Full record / 2025.07.29 Answer to Petition.pdf

2025.07.29 Answer to Petition.pdf

Wgm LLC, Petitioner Vs. City Of Flint, Respondent · 25-002658-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

WGM LLC, 

 

 

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002658 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

v. 

 

CITY OF FLINT, a municipal corporation, 

 

 

Respondent. 

 

_____________________________________________________________________/ 

 

Stephen Polter 

2600 W Big Beaver 

Ste L100 

Troy, MI 48084 

(248) 213-6800 

 

Joseph N. Kuptz (P-68623) 

Chief Deputy City Attorney 

Attorney for Respondent 

City of Flint Law Department 

1101 S. Saginaw St., 3rd Floor 

Flint, MI 48502 

(810) 237-2085 

jkuptz@cityofflint.com

_____________________________________________________________________/ 

 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX ANSWER 

 

Respondent, City of Flint, answers Petitioner’s Entire Tribunal Property Tax 

Petition as follows: 

1. In response to paragraph 1, Admitted. 

2. In response to paragraph 2, Admitted. 

3. Not Applicable. 

4. Not Applicable. 

5. Not Applicable. 

6. In response to paragraph 6, Admitted. 

7. Not Applicable.

Page 2

8. Not Applicable. 

9. Not Applicable. 

10. In response to paragraph 10, Admitted. 

11. In response to paragraph 11, Admitted. 

12. In response to paragraph 12, Admitted. 

13. In response to paragraph 13, Admitted. 

14. In response to paragraph 14, Admitted. 

15. Not Applicable. 

16. In response to paragraph 16, Admitted. 

17. In response to paragraph 17, Denied, for the reason that the values as 

established by Respondent’s Board of Review are correct. 

18. In response to paragraph 18, Admitted that these are the values in dispute. 

19. In response to paragraph 19, Denied, for the reason that the values as 

established by Respondent’s Board of Review are correct. 

20. Not Applicable. 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

Respondent reserves the right to amend or supplement its affirmative defenses in 

this matter. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: July 29, 2025 

 

 

 

/s/ Joseph N. Kuptz_________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Joseph N. Kuptz (P-68623) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chief Deputy City Attorney 

Attorney for Respondent 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1101 S. Saginaw Street, 3rd Fl. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Flint, MI 48502 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(810) 237-2085

PDF reading copy

← View full record