Full record / 24-004091.pdf

24-004091.pdf

Linda Lewis, Petitioner V City Of Detroit, Respondent · 24-004091-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

Coleman A. Young Municipal Center 

2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 105 

Detroit, Michigan 48226 

Phone: (313) 628-0722 

Fax: {313) 224-4576 

www.detroitmi.gov 

woporty Avsassment 

Board of Review 

arv or. 

DETROIT. 

05/16/2024 

RECEIVED 

© 

ay-poH0o9| 

PINCHEM, ANGELA 

NOV 2 22024 

59 SAND BAR LANE 22 

DETROIT Mi 48223 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

RE: 

2024 

MARCH BOARD OF REVIEW PETITION NUMBER: 

M-64519 

and concluded that: 

FINDING OF FACTS: 

1. 

Parcel Number: 

21000060.022 

2. 

Property Address: 

59 SAND BAR LANE 22 

3. 

District: 

5 

4. 

Property Classification: 

407 

(RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS) 

Ad Valorem 

6. 

Principle Residence Exemption: 

% 

5. 

Property Legal Description: 

UNIT 22 WAYNE COUNTY CODOMINIUM PLAN NO 920 * MORGAN WATERFRONT HOMES "REC L44997 P88-149 DEEDS, WCR 217 

6. 

Petitioner timely filed an appeal to the March Board of Review. 

7. The March Board of Review considered 

(if any) petitioner's and/or duly authorized representative evidence 

and/or testimony. The March Board of Review considered facts presented as on the assessment roli and/or any 

recommendations offered by the Office of the Assessor, 

CONCLUSION: 

Taxable Value Uncapping due to Proposal A of 1994 

Before Appeal 

After Appeal 

2024 

Assessed Value 

300,700 

300,600 

2024 

Taxable Value 

75,898 

300,600 

If you are dissatisfied with the decision of the March Board of Review, submit this notice and complete the enclosed 

small claims form to appeal to: 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

P.O. Box 30232 

Lansing MI 48909 

A Michigan Tax Tribunal appeal must be made 

by May 31st 

of the current year for properties classified 

as: 

Commercial 

Real, 

Industrial 

Real, 

Commercial 

Personal, 

Industrial 

Personal 

and 

Utility 

Personal 

Property.

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Linda Lewis, 

Petitioner, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-004091 

City of Detroit, 

Respondent. 

ORDER OF DEFAULT 

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: 

Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of 

action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment 

notice, etc.), as required by TTR 277. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within 

14 days of the entry of this Order. 

Petitioner failed to properly complete the petition and may have failed to pay the full 

required fee for the filing of the petition. See TTR 277 and 267. As such, the appeal is 

not properly pending. Petitioner must complete the petition by providing all information 

required by each applicable section, return the completed petition, and pay the 

additional fee amount required for the filing of the petition, 

if any, within 14 days of the 

entry of this Order. The petition shall note the docket number assigned by the Tribunal. 

Small Claims petition forms and a filing fee calculator can be found on our website at 

www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Unfortunately, the payment may not be made via e-filing. 

Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this Order.} 

Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). 

2 

. 

. 

By, alien 

oF 

I Alpe

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 24-004091 

Page 2 of 2 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

| certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

“A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. 

A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal's e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a." TTR 219(5)

Page 4

METROPLEX MI 480 

i9 MOV 2024 

PM 6 

L 

#2 

& 

Drag mi ey 

Mcgar- Tox 

buna 

Ll] 

W. Otfawa So 

FL MN 

433 

ABSEE-107T0L1 

abd pfs 

yeni sli Tiled 

lf

PDF reading copy

← View full record