Full record / MTT_Docket_26-001405_Amended_Petition copy.pdf

MTT_Docket_26-001405_Amended_Petition copy.pdf

Mohamed Mansour Petitioner Vs. Township Of Mt Morris Respondent · 26-001405-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL 

AMENDED PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

Mohamed Mansour, 

Petitioner 

MTT Docket No. 26-001405 

v. 

 

City of Mt Morris, 

Respondent 

 

 

 

 

1. Property Parcel 

Property Parcel No.: 14-33-100-011 

Property Address: 3502 N Linden Rd, Flint, Michigan 48504 

County: Genesee County 

Property Type: Real property 

Property Classification shown on the 2026 tax bill: 202 – COMMERCIAL-VACANT 

Legal Description: W 198 FT OF N 264 FT OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 SEC 33 T8N R6E 1.20 A 

2. Tax Year and Assessment Information 

Tax Year(s) Appealed: 2026 [CONFIRM IF OTHER YEARS ARE ALSO AT ISSUE] 

The 2026 tax bill identifies a taxable value of $21,000, an SEV of $21,000, and an assessed value of $21,000. 

The assessment or assessments at issue were protested before the Respondent’s Board of Review on: March 

2026 

3. Statement of Facts 

1. Petitioner, Mohamed Mansour, is the owner and taxpayer identified for Parcel No. 14-33-100-011. 

2. The property is located at 3502 N Linden Rd, Flint, Michigan 48504, and contains approximately 1.20 

acres. 

3. The 2026 tax record classifies the property as 202 – COMMERCIAL-VACANT. 

4. The 2026 tax record reports an assessed value and SEV of $21,000 and a taxable value of $21,000. 

5. Petitioner disputes the assessment and seeks review by the Michigan Tax Tribunal. 

6. Petitioner relies on the evidence and documentation submitted with this petition and reserves the right to 

supplement the factual and legal basis of the appeal as permitted by the Tribunal’s rules and orders. 

Petitioner believes that, given the property's current physical and development limitations, including the drain, 

likely easement, floodway, floodplain, possible wetlands, and setbacks, the property would be extremely 

difficult to sell even at a price of $1,400 in its present condition. 

Petitioner states that the property was offered for sale for $14,999 on September 12, 2024, but did not sell at 

that asking price. 

Petitioner acquired the property for $1,400.

Page 2

4. Grounds for Appeal 

These site-specific limitations materially affect the property's development potential and, consequently, its 

market value. Petitioner requests that the Tribunal consider these limitations and the attached engineering 

correspondence and GIS exhibits when determining the property's true cash value. 

Based on the drain and likely easement, floodplain, floodway, possible wetlands, and applicable setbacks, the 

engineer concludes that the site is a very difficult site to develop and that, after those factors are considered, 

there may be little or no buildable area. 

The correspondence also identifies possible wetlands covering most of the site based on the county GIS 

wetlands information. It notes that the online wetlands viewer is not sufficiently reliable to establish a final 

wetlands boundary and that a formal wetlands assessment would be required to determine whether wetlands 

are present and, if so, their boundaries. 

The engineer further states that the southwest corner of the site appears to be outside the floodplain, but that 

the buildable area would still be reduced by applicable setbacks. 

The site also contains a floodway and a 100-year floodplain. The engineer's correspondence states that the 

100-year floodplain covers over half of the site and that a maximum of 300 cubic yards of fill is normally 

allowed before compensating cut is required. 

The correspondence states that a county drain crosses the site diagonally and that the Drain Commissioner will 

typically have an easement centered on such a drain, restricting what can be done within the easement. 

Petitioner retained Daniel W. Bartlett, PE, CFM, Associate / Project Manager with ROWE Professional 

Services Company, to evaluate the site in connection with a proposed building project. Mr. Bartlett provided 

written correspondence regarding the site's development constraints. 

Petitioner contends that the assessment of the subject property does not reflect its true cash value because 

substantial physical and environmental conditions materially limit the property's usable area and development 

potential. 

Petitioner respectfully requests that the Tribunal consider the actual acquisition price, the unsuccessful prior 

listing, the property's physical limitations, and the engineering evidence when determining true cash value. 

Petitioner believes that the property's inability to attract a buyer at the prior $14,999 asking price, together with 

the documented development constraints, is evidence that the property's actual market value is substantially 

lower than a valuation that assumes the entire 1.20 acres is usable commercial land. 

The $1,400 acquisition price is also relevant evidence of the property's market value. Petitioner further states 

that the property was listed for $14,999 on September 12, 2024 and did not sell at that asking price. 

This public listing history provides independent corroboration of the September 12, 2024 $14,999 asking 

price. Petitioner will provide the Zillow property-history page as an exhibit. The listing history does not itself 

establish a sale or the property's true cash value; rather, Petitioner offers it as evidence of the property's prior 

marketing history and unsuccessful exposure at that price. 

Publicly available Zillow listing history for 3502 N Linden Rd confirms a price change to $14,999 on 

September 12, 2024, under MLS/Realcomp II listing number 20240018943. Zillow currently identifies the 

property as off market and reports the lot size as 1.20 acres. 

Petitioner submits the auction receipt as direct documentary evidence of the property's acquisition price and 

requests that the Tribunal consider the $1,400.00 winning bid, together with the property's subsequent 

unsuccessful marketing at $14,999 and the documented physical development constraints, in evaluating the 

property's true cash value. 

The same receipt separately lists a $30.00 deed fee, a $140.00 buyer's premium, and $464.98 in summer tax 

for Lot 8405. Accordingly, the $1,400.00 figure is the winning bid amount, not necessarily the total amount 

paid for all costs associated with acquiring the parcel.

Page 3

The auction receipt provides documentary evidence that Parcel No. 14-33-100-011 was Lot 8405 and was 

acquired by Petitioner at a winning bid of $1,400.00. The receipt identifies Mohamed Mansour as the buyer 

and Parcel No. 14-33-100-011 as Lot 8405. 

5. Relief Requested 

Petitioner respectfully requests that the Michigan Tax Tribunal: 

A. Exercise jurisdiction over this appeal; 

B. Determine the proper valuation and/or classification of the property for the tax year(s) properly before 

the Tribunal; 

C. Reduce or otherwise correct the assessment and taxable value to the amounts supported by the 

evidence; 

D. Grant any other relief authorized by law that the Tribunal determines to be appropriate. 

6. Attachments 

Exhibit E – Genesee County GIS wetlands map for Parcel No. 14-33-100-011. 

Exhibit D – Genesee County GIS floodplain/floodway map for Parcel No. 14-33-100-011. 

Exhibit C – Email from Daniel W. Bartlett, PE, CFM, ROWE Professional Services Company, concerning 

development constraints at Parcel No. 14-33-100-011. 

Exhibit B – Order of Default entered August 11, 2026, MTT Docket No. 26-001405. 

Exhibit A – 2026 Summer Property Tax Bill for Parcel No. 14-33-100-011. 

The attached engineering correspondence is submitted as evidence of the property's site and development 

constraints. Petitioner does not represent the GIS wetlands layer as a final wetlands determination; the 

engineer's correspondence states that a formal wetlands assessment would be required for a definitive 

determination. 

Exhibit G – Evidence of the September 12, 2024 listing at $14,999, if available (listing printout, 

advertisement, broker record, or other documentation). 

Exhibit F – Documentation of the $1,400 acquisition price, if available (purchase agreement, closing 

statement, deed, or other record). 

Exhibit H – Zillow property-history page for 3502 N Linden Rd showing the September 12, 2024 price change 

to $14,999 and the property's current off-market status. 

Web source for Exhibit H: Zillow property page for 3502 N Linden Rd, Flint, MI 48504 (ZPID 

2102861058), accessed August 12, 2026. 

Exhibit I – Auction Receipt documenting Lot 8405 / Parcel No. 14-33-100-011 and the $1,400.00 winning bid. 

7. Petitioner Information 

Name: Mohamed Mansour 

Legal Residence / Mailing Address: 3507 Sunset Dr, Flint, MI 48503 

Telephone: 4076203003 

Email: DRLOVETHEFIRST@yahoo.com 

8. Signature 

I declare that the information stated in this petition is true to the best of my knowledge, information, and 

belief.

Page 4

____________________________________ 

____________________________________ 

Mohamed Mansour, Petitioner 

Date 

 

IMPORTANT FILING NOTE 

The Tribunal’s Order of Default entered August 11, 2026 states that Petitioner must file a petition within 14 

days of entry of the order and must note MTT Docket No. 26-001405. If submitted through the Tribunal’s e-

filing system, the Tribunal’s order states that it should be filed on the assigned docket number as an “amended 

petition.” Supporting evidence should be attached as available.

Page 5

EXHIBIT D — FLOODPLAIN / FLOODWAY GIS MAP 

Parcel 14-33-100-011 — 3502 N Linden Rd, Flint, MI 48504

Page 6

8:14 

all = € 

14-33-100-011 Wetl... 

+ 

X 

0D) 10f1 

Genesee County GIS

Page 7

Genesee County GIS map supplied by Petitioner. The map depicts the parcel and the mapped 

floodplain/floodway areas.

Page 8

EXHIBIT E — WETLANDS GIS MAP 

Parcel 14-33-100-011 — 3502 N Linden Rd, Flint, MI 48504

Page 9

8:14 

ol = € 

34 J 

14-33-100-011Floo... 

+ 

X 

Genesee County GIS 

powered by 

FetchGIS

Page 10

Genesee County GIS wetlands map supplied by Petitioner. The orange shading depicts possible wetlands; the 

accompanying engineer's correspondence states that a formal wetlands assessment would be required for a 

definitive determination.

PDF reading copy

← View full record