SC Answer Valuation - Signed Mailed 9-3-26_0001.pdf
Autozone Development, LLC Petitioner V City Of Fraser Respondent · 26-001285-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
pom, pe (fled ar STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001285 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Unit of Government City Of Fraser Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 33000 Garfield City or Town: State: ZIP Code: Fraser ML Henze Telephone "mr E86-293-31 00 x1 6.7 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): colleent@frasercitymi.gov Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information | First Name: M.L: Last Name: Colleen Thomas Firm Name (if any): C . ity of Fraser Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): Same City or Town: State: ZIP Code: Telephone Number: S a m e Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): colleent@frasercitymi.gov Section 3: Subject Property Information Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. Attach a separate sheet if necessary. [ves [J No BK] Not Applicable Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more for all tax years at issue? O ves No
Page 2
pom, Er dae Lapse STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal The City of Fraser has equitably and uniformly assessed the subject property at 50% of its true cash value as mandated by MCL 211.27a. The valuation assigned by the Assessor will be defended at the appropriate time and place. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? O Yes [v4] No If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: [] March [J yuly [J December If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? O Yes O No If yes, cite the Board's authority. Was the assessment at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? liz] Yes [v4] No If yes, explain Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? [J ves v4) No If so, what is the issue date? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? Section 6: Valuation Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel me 031 1-31-1 00-050 Classification of Property: Real ld Personal [J (check one) Agricultural J Commercial @ Industrial J Residential (J ~~ Timber-Cutover (J Developmental J Utility J (check one) Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established | Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: by the Board of Review: $646,882 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)? $1,401,000 What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed value by 5) $700,500 assessed value) $546 882 Signajdre “requirgd Respontent &t Att, re i