Full record / Alfa Kibbi 3.pdf

Alfa Kibbi 3.pdf

Alfa Kibbi Properties LLC, Petitioner V City Of Detroit, Respondent · 25-003820-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

=CEIVED 

el 

Nov 13 2025 

es 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or 

Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal 

(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not 

submit this document, you may be held in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information 

First 

Name 

M.I. 

Last Name/Company Name 

Alfa Kibbi Properties LLC 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

24001 Southfield Rd Ste 100 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Southfield 

MI 

48075 

Telephone Number 5 4.8.209-6824 ext 106 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name 

M.I. 

Last Name 

Logical Property Management LLC 

Firm Name (if any) 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

115 S Main Street, Ste 200 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Royal Oak 

MI 

48067 

Telephone Number 5 48.209-6824 ext 106 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) 

owners@logicalpm.com 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

How many 

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

parcels are you | [] ves* 

No** 

appealing? 

*If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels. 

**If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulted. 

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) 

[If multiple, list first property's address) 

5745 Marseilles St, Detroit, MI 48224-1321

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check 

all that apply) 

DIRECTOR 

[J True Cash and Taxable Value 

O Poverty Exemption 

Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

[O Disabled Veterans Exemption 

O Uncapping of Taxable Value 

[J Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) 

O Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a 

O Classification 

Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

the taxable value exceeds market value leading to excess taxation. 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Year(s) you are appealing: 

2025 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [A Yes 

[J No 

If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: 

March 

[m] July 

O December 

If No, check the applicable reason(s): 

i) Not required to attend 

[0 Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner 

i Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) 

Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information suse the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous 

parcels. 

Parcel Identification Number: 

21077705. 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

[4 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

$28,300 

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 

$19,377 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 

$19.377 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 

$9,668 

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

Section 8: Classification Information only the Mi Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal* 

Parcel Identification Number: 

21077705. 

Current Classification of Properly as established by Board of Review: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

What do you believe is the property's classification? 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

| 

Ifimproved property, how is the property currently being used? 

residential/real estate 

If improved property, for what use was the property designed? 

residential/real estate

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Fee Information 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? 

O ves 

No 

Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? 

O ves 

No 

Ifyou answered yes to either or both of the above questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees. 

The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. 

If you are appealing more than one 

parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus 

$25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000. 

If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$125.00 

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 

$200.00 

$O0ver $500,000.00 

$300.00 

If your property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$250.00 

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. 

If your property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is $100,000.01 or greater the 

appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed. 

Signature *required 

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

Isl 

4 

7

Page 5

Yi 

al C 

Coleman A Young Municipal 

Center oo oo) 

+ 

2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 105 

’ 

Detroit, Michigan 48226 

Fax; 1313} 224:0576 

www.detroltmi.gov 

05/16/2025 

ALFA KIBBI PROPERTIES LLC 

24001 SOUTHFIELD RD STE 100 

GIcoPyY 

SOUTHFIELD M1 48075 

RE: 

2025 

MARCH BOARD OF REVIEW PETITION NUMBER: 

M-008308 

The March Board of Review has considered the appeal on the 2025 assessment for lhe below described property 

and concluded that: 

1. 

Parcel Number: 

21077708. 

2. 

Property Address: 

5745 MARSEILLES 

3. 

District: 

4 

4. 

Property Classification: 

401 

(RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) 

Ad Valorem 

6. 

Principle Residence Exemption: 

0% 

LL 

5. 

Property Legal Description: 

WIMARSEILLES 41 FARMDALE SUB L51 P26 PLATS WC R 21/745 50 

X 133.69 

6. 

Petitioner timely filed an appeal to the March Board of Review. | 

. The March Board of Review considered (if any) pelitioner's and/or duly authorized representative evidence 

and/or testimony. The March Board of Review considered facts presented as on the assessment roll and/or any 

recommendations offered by the Office of the Assessor. 

CONCLUSION: 

™ Board of Review has considered the appeal filed and found there was no adjustment warranted. 

eg oma 

Before Appeal 

After Appeal 

2025 

Assessed Value 

28,300 

28,300 

2025 

Taxable Value 

19.377 

19,377 

If you are dissatisfied with the decision of the March Board of Review, submil this notice and complete the enclosed 

small claims form to appeal lo: 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

P.O. Box 30232 

Lansing 

MI 48909 

A Michigan 

Tax Tabunal appeal must 

be made 

by May 31st 

of the current year 

for properties classified as: 

Commercial 

Real. 

Industrial 

Real. 

Commercial 

Personal. 

Industrial 

Personal 

and 

Ulility 

Personal 

Property 

A Michigan Tax Tribunal appeal must be made by July 31st 

of the current year 

for Residential Real Property 

Classification.

Page 6

LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE W. ScHMIDT, P.L.L.C. 

ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR 

115 SOUTH MAIN STREET, SUITE 200 

PHONE (248) 414-1155 

ROYAL OAK, MI 48067 

GEORGE W. SCHMIDT 

FAX (248) 414-1167 

gschmidt@gordonmgt.com 

November 7, 2025 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

611 W. Ottawa 

Lansing MI 48933 

RE: 

Property Tax Appeal: 

20314 Gilherist, Detroit, MI 48235 

16074 Eastburn, Detroit, MI 48205 

5745 Marseilles, Detroit, MI 48224 

Dear Michigan Tax Tribunal: 

Enclosed are the Property Tax Appeals for the above properties along with the $125.00 

filing fee for each property. 

This letter should not be construed as an Appearance for the Petitioner, 

Enclosures 

cc: 

Logical Property Management

Page 7

IE UE 

Bu 

Ty CR LE 

RUT 

F

\ 

GEORGE Ww. SCHM

Attorney and Couns

115 S. Main, Suite 

Royal Ouzk, MI 48

tichigay Tay Tr

Gl 

Ww otHawa 

farsies mi 7

Page 8

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Alfa Kibbi Properties LLC, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-003417 

 

City of Detroit, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

CORRECTED ORDER HOLDING PETITIONER IN DEFAULT 

 

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in this case and finds that an order holding Petitioner 

in default was issued on September 23, 2025, because Petitioner failed to use an 

updated Tribunal petition form, failed to include a copy of each of the notice giving rise 

to the appeal for each parcel number under appeal, i.e. Board of Review (BOR) results, 

and failed to pay the required filing fee for the filing of the petition.1 The Tribunal erred 

in the entry of this order as a copy of all the BOR results for the parcel numbers under 

appeal were submitted. Further, the Tribunal failed to include that the petition indicates 

that the properties at issue are not contiguous. As such, Petitioner must file separate 

petitions (including an amended petition for the above-captioned case) and pay 

separate filing fees for each non-contiguous parcel or file proof of contiguity within 14 

days of the entry of this order.2 A list of Tribunal rules and forms can be found online at 

www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Additionally, in the instant case, Petitioner identified its 

representative as “Logical Property Management LLC”, even though the submission 

was sent by the Law Offices of George W. Schmidt, PLLC. When the petition was 

processed, neither Petitioner nor Petitioner’s alleged authorized representatives signed 

the petition as required by MCR 1.109(E), thus Petitioner’s alleged authorized 

representative was never added to the docket, preventing proper service of the Order of 

Default. As such, the Tribunal finds it necessary to reissue the September 23, 2025 

Order of Default. Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is held in DEFAULT. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the 

default: (1) if the parcel numbers are not contiguous, file current, signed Petitions for 

Valuation Appeal, for each parcel number under appeal, identifying Petitioner’s 

authorized representative; or if the parcel numbers are contiguous, file a current, 

signed, Petition for Valuation Appeal, with proof of contiguity, identifying Petitioner’s 

authorized representative, and the requisite multiparcel form; and (2) if the parcel 

numbers are not contiguous, pay the required $125.00 petition filing fee for each petition 

 

1 Although the petition indicates a $325.00 filing fee was paid with the filing of the petition, no filing fee 

has been received. 

2 TTR 201 and 227.

Page 9

MTT Docket No. 25-003416 

Page 2 of 2 

 

being filed, or if providing proof of contiguity, pay the required $125.00 petition filing fee 

plus the $75.00 contiguous parcel fee. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal 

within 14 days of the entry of this Order.3 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the amended petition shall note the docket number 

previously assigned by the Tribunal. Unfortunately, the petition filing fees may not be 

made via e-filing. 

 

Failure to comply with this order will result in Petitioner being required to file a motion to 

set aside the default, with appropriate filing fee. 

 

 

Entered: October 21, 2025 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

kac 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

 

 

 

3 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an 

illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission 

by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).

PDF reading copy

← View full record