STC EX 6A.pdf

Page 1

Jennifer Doyle <jenniferdoyle727@gmail 

to Beaverton = 

Hello Jamie, 

These are the NTA's 

| mentioned on the 

ownership which is almost 50% instead 

$66,300 and on line 5 it says there WA! 

xb 

.com> 

ls Mar 21,2024, 1:56 PM 

phone. The 2022 taxable value jumped from $21,534 to 44,844 and line 5 says there WAS NOT a transfer of 

of the 3% inflation rate for that year 

. Then the next year, 2023 taxable value had another large jump from $44,844 to 

S a transfer. You said you would take a look at that when you get back from vacation, 

so 

| can submit my petition 

regarding the uncapping to the MTT with the most accurate info. 

Hope you had a great vacation. 

Thanks, 

Jennifer Doyle 

to Jamie [5 

Was the property reassessed 

Jamie Houserman <beavert 

10 me 

Hi Jennifer, 

Looks like there were 

2024, as such, 

if the 

Jennifer Doyle <jenniferdoyl 

to Jamie 

Thank you, 

| see the things 

My question is, specifically, 

still went from 23,900 to 49,6 

Jennifer Doyle <jenniferdoylq {727 @gmail.com> 

Apr 2,2024, 1:10PM 

in 2022 and something was on the property that was not assessed in 2021 or before? If so, what was omitted? 

nassessor@yahoo.com> 

wo. Apr3,2024, 3:00PM 

RY.) 

J 

many errors, likely far prior to 2021. 

I attached the changes. 

The value appeal is oR 

re are still errors, please let me know so I can get them corrected for 2025. 

&2 

NN 

a 

B727@gmail.com> 

Apr 3,2024, 3:34PM 

ou circled, and 

| see they are different, but 

| dont know what those codes mean. 

hat caused the $22,600 addition to the 2022 report? The property was still capped in 2022, according to this, but the assessmerit 

00. What exactly caused that? et 

Beaverton Township Asses 

tome 

I'm not sure, there are no sp 

$SOr <beavertonassessor@yahoo.com> 

Apr 3,2024, 4:02PM 

cific notes in the file. 

—— 

Again, if there are any remai 

Jennifer Doyle <jenniferdoyle727@gmail. 

to Beaverton |, 

In addition to the taxable value being inc 

value of my property increased $22,600 

omitted, as you said previously, wouldn" 

of the uncapping law is correct, and at thy 

In summary, 

it looks like a $22,600 additif 

overpaid? If a mistake was made, 

| just 

Beaverton Township Asse! 

tome [, 

Agree. 

—— 

ing current errors, please let me know. 

om> 

Wed, Apr 3,2024, 6:10 PM 

rrectly uncapped in 2023, based on MCL 211.27a 7 (t,u,v), which 

| am appealing with MTT, there is no explanation why the taxable 

in 2022 while it was still capped, instead of just increasing 3% as that was the inflation rate that year? If things were previously 

you have turned in L4154 form? Additionally, I'm pretty sure this mistake in 2022 does affect the current year if my understanding 

e very least, it means we were overcharged that year. 

on appeared out of thin air with no explanation. Who do 

| contact, if not you, to explain the addition and issue a refund for what we 

ant it corrected. 

¥ 

§sOr <beavertonassessor@yahoo.com> 

Wed, Apr 3,2024, 7:35PM