26 - Flint twp. - POS.pdf
Brockway Investments LLC Petitioner Vs. Township Of Flint Respondent · 26-001497-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL BROCKWAY INVESTMENTS LLC, Petitioner, v. MTT Docket # 26-001497 TOWNSHIP OF FLINT, Respondent. PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF MICHIGAN ) ) ss. COUNTY OF OAKLAND} Aaron M. Fales, being duly sworn, deposes and says that on September iS 2026 he served a copy of Petitioner's Petition on the parties named on the attached list. Aaron M. Fales p_. IU
Page 2
BY CERTIFIED UNITED STATES MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED: Flint Township Assessor 1490 S. Dye Rd. Flint, MI 48532 Flint Township Assessor 1490 S. Dye Rd. Flint. MI 48532 AND BY FIRST CLASS UNITED STATES MAIL: Genesee County Equalization Director 1101 Beach St. Flint, MI 48502 Genesee County Clerk 1101 Beach St. Flint, MI 48502 Flint Public Schools Secretary of the School Board (G-3475 W. Court Street Flint. MI 48532 State Treasurer Michigan Department of Treasury Treasury Building 430 W. Allegan St. Lansing, Ml 48922
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Brockway Investments LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-001497 Township of Flint, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[tlhe respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: August 14, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE | certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS SYSTEM
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
BROCKWAY INVESTMENTS LLC,
Petitioner,
MTT Docket #26. 001497
vs.
Parcel No. 07-27-100-017
CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF FLINT,
Respondent.
/
PETITION
BROCKWAY INVESTMENTS
LLC
(“Petitioner”), through
its
attorneys, Law
Office of Aaron M. Fales, P.C., says:
1.
Petitioner's principal office address is 30201 Orchard Lake Rd.
, Ste.
110, Farmington
Hills, MI 48334.
Petitioner
is a party in interest with respect to
property
faxes
on
real
property
tax
parcel
no.
07-27-100-017
("Petitioner's
Property"), at 3415 Miller Rd., Flint, MI, 48507.
2.
Respondent, Flint Township assesses and collects property taxes on
Petitioner's Property.
3.
In 2026, Respondent determined the taxable value of Petitioner's
Property to be $483,600 and assessed Petitioner's Property at $483,600 resulting in
a state equalized value of the same amount based on the tenative equalizationPage 5
4.
Petitioner's
Property
is
classified
as
Commercial
Real
Property.
Petitioner's Property
is commercial property.
Petitioner believes that Petitioner's
Property was designed to be used as a commercial purposes.
5.
This matter involves issues relating to: {a} valuation, (b) assessment,
(c) taxable value, and {d} uniformity.
6.
At this time, Petitioner believes, as
if relates to taxable value, that
there is a dispute relative to the value of a loss.
7.
The 2026 assessment, including state equalized value and taxable
value,
imposed
on
Petitioner's
Property,
and
the
taxes
to
be
levied
and
collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the
taxpayer for the reasons that:
(a)
The
assessment,
including
state
equalized
value
and/or
taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and
applicable statutes;
(b}
The
assessment,
including
state
equalized
value
and/or
taxable value, are at higher percentages of frue cash value than permissible
under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes;
[c})
The
assessment,
including
taxable
value
and/or
state
equalized value, are based upon an erroneous determination of the true cashPage 6
(d) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional rights fo uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order reducing the 2026 taxable value of Petitioner's Property from $483,600 to $300,000, and reducing the 2026 assessed and state equalized values of Petitioner's Property from $483,600 to $300,000, and requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs. Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICE OF AARON M. FALES, P.C. Attorney for Pefitioner oy Loa Aaron M. Fales (P72864) 330 Hamilton Row, Suite 350 Birmingham, MI 48009 (248) 767-9840 Dated: May 26, 2026