0021_260626143310_001 (3).pdf
Shoshana R Grant Petitioner V City Of Hazel Park Respondent · 26-002486-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
GRETCHEN WHITMER
GOVERNOR
STATE OF MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
LANSING
|
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM
|
RECEIVED
APR 102026
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
MARLON
f. BROWN, DPA
DIRECTOR
VALUATION / UNCAPPING
Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Other
Exemptions, Special Assessments, or Non-Property tax disputes,
| Pursuant
to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e, Board of
i Review Decision or other notice) with this petition, if applicable.
If you do not submit this document, you may be held in
{ default.
Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information
First Namo
EX
Last Name/Company Name
Shoshana
IR
Grant
Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O, Box or Rural Route)
or
TTT
71 W Shevlin Ave
City or Town
or
State
ZIP Code
Hazel Park
Mi
48030
Telephone Number 2488098783
shoshanagrant@gmail.com
Email Address {do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email)
Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact information
First Name
Last Name
]
|
Firm Name
(if any)
7
|
Mailing Address (No., Street, P.0. Box or Rural Route) |
City or Town
h
State
| ZIP Code
oT
Telephone Number
“Email Address
{do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via emall)
Section 3: Subject Property | Information use the multiple parce! form for additional, contiguous parcels.
How many parcels are you
appealing?
1
If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?
LJ Now
**If No, you must file separate appeals for each parcel
[1 ves*
Property Address (No., Street)
71 W Shevlin Ave
City or Town
Hazel Park
ng Authority” (
City of Hazel Park
or Township)
[ "Oakland
Stale
Mi
ZIP Code
48030Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing check ai that apply) [4 True Cash and Taxable Value (J Taxable Value Only (calculation) LO Uncapping of Taxable Value Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal I am writing to formally appeal the March 2026 Board of Review decision regarding the assessed value of my properly. | respectfully dispute the current assessed value and request further consideration based on documented evidence of the property’ s true cash value. Enclosed with this letter are the Board of Review results, along with a recent independent appraisal compleled to determine the fair market value of my home. The appraisal establishes a true cash value of $333,000. Prior to the review, my property was assessed at $210,980, which significantly exceeded 50% of the documented true cash value. Following the Board of Review, the assessed value was reduced to $180,000, which | appreciate. However, this assessment remains inconsistent with the requirements of the Michigan General Property Tax Act. Under Michigan law, a properly’ s assessed value may not exceed 50% of its true cash value. Based on the verified appraisal value of $333,000, the maximum allowable assessed value should be $166,500. The current assessment of $180,000 exceeds this statutory limit. For these reasons, | respectfully request a further reduction of my property’ s assessed value to $166,500, in accordance with state law and the supporting appraisal documentation provided. Thank you for your time and consideration of this appeal. Please let me know if any additional information or documentation is needed to assist with your review. Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues i} Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [74] Yes [i] No if Yes, check which BOR you attended: [# March LJ July L.] December If No, please check the applicable reason(s): [J Not required to attend tl Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 6) [J Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order 5 Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping Other "If you checked “other” above, explain: r appeal: "202 6
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WIITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 7: Valuation Information -use te mutipte parcet form for additional, contiguous parcets.
Parcei Mmbering 95.26-235-014
Classification
of Properly:
Real 4
Personal [] (check one)
Agricultural [J
Commercial [J
Industrial [1
Residential 4
Timber-Cutover [1
Developmental [1
Utility {J (che
Assessed Value (also known as Stale Equalized Value) established
| Taxable Value
established by the Board of Review:
by
the Bos
Review:
by the
Board of
Review: 180) (00
180,000
What do you believe is ihe fair market value (also known as true cash value)?
333,000
:
What do you believe Is the assessed value? (multiply true cash
“What do you believe is the taxable value? {cannot exceed
value by .5)
166.500
Fee information
_
|
Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at feast 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax year
issua?
Pl Yes
[]
No
If you answered yes to the above question, you are not required to pay any filing fees.
if the properly does not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at
issue, the filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute.
If you are appealing more than one
parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00
will be added for each additional parce! being appealed, nol to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.00
If your property is residential property (see MCL 205,762) and
the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is:
Filing Feels:
$100,000.00 and under
$125.00
$100,000.01 to $500,000.00
$200.00
$0ver $500,000.00
$300.00
i the properly is NOT residential property (sce MCL 205.762) and
the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is:
Fillng Fee is:
$100,000.00 and under
$250.00
“Plus $26.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above.
If the property Is
NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute is $100,000.01 or greater the
appeai dees not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed.