Full record / Withdrawal Request_SSP Associates Inc (6200 State St)_#25-002492.pdf

Withdrawal Request_SSP Associates Inc (6200 State St)_#25-002492.pdf

Ssp Associates Inc, Petitioner Vs. Township Of Saginaw, Respondent · 25-002492-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

1 

 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

SSP ASSOCIATES INC, 

 

 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

 

 

MTT Docket No.: 25-002492 

 

v 

 

TOWNSHIP OF SAGINAW, 

 

 

 

Respondent. 

______________________________________________________________________________ 

 

MICHIGAN TAX APPEAL SERVICES 

 

BRAUN KENDRICK FINKBEINER P.L.C. 

By: 

Steve Johnson 

 

 

 

By: 

Francis J. Keating (P39223) 

Representative for Petitioner 

 

 

Attorneys for Respondent 

436 N. Center St. 

 

 

 

 

4301 Fashion Square Blvd. 

Northville, MI 48167 

 

 

Saginaw, MI 48603 

(248) 392-4342 

 

 

 

 

(989) 498-2100 

sjohnson@mitaxappeal.com 

 

 

frakea@braunkendrick.com 

______________________________________________________________________________ 

 

PETITIONER’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEAL 

 

 

Petitioner, by and through its Representative, states the following in support of its above 

captioned request: 

1. As of the date of this filing the above noted case has not been placed on a prehearing general 

call. Respondent has filed an answer. 

2. The same parcel at issue in this case is at issue in MTT 24-002208. Indeed, the 2025 tax 

year began as part of the 2024 appeal and was severed to this docket. 

3. In light of the pending 2024 appeal and that any reduction in value from that year will carry 

forward into the 2025 assessment, Petitioner has determined that it is no longer necessary to pursue 

two cases at the same time and wishes to have this case dismissed with prejudice and without costs 

to either party.

Page 2

2 

 

4. Respondent will not be harmed nor prejudiced by the dismissal of this case involving only 

the 2025 tax year. Petitioner informed Respondent that it desired to dismiss the case on October 9, 

2025 and sought concurrence in the request but Respondent did not reply. There is good cause to 

dismiss this matter with prejudice and without costs to either party due to the status of the case. 

Said relief is in the interest of efficient administration of justice. Respondent has been served with 

a copy of this request as set forth below. 

WHEREFORE, Petitioner, by and through its representative, requests that the Tribunal enter 

an Order dismissing the above captioned appeal with prejudice and without costs to either party. 

 

 

 

 

By: /s/ Steve Johnson__________ 

Steve Johnson 

Michigan Tax Appeal Services 

Representative for Petitioner 

436 N. Center St. 

Northville, MI 48167 

616-710-4119

Page 3

3 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

On the date below I sent by electronic mail a copy of the foregoing motion to dismiss to: 

 

Francis J. Keating, Esq. 

frakea@braunkendrick.com 

 

I declare that the statement above is true to the best of my information, knowledge and belief. 

 

 

 

_/s/Rebecca Adler 

 

Dated: October 17, 2025 

Rebecca Adler

PDF reading copy

← View full record