Full record / Financial Plus Credit Union 2.pdf

Financial Plus Credit Union 2.pdf

Financial Plus Credit Union, Petitioner Vs. Township Of Davison, Respondent · 25-002361-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

MAY 2 9 2025 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Cl 

i 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |, BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Financial Plus Credit Union 

Petitioner(s) 

MTT Docket No. 

Davison Township 

Respondent(s) 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1. 

Property Parcel No; 05-17-100-012 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parce! Petition 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

2. 

The property identified above is _X 

real 

___ personal. 

3. 

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties 

contiguous? ___ Yes ___ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- 

contiguous parcel.) 

4, 

Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property 

under appeal? __ Yes ___No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each 

parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under 

appeal.) 

5. 

If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal 

property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

6. 

The property identified above is classified as Commercial

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 

Page 2 of 4 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the 

assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the 

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 

of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

The property or properties at issue are located in Genesee 

County. The 

property or properties’ address is: 

8075 Lapeer Rd. 

Davison, MI] 48423 

The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable 

local governmental unit): Davison Township 

Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 

G 3381 Van Slyke Rd. 

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

X 

the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a 

dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes No 

uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 

Page 3 of 4 

15. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the prior 

tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's 

Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

2025 

1,785,600 

892,800 

761,218 

17. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2025 

786,000 

393,000 

393,800 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2025 

999,600 

499,800 

367,418 

19. 

Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

The assessment when equalized exceeds 50% of True Cash Value. 

The property as improved suffers from physical, functional and economic depreciation.

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 

Page 4 of 4 

Sign 

ture pr Poaioners Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Flt Alp by 

y= 

{ 

Printed Name of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Ward D. Tubbs 

Email Address: JTCD0543@gmail.com 

Mailing Address: 

Jim Tubbs Tax Consultants 

(-8469 S Saginaw St. 

Grand Blanc, Ml 48439 

Telephone Number: 810 444-1779 

Date: 05-19-2025

Page 5

State of Michigan 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

Financial Plus Credit Union 

Petitioner 

Davison Township 

Respondent 

Filing Fee 

2025 Assessed Value 

892,800 

2025 Requested Assessed Value 

393,000 

Assessed Value in dispute 

499,800 

Filing Fee 

$400.00

Page 6

Ward D. Tubbs 

Jim Tubbs Tax Consultants, LLC 

AY 2025 AM 16 L 

G-8469 S. Saginaw St 

zm 

Grand Blanc, MI 48439 

> 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

PO Box 30232 

Lansing, MI 48909

PDF reading copy

← View full record