Full record / 26-000319 Extend Default (no response).pdf

26-000319 Extend Default (no response).pdf

Sarmand Gumma, Sonya Gumma, Petitioners V Township Of Bloomfield, Respondent · 26-000319-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Sarmand Gumma and Sonya Gumma, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioners, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 26-000319 

 

Bloomfield Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONERS TO CURE DEFAULT 

 

ORDER HOLDING RESPONDENT IN DEFAULT 

 

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that it entered an order 

holding Petitioners in default on March 26, 2026, because Petitioners failed to file a 

copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal, i.e., March Board of Review (MBOR) 

results.1 Petitioners were required to cure the default by obtaining a copy of the results 

from Respondent and submit a copy to the Tribunal within 14 days. Petitioners have 

had ample time to comply, yet have failed to respond or submit the required filings. 

Though the Tribunal finds an extension of time to cure the default appropriate, 

Petitioners’ failure to comply with Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and 

Procedure has established a history of deliberate delay that would justify dismissal of 

the case for failure to timely comply with this order.2 

 

Further, the Tribunal finds Respondent has filed an answer, however the 

Attorney/Authorized Representative who signed the answer is not the same 

Attorney/Authorized Representative listed in section 2 of the answer. As such, 

Respondent is held in default. Respondent must complete and return an amended 

answer indicating the same Attorney/Authorized Representative in both section 2 and 

the signature line within 14 days of the entry of this order. Tribunal rules and Small 

Claims answer forms can be found online at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 

 

Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that the time for Petitioners to cure the default is EXTENDED. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners must complete the following to cure the 

default: (1) file a copy of the MBOR results, (2) file a Motion to Set Aside Default, and 

(3) file proof the motion was served on Respondent. The foregoing must be filed with 

 

1 The order further stated, “Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being 

required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 

2 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010).

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-000319 

Page 2 of 2 

 

the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this order.3 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent is held in DEFAULT. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent must complete the following to cure the 

default: (1) file an amended answer indicating the same Attorney/Authorized 

Representative in both section 2 and the signature line. The foregoing must be filed 

with the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this order. 

 

Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of the case, as provided by TTR 

237, or Respondent being required to file a Motion to Set Aside Default with filing fee if 

applicable, as provided by TTR 231.4 

 

 

Entered: April 24, 2026 

 

 

 

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm 

kac 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

 

 

 

3 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5). 

4 See also MCL 205.732.

PDF reading copy

← View full record