2026 Petition - Flint Sweco.pdf
Sweco Flint LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Flint Respondent · 26-001665-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS SYSTEM
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
SWECO FLINT LLC,
Petitioner,
vs.
CITY OF FLINT,
Respondent.
/
MTT Docket #26-
Parcel No. 41-04-352-030 &
41-04-352-031
PETITION
SWECO FLINT LLC (“Petitioner”), through its attorneys, Law Office of Aaron
M. Fales, P.C., says:
1.
Petitioner's principal office address is PO BOX 480485, New Haven,
MI 48048. Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property taxes on
contiguous real property tax parcel nos. 41-04-352-030 and 41-04-352-031
("Petitioner's Property"), at 2010 N Dort Hwy., Flint, MI 48506.
2.
Respondent, City of Flint, assesses and collects property taxes on
Petitioner's Property.
3.
In 2026, Respondent determined the taxable value of Petitioner's
Property to be $33,883 and assessed Petitioner's Property at $43,000 resulting in a
state equalized value of the same amount based on the tenative equalization
factor for parcel 41-04-352-030 and determined the taxable value of Petitioner's
Property to be $1,252,148 and assessed Petitioner's Property at $1,293,100Page 2
resulting in a state equalized value of the same amount based on the tenative equalization factor for parcel 41-04-352-031. 4. Petitioner's Property is classified as Industrial Real Property. Petitioner's Property is an industrial property. Petitioner believes that Petitioner's Property was originally designed to be used for industrial purposes. 5. This matter involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, (c) taxable value, and (d) uniformity. 6. At this time, Petitioner believes, as it relates to taxable value, that there is a dispute relative to the value of a loss. 7. The 2026 assessments, including state equalized value and taxable value, imposed on Petitioner's Property, and the taxes to be levied and collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: (a) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (b) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (c) The assessment, including taxable value and/or state equalized value, are based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash
Page 3
value of that portion of Petitioner's Property that is taxable under Michigan law, and are based upon the application of wrong principles; and, (d) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional rights to uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order reducing the 2026 taxable value of Petitioner's Property identified as Parcel 41- 04-352-030 from $33,883 to $1,000, and reducing the 2026 assessed and state equalized values of Petitioner's Property from $43,000 to $1,000 and reducing the 2026 taxable value of Petitioner's Property identified as Parcel 41-04-352-031 from $1,252,148 to $500,000, and reducing the 2026 assessed and state equalized values of Petitioner's Property from $1,293,100 to $500,000, and requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs. Dated: May 27, 2026 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICE OF AARON M. FALES, P.C. Attorney for Petitioner By: _________________________ Aaron M. Fales (P72864) 330 Hamilton Row, Ste. 350 Birmingham, MI 48009 (248) 767-9840