Record Finder / 26-001239-TT
Michigan

153 Seward LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Grand Rapids Respondent

Petitioner
153 Seward LLC
Respondent
City Of Grand Rapids

Case overview

Docket number
26-001239-TT
Status
Answer Due
CaseType
ET Property
Division
ET
County
Kent
Judge
No judge assigned

Docket history

Line #SubjectFilerLine RefEnter Date/Post MarkFeeRelated Item
5Answer was receivedRESPNot recorded10/08/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
4Proof of service of petition was received.Not recordedNot recorded09/10/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
3Petition has been verifiedPET107/30/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
2Notice of Docket Number ETNot recordedNot recorded07/30/2026Not recordedDownload
1A petition was received.PETNot recorded05/22/2026$400.00Download
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload

Documents

2026-10-07 153 Seward Answer.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

1 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

_______________________ 

153 SEWARD LLC, 

Petitioner, 

Docket No. 26-001239 

v. 

Parcel No.: 41-13-25-154-009 

CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS, 

Respondent. 

_____________________________________________________________________________ 

Steve Johnson 

Michigan Tax Appeal Services 

Representative for Petitioner 

436 N. Center Street 

Northville, MI 48167 

(248)-392-4342 

info@mitaxappeal.com 

Kendall R. O’Connor (P84036) 

Lee S. Schofield (P62748) 

City of Grand Rapids Law Department 

Attorneys for Respondent 

300 Monroe Ave. NW, Suite 620 

Grand Rapids, MI 49503 

(616) 456-3103

koconnor@grand-rapids.mi.us

lschofield@grand-rapids.mi.us

______________________________________________________________________________ 

RESPONDENT’S APPEARANCE AND ANSWER TO PETITION 

WITH PROOF OF SERVICE 

NOW COMES Kendall R. O’Connor and Lee S. Schofield for the City of Grand Rapids, 

who hereby enter their Appearance of Counsel on behalf of Respondent City of Grand Rapids, and 

answers Petitioner’s Petition as follows: 

1. Property Parcel No: 41-13-25-154-009

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form

addressing all other parcels at issue.)

ANSWER: Respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as 

to the truth the allegations in paragraph 1 of Petitioner’s Petition and leaves 

Petitioner to its proofs.

Page 2

2 

2. The property identified above is x real personal.

ANSWER: Respondent admits the allegations in paragraph 2 of Petitioner’s

Petition.

3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous?

____ Yes ____ No. (If no, separate Petitioners are required for each non-contiguous parcel.)

ANSWER: There are no allegations in paragraph 3 of Petitioner’s Petition and

therefore no response is required. To the extent a response is required, Respondent

lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth the

allegations in paragraph 3 of Petitioner’s Petition and leaves Petitioner to its proofs.

4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal?

____ Yes _x__ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal

property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.)

ANSWER: Respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as

to the truth the allegations in paragraph 4 of Petitioner’s Petition and leaves

Petitioner to its proofs.

5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property

statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary):

N/A.

ANSWER: Respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as 

to the truth the allegations in paragraph 5 of Petitioner’s Petition and leaves 

Petitioner to its proofs. 

6. The property identified above is classified as Commercial

ANSWER: Respondent admits the allegations in paragraph 6 of Petitioner’s Petition.

The real property with the parcel code number identified in paragraph 1 of

Petitioner’s Petition is classified as 201 Commercial.

7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to

Respondent’s ____ March ____ July ____ December Board of Review.

ANSWER: There are legal conclusions in paragraph 7 of Petitioner’s Petition and so

no response is required. To the extent a response is required, Respondent lacks

Page 3

3 

knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth the allegations in 

paragraph 7 of Petitioner’s Petition and leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 

8. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon

which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary).

N/A

ANSWER: There are legal conclusions in paragraph 8 of Petitioner’s Petition and so 

no response is required. To the extent a response is required, Respondent lacks 

knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth the allegations in 

paragraph 8 of Petitioner’s Petition and leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 

9. If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax

year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke

the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach page if

necessary):

N/A

ANSWER: There are legal conclusions in paragraph 9 of Petitioner’s Petition and so 

no response is required. To the extent a response is required, Respondent lacks 

knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth the allegations in 

paragraph 9 of Petitioner’s Petition and leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 

10. The property or properties at issue are located in Kent County. The property or properties’

address is:

153 NW Seward Ave, Grand Rapids, MI 49504 

ANSWER: Respondent admits the allegations in paragraph 10 of Petitioner’s 

Petition. The real property with the parcel code number identified in paragraph 1 of 

Petitioner’s Petition has the location and common address alleged. 

11. The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local

government unit): City of Grand Rapids

ANSWER: Respondent admits only that it establishes the assessments for the real 

property with the parcel code number identified in paragraph 1. Respondent lacks 

knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of any remaining 

allegations in paragraph 11 of Petitioner’s Petition and leaves Petitioner to its proofs.

Page 4

4 

12. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is:

152 E 6th Street, Holland, MI 49423

ANSWER: Respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a

Page 5

5 

16.

Page 6

6

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISAnswer.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001239

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: 

Local Unit of Government

Local Unit of Government

City Of Grand Rapids (KENT)

First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Lee

M.I.

S.

Last Name

Schofield

Firm Name (if any)

City of Grand Rapids

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

300 Monroe Avenue NW

Suite 620

City or Town

Grand Rapids

State

 Michigan

ZIP Code

49503

Telephone Number

616-456-3103

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

lschofield@grand-rapids.mi.us

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: 

Lee S. Schofield

/s/

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Proof of Service_153 Seward LLC_26-001239.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

153 Seward LLC 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-001239 

City of Grand Rapids 

Respondent(s) 

PROOF OF SERVICE FOR PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

*To be filed after the Tribunal issues the Notice of Docket Number* 

Rebecca Adler 

states that on 

9/10/26 

he/she 

[Name of person serving/mailing petition] 

[date of service] 

served a copy of the Petition relative to the above-captioned matter upon: 

[Provide name and address of the following entities] 

1. 

Assessor (via certified mail): 

Lindsey Post, City Assessor, City of Grand Rapids Assessing Office, 300 Monroe Ave NW, 

Grand Rapids, MI'49503 

2. 

City Clerk or Township Supervisor/Clerk (via certified mail): 

Joel Hondorp, City Clerk, City of Grand Rapids Clerk's Office, 300 Monroe Avenue NW, Grand 

Rapids, MI 49503 

3. 

County Equalization Director (via first class mail or personal service): 

Kent County Equalization Director, Kent County Equalization Dept., 300 Monroe Avenue NW, 

Grand Rapids, MI 49503 

4. 

County Clerk (via first class mail or personal service): 

Kent County Clerk, Kent County Clerk's Office, 300 Monroe Avenue NW, Grand Rapids, MI 

49503 

5. 

Secretary of the local school board (via first class mail or personal service): 

Secretary of School Board, Grand Rapids City School District, P.O. Box 117, Grand Rapids, MI 

49507 

6. 

State Treasurer (via first class mail): 

Michigan Department of Treasury, State Treasurer 

430 W. Allegan 

Lansing, MI 48922 

Is! Rebecca Adler 

Rebecca Adler 

[Signature of person who is serving/mailing copy] 

[Print/type name of person serving/mailing copy] 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

- 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 

- 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 

- Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

Docket Number: 26-001239

Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No

Party Filing Document 

Petitioner

Files

Document Type: Proof of Service: Petition

Attachment File Name: Proof of Service_153 Seward LLC_26-001239

Fee Information

Filing Fee: $ 0.00

Payment Information

Payment: $ 0.00

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

153 Seward LLC NEW 2026 ET-Petition-Prop-fillable.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

v 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

LANSING 

_____________________________, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

MTT Docket No. 

_____________________________, 

Respondent(s) 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1.

Property Parcel No: _____________________________________________

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.)

2.

The property identified above is ___real ___personal.

3.

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties

contiguous? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non­

contiguous parcel.)

4.

Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property

under appeal? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each

parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under

appeal.)

5.

If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal

property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary):

6.

The property identified above is classified as _________________________

7.

If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made

to Respondent’s ___ March ___ July ___December Board of Review.

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

153 Seward LLC

City of Grand Rapids

41-13-25-154-009

X

X

N/A

Commercial

Page 2

MTT Docket No. _________________ 

Page 2 of 4 

8.

If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the

assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary):

9.

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31

of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary):

10.

The property or properties at issue are located in _______________County. The

property or properties’ address is:

11.

The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable

local governmental unit): ________________________________________

12.

Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is:

13.

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable):

________the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values

________the property or properties’ taxable value only

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a 

dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes ___No 

________uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment 

________the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation 

under MCL ______ 

14.

The tax year(s) at issue are: _______________________________________

N/A

N/A

Kent

153 NW Seward Ave, Grand Rapids, MI 49504

City of Grand Rapids

152 E 6th Street, Holland, MI 49423

X

2026

Page 3

MTT Docket No. _________________ 

Page 3 of 4 

15. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior 

tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 

Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value

Taxable Value 

17. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value

Taxable Value 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value

Taxable Value 

19. 

Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

20. 

List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the 

relief requested (attach additional page if necessary): 

N/A

2026

1,522,800

761,400

761,400

2026

1,027,489

513,745

513,745

2026

495,311

247,655

247,655

Petitioner requests that the Tribunal reduce the assessed, state equalized, and 

taxable values from 761,400 to 513,745 and order a refund with interest as provided 

by the Tax Tribunal Act.

Our initial review of the subject property indicates the assessment exceeds 50% of 

the true cash value.

Page 4

______________________________________________________________________ 

______________________________________________________________________ 

______________________________________________________________________ 

______________________________________________________________________ 

______________________________________________________________________ 

______________________________________________________________________ 

MTT Docket No. _________________ 

Page 4 of 4 

Signature of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Printed Name of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Email Address: _________________________________________________________ 

Mailing Address: 

Telephone Number: _____________________________________________________ 

Date: _________________________________________________________________ 

/s/ Steve Johnson

Steve Johnson

info@mitaxappeal.com

436 N Center St, Northville, MI 48167

248-392-4342

May 21, 2026

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Organization 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

153 Seward LLC

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

152 E 6th Street

City or Town

Holland

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

49423

Telephone Number

248-392-4342

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

info@mitaxappeal.com

 

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Steve

M.I.

Last Name

Johnson

Firm Name (if any)

Michigan Tax Appeal Services

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

436 N. Center Street

City or Town

Northville

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48167

Telephone Number

248-392-4342

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

info@mitaxappeal.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

153 NW Seward Ave

Grand Rapids

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Michigan

49504

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City Of Grand Rapids (KENT) 

County

Kent

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

If “Other”, please explain:

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

41-13-25-154-009

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

761400

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

761400

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

1027489

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

513745

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Steve Johnson

Payment Information

Amount: 400

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26052186445981

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-07-30_06-45-23.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

153 Seward LLC, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 26-001239

City Of Grand Rapids, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: July 30, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

153 Seward LLC NEW 2026 ET-Petition-Prop-fillable.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

v 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

LANSING 

_____________________________, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

MTT Docket No. 

_____________________________, 

Respondent(s) 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1.

Property Parcel No: _____________________________________________

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.)

2.

The property identified above is ___real ___personal.

3.

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties

contiguous? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non­

contiguous parcel.)

4.

Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property

under appeal? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each

parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under

appeal.)

5.

If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal

property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary):

6.

The property identified above is classified as _________________________

7.

If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made

to Respondent’s ___ March ___ July ___December Board of Review.

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

153 Seward LLC

City of Grand Rapids

41-13-25-154-009

X

X

N/A

Commercial

Page 2

MTT Docket No. _________________ 

Page 2 of 4 

8.

If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the

assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary):

9.

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31

of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary):

10.

The property or properties at issue are located in _______________County. The

property or properties’ address is:

11.

The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable

local governmental unit): ________________________________________

12.

Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is:

13.

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable):

________the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values

________the property or properties’ taxable value only

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a 

dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes ___No 

________uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment 

________the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation 

under MCL ______ 

14.

The tax year(s) at issue are: _______________________________________

N/A

N/A

Kent

153 NW Seward Ave, Grand Rapids, MI 49504

City of Grand Rapids

152 E 6th Street, Holland, MI 49423

X

2026

Page 3

MTT Docket No. _________________ 

Page 3 of 4 

15. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior 

tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 

Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value

Taxable Value 

17. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value

Taxable Value 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value

Taxable Value 

19. 

Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

20. 

List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the 

relief requested (attach additional page if necessary): 

N/A

2026

1,522,800

761,400

761,400

2026

1,027,489

513,745

513,745

2026

495,311

247,655

247,655

Petitioner requests that the Tribunal reduce the assessed, state equalized, and 

taxable values from 761,400 to 513,745 and order a refund with interest as provided 

by the Tax Tribunal Act.

Our initial review of the subject property indicates the assessment exceeds 50% of 

the true cash value.

Page 4

______________________________________________________________________ 

______________________________________________________________________ 

______________________________________________________________________ 

______________________________________________________________________ 

______________________________________________________________________ 

______________________________________________________________________ 

MTT Docket No. _________________ 

Page 4 of 4 

Signature of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Printed Name of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Email Address: _________________________________________________________ 

Mailing Address: 

Telephone Number: _____________________________________________________ 

Date: _________________________________________________________________ 

/s/ Steve Johnson

Steve Johnson

info@mitaxappeal.com

436 N Center St, Northville, MI 48167

248-392-4342

May 21, 2026

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Organization 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

153 Seward LLC

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

152 E 6th Street

City or Town

Holland

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

49423

Telephone Number

248-392-4342

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

info@mitaxappeal.com

 

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Steve

M.I.

Last Name

Johnson

Firm Name (if any)

Michigan Tax Appeal Services

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

436 N. Center Street

City or Town

Northville

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48167

Telephone Number

248-392-4342

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

info@mitaxappeal.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

153 NW Seward Ave

Grand Rapids

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Michigan

49504

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City Of Grand Rapids (KENT) 

County

Kent

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

If “Other”, please explain:

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

41-13-25-154-009

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

761400

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

761400

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

1027489

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

513745

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Steve Johnson

Payment Information

Amount: 400

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26052186445981

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.