25-002508 Default (severed petition).pdf
Sfld Hotel LLC, Petitioner Vs. City Of Southfield, Respondent · 25-002508-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 SFLD Hotel LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 25-002508 City of Southfield, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER HOLDING PETITIONER IN DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in this case and finds that the Tribunal entered an order severing the 2025 tax year from Docket No. 24-001287 on June 25, 2025. The order required Petitioner to file a petition for the 2025 tax year within 21 days of entry of the order. Petitioner has had ample time to comply but has failed to respond or file the required petition. Petitioner is subject to default as a result, and its failure to comply with Tribunal orders and rules has established a history of deliberate delay that would justify the dismissal of this case for failure to timely comply with this order.1 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is held in DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must file a petition pertaining to the 2025 tax year within 14 days of entry of this order. The petition shall note the docket number assigned by the Tribunal for the 2025 tax year and if filed utilizing the Tribunal’s e-filing system, must be filed on the assigned 2025 docket number as a “Severed Petition.” Failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this case. Entered: July 28, 2025 By _____________________________ nk/jcr PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk 1 See TTR 237 Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010).