20251021144506972.pdf
Broadway Detroit Development II LLC, Petitioner Vs. City Of Detroit, Respondent · 25-002384-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
RECEIVED STATE OF MICHIGAN 0CT 21 2025 COURT OF APPEALS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL BROADWAY DETROIT DEVELOPMENT Il LLC, Petitioner - Appellant, \ Court of Appeals Case # MTT Docket No. 25-002384 CITY OF DETROIT, Respondent — Appellee. / Aaron Fales (P72864) Mary Beth Cobbs (P40080) Law Office of Aaron M. Fales, PC Kevin Richard (P43417) Attorneys for Petitoner-Appellant City of Detroit Law Department 330 Hamilton Row, Suite 350 Attorneys for Respondent-Appellee Birmingham, MI 48009 Coleman A. Young Municipal Center 248-767-9840 2 Woodward Ave., Suite 500 aaron@afaleslow.com Detroit, MI 48226 313-237-3061 cobbm@detroitmi.gov richkc@detroitmi.gov Notice of Filing Claim of Appeal TO: Chief Clerk Michigan Tax Tribunal 611 W. Ottawa Lansing, Ml 48933 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on October 16, 2025, the attached Claim od Appeal was filed electronically with the Court of Appeals.
Page 2
JIS Code; COA STATE OF MICHIGAN JUDICIAL DISTRICT JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS CLAIM OF APPEAL CASE NO. CIRCUIT michigan Tax Tribunal DISTRICT 25-002384 PROBATE Court address Court telephone no. Plaintiff's/Petitioner’s name(s) and address(es) [<] Appeliant Broadway Detroit Development II LLC ClAppeliee Defendant’s/Respondent’s name(s) and address(es) [Appellant City of Detroit [“Iappeliee Plaintiff's attorney, bar no., address, and telephone no. Aaron Fales (P72864) Law Office of Aaron M. Fales, P.C. 330 Hamilton Row, Ste. 350, Birmingham, MI 48009 248-767-9840 Defendant's attorney, bar no., address, and telephone no. Mary Beth Cobbs (P40080}, Kevin Richard (P43417) City of Detroit Law Dept., CAYMC 2 Woodward, Ste. 500, Detroit, MI 48226 313-237-3061 In the matter of Other interested party(ies) of probate matter 4. Broadway Detroit Development II LLC Name September 29, 2025 in the Michigan Tax Tribunal claims an appeal from a final judgment or final order entered on Court of the State of Michigan, Date Court name and number or county py [districtjudge [dcircuitjudge [probate judge [district court magistrate Presiding Judge Jason C. Grinnell . Name of judge or district court magistrate Bar no. .Bondonappealis [lfiled. [lattached. waived. [not required. wn . a. The transcript has been ordered. [b. The transcript has been filed. ¢. No record was made.
Page 3
Claim of Appeal (9/23) aim of Case No, 25-002384 []14. THIS CASE INVOLVES [Ja. ACONTEST AS TO THE CUSTODY OF A MINOR CHILD. 1b. AN ADULT OR MINOR GUARDIANSHIP UNDER THE ESTATES AND PROTECTED INDIVIDUALS CODE OR UNDER THE MENTAL HEALTH CODE. Ic. AN INVOLUNTARY MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT CASE UNDER THE MENTAL HEALTH CODE. d. ARULING THAT A PROVISION OF THE MICHIGAN CONSTITUTION, A MICHIGAN STATUTE, A RULE OR REGULATION INCLUDED IN THE MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, OR ANY OTHER ACTION OF THE LEGISLATIVE OR EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF STATE GOVERNMENT IS INVALID. [J e. AN ADOPTION ORDER UNDER CHAPTER X OF THE PROBATE CODE. [CJf. AFREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT ISSUE. 10/16/2025 /s/ Aaron Fales Date Appellant/Attorney signature PROOF OF SERVICE | certify that copies of this claim of appeal and bond (if required) were served on Mary Beth Cobbs on 10/16/2025 by [personal service. [first-class mail. Name Date Kevin Richard on 10/16/2025 by [personalservice. [first-class mail. Name Date on by [personalservice. [first-class mail. Name Date /s/ Aaron Fales Date Signature
Page 4
Case Name: Jurisdiction 0) hd c 0 = o = =; oT o (14 Oo) Michigan Court of Appeals Lower Court/Tribunal: Michigan Tax Tribunal Jurisdictional Checklist 95.002384 Lower Court Case No.: Broadway Detroit Development II LLC v. City of Detroit INSTRUCTIONS: For a civil claim of appeal, please complete the following statements. [SELECT ONE] An appeal of right may be filed because the order is: MCR 7.203(A) ] A final order of the circuit court under MCR 7.202(6). Specify subsection: ] A probate court order that falls within MCR 5.801(A). Specify subsection: MI Const. art 6, sec 28; MCL 205.753(1); MCR 7.203(A)(2) Appealable as of right by law or court rule. Specify law or rule: [SELECT ONE] This claim of appeal is timely because it is being filed: MCR 7.204(A) Within 21 days from entry of the order appealed from (as identified above). 1] Within 21 days of an order deciding a motion for new trial, rehearing, reconsideration, or other relief from the order appealed, and the postjudgment motion was filed within 21 days of the order appealed from. [] other: INSTRUCTIONS: Please complete the checklist and file with your claim of appeal. Failure to file all required documents and requisite fees may result in rejection of MCR 7.201(B)(2) your claim of appeal. A signed claim of appeal. The caption must list all of the parties in each lower court MCR 7.204(B)(1) & (D) case appealed. A copy of the order you are appealing (as identified in Jurisdiction section). MCR 7.204(C)(1) An official current register of actions from the lower court or tribunal showing entry MCR 7.204(C)(5) of the order appealed. The filing fee or exception (example: motion to waive fees). MCR 7.202(3), MCR 7.204(B)(2) Evidence of the transcript (Select one): MCR 7.204(C)(2) 1] The complete transcript has been ordered. MCR 7.210(B)(1)(a)
Page 5
Order Appealed
Page 6
LETS = 20 i STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Broadway Detroit Development ll LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, \ MTT Docket No. 25-002384 City of Detroit, Presiding Judge Respondent. Jason C. Grinnell ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION On September 24, 2025, Petitioner filed a motion requesting that the Tribunal reconsider the Order of Dismissal entered in this case on August 20, 2025. in the motion, Petitioner states that the appeal was within 35 days of Respondent's March Board of Review decision, which was the notice giving rise to the appeal because of the Board's uncapping action. The Tribunal has considered the motion and the case file and finds that it “may order a rehearing or reconsideration of any decision or order upon its own initiative or motion filed within 21 days after the entry of the decision or order sought to be reheard or reconsidered.” Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration was filed beyond this 21-day deadline, and as a result, is not properly pending before the Tribunal.2 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. This order resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. APPEAL RIGHTS if you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the record on appeal. There is no certification fee. * Entered: September 29, 2025 By /] wr . - bw / —-
Page 7
MTT Docket No. 25-002384 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE | certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 8
Official Current Tax Tribunal Register of Actions
Page 9
Michigan Tax Tribunal
Litensing and Regulatory AHairs
Mi.gov Home
Contact the Tribunal
Tax Tribunat Home
Tax Docket Lookup
Tax Docket Information:
00ckat Number: {25-002364.TT
i
Statun: [Disposed
Patitianar; {Broadway
Caso Typo: [ET Property
County: [Wayne
|
Full Tite: Beoadveay Detroit Development H
LLC Pettiooer vs. City of
{Detroit Respondent
bn
1d
Judge:{Nojudgaassigned
H
» Dovenload links ate available on the right below.
Action information
Tins
Line.
Enter DatwPost
Rolsted
N
Sutiect
Fae
w
Eeron
ro
Ro
n
Notice of No Action
0409/2025
Dowrlasd
9
A response to motion was filad,
RESP
09/30/2025
Downlosd
9
Dented
per
7
022025
Dowrdosd
[
Order Denying Motion
7
oanonons
Ooarissa
7
Motion for Reconsideration was received
PEY
09/26/2025
$5000
Download
8
Ordav of Dismissal
08/20/2025
Download
5
Pebl-on
hat baen venfied
PET
2
TR/20/2025
Download
pg
Notk
of Docket Number £
omsrzors
Douros
3
Attachments
to the Petition were filed
PET
061272025
Doanvead
2
A perition was recoied,
per
osnanors
Dowrvoad
1
ET Case Info Shoat.
06/12/2025
$400.00
Dowriosd
Back
New SearchPage 10
Respectfully submitted, Law OFFICE OF AARON M. FaLEs, P.C. Attorneys for Petitioner-Appellant, By: /s/ Aaron M. Fales Aaron Fales (P72864) 330 Hamilton Row, Suite 350 Birmingham, Ml 48009 248-767-9840 Dated: October 16, 2025 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE STATE OF MICHIGAN ) ) ss. COUNTY OF OAKLAND ) Aaron M. Fales, being duly sworn, deposes and says that on October 16, 2025 he served a copy of the NOTICE OF FILING OF APPEAL AND CLAIM OF APPEAL on the Michigan Tax Tribunal by FEDEX to the Tribunal's Overnight courier address: Attn Michigan Tax Tribunal 2407 N Grand River Avenue, Lansing, MI 48906, and upon Respondent-Appellee via email. /s/ Aaron Fales Aaron M. Fales
Page 11
=
|
Oo!
=
5p
=
5
|
°c 88
x
5
{
a
N=
i
i}
i
he)
8
ed >
=
£
i
Q
|
o 89
£
of
’
‘
kel
2
23
5:
&
ih
n
0
z
=
9
0!
ssa103
if,
8
3
>
@
I'l
$
588
5.
pa SYR Eh
2)
E
3 9
23
mT
2
i
C
=
1
Ey
J)
pe
=
90687 IN ONISNV1
er]
®
:
o|
g
JAY HA ONVAO
N L0¥2
|
sy
TYNNEI¥L XL NYOIHOIN INLLY
1y1n93Y ONY oNISNIM 40 IN3INLYYdAA o
¥3IaNas Tig
00 W SE
06€ 3LINS
.
JOY NOLTINVH 0¢€
GeGyLINNGERgE8YOl :Qyd
SININISIAN! WNOSNY
To av
me Bono
71009) 31v0 diHS
|