Full record / 2026 Petition - AH Jenison.pdf

2026 Petition - AH Jenison.pdf

Ah Jenison Property Owner LLC Petitioner Vs. Township Of Georgetown Respondent · 26-000902-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

1 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

 

 

AH JENISON PROPERTY OWNER LLC, 

 

Petitioner, 

 

v 

 

GEORGETOWN CHARTER TOWNSHIP, 

 

Respondent. 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Docket No. 26-____________ 

Parcel No.: 70-14-14-200-063, 

and additional parcels 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

(Entire Tribunal, 2026 Tax Year) 

 

Petitioner, by and through its attorneys, Hallahan & Associates, P.C., contends: 

1. The property that is the subject of this appeal consists of these contiguous real property 

parcels: 

REAL PROPERTY - CONTIGUOUS 

Parcel Number 

Address 

Classification 

Use 

70-14-14-200-063 

8001 Cottonwood Dr. 

201-Commercial Senior Center 

70-14-13-100-055 

7811 Cottonwood Dr. A1 

201-Commercial Senior Center 

 

2. ☒ N/A. 

If the assessment at issue was protested, the protest was made to Respondent’s: 

☐ March, ☐ July, ☐ December Board of Review. 

3. Respondent, identified above, assesses and collects taxes on the subject property. 

4. The subject property is located in the County of Ottawa and school district of Jenison Public 

School District. 

5. Petitioner is a taxpayer/party-in-interest with respect to property taxes on the subject property. 

6. The Petitioner’s principal office/legal residence address is: One Towne Square, Suite 1600, 

Southfield, MI 48076.

Page 2

2 

7. This appeal involves issues related to: 

☒ the subject property’s true cash and taxable values 

☐ the subject property’s taxable value only 

 

there is a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss: ☐ Yes ☐ No 

☐ uniformity of the subject property’s assessment 

☐ the subject property’s exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ______ 

8. The tax year at issue is 2026. 

9. The subject property is listed on the attachment, including, by parcel number: 

a. 

Respondent’s Board of Review established values, 

b. 

Petitioner’s value contentions, and 

c. 

Values in dispute. 

10. Petitioner relies upon the following to support the relief requested: 

The 2026 values imposed on Petitioner’s property, and the taxes to be levied and collected 

thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: 

a. 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values exceed the amounts permitted by the 

Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

b. 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are at higher percentages of true cash 

value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

c. 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are based upon an erroneous 

determination of the true cash value of that portion of Petitioner’s property that is taxable 

under Michigan law and are based upon the application of wrong principles; and 

d. 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values, and the mode of assessment adopted 

by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional 

rights of uniformity, equal protection and due process of law.

Page 3

3 

Petitioner requests that the Tribunal enter an order reducing the 2026 values from those established 

by Respondent’s Board of Review to those contended by Petitioner, and order refunds attributable 

to the reductions, with interest, as provided by the Tax Tribunal Act. 

 

HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 

 

 

/s/ Laura M. Hallahan 

 

Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) 

Attorney for Petitioner 

1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302-0179 

(248) 731-3089 

Dated: May 13, 2026 

lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com 

 

Filing Fee: $625

Page 4

4 

ATTACHMENT TO PETITION 

(Subject Property) 

 

 

VALUES 

Respondent’s Board of Review -and- Petitioner’s Contention 

Parcel Number 

Respondent 

Petitioner 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

70-14-14-200-063 

21,048,200 10,524,100 

9,052,949 

3,600,000 

1,800,000 

1,800,000 

70-14-13-100-055 

1,231,600 

615,800 

472,707 

200,000 

100,000 

100,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Totals 

22,279,800 11,139,900 

9,525,656 

3,800,000 

1,900,000 

1,900,000 

 

 

VALUES IN DISPUTE 

Parcel Number 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

70-14-14-200-063 

17,448,200 

8,724,100 

7,252,949 

70-14-13-100-055 

1,031,600 

515,800 

372,707 

 

 

 

 

Totals 

18,479,800 

9,239,900 

7,625,656

PDF reading copy

← View full record