310 S Mechanic Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership Petitioner Vs. City Of Jackson Respondent
- Petitioner
- 310 S Mechanic Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership
- Respondent
- City Of Jackson
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-000941-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Jackson
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Consent Judgment | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/25/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | A Stipulation has been received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/18/2026 | $50.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | Prehearing General Call | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/03/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 05/28/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 06/25/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/25/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Proof of service of petition was received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 05/19/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/14/2026 | $400.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 310 S Mechanic Limited Dividend Housing MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Association Limited Partnership, Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 26-000941 City of Jackson, Presiding Judge Respondent. Marcus L. Abood ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and the submitted Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment (Stipulation) and finds that the Stipulation meets all filing and statutory requirements.1 As such, the Tribunal shall enter the Stipulation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment including all attachments, terms and conditions is GRANTED and ADOPTED, unless otherwise indicated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with maintaining the assessment rolls for the tax years at issue shall correct or cause the assessment rolls to be corrected to reflect the property’s true cash and taxable values as provided in this Consent Judgment within 20 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment.2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with collecting or refunding the affected taxes shall collect taxes and any applicable interest or issue a refund as required by the Consent Judgment within 28 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment. If a refund is warranted, it shall, unless otherwise indicated, include a proportionate share of any property tax administration fees paid and of penalty and interest paid on delinquent taxes. The refund shall also, unless otherwise indicated, separately indicate the amount of the taxes, fees, penalties, and interest being refunded. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been unlawfully paid shall, unless otherwise indicated, bear interest from the date of payment to the date of judgment and the judgment shall bear interest to the date of its payment. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been underpaid shall not bear interest for any time period prior to 28 days after the issuance of this Consent Judgment. Pursuant to MCL 205.737, interest shall accrue (i) after December 31, 2013, through June 30, 2016, at the rate of 4.25%, 1 See MCL 211.27a. 2 See MCL 205.755.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-000941 Page 2 of 2 (ii) after June 30, 2016, through December 31, 2016, at the rate of 4.40%, (iii) after December 31, 2016, through June 30, 2017, at the rate of 4.50%, (iv) after June 30, 2017, through December 31, 2017, at the rate of 4.70%, (v) after December 31, 2017, through June 30, 2018, at the rate of 5.15%, (vi) after June 30, 2018, through December 31, 2018, at the rate of 5.41%, (vii) after December 31, 2018, through June 30, 2019, at the rate of 5.9%, (viii) after June 30, 2019, through December 31, 2019, at the rate of 6.39%, (ix) after December 31, 2019, through June 30, 2020, at the rate of 6.40%, (x) after June 30 2020, through December 31, 2020, at the rate of 5.63%, (xi) after December 31, 2020, through June 30, 2022, at the rate of 4.25%, (xii) after June 30, 2022, through December 31, 2022, at the rate of 4.27%, (xiii) after December 31, 2022, through June 30, 2023, at the rate of 5.65%, (xiv) after June 30, 2023, through December 31, 2023, at the rate of 8.25%, (xv) after December 31, 2023, through June 30, 2024, at the rate of 9.30%, (xvi) after June 30, 2024, through December 31, 2024, at the rate of 9.50%, (xvii) after December 31, 2024, through June 30, 2025, at the rate of 9.47%, (xviii) after June 30, 2025, through December 31, 2025, at the rate of 8.66%, (xix) after December 31, 2025, through June 30, 2026, at a rate of 8.48%, and (xx) after July 1, 2026, through December 31, 2026, at a rate of 7.85%. This Consent Judgment resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. See docket look up for a copy of stipulation and for any possible refund paragraph. Entered: August 25, 2026 By: /s/ Marcus L. Abood am PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 310 S Mechanic Lofts Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership, Petitioner, MTT Docket No. 26-000941 City of Jackson, Respondent. / Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment The parcel is located in Jackson County. The case is pending in the X Entire Tribunal OR Small Claims Division. Property Parcel No: 4-007400000. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax True Cash Assessed Taxable Year Value Value Value 2026 $1,023,600 $511,800 $511,800 S. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax True Cash State Equalized Taxable Year Value Value Value 2026 $500,000 $250,000 $250,000 If stipulation addresses tax years other than the tax year originally appealed or tax years added through motions to amend that have been granted by the Tribunal, list the separate facts upon which the parties rely to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over those tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): List separately any special terms or conditions being proposed by the parties that would affect the execution of this Consent Judgment including, but not limited to, the joint payment of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc.: 76733142.1
Page 2
Honigman LLP Attorneys for Petitioner, By fod ie J. Cook ( 660 Woodward Avenue 2290 First National Bldg. Detroit, MI 48226-3506 (313) 465-7270 jcook@honigman.com Dated: August 18, 2026 76733142.1 Jackson City Attorney’s Office Attorneys for Respondent, By: Matthew M. Hagerty (P6015) Mark M. Porterfield (P57917) 161 W. Michigan Avenue Jackson, MI 49201 (517) 788-4050 mhagerty@cityofjackson.org mporterfield@cityofjackson.org Dated: August 18, 2026
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-000941 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Joint Files Document Type: Stip for Consent Judgment Attachment File Name: Stip for CJ - 310 Mechanic Lofts LDHA Jackson (26-000941) Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 50.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 50.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NOTICE OF JULY 1- 15, 2027 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER OF PROCEDURE 310 S Mechanic Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership, Petitioner, v City Of Jackson, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 26-000941 Please be advised that 26-000941 has been placed on a two-week Prehearing General Call commencing July 01, 2027. Unless ordered otherwise, parties will be notified at least 28 days before they are scheduled to appear. Scheduling will not necessarily occur in the order in which the cases are listed below. Parties are required to submit a valuation disclosure or written notification that no valuation disclosure is required by the dates indicated herein. A “valuation disclosure” is defined as documentary or other tangible evidence in a property tax proceeding that a party relies upon in support of the party’s contention as to the true cash value of the subject property or any portion thereof and contains the party’s value conclusion and data, valuation methodology, analysis or reasoning. See TTR 203 and TTR 241. Users who file documents with the Tribunal are advised that filed documents are public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tribunal’s Tax Docket Lookup. If a user wishes to file a document for consideration by the Tribunal and prevent its publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for Protective Order under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents covered by the order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a Protective Order will be published. In accordance with MCR 1.109(D)(9) and TTR 209, the responsibility for excluding or redacting personal identifying information (PII) from all documents filed with or offered to the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and their attorneys. The Tribunal is not responsible for or required to review, redact, or screen documents at the time of filing for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A party, representative, or interested person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may request that the Tribunal redact PII contained in a previously filed document by submitting a Request for Redactions. The Request for Redactions form is available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages of the Tribunal’s website.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-000941 Page 2 of 3 Please refer to the Tribunal’s FAQs and Glossary of Terms pages on the Tribunal’s website for more information. IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall: a. If no valuation disclosure is required, notify the Tribunal and the opposing parties in writing within 21 days of entry of this order that no valuation disclosure is being filed. The notice shall indicate the reason or reasons why no valuation disclosure is required (i.e., exemption claim, etc.). b. If a valuation disclosure is required, file and exchange their valuation disclosures by March 4, 2027. Valuation disclosures will not be admitted into evidence unless disclosed and furnished in accordance with this order (even though admissible) except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their Prehearing Statements by March 4, 2027. Witnesses, with the exception of rebuttal witnesses, will not be allowed to testify unless disclosed in the Prehearing Statement and the Prehearing Statement is furnished in accordance with this order except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. Failure to file the Prehearing Statement may result in holding a party or parties in default. See TTR 237. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on March 4, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. Discovery relative to the valuation disclosure prepared for purposes of litigating this case or the valuation expert that prepared that valuation disclosure is not permitted during “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on July 1, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is limited to the opposing party’s valuation disclosure, the opposing party’s valuation expert, and the witnesses identified on the opposing party’s Prehearing Statement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if this case is not scheduled for a date certain prehearing conference during the time frame indicated it may be scheduled for a date certain
Page 3
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
1 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ______________________________________________________________________________ 310 S. Mechanic Lofts Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership, Petitioner, MTT Docket No. 26-000941 Parcel No. 4-007400000 -vs- ANSWER TO PETITION AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES City of Jackson, Respondent. _____________________________________________________________________________/ Honigman LLP By: Jackie J. Cook (P68781) Attorney for Petitioner 2290 First National Bldg. 660 Woodward Ave. Detroit, MI 48226 (313)465-7270 jcook@honigman.com JACKSON CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE By: Matthew M. Hagerty (P66015) Mark M. Porterfield (P57917) Attorneys for Respondent 161 W. Michigan Avenue Jackson, MI 49201 (517) 788-4050 mhagerty@cityofjackson.org mporterfield@cityofjackson.org ____________________________________________________________________________/ RESPONDENT CITY OF JACKSON’S ANSWER TO PETITION NOW COMES Respondent, City of Jackson, by and through its attorneys, the City Attorney’s Office, and for its Answer to Petitioner’s Petition, states as follows: 1. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegation contained in Paragraph 1 of Petitioner’s Petition and leaves Petitioner to its strict proofs. 2. Respondent admits the allegation contained in Paragraph 2 of Petitioner’s Petition. 3. Respondent admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 3 of Petitioner’s Petition. 4. Respondent admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 4 of Petitioner’s Petition.
Page 2
2 5. Respondent admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 5 of Petitioner’s Petition. 6. Respondent admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 6 of Petitioner’s Petition. 7. Respondent admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 7 of Petitioner’s Petition. 8. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegation contained in Paragraph 8 of Petitioner’s Petition and leaves Petitioner to its strict proofs. 9. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegation contained in Paragraph 9 of Petitioner’s Petition and leaves Petitioner to its strict proofs. 10. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegation contained in Paragraph 10 of Petitioner’s Petition and leaves Petitioner to its strict proofs. 11. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegation contained in Paragraph 11 of Petitioner’s Petition and leaves Petitioner to its strict proofs. 12. Respondent denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 12(a) through (d) of Petitioner’s Petition as untrue. WHEREFORE, Respondent City of Jackson requests this Honorable Tribunal dismiss Petitioner’s Petition in its entirety, that it assess actual costs and attorney fees against Petitioner for costs incurred in responding to the Petition, and further requests all other relief the Tribunal deems to be just and equitable. Respectfully submitted, DATED: May 28, 2026 BY: ______________________________ MATTHEW M. HAGERTY (P66015) MARK M. PORTERFIELD (P57917) Office of the City Attorney City of Jackson, Michigan 161 W. Michigan Ave. Jackson, MI 49201
Page 3
3 AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES NOW COMES Respondent, City of Jackson, by and through its attorneys, the City Attorney’s Office, and states the following Affirmative Defenses alternatively and consecutively: 1. The subject property’s assessed, true cash, and taxable values are levied in accordance with the Michigan General Property Tax Act and Michigan Constitution. 2. The subject property is assessed in accordance with generally accepted assessing standards. 3. The subject property is assessed at no more than 50% of its true cash value. 4. Petitioner has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 5. Respondent reserves the right to amend its affirmative defenses through the conclusion of discovery. Respectfully submitted, DATED: May 28, 2026 BY: ______________________________ MATTHEW M. HAGERTY (P66015) MARK M. PORTERFIELD (P57917) Office of the City Attorney City of Jackson, Michigan 161 W. Michigan Ave. Jackson, MI 49201
Page 4
4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE STATE OF MICHIGAN ) ) ss COUNTY OF JACKSON ) The undersigned certifies under penalty of perjury that on May 28, 2026 he served copies of Respondent City of Jackson’s Answer to Petition and Affirmative Defenses upon the Petitioner by first class mail with postage fully prepaid to the following address: Jackie J. Cook (P68781) Attorney for Petitioner 2290 First National Bldg. 660 Woodward Ave. Detroit, MI 48226 DATED: May 28, 2026 ________________________________ Matthew M. Hagerty (P66015) Office of
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
26-0014
75573363.1
STATE OF MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
310 S Mechanic Lofts Limited Dividend
Housing Association Limited Partnership,
Petitioner,
v
City of Jackson,
Respondent.
MTT Docket No. ________
Parcel No. 4-007400000
Jackie J. Cook (P68781)
Honigman LLP
Attorneys for Petitioner
2290 First National Building
660 Woodward Avenue
Detroit, MI 48226-3506
(313) 465-7270
jcook@honigman.com
Petition
310 S Mechanic Lofts Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership
(“Petitioner”), through its attorneys, HONIGMAN LLP, says:
1.
Petitioner's principal office address is 2627 E. Beltline Ave. SE, Suite 200, Grand
Rapids, MI 49546.
2.
The subject real property, tax parcel number 4-007400000, is located at 310 S.
Mechanic, Jackson, MI, in Jackson County ("Petitioner's Property").
3.
Respondent, City of Jackson, assesses and collects property taxes on Petitioner's
Property.Page 2
2 75573363.1 4. In 2026, Respondent’s board of review set the taxable value of Petitioner's Property at $511,800 and assessed Petitioner's Property at $511,800. 5. The assessment will result in a state equalized value in the same amount based upon the tentative equalization factor. 6. Petitioner's Property is classified as commercial real. 7. Petitioner's Property is presently used or available for use for commercial purposes. 8. Petitioner believes that Petitioner's Property was originally designed to be used for commercial purposes. 9. This matter involves issues relating to (a) valuation, (b) assessment, (c) taxable value, and (d) uniformity. 10. At this time, Petitioner believes, as it relates to taxable value, that there is a dispute relative to the value of a loss. 11. No board of review protest was required for Petitioner’s Property. 12. The 2026 assessment – including the state equalized and taxable values – imposed on Petitioner's Property, the taxes to be levied and collected on Petitioner’s Property, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent are invalid, unlawful, and operate as a fraud on Petitioner, because they (a) Exceed amounts permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (b) Are calculated at or derived from higher percentages of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (c) Are based on the application of wrong principles and an erroneous determination of the true cash value of that portion of Petitioner's Property that is taxable under Michigan law, if any; and
Page 3
3 75573363.1 (d) Discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional rights to uniformity, equal protection, and due process of law. WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order: (i) reducing the 2026 taxable value, assessed value, and state equalized value of Petitioner's Property from $511,800 to $200,000; (ii) requiring payment to Petitioner of the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs; and (iii) awarding Petitioner any other relief to which it is entitled. Dated: May 14, 2026 Respectfully submitted, Honigman LLP Attorneys for Respondent By: Jackie J. Cook (P68781) 2290 First National Building 660 Woodward Avenue Detroit, MI 48226-3506 (313) 465-7270 jcook@honigman.com
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name 310 S Mechanic Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 2627 E. Beltline Ave. SE City or Town Grand Rapids State Michigan ZIP Code 49544 Telephone Number 2485668300 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) jcook@honigman.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Jackie M.I. J. Last Name Cook Firm Name (if any) Honigman LLP Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 2290 First National Building 660 Woodward Avenue City or Town Detriot State Michigan ZIP Code 48226 Telephone Number 3134657270 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) jcook@honigman.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 310 S. Mechanic
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Jackson Michigan 49201 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Jackson (JACKSON) County Jackson If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 4-007400000 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 511800 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 511800 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 400000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 200000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Jackie J. Cook Payment Information Amount: 400 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26051485369084 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 310 S Mechanic Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-000941 City Of Jackson, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: June 25, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 310 S Mechanic Lofts Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership, Petitioner, MTT Docket No. Alo ) Oo oF o ( Parcel No. 4-007400000 Vv City of Jackson, Respondent. Jackie J. Cook (P68781) Honigman LLP Attorneys for Petitioner 2290 First National Building 660 Woodward Avenue Detroit, MI 48226-3506 (313) 465-7270 jcook@honigman.com Proof of Service Lisa Joseph states that she is employed by HONIGMAN LLP, attorneys for Petitioner, and that on s/ / S/ “b , she did serve a copy of Petitioner's Petition, with docket number, upon the parties named on the attached list. 5 Ae A Q Fey 4 1/4 7 Lisa Joseph 26-0014 75573363.1
Page 2
BY CERTIFIED UNITED STATES MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED: CLERK JACKSON 161 W. MICHIGAN AVENUE JACKSON, MI 49201-1324 ASSESSOR JACKSON 161 W. MICHIGAN AVENUE JACKSON, MI 49201-1324 AND BY FIRST-CLASS UNITED STATES MAIL: CLERK JACKSON COUNTY 120 WEST MICHIGAN JACKSON, MI 49201 DIRECTOR OF EQUALIZATION JACKSON COUNTY 120 WEST MICHIGAN JACKSON, MI 49201 SECRETARY OF SCHOOL BOARD JACKSON PUBLIC SCHOOLS 522 WILDWOOD AVENUE JACKSON, MI 49201-1013 STATE TREASURER MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY TREASURY BUILDING 430 W. ALLEGAN ST. LANSING, MI 48922 26-0022 75573363.1
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
1 of 1 Docket #: 26-000941 Party Filing Document Party Filing Document: Petitioner Petitioner If 'other', Identify: File Document Type: fuFile:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
26-0014
75573363.1
STATE OF MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
310 S Mechanic Lofts Limited Dividend
Housing Association Limited Partnership,
Petitioner,
v
City of Jackson,
Respondent.
MTT Docket No. ________
Parcel No. 4-007400000
Jackie J. Cook (P68781)
Honigman LLP
Attorneys for Petitioner
2290 First National Building
660 Woodward Avenue
Detroit, MI 48226-3506
(313) 465-7270
jcook@honigman.com
Petition
310 S Mechanic Lofts Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership
(“Petitioner”), through its attorneys, HONIGMAN LLP, says:
1.
Petitioner's principal office address is 2627 E. Beltline Ave. SE, Suite 200, Grand
Rapids, MI 49546.
2.
The subject real property, tax parcel number 4-007400000, is located at 310 S.
Mechanic, Jackson, MI, in Jackson County ("Petitioner's Property").
3.
Respondent, City of Jackson, assesses and collects property taxes on Petitioner's
Property.Page 2
2 75573363.1 4. In 2026, Respondent’s board of review set the taxable value of Petitioner's Property at $511,800 and assessed Petitioner's Property at $511,800. 5. The assessment will result in a state equalized value in the same amount based upon the tentative equalization factor. 6. Petitioner's Property is classified as commercial real. 7. Petitioner's Property is presently used or available for use for commercial purposes. 8. Petitioner believes that Petitioner's Property was originally designed to be used for commercial purposes. 9. This matter involves issues relating to (a) valuation, (b) assessment, (c) taxable value, and (d) uniformity. 10. At this time, Petitioner believes, as it relates to taxable value, that there is a dispute relative to the value of a loss. 11. No board of review protest was required for Petitioner’s Property. 12. The 2026 assessment – including the state equalized and taxable values – imposed on Petitioner's Property, the taxes to be levied and collected on Petitioner’s Property, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent are invalid, unlawful, and operate as a fraud on Petitioner, because they (a) Exceed amounts permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (b) Are calculated at or derived from higher percentages of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (c) Are based on the application of wrong principles and an erroneous determination of the true cash value of that portion of Petitioner's Property that is taxable under Michigan law, if any; and
Page 3
3 75573363.1 (d) Discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional rights to uniformity, equal protection, and due process of law. WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order: (i) reducing the 2026 taxable value, assessed value, and state equalized value of Petitioner's Property from $511,800 to $200,000; (ii) requiring payment to Petitioner of the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs; and (iii) awarding Petitioner any other relief to which it is entitled. Dated: May 14, 2026 Respectfully submitted, Honigman LLP Attorneys for Respondent By: Jackie J. Cook (P68781) 2290 First National Building 660 Woodward Avenue Detroit, MI 48226-3506 (313) 465-7270 jcook@honigman.com
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name 310 S Mechanic Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 2627 E. Beltline Ave. SE City or Town Grand Rapids State Michigan ZIP Code 49544 Telephone Number 2485668300 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) jcook@honigman.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Jackie M.I. J. Last Name Cook Firm Name (if any) Honigman LLP Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 2290 First National Building 660 Woodward Avenue City or Town Detriot State Michigan ZIP Code 48226 Telephone Number 3134657270 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) jcook@honigman.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 310 S. Mechanic
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Jackson Michigan 49201 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Jackson (JACKSON) County Jackson If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 4-007400000 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 511800 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 511800 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 400000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 200000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Jackie J. Cook Payment Information Amount: 400 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26051485369084 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.