Answer to Petition.pdf
Walgreen Co Petitioner Vs. City Of Muskegon Respondent · 26-002254-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL * kk WALGREEN COMPANY, MTT Docket No. 26-002254 Petitioner, Parcel No. 24 036 400 0032 00 v CITY OF MUSKEGON, Respondent. / Peter Ellenson (P47383) Brennen J. Gorman (P80958) LAW OFFICE OF PETER ELLENSON, P.C. PARMENTER LAW Attorney for Petitioner Attorneys for Respondent 30500 Northwestern Highway, Suite 500 601 Terrace Street, PO Box 786 Farmington Hills, MI 48334 Muskegon, MI 49443-0786 (248) 406-4443 (231) 722-1621 peter@ellensonlaw.com brennen@parmenterlaw.com / ANSWER TO PETITION NOW COMES the Respondent, City of Muskegon, by and through its attorneys, and in its Answer to Petitioner’s Entire Tribunal Tax Petition states as follows: 1. Respondent lacks the information and knowledge necessary to respond to the truth of the allegations set forth in Paragraph 1 and therefore leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 2. Respondent lacks the information and knowledge necessary to respond to the truth of the allegations set forth in Paragraph 2 and therefore leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 3. Admit. 4. Admit. 5. Admit.
Page 2
6. Admit. 7. Admit. 8. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations in Paragraph 8. 9. Admit. 10. Admit that this is Petitioner’s position. 11. Admit that this is Petitioner’s position. 12. Respondent neither admits nor denies, as it calls for a legal conclusion. 13. Respondent neither admits nor denies, as it calls for a legal conclusion. PARMENTER LAW / Dated: August 6, 2026 pd = Brennen J. Gorman (P80958) Attorneys for Respondent