Stip for Entry of Consent Judgment.pdf
Traverse City Curling Club Inc Petitioner Vs. Township Of Garfield Respondent · 26-002554-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS ORLENE HAWKS GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Traverse City Curling Club , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MOAHR Docket No. 26-002554 Garfield Township , Respondent. STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT (VALUATION) 1. Identify if this is a: [Partial Stipulation or a [#/ Full Stipulation. 2. If this is a partial stipulation: a. The parties agree to the withdrawal of parcel number: 28-05-014-049-21 (If more than one parcel is being withdrawn, attach a separate page addressing all other parcels being withdrawn.) b. The parties agree to the withdrawal of tax year 2026 3. The case is pending in the X__ Entire Tribunal OR ____ Small Claims Division. 4. The subject property is in Grand Traverse County. 5. Property Parcel No: 28-05-014-049-21 . (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 6. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax year Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 5,063,700 5,063,700
Page 2
MOAHR Docket No. 26-002554 Page 2 of 2 Tax year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 5,700,000 2,850,000 2,850,000 8. If this stipulation addresses tax years other than the tax year originally appealed or tax years added through motions to amend that have been granted by the Tribunal, list the separate facts upon which the parties rely to invoke the Tribunal's authority over those tax years (attach additional page if necessary): 9. List all reasons (with explanation) why the stipulation’s taxable value does not equal the prior year TV multiplied by the applicable inflation rate. (e.g. transfer of ownership, additions, losses, omitted property etc . . .) Agreed upon change in valuation 10. List any special terms or conditions being proposed by the parties that would affect the execution of this Consent Judgment including, but not limited to, the joint payment of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc. (attach additional page if necessary): This Judgment is dependent on both parties executing the Stipulation for Consent Judgment in a separate meeting pending before the Tribunal (25-003028). Signature of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Printed Name: Andrew M. Harris, Esq. Date: October 1, 2026 Signature of Respondent's authorized representative:
Page 3
Andrew M. Harris — From: Andrew M. Harris Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2026 11:05 AM To: Dillon, Thomas Cc: Catherine Werenicz; Scott Strouse Subject: Re: TCCC v Garfield Stip Tom, TCCC just approved both Orders. | am in a deposition now until 1pm. Does your office want to file? Thanks Get Outlook for iOS From: Dillon, Thomas <TDillon@fosterswift.com> Sent: Thursday, 01 October 2026 10:43:25 To: Andrew M. Harris <aharris@maddinhauser.com> Cc: Catherine Werenicz <CWerenicz@maddinhauser.com> Subject: RE: TCCC v Garfield Stip [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Yes, they look fine to me. You can sign both on my behalf. Tom Thomas K. Dillon Attorney Foster Swift Collins & Smith PC 1700 East Beltline, NE, Suite 200 Grand Rapids, MI 49525-7044 Phone: 616.726.2258 Fax: 616.726.6858 tdillon@fosterswift.com https://link.edgepilot.com/x/mmvprAAnXTYpc7W8zXmoalL.8?u From: Andrew M. Harris <aharris@maddinhauser.com> Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2026 9:26 AM To: Dillon, Thomas <TDillon@fosterswift.com> Cc: Catherine Werenicz <CWerenicz@maddinhauser.com> Subject: RE: TCCC v Garfield Stip