Full record / scanswer_valuation.pdf

scanswer_valuation.pdf

Patrick Hoelscher Petitioner V Township Of Peninsula, Sally A Murray Respondents · 26-002873-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

 GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR



 PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM

 VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL



 MTT DOCKET NO. 26-002873



 Respondent’s Contact Information:

 Filer Type: Local Unit of Government:

 Individual



 First Name M.I. Last Name

 Sally A Murray



 Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

 13235 Center Rd



 City or Town State ZIP Code

 Traverse City Michigan 49686



 Telephone Number

 2312237313



 E-mail Address

 assessor@peninsulatownship.com



 Subject Property Information:

 Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings.

 *If necessary, attach a separate sheet.

 N/A



 Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of 50% or more?

 Yes



 Please Explain Your Answer to this Appeal:

 The petitioner argument is flawed. Assessments shall not be set at half of the sales price. State Tax Commission 3 of 1997 defines "chasing sales" as an illegal and

 prohibited practice of adjusting assessments to match sales, rather than appraising based on the proper mass appraisal approach. Further, the General Property

 Tax Act provides, in section 211.27(5): "....the purchase price paid in a transfer of property is not the presumptive true cash value of the property transferred. In

 determining the true cash value of transferred property, an assesssing officer shall assess that property using the same valuation method used to value all other

 property of that same classification in the assessing jurisdiction."

 The subject parcel was valued utilizing a proper mass appraisal approach. Additional evidence to be provided in advance of a scheduled hearing date.

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

 GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR



 Jurisdictional Issues:



 IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES:



 Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review?

 Yes



 If Yes, check which Board of Review Petitioner attended:

 March



 If No, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March Board of Review?



 *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer.



 If the July or December Board of Review revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority?



 If yes, please cite the Board’s authority?



 Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact?

 No



 If yes, please explain



 Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order?

 No



 If yes, when was it issued?



 IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE:



 When was the Notice of Uncapping issued?



 Under what statutory section was the taxable value uncapped?



 Valuation Information:

 Parcel Identification Number:

 28-11-514-031-00



 Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

 GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR



 Residential (check one)



 Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review:

 972500



 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

 972500



 What do you believe is the fair market value?

 1945000



 What do you believe is the taxable value?

 672500



 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

 Respondent’s Signature:



 /s/ Sally Ann Murray

 Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature:



 /s/

PDF reading copy

← View full record