property was originally designed to be used for Commercial 

purposes. 

5. Protest to the 2026 Board of Review was not made and is not required by law for the 

Subject Property. 

6. The Subject Property’s address is: 

940 S ROCHESTER RD, ROCHESTER HILLS, MI 48307-2742 

7. This appeal involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, (c) taxable value 

and (d) uniformity. 

8. The tax year(s) at issue are: 2026 

9. The values for the Subject Property as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: 

 

Tax Year 

Parcel Number 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable 

Value 

2026 

70-15-15-476-

011 

$556,640.00 

$278,320.00 

$160,010.00 

 

10. The 2026 assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value imposed 

upon all parcels of the Subject Property, and the taxes to be levied and collected thereon, 

are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: 

a. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value 

exceeds the amounts permitted by the Michigan Constitution, applicable 

statutes and case law;

Page 3

2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service 

940 ROCHESTER LLC v City of Rochester Hills 

Parcel Number: 70-15-15-476-011 

MTT Docket No.: 

 

Page 3 of 5 

 

b. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value are 

at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan 

Constitution, applicable statutes and case law; 

c. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value are 

based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash value of that portion 

of the Subject Property that is taxable under Michigan law, and are based 

upon the application of wrong principles; and 

d. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value, 

and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, discriminate against 

Petitioner and denies Petitioner its constitutional rights to uniformity, equal 

protection and dues process of law. 

11. Petitioner contends that the actual values for the Subject Property are: 

Tax Year 

Parcel Number 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

70-15-15-476-

011 

$212,800.00 

$106,400.00 

$106,400.00 

 

 

12. The amount of value in contention for the Subject Property is: 

 

Tax Year 

Parcel Number 

Assessed Value in Contention 

2026 

70-15-15-476-011 

$171,920.00 

 

13. Petitioner relies on the following specific facts to support the relief requested: Market 

sales and income data indicates that the subject property’s assessed value, state equalized 

value and taxable value exceed 50% of its actual market value. In addition, the cost less 

depreciation method Respondent utilizes to establish the Subject Property’s assessment at 

issue is not related to the Subject Property’s actual market value.

Page 4

2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service 

940 ROCHESTER LLC v City of Rochester Hills 

Parcel Number: 70-15-15-476-011 

MTT Docket No.: 

 

Page 4 of 5 

 

WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that this Honorable Michigan Tax Tribunal enter an 

Order reducing the 2026 assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value for the Subject 

Property to the values stated in Paragraph 11 above and requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner 

the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Respectfully Submitted, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Representative for Petitioner 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:_/s/ Joshua T. Shillair__Dated:05/18/2026 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) 

Vice President | Tax Appeal 

400 E 4th Street, Suite 350 

Royal Oak, MI 48067 

O: 248-226-1632 

F: 248-226-1633 

Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com

Page 5

2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service 

940 ROCHESTER LLC v City of Rochester Hills 

Parcel Number: 70-15-15-476-011 

MTT Docket No.: 

 

Page 5 of 5 

 

 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Organization 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

940 ROCHESTER LLC

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

130 King St W, Suite 300,Toronto, ON M5X 1E1, Canada.

130 King St W, Suite 300,Toronto, ON M5X 1E1, Canada

City or Town

TORONTO

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

12345

Telephone Number

2482261632

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

tax.efile@colliers.com

 

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Joshua

M.I.

Thomas

Last Name

Shillair

Firm Name (if any)

Colliers International

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

400 W 4th Street, Suite 350

City or Town

Royal Oak

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48067

Telephone Number

248-226-1632

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

tax.efile@colliers.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

940 S ROCHESTER RD

ROCHESTER HILLS

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Michigan

48307-2742

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City Of Rochester Hills (OAKLAND) 

County

Oakland

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

If “Other”, please explain:

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

70-15-15-476-011

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

278320

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

160010

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

212800

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

106400

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ /s/Joshua T. Shillair

Payment Information

Amount: 400

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26052686976510

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-08-13_17-34-54.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

940 Rochester LLC, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 26-001473

City Of Rochester Hills, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: August 13, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

940 Rochester LLC, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 26-001473

City Of Rochester Hills, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: August 13, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

940ROCHESTERLLC.PET & POS.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service 

940 ROCHESTER LLC v City of Rochester Hills 

Parcel Number: 70-15-15-476-011 

MTT Docket No.: 

 

Page 1 of 5 

 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

940 ROCHESTER LLC, 

 

Petitioner, 

 

v 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 

 

City of Rochester Hills, 

 

Respondent. 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

Colliers International 

By: Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) 

Vice President | Tax Appeal 

Representative for Petitioner 

400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 

Royal Oak, MI 48067 

O: 248-226-1632 

F: 248-226-1633 

Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com 

Karen.Cameron@Colliers.com 

 

 

City of Rochester Hills 

Assessing Office 

1000 Rochester Hills Dr. 

Rochester Hills, MI 48309 

(248) 656-4600 

 

 

 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

2026 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

 

1. The Petitioner in this matter, 940 ROCHESTER LLC, has the legal residence or principal 

office address of 130 King St W, Suite 300,Toronto, ON M5X 1E1, Canada. Petitioner is 

a party in interest with respect to property taxes on property parcel no(s). (hereinafter 

referenced as the Subject Property) 70-15-15-476-011. If the Subject Property in this 

petition includes more than one (1) real property tax parcel, the Subject Property’s tax 

parcels are contiguous. 

2. The Subject Property is located in Oakland County.

Page 2

2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service 

940 ROCHESTER LLC v City of Rochester Hills 

Parcel Number: 70-15-15-476-011 

MTT Docket No.: 

 

Page 2 of 5 

 

3. Respondent, City of Rochester Hills of Oakland County, assesses and collects property 

taxes on the Subject Property. 

4. The Subject Property is real property and is classified as Commercial. The Subject 

Property is presently used or available for use for Commercial purposes. Petitioner 

believes that the Subject Property was originally designed to be used for Commercial 

purposes. 

5. Protest to the 2026 Board of Review was not made and is not required by law for the 

Subject Property. 

6. The Subject Property’s address is: 

940 S ROCHESTER RD, ROCHESTER HILLS, MI 48307-2742 

7. This appeal involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, (c) taxable value 

and (d) uniformity. 

8. The tax year(s) at issue are: 2026 

9. The values for the Subject Property as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: 

 

Tax Year 

Parcel Number 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable 

Value 

2026 

70-15-15-476-

011 

$556,640.00 

$278,320.00 

$160,010.00 

 

10. The 2026 assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value imposed 

upon all parcels of the Subject Property, and the taxes to be levied and collected thereon, 

are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: 

a. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value 

exceeds the amounts permitted by the Michigan Constitution, applicable 

statutes and case law;

Page 3

2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service 

940 ROCHESTER LLC v City of Rochester Hills 

Parcel Number: 70-15-15-476-011 

MTT Docket No.: 

 

Page 3 of 5 

 

b. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value are 

at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan 

Constitution, applicable statutes and case law; 

c. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value are 

based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash value of that portion 

of the Subject Property that is taxable under Michigan law, and are based 

upon the application of wrong principles; and 

d. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value, 

and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, discriminate against 

Petitioner and denies Petitioner its constitutional rights to uniformity, equal 

protection and dues process of law. 

11. Petitioner contends that the actual values for the Subject Property are: 

Tax Year 

Parcel Number 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

70-15-15-476-

011 

$212,800.00 

$106,400.00 

$106,400.00 

 

 

12. The amount of value in contention for the Subject Property is: 

 

Tax Year 

Parcel Number 

Assessed Value in Contention 

2026 

70-15-15-476-011 

$171,920.00 

 

13. Petitioner relies on the following specific facts to support the relief requested: Market 

sales and income data indicates that the subject property’s assessed value, state equalized 

value and taxable value exceed 50% of its actual market value. In addition, the cost less 

depreciation method Respondent utilizes to establish the Subject Property’s assessment at 

issue is not related to the Subject Property’s actual market value.

Page 4

2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service 

940 ROCHESTER LLC v City of Rochester Hills 

Parcel Number: 70-15-15-476-011 

MTT Docket No.: 

 

Page 4 of 5 

 

WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that this Honorable Michigan Tax Tribunal enter an 

Order reducing the 2026 assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value for the Subject 

Property to the values stated in Paragraph 11 above and requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner 

the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Respectfully Submitted, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Representative for Petitioner 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:_/s/ Joshua T. Shillair__Dated:05/18/2026 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) 

Vice President | Tax Appeal 

400 E 4th Street, Suite 350 

Royal Oak, MI 48067 

O: 248-226-1632 

F: 248-226-1633 

Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com

Page 5

2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service 

940 ROCHESTER LLC v City of Rochester Hills 

Parcel Number: 70-15-15-476-011 

MTT Docket No.: 

 

Page 5 of 5 

 

 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Organization 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

940 ROCHESTER LLC

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

130 King St W, Suite 300,Toronto, ON M5X 1E1, Canada.

130 King St W, Suite 300,Toronto, ON M5X 1E1, Canada

City or Town

TORONTO

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

12345

Telephone Number

2482261632

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

tax.efile@colliers.com

 

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Joshua

M.I.

Thomas

Last Name

Shillair

Firm Name (if any)

Colliers International

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

400 W 4th Street, Suite 350

City or Town

Royal Oak

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48067

Telephone Number

248-226-1632

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

tax.efile@colliers.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

940 S ROCHESTER RD

ROCHESTER HILLS

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Michigan

48307-2742

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City Of Rochester Hills (OAKLAND) 

County

Oakland

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

If “Other”, please explain:

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

70-15-15-476-011

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

278320

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

160010

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

212800

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

106400

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ /s/Joshua T. Shillair

Payment Information

Amount: 400

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26052686976510

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.