Full record / Deny_Stip-Wease.2025-03-28_07-50-45.0000.pdf

Deny_Stip-Wease.2025-03-28_07-50-45.0000.pdf

Romulus Development LLC, Petitioner Vs. City Of Sterling Heights, Respondent · 24-004182-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Romulus Development LLC, 

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No. 24-004182

City Of Sterling Heights,

Respondent.

ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT

The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on March 24, 2025, 

and finds that the parties have stipulated to a taxable value(s) which does not appear to 

be in compliance with MCL 211.27a and the parties have failed to provide any 

justification for the proposed value(s). Specifically, the stipulated taxable value 

decreased below the state equalized value without legal justification. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is 

DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall remain on the previously-scheduled 

Prehearing General Call and a Prehearing Conference will be scheduled accordingly.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any 

future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance 

of this Order, no additional filing fee is required.

By _____________________________

 Joshua M. Wease, Tribunal Member 

Entered: March 28, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-004182

Page 2 of 6

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Romulus Development LLC, 

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No. 24-004182

City Of Sterling Heights,

Respondent.

ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT

The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on March 24, 2025, 

and finds that the parties have stipulated to a taxable value(s) which does not appear to 

be in compliance with MCL 211.27a and the parties have failed to provide any 

justification for the proposed value(s). Specifically, the stipulated taxable value 

decreased below the state equalized value without legal justification. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is 

DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall remain on the previously-scheduled 

Prehearing General Call and a Prehearing Conference will be scheduled accordingly.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any 

future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance 

of this Order, no additional filing fee is required.

By _____________________________

 Joshua M. Wease, Tribunal Member 

Entered: March 28, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 24-004182

Page 4 of 6

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 5

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Romulus Development LLC, 

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No. 24-004182

City Of Sterling Heights,

Respondent.

ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT

The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on March 24, 2025, 

and finds that the parties have stipulated to a taxable value(s) which does not appear to 

be in compliance with MCL 211.27a and the parties have failed to provide any 

justification for the proposed value(s). Specifically, the stipulated taxable value 

decreased below the state equalized value without legal justification. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is 

DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall remain on the previously-scheduled 

Prehearing General Call and a Prehearing Conference will be scheduled accordingly.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any 

future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance 

of this Order, no additional filing fee is required.

By _____________________________

 Joshua M. Wease, Tribunal Member 

Entered: March 28, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

Page 6

MTT Docket No. 24-004182

Page 6 of 6

By: Tribunal Clerk

PDF reading copy

← View full record