scanswer_val_class.pdf
Stephen A Harlow Petitioner V Township Of Bloomfield Respondent · 26-000889-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. 26-000889 Respondent’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government: Township Of Bloomfield (OAKLAND) First Name M.I. Last Name Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information, if any: First Name Mary M.I. F Last Name Wilson Firm Name (if any) Charter Township of Bloomfield Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) P.O.Box 489 City or Town Bloomfield Hills State Michigan ZIP Code 48303 Telephone Number 248-433-7710 E-mail Address mwilson@bloomfieldtwpmi.gov Subject Property Information: Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. *If necessary, attach a separate sheet. No Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of 50% or more? Yes Please Explain Your Answer to this Appeal:
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION Bloomfield Township contends that the values estimated by the assessor and confirmed by the BOR are correct and lawful. Respondent reserves the right to add further defenses at least 21 days prior to a scheduled hearing. Jurisdictional Issues: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES: Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes If Yes, check which Board of Review Petitioner attended: March If No, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March Board of Review? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December Board of Review revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, please cite the Board’s authority? Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No If yes, please explain Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? No If yes, when was it issued? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE: When was the Notice of Uncapping issued? Under what statutory section was the taxable value uncapped? Valuation Information: Parcel Identification Number: C-19-31-352-020 Classification of Property: Real (check one)
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION Residential (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 468550 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 433480 What do you believe is the fair market value? 937100 What do you believe is the taxable value? 433480 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent’s Signature: /s/ Mary Catherine Wilson Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/