325 S Old Woodward LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Birmingham Respondent

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

325 S Old Woodward LLC, 

 

 

 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

 

City of Birmingham, 

 

 

 

Respondent. 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 26-001349 

 

Parcel No. 08-19-36-208-015 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

ANSWER TO PETITION 

 

Respondent City of Birmingham, through its attorneys, Beier Howlett, P.C., responds to 

the allegations made in the Petition as follows: 

1. Admitted. 

2. Admitted. 

3. Admitted. 

4. Admitted. 

5. Neither admit nor deny as Respondent is without sufficient information and therefore, 

Respondent leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 

6. Neither admit nor deny as Respondent is without sufficient information and therefore, 

Respondent leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 

7. Respondent denies all of the allegations in this paragraph including, without limitation; 

those contained in subparts (a) through (d). 

WHEREFORE, Respondent City of Birmingham requests that the Tribunal dismiss the 

Petition, affirm Respondent’s assessed and taxable values, subject to county and state equalization, 

and award Respondent its costs and attorney fees.

Page 2

Respectfully submitted, 

BEIER HOWLETT, P.C. 

/s/ Michael C. Gibbons 

 

Michael C. Gibbons (P51304) 

Attorneys for Respondent 

3001 W. Big Beaver Rd., Ste. 600 

Troy, MI 48084 

Date: October 12, 2026 

 

 

248-282-1069/ mgibbons@bhlaw.us.com

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

325 S Old Woodward LLC, 

 

 

 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

 

City of Birmingham, 

 

 

 

Respondent. 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 26-001349 

 

Parcel No. 08-19-36-208-015 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

On the date below I sent by first class mail a copy of this Answer to: 

Aaron M. Fales 

330 Hamilton Row, Suite 350 

Birmingham, MI 48009 

 

I declare that the statements above are true and to the best of my information, knowledge and 

belief. 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Erin Miller 

 

 

 

Erin Miller 

Dated: October 12, 2026

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001349

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: 

Local Unit of Government

Local Unit of Government

City Of Birmingham (OAKLAND)

First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Michael

M.I.

C.

Last Name

Gibbons

Firm Name (if any)

Beier Howlett P.C.

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

3001 W. Big Beaver Rd.

Suite 600

City or Town

Troy

State

 Michigan

ZIP Code

48084

Telephone Number

2482821069

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

mgibbons@bhlaw.us.com

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: 

Michael C. Gibbons

/s/

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

325 S OLD WOODWARD LLC, 

Petitioner, 

Vv. 

MTT Docket # 26-001349 

CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, 

Respondent. 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

) 

) ss. 

COUNTY OF OAKLAND) 

Aaron M. Fales, being duly sworn, deposes and says that on September IS 

2026 he served a 

copy of Petitioner's Petition on the parties named on the attached list. 

Aaron M. Fales

Page 2

BY CERTIFIED UM TID STA TES MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUES] ey 

av 

CLERK 

ps 

HH MART 

57 

3C 

30 

280 

SiRM 

3H 

2851 ps 

ASSESS PR 

EB ida iN Gran 

ART 

aio 

0 3CX 3601 

Ma GH. 

A 

PON 

AN D8Y 

-CLASS UNITED STATES MAIL 

£34 

~ 

SA KANT 

CO 

eo 

en 

pat) 

rs 

4% 

RCAZ 

PON 

i AT. Wi a632: 

Po 

I»; CHR ECTOR 

HON 

DAKLARND 

SE. 

1200 NLUTELSGRA 

3042 

PONT ALS 

a 

£23 

SE 

sor 

OFICROS Sma 

CRE TARY Gf 

SC BC. 

SIRMINGH 

40 

RG 

SCHOOL 

gv ERGRES 

2040 

ag 

Lv 

30 23 

URER 

tes 

SAND 5 4 

ne 

LONG 

L ALLTS CA Al NS 

SING. wi £83 iz

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

325 8 Old Woodward LLC, 

Petitioner, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

v 

MTT Docket No.: 26-001349 

City Of Birmingham, 

Respondent. 

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER 

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. 

A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. 

Under TTR 235(1), “tlhe respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” 

Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default. 

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. 

Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunals rules. 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

Entered: August 10, 2026 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

| certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

3255 OLD WOODWARD LLC, 

Petitioner, 

MTT Docket #24. 001349 

vs. 

Parcel No. 08-19-36-208-015 

CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, 

Respondent. 

/ 

PETITION 

325 § Old Woodward LLC {“Pefitioner”), through its attorneys, Law Office 

of Aaron M. Fales, P.C., says: 

I. 

Petitioner's principal office address 

is 330 Hamilton Row, Ste. 300, 

Birmingham, MI 48009. 

Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property 

taxes on real property tax parcel no. 08-19-36-208-015 ("Petitioner's Property"), at 

325 S Old Woodward, Birmingham, Mi, 48009. 

2. 

Respondent, 

City 

of Birmingham 

assesses and 

collects 

property 

faxes on Petitioner's Property. 

3. 

In 2026, Respondent determined the taxable value of Petitioner's 

Property 

to 

be 

$1,328,330 and 

assessed 

Petitioner's 

Property 

at 

$1,988,640 

resulting in a state equalized value of the same amount based on the fenative

Page 5

4. 

Petitioner's 

Property 

is 

classified 

as 

Commercial 

Real 

Property. 

Petitioner's Property is commercial property. 

Petitioner believes that Petitioner's 

Property was designed to be used as a commercial purposes. 

5. 

This matter involves issues relating to: {a) valuation, (b) assessment, 

(c) taxable value, and {d) uniformity. 

6. 

At this time, Petitioner believes, as 

it relates to taxable value, that 

there is a dispute relative to the value of a loss. 

7. 

The 2026 assessment, including state equalized value and taxable 

value, 

imposed 

on 

Petitioner's 

Property, 

and 

the 

taxes 

to 

be 

levied 

and 

collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the 

taxpayer for the reasons that: 

(a) 

The 

assessment, 

including 

state 

equalized 

value 

and/or 

taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and 

applicable statutes; 

(b) 

The 

assessment, 

including 

state 

equalized 

value 

and/or 

taxable value, are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible 

under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

(c} 

The 

assessment, 

including 

taxable 

value 

and/or 

state 

equalized value, are based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash

Page 6

(d} 

The 

assessment, 

including 

state 

equdlized 

value 

and/or 

faxable 

value, 

and 

the 

mode 

of 

assessment 

adopted 

by 

Respondent, 

discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner 

its constitutional 

rights 

to 

uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. 

WHEREFORE, 

Petitioner requests 

that 

the 

Tax Tribunal 

enter an Order 

reducing 

the 

2026 taxable value 

of 

Petitioner's Property from $1,328,330 

to 

$700,000, 

and 

reducing 

the 

2026 

assessed 

and 

state 

equalized 

values 

of 

Petitioner's Property from $1,988,660 to $700,000, and requiring Respondent to 

pay Petitioner the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs. 

Respectfully submitted, 

LAW OFFICE OF AARON M. FALES, P.C. 

Attorney for Petitioner 

za 

Aaron M. Fales (P72864) 

330 Hamilton Row, Suite 350 

Birmingham, MI 48009 

(248) 767-9840 

By: 

Dated: May 19, 2025

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

Docket Number: 26-001349

Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No

Party Filing Document 

Petitioner

Files

Document Type: Proof of Service: Petition

Attachment File Name: 26 - BHAM - 325 - POS

Fee Information

Filing Fee: $ 0.00

Payment Information

Payment: $ 0.00

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

325 S OLD WOODWARD LLC, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, 

Respondent. 

/

 

 

 

MTT Docket #26- 

Parcel No. 08-19-36-208-015 

 

PETITION 

 

 

325 S Old Woodward LLC (“Petitioner”), through its attorneys, Law Office 

of Aaron M. Fales, P.C., says: 

 

1. 

Petitioner's principal office address is 330 Hamilton Row, Ste. 300, 

Birmingham, MI 48009. Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property 

taxes on real property tax parcel no. 08-19-36-208-015 ("Petitioner's Property"), at 

325 S Old Woodward, Birmingham, MI, 48009. 

 

2. 

Respondent, City of Birmingham assesses and collects property 

taxes on Petitioner's Property. 

 

3. 

 In 2026, Respondent determined the taxable value of Petitioner's 

Property to be $1,328,330 and assessed Petitioner's Property at $1,988,660 

resulting in a state equalized value of the same amount based on the tenative 

equalization factor.

Page 2

4. 

Petitioner's Property is classified as Commercial Real Property. 

Petitioner's Property is commercial property. Petitioner believes that Petitioner's 

Property was designed to be used as a commercial purposes. 

 

5. 

This matter involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, 

(c) taxable value, and (d) uniformity. 

 

6. 

At this time, Petitioner believes, as it relates to taxable value, that 

there is a dispute relative to the value of a loss. 

 

7. 

The 2026 assessment, including state equalized value and taxable 

value, imposed on Petitioner's Property, and the taxes to be levied and 

collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the 

taxpayer for the reasons that: 

 

 

(a) 

The assessment, including state equalized value and/or 

taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and 

applicable statutes; 

 

 

(b) 

The assessment, including state equalized value and/or 

taxable value, are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible 

under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

 

 

(c) 

The assessment, including taxable value and/or state 

equalized value, are based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash 

value of that portion of Petitioner's Property that is taxable under Michigan law, 

and are based upon the application of wrong principles; and,

Page 3

(d) 

The assessment, including state equalized value and/or 

taxable value, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, 

discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional rights to 

uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. 

 

WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order 

reducing the 2026 taxable value of Petitioner's Property from $1,328,330 to 

$700,000, and reducing the 2026 assessed and state equalized values of 

Petitioner's Property from $1,988,660 to $700,000, and requiring Respondent to 

pay Petitioner the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dated: May 19, 2025 

Respectfully submitted, 

 

LAW OFFICE OF AARON M. FALES, P.C. 

Attorney for Petitioner 

 

 

By: _________________________ 

 

Aaron M. Fales (P72864) 

 330 Hamilton Row, Suite 350 

 Birmingham, MI 48009 

 (248) 767-9840

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Organization 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

325 S Old Woodward LLC

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

330 Hamilton Row

City or Town

Birmingham

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48009

Telephone Number

2487679840

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

afaleslaw@gmail.com

 

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Aaron

M.I.

Last Name

Fales

Firm Name (if any)

Law Office of Aaron M Fales, P.C.

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

330 Hamilton Row

Suite 350

City or Town

Birmingham

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48009

Telephone Number

248-767-9840

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

afaleslaw@gmail.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

325 S Old Woodward

Birmingham

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Michigan

48009

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City Of Birmingham (OAKLAND) 

County

Oakland

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

If “Other”, please explain:

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

08-19-36-208-015

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

1988660

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

1328330

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

1400000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

700000

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

700000

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Aaron Fales

Payment Information

Amount: 600

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26052486759092

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

325 S Old Woodward LLC, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 26-001349

City Of Birmingham, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: August 10, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

325 S OLD WOODWARD LLC, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, 

Respondent. 

/

 

 

 

MTT Docket #26- 

Parcel No. 08-19-36-208-015 

 

PETITION 

 

 

325 S Old Woodward LLC (“Petitioner”), through its attorneys, Law Office 

of Aaron M. Fales, P.C., says: 

 

1. 

Petitioner's principal office address is 330 Hamilton Row, Ste. 300, 

Birmingham, MI 48009. Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property 

taxes on real property tax parcel no. 08-19-36-208-015 ("Petitioner's Property"), at 

325 S Old Woodward, Birmingham, MI, 48009. 

 

2. 

Respondent, City of Birmingham assesses and collects property 

taxes on Petitioner's Property. 

 

3. 

 In 2026, Respondent determined the taxable value of Petitioner's 

Property to be $1,328,330 and assessed Petitioner's Property at $1,988,660 

resulting in a state equalized value of the same amount based on the tenative 

equalization factor.

Page 2

4. 

Petitioner's Property is classified as Commercial Real Property. 

Petitioner's Property is commercial property. Petitioner believes that Petitioner's 

Property was designed to be used as a commercial purposes. 

 

5. 

This matter involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, 

(c) taxable value, and (d) uniformity. 

 

6. 

At this time, Petitioner believes, as it relates to taxable value, that 

there is a dispute relative to the value of a loss. 

 

7. 

The 2026 assessment, including state equalized value and taxable 

value, imposed on Petitioner's Property, and the taxes to be levied and 

collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the 

taxpayer for the reasons that: 

 

 

(a) 

The assessment, including state equalized value and/or 

taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and 

applicable statutes; 

 

 

(b) 

The assessment, including state equalized value and/or 

taxable value, are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible 

under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

 

 

(c) 

The assessment, including taxable value and/or state 

equalized value, are based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash 

value of that portion of Petitioner's Property that is taxable under Michigan law, 

and are based upon the application of wrong principles; and,

Page 3

(d) 

The assessment, including state equalized value and/or 

taxable value, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, 

discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional rights to 

uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. 

 

WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order 

reducing the 2026 taxable value of Petitioner's Property from $1,328,330 to 

$700,000, and reducing the 2026 assessed and state equalized values of 

Petitioner's Property from $1,988,660 to $700,000, and requiring Respondent to 

pay Petitioner the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dated: May 19, 2025 

Respectfully submitted, 

 

LAW OFFICE OF AARON M. FALES, P.C. 

Attorney for Petitioner 

 

 

By: _________________________ 

 

Aaron M. Fales (P72864) 

 330 Hamilton Row, Suite 350 

 Birmingham, MI 48009 

 (248) 767-9840

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Organization 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

325 S Old Woodward LLC

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

330 Hamilton Row

City or Town

Birmingham

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48009

Telephone Number

2487679840

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

afaleslaw@gmail.com

 

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Aaron

M.I.

Last Name

Fales

Firm Name (if any)

Law Office of Aaron M Fales, P.C.

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

330 Hamilton Row

Suite 350

City or Town

Birmingham

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48009

Telephone Number

248-767-9840

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

afaleslaw@gmail.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

325 S Old Woodward

Birmingham

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Michigan

48009

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City Of Birmingham (OAKLAND) 

County

Oakland

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

If “Other”, please explain:

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

08-19-36-208-015

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

1988660

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

1328330

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

1400000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

700000

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

700000

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Aaron Fales

Payment Information

Amount: 600

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26052486759092

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.