26-002301.pdf

Nelson Manufacturing Inc Petitioner V Township Of Moore Respondent · 26-002301-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

RECEIVED 

JUN 2 2 2026 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

OTHER EXEMPTION 

MTT DOCKET NO. _ Ado» £102 3101 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information 

Unit of Government 

S 

Mailing Address (No., Street, $.0. Box or Ryral Route): 

[534 Vain SEP. Prod 2.3) 

City or Town: 

or Vim 2 

IO 

State: 

Yes 

ZIP Code: 

USHy2. 

Telephone Number: 

$10 -HoH Dlg 2 

Email Address {do not enter uniess you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

ection 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact information 

onda 

Mi: 

Last Name: 

Firm Name 

arlosa 

any): 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rugal Route): 

2545 Alosth fd 

City or 

n: 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

El 

Acide hop 

“me | Yes 

gy Nimber: 

SIO -pt] -L46F 2 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Are the parcels fisted by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? 

ves 

[Ono 

x Not Applicable 

if no, list all parcels that are adjoining In separate groupings. Attach a 

separate sheet if necessary. 

J ves 

X No 

Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more for all tax years at issue?

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1, BROWN, DPA 

© 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal 

Whist beeitding ido becibiin 2003 

24 ss pritodThuhodt 2 Dds 

hs =) 

IT 

ca SAI py 

Np 1d, Comme 

BOL ont Mand: 1D, 2eo3dpe ferdecleed er er 

deg 

por 

rea Ae Tinspisath fo obosi be 

“tho Lorene 

w lornigaeTined Sosy 

Oe getty aleed proce apres [Eo 

ite 

= 

8 Rave 

2 

Ary Esai 

to Ernmesded ya — 2.007, 

GF boneprent v 

MQ a 

 Corvparisce 

from 214-2 203 bo. Sam YA 

Sess] 

onosico Ka bwro-eld Have pid co! fonsmue el 

2 

ACh 

J, 

Fa, bo Ras. 

8 icras fired in 2074 

Joh gra 

dig fon 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues 

What action prompted this or 

notice of assessment, Board of Review decision, assessor notice): 

. 

if applicable, check which Board of Review issued a denial: [J March 

[J July 

[J] December 

the was so dencal, raf a Corrediin 

i thoqs for 202 

hd 

4 

List the data the denial, if any, was issued: 

If applicable, list the year(s) denied: 

Section 6: Valuation information 

Parco! Identification Number: 

To 

= 80 =~ 03 bo op- 00-00 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

X[, 

Personal [J {check one) 

Agricultural 

0 

Commercial [J 

industrial ig 

Residentiat [1 

Timber-Cutover [1 

Developmental [J 

Utility [J (check one) 

Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: 

What do you believe is the taxable value? 

B20 To 

& B54. Th 

Electronic Signature +required 

Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representatlve’s Signature: 

5 (aandars 

Cocalo 

Jay Aydvaops. Leese hop

PTT Docled To. A= O02 BO) 

May 19, 2026 

Nelson Manufacturing 76-200-036-400-070-00 

Brian Nelson 

| have compared the taxable value of the above property for the difference between Industrial 

and commercial. Results are as follows: 

| do not have records from 2003 to 2013. 

| could not 

find them in any files. 

| started for the Township in 2014 is why 

| have all those records. 

Sev 

Taxable 

difference in taxes 

2014 

Industrial 

161,800 

159,095 

-$64,500 

Commercial 

97,300 

97,300 

2015 

Industrial 

114,700 

114,700 

+5$20,600 

Commercial 

135,300 

135,300 

2016 

industrial 

114,100 

114,100 

+516,300 

Commercial 

130,400 

130,400 

2017 

Industrial 

214,140 

173,024 

No difference 

Commercial 

214,140 

173,024 

2018 

Industrial 

218,200 

176,657 

No difference 

Commercial 

216,700 

176,657 

2019 

Industrial 

209,000 

180,896 

No difference 

Commercial 

222,600 

180,896 

2020 

Industrial 

224,60 

184,333 

No difference 

Commercial 

230,700 

184,333 

2021 

Industrial 

271,500 

186,913 

No difference 

Commercial 

248,440 

186,913

02 201 

ITT Koocltes P90. HTC 

Page 2 

2022 

Industrial 

254,700 

193,081 

No difference 

Commercial 

236,400 

193,081 

2023 

Industrial 

267,700 

202,735 

No difference 

Commercial 

226,400 

202,735 

2024 

industrial 

436,700 

365,271 

-$30,471 

Commercial 

334,800 

334,800 

2025 

Industrial 

394,100 

376,594 

No difference 

Commercial 

394100 

376,594 

2026 

Industrial 

465,500 

386,762 

No difference 

Commercial 

465,500 

386,762 

Minus in taxable 

2014 

-$64,500 

Plus in taxable 2015 

$20,600 

2024 

-$30,471 

2016 

$16,300 

-$94,971 

+$36,900 

Indus. Taxes paid 2014 was $6,786.45 

(If comm. Taxes would have been $4,314.00 } 

taxes would have been minus by $2,472.45 

indus. Taxes paid 2015 was $4,895.42 

(If comm, Taxes would have been $6,018.22) 

taxes would have been a plus of $1,122.80 

Indus. Taxes paid 2016 was $4,925.14 (if comm. Taxes would have been $5,863.50) 

taxes would have been plus of $938.36 

Indus. Taxes paid 2024 was $16,348.31 

(if comm. Taxes would have been $14,966.35) 

taxes would have been minus $1,381.35 

Minus: 

$2,472.45 

Plus: 

$1,122.80 

1,381.35 

938.36 

Diff $3,853.80 

2,061.16

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA 

+ 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Nelson Manufacturing Inc, 

Petitioner, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

\ 

MTT Docket No. 26-002301 

Township Of Moore, 

Respondent. 

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER 

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal's rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case. 

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal's website. 

By: _ Tribunal Clerk 

Entered: June 13, 2026 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

| certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

Las 

3 SETROPLEX MI "380 

18 JUN 2026 

AM 15L 

ieotn 

Juap. Seridsc 

hit | 

fo 

| 

| 

BARBARA 

E(t 

3565 North Rd. 

to 

i 

“et higon Jo riderat 

bo Bok 30232 

3 

fis 

Rtas, 

ria HE 96 

slid iffy gla dp 

ee 

I febsdyf 

sr

← View full record